فَإِنْ شَكَوتَ لِمَن طَابَ الزَمانُ لَهُ عَيناك تَغلِي وَمَن تَشكُو لَهُ صَنَمُ وإِن شَكَوتَ لِمَن شَكواكَ تُسْعِدَهُ أَضَفتَ جُرحًا لِجُرحِكَ إِسمهُ النَدَمُ

Channel
. ࿔ نجمة رَوانِ
@lRlTI
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
75,250subscribers
+1,001 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001660775631 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lRlTI |
| Description | كَالشَمسِ إِنّ بَرَقَت مَجاسِدُها تَحكِي لَنَا اليَاقُوْتَ وَالذَهَبا . - لطَلب التمويل : @RlN6_bot |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lRlTI |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:35 | 75,250 | +23 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 75,227 | +5 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:54 | 75,222 | +31 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 75,191 | -38 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:56 | 75,229 | +99 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 75,130 | +4 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:56 | 75,126 | -37 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:39 | 75,163 | -100 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 75,263 | -30 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:44 | 75,293 | +53 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:58 | 75,240 | -36 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 75,276 | -54 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 75,330 | -16 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 75,346 | +32 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 75,314 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 75,317 | -52 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 75,369 | +45 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 75,324 | -43 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 75,367 | +49 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 75,318 | first reading |
Engagement
177 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.28%
- avg views ÷ 75,250 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,480
- 94 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 94
- of 177 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 94 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 177 (25 July 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 514,773 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 00:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,290
- Videos
- ≈1
- Links
- ≈11
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 177 we hold a reading for · 1%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lRlTI. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 177 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
فَلَسْتُ الَّذِي تُغْرِيهِ فِي الْخَلْقِ كَثْرَةٌ.
Photo, posted without a caption
أغـــــــارررررررررر 🙂✨
أني مـا احَب الرسايّل ، أني احَبك أخ لـو تقرا الحَچي الـ ما ينكتبلك
هواچيس الشُعراء العراقيين 🌚
" خلفيات لحسابچ " ♻️🩷
Photo, posted without a caption
جَاءَتْ مُعَذِّبَتِي فِي غَيْهَبِ الغَسَقِ كَأنَّهَا الكَوْكَبُ الدُرِيُّ فِي الأُفُقِ.
سيّدتي أنتِ صاحبةُ هذا العصر بالجمالِ
Photo, posted without a caption
اختاري قلب وأكتشفي شخصيتچ 😂💚!
Showing the 12 most recent of 177 posts we hold for @lRlTI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@MSiMiM · 31,94221 posts-حَچي هَلي.
@ERT8l · 130,01619 postsحيث أنا
@hayaa_0 · 73,47316 postsاستراحة
@estraha_0 · 17,52114 posts-حَبيبتِي السَّمراء.
@Narla2 · 70,8717 postsثروناو :
@cf67c · 43,6786 postsفوضىٰ مشاعِر
@V_UUll · 27,5465 postsشَمسك .
@IIU4F · 68,4684 postsدَيرة هَلي .
@Mzajyati · 27,4934 postsالامام المهدي"عج"ستوريات حسينيه
@huditi2017 · 175,3123 postsتوهِين .
@eoivnr · 79,4822 postsقناة فسنجون
@fasngon · 3,250,5691 postثالث عيوني .
@Oh_RR · 38,3901 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@iii_s1r · 18,7268 posts🦢
@laivl · 35,5398 postsقـمــري🪐⇣˓
@O_1os · 4,3238 postsحيث أنا
@hayaa_0 · 73,4737 posts-﮼أُنثى رَقيقة .
@DRT86 · 41,7655 postsشَمسك .
@IIU4F · 68,4685 postsمتجر ام البنين 🤍
@jlnvooo · 7,2125 postsفوضىٰ مشاعِر
@V_UUll · 27,5465 postsمَعلِش .
@DlI_lD · 53,9714 postsتوهِين .
@eoivnr · 79,4824 postsريبوست
@iibost · 57,5374 posts-حَبيبتِي السَّمراء.
@Narla2 · 70,8714 postsرُبما نَلتقي .
@DII_lID · 34,2263 postsقصائد حسينيه
@fflx1 · 52,5893 postsمَلاك .
@llivrz · 17,8363 postsكَواكِب .
@nscsz · 90,2013 postsمن برّه | Min Barra
@minbra25 · 6992 postsفساتين الجوهرة 369
@Sdjxdjzjdff · 4,7052 postsازياء رهف 👗 تسوق فساتين
@XD_DS · 20,6922 postsأزياء جنه للفساتين السهرهَ 👗🪄
@D6_O2 · 20,1771 postdenial
@hussein2005926 · 2431 post﮼النجم،الساطع ||𝐁𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫
@LO100A · 2,0241 post˚₊‧ Olive | اوليڤ ‧₊˚
@Olive9090 · 7181 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@vc6Il · 133,513#1
@IIU4T · 75,567#2
@cf67z · 87,668#3
@ERT8l · 130,016#4
@UIOIU0 · 105,342#5
@SUDEn_MOMEnt · 50,442#6
@Geoooom · 73,521#7
@M1140 · 100,176#8
@afQ55 · 129,906#9
@HiEiND · 73,477#10
@Kd_kla1 · 41,099#11
@asxtye · 54,012#12
@cckkxs · 14,712#13
@Diilen · 114,194#14
@cf67c · 43,678#15
@SlSl2l · 114,697#16
@Narla2 · 70,871#17
@Nh_NE · 83,811#18
@myiyia · 192,764#19
@Majaraat · 58,943#20
@rsr2z · 46,688#21
@HH_H7S · 275,231#22
@citystop2 · 26,781#23
@spwnrz · 62,288#24
@AE_Hl · 111,344#25
@sxserc · 27,759#26
@FCB_V · 90,090#27
@m3im3ii · 114,754#28
@huda_gallery · 52,686#29
@teel_iu · 5,929#30
@nrrd3 · 63,982#31
@T_16_7 · 49,959#32
@MOOQQ55 · 77,365#33
@Yllh7 · 17,047#34
@OOIIIEEE · 55,992#35
@hayaa_0 · 73,473#36
@yatmanqalbi · 103,729#37
@smr120h · 105,214#38
@IIUYL · 17,221#39
@n_a2u · 12,876#40
@nr0lll · 81,929#41
@bggcp · 29,456#42
@Lne_8 · 138,115#43
@ff2tm · 46,794#44
@lBIBPl · 33,887#45
@DEPTH02 · 32,548#46
@ssswvs · 19,304#47
@Firat25 · 12,948#48
@lAlMosahfl · 776,377#49
@zzzzzz · 2,011,602#50
@PPPJP · 3,208,272#51
@llllTBi · 10,460#52
@IIU4F · 68,468#53
@lIIM6 · 27,087#54
@t88q1 · 40,716#55
@DRT86 · 41,765#56
@bbosha16 · 5,816#57
@sdqgii · 31,064#58
@K27R99 · 33,170#59
@nrrd1 · 36,216#60
@Qiise · 21,835#61
@ahmed_aldahlaky · 7,573#62
@povv4 · 123,324#63
@NO_6C · 33,038#64
@PPPPJ · 2,330,076#65
@zt_tz2 · 30,045#66
@ksa_gigi · 14,893#67
@ANNI1l · 29,507#68
@yypyy · 894,458#69
@kooora_land · 22,609#70
@II8II5 · 8,699#71
@ooaooos · 231,105#72
@NNNN0I · 11,782#73
@nscsz · 90,201#74
@ZZ_VVi · 14,762#75
@iraqed4 · 3,333,171#76
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Majaraat · 58,943
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
@IIU4T · 75,567
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
@Nh_NE · 83,811
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 August 2026
@UIOIU0 · 105,342
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
@myiyia · 192,764
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
@RRR9_0 · 44,591
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 27 August 2026
@IIU4F · 68,468
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
@m3im3ii · 114,754
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
@sxserc · 27,759
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 10 September 2026
@HiEiND · 73,477
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 August 2026
@afQ55 · 129,906
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
@lBIBPl · 33,887
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 3 September 2026
@trrteb · 66,246
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 20 August 2026
@Geoooom · 73,521
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
@Sixth_Portal · 80,949
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 18 August 2026
@AE_Hl · 111,344
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 August 2026
@UIOIU0U · 184,602
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 August 2026
@fsbdys · 26,773
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 11 September 2026
@SSEN2 · 48,731
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
@ecnoc · 63,334
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
@nrrd3 · 63,982
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
@Narla2 · 70,871
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
@vc6Il · 133,513
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
@yatmanqalbi · 103,729
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 156 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“. ࿔ نجمة رَوانِ” (@lRlTI), 75,250 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lRlTI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.