گلبي شابع ضَيم ويَغنيلك .

Channel
. ࿔ نجمة رَوانِ
@lRlTI
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
76,302subscribers
+2,053 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001660775631 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lRlTI |
| Description | كَالشَمسِ إِنّ بَرَقَت مَجاسِدُها تَحكِي لَنَا اليَاقُوْتَ وَالذَهَبا . - لطَلب التمويل : @RlN6_bot |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lRlTI |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 01:15 | 76,302 | +49 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 02:41 | 76,253 | +52 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 23:40 | 76,201 | +22 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 23:36 | 76,179 | +61 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 00:40 | 76,118 | +42 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:19 | 76,076 | +147 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:34 | 75,929 | +38 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:29 | 75,891 | +129 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:30 | 75,762 | +44 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 01:51 | 75,718 | +73 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:45 | 75,645 | +85 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:54 | 75,560 | +68 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 00:48 | 75,492 | +54 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:28 | 75,438 | +105 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 75,333 | +3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 05:30 | 75,330 | -5 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 01:11 | 75,335 | +10 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 21:05 | 75,325 | +8 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:48 | 75,317 | +5 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 16:17 | 75,312 | first reading |
Engagement
363 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 188 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.75%
- avg views ÷ 76,302 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,150
- 132 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 132
- of 363 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 363 (25 July 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 680,271 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 09:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,320
- Videos
- ≈1
- Links
- ≈11
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 3
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 363 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lRlTI. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 363 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 132 posts held from the last 30 days (3.03%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
✨صَـور بروفايـلچ ✨
من فرحتي بـ شوفتك ضحگن عيوني
رتبي فُونچ يحلوة 🫶🤎🤎
يگول جبار رشيد 🖤
أنتُ جزء مني ، مهما كانت المسافات
صـور كانهَا الـچ ✨✨
مَحلاها للموت لو ايَدي بَايديك.
بسبب هالقناة حبيبي خطبني 💍🫂
احضــني 🫂🦋🦋
صــور اضافـيري 💅🏼🩵
وينج ام خَـدود !! ✨✨
Showing the 12 most recent of 363 posts we hold for @lRlTI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 8 posts on @lRlTI as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 28 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 13 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 5
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@HH_lEl · 44,1247 postsحَزن روُحي .
@MSiMiM · 30,7845 postsشِنَساهنٰ
@Nh_NE · 83,0655 posts-حَچي هَلي.
@ERT8l · 128,9304 posts-حَبيبتِي السَّمراء.
@Narla2 · 71,1134 postsثروناو :
@cf67c · 44,7504 postsمَلاذكُم
@cf67e · 56,1021 postحيث أنا
@hayaa_0 · 74,6251 postنَـبأ ڪـَراࢪ🦌🍁.
@nabakarar · 1201 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@HH_lEl · 44,1242 posts-حَبيبتِي السَّمراء.
@Narla2 · 71,1132 postsقـمــري🪐⇣˓
@O_1os · 3,9512 postsفوضىٰ مشاعِر
@V_UUll · 31,0802 postsريبوست
@iibost · 63,7132 postsᴏᴄʜᴏ
@och8o · 7172 postsاَراكَ مَلجَئي.
@E333ll · 2701 post-حَچي هَلي.
@ERT8l · 128,9301 postعُ
@OAFL2 · 6,1211 postحيث أنا
@hayaa_0 · 74,6251 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@DRT86 · 41,84745 postsحَزن روُحي .
@MSiMiM · 30,78437 postsشِنَساهنٰ
@Nh_NE · 83,06535 posts-حَچي هَلي.
@ERT8l · 128,93032 postsثروناو :
@cf67c · 44,75030 postsحِزن شَفاف
@cf67z · 85,88930 postsمَلاذكُم
@cf67e · 56,10229 postsحيث أنا
@hayaa_0 · 74,62527 posts-حَبيبتِي السَّمراء.
@Narla2 · 71,11321 postsمَيخالف .
@OOIIIEEE · 56,14518 postsاستراحة
@estraha_0 · 17,34914 postsاقتباسات، حالات واتساب، خلفيات،عبارت حب،
@STORS5 · 278,2695 postsفوضىٰ مشاعِر
@V_UUll · 31,0805 postsحَزن اهلنا .
@esecs · 63,1004 postsشَمسك .
@IIU4F · 70,7284 postsدَيرة هَلي .
@Mzajyati · 31,0074 postsالامام المهدي"عج"ستوريات حسينيه
@huditi2017 · 168,7963 posts𝙰𝚈𝙾
@Ayooty20 · 26,7072 postsتوهِين .
@eoivnr · 81,4122 postsغمچ گلبي
@lllxcrn · 45,3782 postsمَبتهمنيِش .
@Diilen · 116,2731 postقناة فسنجون
@fasngon · 3,348,1261 postثالث عيَوني
@TSS4X · 39,4291 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@ERT8l · 128,93019 postsحيث أنا
@hayaa_0 · 74,62512 posts-﮼أُنثى رَقيقة .
@DRT86 · 41,84710 postsمَلاذكُم
@cf67e · 56,1028 postsتوهِين .
@eoivnr · 81,4128 postsعَالم زُمردة 𐙚.
@iii_s1r · 33,2288 posts🦢
@laivl · 36,8698 postsقـمــري🪐⇣˓
@O_1os · 3,9518 postsحَزن روُحي .
@MSiMiM · 30,7847 postsمَلاك .
@llivrz · 21,2176 posts-حَبيبتِي السَّمراء.
@Narla2 · 71,1136 postsرُبما نَلتقي .
@DII_lID · 34,6885 postsشَمسك .
@IIU4F · 70,7285 postsمتجر ام البنين 🤍
@jlnvooo · 6,4845 postsحِچايات أهَلنة .
@MOOQQ55 · 78,0605 postsفوضىٰ مشاعِر
@V_UUll · 31,0805 posts𝙰𝚈𝙾
@Ayooty20 · 26,7074 postsمَعلِش .
@DlI_lD · 55,2794 postsريبوست
@iibost · 63,7134 postsحِزن شَفاف
@cf67z · 85,8893 postsمُغِيثُ الصَّالِحِينَ .
@clilx1 · 37,5453 postsقصائد حسينيه
@fflx1 · 54,0993 postsجاا وكلبي .
@nscsz · 81,2483 postsمَيخالف .
@OOIIIEEE · 56,1453 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@lRlTI named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 October 2026 – 12 October 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@vc6Il · 139,649#1
@IIU4T · 73,278#2
@cf67z · 85,889#3
@ERT8l · 128,930#4
@UIOIU0 · 103,206#5
@SUDEn_MOMEnt · 48,361#6
@Geoooom · 68,557#7
@M1140 · 106,679#8
@afQ55 · 124,679#9
@HiEiND · 70,317#10
@Kd_kla1 · 42,803#11
@asxtye · 51,268#12
@cckkxs · 15,408#13
@Diilen · 116,273#14
@cf67c · 44,750#15
@SlSl2l · 121,055#16
@Narla2 · 71,113#17
@Nh_NE · 83,065#18
@myiyia · 190,760#19
@Majaraat · 58,282#20
@rsr2z · 44,560#21
@HH_H7S · 264,500#22
@citystop2 · 25,798#23
@spwnrz · 61,099#24
@AE_Hl · 109,946#25
@sxserc · 27,318#26
@FCB_V · 89,424#27
@m3im3ii · 114,714#28
@huda_gallery · 50,868#29
@teel_iu · 5,905#30
@nrrd3 · 61,623#31
@T_16_7 · 47,776#32
@MOOQQ55 · 78,060#33
@Yllh7 · 16,674#34
@OOIIIEEE · 56,145#35
@hayaa_0 · 74,625#36
@yatmanqalbi · 101,672#37
@smr120h · 102,180#38
@IIUYL · 16,617#39
@n_a2u · 13,000#40
@nr0lll · 78,441#41
@bggcp · 40,640#42
@Lne_8 · 136,652#43
@ff2tm · 45,319#44
@lBIBPl · 34,161#45
@DEPTH02 · 32,888#46
@ssswvs · 18,665#47
@Firat25 · 12,882#48
@lAlMosahfl · 780,442#49
@zzzzzz · 1,990,844#50
@PPPJP · 3,186,149#51
@llllTBi · 10,371#52
@IIU4F · 70,728#53
@lIIM6 · 29,545#54
@t88q1 · 39,095#55
@DRT86 · 41,847#56
@bbosha16 · 5,714#57
@sdqgii · 29,840#58
@K27R99 · 30,333#59
@nrrd1 · 37,542#60
@Qiise · 21,605#61
@ahmed_aldahlaky · 7,234#62
@povv4 · 126,927#63
@NO_6C · 31,908#64
@PPPPJ · 2,319,761#65
@zt_tz2 · 28,965#66
@ksa_gigi · 14,114#67
@ANNI1l · 27,991#68
@yypyy · 891,229#69
@kooora_land · 2#70
@II8II5 · 8,251#71
@ooaooos · 233,148#72
@NNNN0I · 11,271#73
@nscsz · 81,248#74
@ZZ_VVi · 14,149#75
@iraqed4 · 3,201,066#76
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ssswvs · 18,665
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 3 October 2026
@Majaraat · 58,282
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
@IIU4T · 73,278
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
@Nh_NE · 83,065
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 August 2026
@UIOIU0 · 103,206
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
@myiyia · 190,760
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
@Tazkeraet · 19,651
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 28 September 2026
@RRR9_0 · 42,708
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 27 August 2026
@IIU4F · 70,728
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
@m3im3ii · 114,714
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
@sxserc · 27,318
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 10 September 2026
@HiEiND · 70,317
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 August 2026
@afQ55 · 124,679
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
@lBIBPl · 34,161
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 3 September 2026
@trrteb · 63,808
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 20 August 2026
@Geoooom · 68,557
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
@Sixth_Portal · 4
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 18 August 2026
@AE_Hl · 109,946
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 August 2026
@UIOIU0U · 178,783
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 August 2026
@fsbdys · 25,823
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 11 September 2026
@P_E_68 · 10
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 23 September 2026
@SSEN2 · 47,086
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
@ecnoc · 61,506
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
@nrrd3 · 61,623
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 166 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“. ࿔ نجمة رَوانِ” (@lRlTI), 76,302 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lRlTI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.