ام غمازة وينچ؟ 😔😂🤍

Channel
حِزن شَفاف
@cf67z
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
86,370subscribers
-2,643 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001212863941 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cf67z |
| Description | بس ماتعدِي ولازم نشور بيك حُوبتنه تكتل واحنَا وَادم فقرَه لتـمويل قنواتكم : @cf674 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 47 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cf67z |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:39 | 86,370 | -43 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:29 | 86,413 | -52 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 14:58 | 86,465 | +50 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:36 | 86,415 | -135 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 13:11 | 86,550 | -102 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:06 | 86,652 | +83 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:28 | 86,569 | +39 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 13:00 | 86,530 | -84 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 14:10 | 86,614 | +49 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 14:21 | 86,565 | -98 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 03:07 | 86,663 | -23 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 18:02 | 86,686 | -868 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 10:57 | 87,554 | +280 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 00:22 | 87,274 | -394 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 09:40 | 87,668 | -140 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 87,808 | -194 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:39 | 88,002 | +18 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 87,984 | -182 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:21 | 88,166 | -54 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 88,220 | first reading |
Engagement
2,338 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 162 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.684%
- avg views ÷ 86,370 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 591
- 926 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 926
- of 2,338 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,338 (30 June 2026 – 24 October 2026) |
| Views total | 546,993 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Oct 2026, 06:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,030
- Videos
- ≈194
- Links
- ≈31
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 33s
- Average length
- 33s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
صور دولــمـة 🥗 .
صـوري بالمستشفى 💔😱
صـــــور عيـــــون .💓🙂
بس العلويات يدخلن!!!
صـوري بلعبـاية 🩶✨
I'm just girl ✨✨
بس امهات العيون الحلوة يطبن!
غــــــــزل للعيون الحلوة ❤️🦋
خَايف احَن وارد لسَابع حِزن
دَليني عَليك سِنين تايه بيك .
لو بيدِي أسافِر لِلغُرب ديرة هَلي يغثون .
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,338 posts we hold for @cf67z. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Narla2 · 70,5915 posts-﮼أُنثى رَقيقة .
@DRT86 · 41,2834 posts-حَچي هَلي.
@ERT8l · 129,4524 postsثالث عيَوني
@TSS4X · 38,7473 postsسَطر عِراقي
@aassx22 · 111,1962 postsلــ 💔.
@LLXX1 · 2141 postاقتباسات، حالات واتساب، خلفيات،عبارت حب،
@STORS5 · 279,5971 post- 𝗝𝗨𝗦𝗧 𝗠𝗘
@Zhaa_19 · 5801 post𝐔𝐧 𝐒𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐭 نصوص
@unfor2 · 240,8711 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Republishes 58 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
@ZllA76 · 36,79653 postsاني والدنيا
@ym_ymo · 20,45340 postsمتجر مليكة .
@Malika_store14 · 13,32333 postsريبوست
@iibost · 60,36432 postsجَـمارة
@f_tm4i · 3,94026 postsازياء هَـيلة 🌵.
@mttypf · 13,11523 postsمتجر بابلز
@bubbles_fashion20 · 4,54721 postsحيث أنا
@hayaa_0 · 72,71520 postsنحاول :
@OieeiO · 31,05418 postsوهَج
@MLLLM33 · 105,09117 postsمجمع الجوهرة 💎369
@aljawharatk · 6,96715 posts- شارع النِسَاء .
@UIOIU0 · 102,76514 postsنيران ستورر
@rd1rn · 1,18714 postsمتجر زين | اكسسوارات
@ZainSt0re · 15,40313 postsأنتهينا
@rrrr_srr · 5,99013 postsازياء تيجان 1👗
@koillll · 15,68812 posts-﮼أُنثى رَقيقة .
@DRT86 · 41,28311 postsطريق الهُدىٰ
@MY_YiY · 53,12511 postsمَتجر نَبأ.
@Naba_strong · 20,56310 postsازياء توليب 👚.
@lMiMiiM · 10,89410 postsماتجين؟
@SAJAZPO · 1,1879 postsعَالم زُمردة 𐙚.
@iii_s1r · 29,9749 postsoff
@offmemz · 26,5509 posts" كون يَمك "
@thol28 · 8,4099 postsSHEIN 💕
@SHEINN2002 · 2208 postsمَلاز .
@ci1rrr · 21,8538 postsواقع :
@in8ee · 16,4978 posts-حَچي هَلي.
@ERT8l · 129,4527 posts5:15
@iT64i · 78,4607 postsحِچايات أهَلنة .
@MOOQQ55 · 77,4776 postsسَكينةُ آية
@ZE_QFE · 51,4796 postsمتجر الهوس❤
@hjbmool · 1,7166 postsازَياءْ شَمُس💜"
@shames_6 · 12,3686 postscore :
@KUB89 · 3,3954 postsReal :
@No0ii · 33,7474 postsمَتجر رباب.
@Rabab_Store19 · 6314 postsStory :
@Story21r · 3,3594 postsشَمسك .
@IIU4F · 70,0453 postsمَلاذ المُؤمِن .
@IlNl0 · 26,8053 postsهواجيس
@MX_99M9 · 4,8963 postsثالث عيَوني
@TSS4X · 38,7473 postsإِنَّ اللَّهَ مَعَنَا 🤍
@ahhm988 · 2563 postsعتاب
@bggcp · 36,9603 postsملاذي.
@ci2rrr · 13,6973 postsسِدال
@sidal_0000 · 2,3823 postsمُـبعثَر
@Kd_kla1 · 43,2092 posts𝐀
@ayyyyyyyy28 · 1,2222 postsحرفياً :
@literally_0 · 25,8662 posts
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@ERT8l · 129,45274 posts-حَبيبتِي السَّمراء.
@Narla2 · 70,59168 posts-﮼أُنثى رَقيقة .
@DRT86 · 41,28323 postsشَمسك .
@IIU4F · 70,04514 postsثالث عيَوني
@TSS4X · 38,7479 postsسَطر عِراقي
@aassx22 · 111,1965 postsكليشات ذكاء اصطناعي
@QCQ37 · 76,4545 posts𝐔𝐧 𝐒𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐭 نصوص
@unfor2 · 240,8715 posts᷂فراشَه ღ.
@HH_lEl · 44,1454 postsاقتباسات، حالات واتساب، خلفيات،عبارت حب،
@STORS5 · 279,5974 postsمَبتهمنيِش .
@Diilen · 114,9063 postsإقتباسات مترجمة
@HH_H7S · 266,5443 posts. ࿔ نجمة رَوانِ
@lRlTI · 75,4383 postsاني والدنيا
@ym_ymo · 20,4532 postsمُلهَم
@TSsiS · 79,7171 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@n0n99n · 27,656137 postsبيت النساء 🏩 .
@ztt223 · 35,10463 postsمُـبعثَر
@Kd_kla1 · 43,20961 posts-حَبيبتِي السَّمراء.
@Narla2 · 70,59157 postsاني والدنيا
@ym_ymo · 20,45356 postsحيث أنا
@hayaa_0 · 72,71546 postsعَالم زُمردة 𐙚.
@iii_s1r · 29,97443 postsريبوست
@iibost · 60,36436 posts- شارع النِسَاء .
@UIOIU0 · 102,76535 posts-حَچي هَلي.
@ERT8l · 129,45234 postsكليشات ذكاء اصطناعي
@QCQ37 · 76,45434 postsفوضىٰ مشاعِر
@V_UUll · 30,16634 postsReal :
@No0ii · 33,74731 postsشَمسك .
@IIU4F · 70,04529 postsعتاب
@bggcp · 36,96028 posts. ࿔ نجمة رَوانِ
@lRlTI · 75,43827 postsمَشاعر ألك
@tl1ll · 53,02127 postsطريق الهُدىٰ
@MY_YiY · 53,12525 postsمتجر بابلز
@bubbles_fashion20 · 4,54724 postsبغدادي 🤎.
@B0BBB7 · 21,81423 postsقصائد حسينيه
@fflx1 · 52,48622 posts☀️
@Ohmaiam · 13,42822 postsكلايش ذكاء اصطناعي .
@rroxba · 7,72422 postscore :
@KUB89 · 3,39521 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 2
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@cf67z named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 7 posts, 10 October 2026 – 10 October 2026 · confirmed gone 15 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 26 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 2 October 2026 – 2 October 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@MOOQQ55 · 77,477
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
@Narla2 · 70,591
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
@OOIIIEEE · 55,807
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
@lRlTI · 75,438
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
@nrrd3 · 62,173
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
@IIU4T · 73,698
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
@s54ou · 42,899
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
@cf67c · 43,690
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
@T_16_7 · 48,268
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 25 August 2026
@IIU4F · 70,045
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
@vv1996 · 225,392
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
@MAi3i · 57,885
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
@asxtye · 51,999
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 August 2026
@FlIII · 78,883
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 18 August 2026
@Geoooom · 69,567
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
@HiEiND · 71,093
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 August 2026
@q_p_81 · 243,626
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
@RRR9_0 · 43,145
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 27 August 2026
@SUDEn_MOMEnt · 48,861
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 25 August 2026
@trrteb · 64,377
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 20 August 2026
@nasme_t · 209,378
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
@mtd7knish · 223,559
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
@bagda1d · 67,008
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 20 August 2026
@Sixth_Portal · 77,718
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 69 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“حِزن شَفاف” (@cf67z), 86,370 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cf67z.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.