File, posted without a caption

Channel
مُـبعثَر
@Kd_kla1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
42,803subscribers
+3,365 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002149274694 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Kd_kla1 |
| Description | حسبيني جره گحل مديني بعِيونـچ || |
| Created | Between 1 April 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Kd_kla1 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 19:50 | 42,803 | -30 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 16:09 | 42,833 | -40 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:08 | 42,873 | -21 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:36 | 42,894 | -51 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 23:54 | 42,945 | -87 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:46 | 43,032 | -31 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:19 | 43,063 | -47 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 01:06 | 43,110 | -17 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 02:41 | 43,127 | -13 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:51 | 43,140 | +11 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:40 | 43,129 | -44 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:19 | 43,173 | -8 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:37 | 43,181 | -28 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 00:46 | 43,209 | -5 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:57 | 43,214 | +32 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:21 | 43,182 | +200 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 21:22 | 42,982 | +3 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:29 | 42,979 | +2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:46 | 42,977 | +43 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 17:57 | 42,934 | first reading |
Engagement
385 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 184 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.03%
- avg views ÷ 42,803 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,010
- 146 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 146
- of 385 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 146 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 385 (29 June 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 439,506 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 04:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 610
- Videos
- 17
- Links
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 23s
- Average length
- 21s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 47
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 26
- of 385 we hold a reading for · 7%
- Most on one post
- 10
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Kd_kla1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 385 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 146 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
✨
دِيربالك على عِيونك راح اروح واني هَم راح ابقَى ارَاقب مِن بعّيد ممَقتنع بالصَار كُلي شَلون هَيج ليش ماوضَحت كِلشي وحِجيت الگه أحسَن منك بَيا دنيا هاي انِي صدَكني رِدت بّس مالكِيت جِنت ارد فَرحان نتَلاكه يوم هَاي اول مرة اكول شَعندي اجيت .
ضَل دَردُم بِمَگفاي يَالمَالك عِلوم حُر أنه والحُر دُوم مارَافك البُوم
✨
File, posted without a caption
ليش أسود لابسه وشكلچ حَزين هـوَا صَح يلوگلج بَس بي ونين أنتِ ورده والورد مابي سَواد انتِ سالوفهَ جميلة وشَهرزادَ طحنهَ يَحبيبهَ بهَواكم والگـلب هَذه حَنين ليش لابسهَ اسوَد وشگلچ حَزين؟
و شِيردك بعَد چَنك ايام الخِير .
File, posted without a caption
✨
ترا المَاشوك چذابين محد حَبك بگدي .
أول مَاشَّفت طَولك عَلى الباب وأول مَا أجت عَينك بعيني جنن تكول أعَرفك صَارلي سنين وجنن عشرة عُمر بينك وبيني عَشت مَطلوب عُمري لِشوفتك دين وهسّه بشوفتك وفيت ديني إذا تشّعل حبيبي لجيتي شموع الك كُلي أشتعل لمن تجيّني .
Showing the 12 most recent of 385 posts we hold for @Kd_kla1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Kd_kla1 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 19 posts on @Kd_kla1 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 5 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 13 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 11
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Narla2 · 71,11321 posts-﮼أُنثى رَقيقة .
@DRT86 · 41,84713 posts-حَچي هَلي.
@ERT8l · 128,93012 postsشِنَساهنٰ
@Nh_NE · 83,0658 postsمَيخالف .
@OOIIIEEE · 56,1454 postsمَلاذكُم
@cf67e · 56,1024 postsحِزن شَفاف
@cf67z · 85,8892 postsتوهِين .
@eoivnr · 81,4121 postتـرآكـمـآت
@tarakoomat · 1,1211 postلــ طـيـبـه
@tebaabh · 1201 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Nh_NE · 83,06583 postsحِزن شَفاف
@cf67z · 85,88965 postsثروناو :
@cf67c · 44,75051 postsمَلاذكُم
@cf67e · 56,10238 postsمَيخالف .
@OOIIIEEE · 56,14535 posts-حَبيبتِي السَّمراء.
@Narla2 · 71,11334 posts-﮼أُنثى رَقيقة .
@DRT86 · 41,84728 posts-حَچي هَلي.
@ERT8l · 128,93028 postsتوهِين .
@eoivnr · 81,4126 postsاحساس وشعر .
@Hl_HII · 116,1324 postsكفخه إدراك:
@spwnrz · 61,0993 posts
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ERT8l · 128,930
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026
@T_16_7 · 47,776
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 25 August 2026
@Narla2 · 71,113
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
@aassx22 · 120,071
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 16 August 2026
@vxxxii · 53,530
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 24 August 2026
@vc6Il · 139,649
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
@IIU4F · 70,728
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
@yatmanqalbi · 101,672
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
@FN_73 · 148,955
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 12 August 2026
@trrteb · 63,808
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 20 August 2026
@MOOQQ55 · 78,060
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
@RRR9_0 · 42,708
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 27 August 2026
@asxtye · 51,268
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 August 2026
@nrrd3 · 61,623
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
@Nh_NE · 83,065
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 August 2026
@lRlTI · 76,302
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
@vv1996 · 224,626
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
@OOIIIEEE · 56,145
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
@IIU4T · 73,278
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
@spwnrz · 61,099
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 22 August 2026
@HiEiND · 70,317
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 August 2026
@afQ55 · 124,679
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
@SlSl2l · 121,055
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
@ST_SSSSSSSS · 54,332
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 75 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مُـبعثَر” (@Kd_kla1), 42,803 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kd_kla1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.