✨✨نجحتتتتتت ✨✨

Channel
مَلاذكُم
@cf67e
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
58,137subscribers
-53 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001634921671 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cf67e |
| Description | كتبت هوَاي عَسى وبَلچن يلوحك بيَت . لتمويل قنواتكم : @cf674 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cf67e |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 58,137 | +21 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 58,116 | +19 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 58,097 | -69 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 58,166 | +44 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 58,122 | -42 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 58,164 | -32 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 58,196 | +72 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 58,124 | +5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 58,119 | +17 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 58,102 | -52 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 58,154 | -63 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 58,217 | +40 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 58,177 | -13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 58,190 | first reading |
Engagement
452 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.825%
- avg views ÷ 58,137 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 479
- 445 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 445
- of 452 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 452 (19 July 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 213,343 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 535
- Videos
- 76
- Links
- 24
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 3m 01s
- Average length
- 3m 01s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
شبساع انضميتن گلجن !!
شعور الكتمان 💔💔 :
File, posted without a caption
أخر ظهور منذ زمن طويل 📞
مواليد 2010 قررت ترتبط 🥺
🔺متتتتتتتت أكثر قناة تمثلنا بنات لتفوتكُم 🤣🔥.
- @VQVOBOT - 2 / 5
كليشة صورتج انتي والبيت 🫦
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
وضع العراق بالصيـف 😥😭:
Showing the 12 most recent of 452 posts we hold for @cf67e. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 361,795 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@Malika_store14 · 13,37516 posts5:15
@iT64i · 81,64815 posts-﮼أُنثى رَقيقة .
@DRT86 · 41,88811 postsطريق الهُدىٰ
@MY_YiY · 55,28911 postsمَتجر نَبأ.
@Naba_strong · 20,23710 postsازياء تيجان 1👗
@koillll · 16,1129 postsمجمع الجوهرة 💎369
@aljawharatk · 7,1437 postsجَـمارة
@f_tm4i · 1,2446 postsمتجر الهوس❤
@hjbmool · 2,1496 postsمتجر بابلز
@bubbles_fashion20 · 3,6615 postsمُمكِن؟
@ceen6 · 41,3324 postsرياكشن
@ci1rrr · 17,7294 postsFACT :
@FCB_V · 95,9794 postsإِنَّ اللَّهَ مَعَنَا 🤍
@ahhm988 · 2723 postsTrend
@ci4rrr · 13,4233 postsأثر
@le_lrl · 17,3053 postsمتجر زين | اكسسوارات
@ZainSt0re · 14,6683 posts𝐀
@ayyyyyyyy28 · 1,3432 postsازياء هَـيلة 🌵.
@mttypf · 13,2862 postsSHEIN 💕
@SHEINN2002 · 2962 postsسِدال
@sidal_0000 · 1,8362 postsمُلهَم
@TSsiS · 74,1142 postsريبوست
@iibost · 55,4141 postعَالم زُمردة 𐙚.
@iii_s1r · 13,0471 postمَيخالف .
@OOIIIEEE · 56,3301 postرَجَاءُ المتَّقِينَ .
@sirccq · 22,2341 postبــاچر تـهون.
@toete17h · 1401 post-مُرهـَق .
@xlxKn · 16,6491 postمود :
@ym_ymo · 20,2961 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@DRT86 · 41,88824 posts• Girl mood ☀️.
@n0n99n · 25,92424 postsTrend
@ci4rrr · 13,42322 postsكليشات ذكاء اصطناعي
@QCQ37 · 76,58120 postsمُمكِن؟
@ceen6 · 41,33218 postsعَالم زُمردة 𐙚.
@iii_s1r · 13,04713 postsرَجَاءُ المتَّقِينَ .
@sirccq · 22,23413 postsمُلهَم
@TSsiS · 74,11413 postsرياكشن
@ci1rrr · 17,72912 postsذكاء اصطناعي .
@thol28 · 9,18212 postsمتجر بابلز
@bubbles_fashion20 · 3,66111 postsأثر
@le_lrl · 17,30511 postsدربونة بغدادية
@asscac · 25,03810 postsكلايش بنات 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝘀𝗵 𝗚𝗶𝗿𝗹𝘀
@ztt223 · 31,95710 postsريبوست
@iibost · 55,4148 posts5:15
@iT64i · 81,6488 postsطريق الهُدىٰ
@MY_YiY · 55,2898 posts-حَبيبتِي السَّمراء.
@Narla2 · 70,9595 posts- لمة بنات💗.
@INTJ_CYS · 2,4274 posts🦢
@oHzoz · 4484 postsمود :
@ym_ymo · 20,2964 postsبــاچر تـهون.
@toete17h · 1403 posts-مُرهـَق .
@xlxKn · 16,6493 postsجَـمارة
@f_tm4i · 1,2442 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@cf67e named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 21 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مَلاذكُم” (@cf67e), 58,137 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cf67e.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.