Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for عتاب

Channel

عتاب

@bggcp

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

36,960subscribers

+7,295 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001941071897
TypeChannel
Username@bggcp
Descriptionأَمِثلُ قَلْبيّ يُهمَل؟
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 October 2026
Measurements held41
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/bggcp

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

29,45636,96033,20810 August 2026 — 29,665 subscribers10 August 2026 — 29,665 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29,661 subscribers12 August 2026 — 29,646 subscribers14 August 2026 — 29,647 subscribers16 August 2026 — 29,622 subscribers17 August 2026 — 29,626 subscribers18 August 2026 — 29,621 subscribers19 August 2026 — 29,603 subscribers20 August 2026 — 29,601 subscribers23 August 2026 — 29,592 subscribers25 August 2026 — 29,587 subscribers26 August 2026 — 29,564 subscribers27 August 2026 — 29,566 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,571 subscribers29 August 2026 — 29,559 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,553 subscribers31 August 2026 — 29,542 subscribers1 September 2026 — 29,544 subscribers3 September 2026 — 29,541 subscribers4 September 2026 — 29,528 subscribers7 September 2026 — 29,519 subscribers10 September 2026 — 29,501 subscribers12 September 2026 — 29,477 subscribers14 September 2026 — 29,481 subscribers16 September 2026 — 29,458 subscribers18 September 2026 — 29,456 subscribers2 October 2026 — 33,547 subscribers6 October 2026 — 34,589 subscribers11 October 2026 — 34,145 subscribers13 October 2026 — 34,515 subscribers15 October 2026 — 34,642 subscribers15 October 2026 — 34,806 subscribers17 October 2026 — 34,927 subscribers18 October 2026 — 35,057 subscribers19 October 2026 — 35,437 subscribers20 October 2026 — 36,057 subscribers21 October 2026 — 36,223 subscribers22 October 2026 — 36,515 subscribers23 October 2026 — 36,610 subscribers24 October 2026 — 36,960 subscribers10 August 202624 October 2026
41 measurements spanning 75 days, net +7,295. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,330–38,086 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 41
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Oct 2026, 05:2036,960+350
23 Oct 2026, 07:4436,610+95
22 Oct 2026, 09:5936,515+292
21 Oct 2026, 06:3436,223+166
20 Oct 2026, 02:1836,057+620
19 Oct 2026, 02:5535,437+380
18 Oct 2026, 00:2635,057+130
17 Oct 2026, 01:3134,927+121
15 Oct 2026, 23:2934,806+164
15 Oct 2026, 02:3834,642+127
13 Oct 2026, 23:5134,515+370
11 Oct 2026, 02:0134,145-444
6 Oct 2026, 23:1634,589+1,042
2 Oct 2026, 01:0133,547+4,091
18 Sept 2026, 09:3929,456-2
16 Sept 2026, 02:2029,458-23
14 Sept 2026, 06:4029,481+4
12 Sept 2026, 16:5729,477-24
10 Sept 2026, 13:1929,501-18
7 Sept 2026, 07:4129,519first reading

Engagement

135 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 121 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.4%
avg views ÷ 36,960 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,060
83 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
83
of 135 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 83 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026
Posts held135 (9 July 2026 – 24 October 2026)
Views total503,034
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Oct 2026, 12:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
326
Videos
2
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

22 Oct 2026, 21:04 UTC≈3,140 viewsread 24 October 2026
Voice message

سمير صبيح يتحدث عن البداخلي :

22 Oct 2026, 21:03 UTC≈3,390 viewsread 24 October 2026

امِس مِن احترَك گَلبي انطفيَت إنتَ .

22 Oct 2026, 21:03 UTC≈3,090 viewsread 24 October 2026

انا بعمر الوَرد بس ورود ذَبلانة انا بـ روحِي غصن ذَبلان وتگلي الناس حَليِانة.

20 Oct 2026, 21:00 UTC≈5,480 views0 reactionsread 24 October 2026

شكَد زعلنَا ، شكَد رضينَا شكَد تعاتبنَا وحچينَا . ما بُرد عنك حنيّني وكَلبي أبد ما كَلي إنسى ولك شمّا حصل بينك وبينّي الحُب إلك ظل هوَ نفسَة .

20 Oct 2026, 21:00 UTC≈5,570 viewsread 24 October 2026

غَريّبة الناس بس أنتَ وطن روُحيَّ .

20 Oct 2026, 21:00 UTC≈5,530 viewsread 24 October 2026

العزيز اليبتعد تكثر معزَتة ابعد شمَا تبعد تبقى أنـتَ وأنـتَ .

Showing the 12 most recent of 135 posts we hold for @bggcp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 35 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

طيف 𐦍
@DEPTH02 · 32,722
#1
حيث أنا
@hayaa_0 · 72,770
#2
المُهرَقان .
@MH2lR · 15,660
#3
شفق:
@nr0lll · 79,071
#4
لـنوُر .
@n_a2u · 12,904
#5
المُصْحَف
@lAlMosahfl · 777,632
#6
سِيفدا
@smr120h · 102,805
#7
᷂جَعـفر
@jar969 · 7,882
#8
شعر عربي فصيح
@fluent_poetry1 · 60,111
#9
🦢
@swangirl6 · 10,453
#10
مَ
@I17IIO · 5,191
#11
القمة وظائف فرص عمل مندوبين
@ieq4ee · 396,120
#12
رِيمانّ
@FFA04 · 5,256
#13
. ࿔ نجمة رَوانِ
@lRlTI · 75,438
#14
حيادر
@llSPR · 19,794
#15
ִֶָ حَوْرَاءُ | فَ شِ
@HlllllllHio · 8,778
#16
❣️
@viiiihl · 12,937
#17
شمسِين .
@vc6Il · 136,075
#18
تواق
@IIU4T · 73,698
#19
خمرآئيل 405
@lqii_i · 22,655
#20
البرت ♰
@Albrt2000 · 7,324
#21
شُقاق .
@CllOC · 18,002
#22
لَوعة عَينيهِ
@lUl4e · 7,730
#23
استراحة
@estraha_0 · 17,287
#24
فَتَآيُ الْقَمحِي
@vlxlii · 8,454
#25
نِيلانَ .
@bwxan · 785
#26
مزج حنيتلك .
@I8ii9ii · 35,229
#27
أطمئنَان.
@LZDT5 · 4,720
#28
- سِحرُ العُيُونِ
@sxserc · 27,352
#29
مسك
@Assro19 · 12,356
#30
مُلهَم
@TSsiS · 79,717
#31
بَلا ولا شيء
@JJ3DA · 21,165
#32
Photography📸
@wahj54 · 3,685
#33
شَيءٌ ما مُختلِف
@mokhtalifah · 70,738
#34
شَيءٌ قَديم
@wzzww · 33,988
#35
مَـروه .
@m_12i · 2,465
#36
نجم ⋆
@me_hoshi · 2,946
#37
ڤانيسيا.
@FNISIA · 2,510
#38
-حَبيبتِي السَّمراء.
@Narla2 · 70,591
#39
نحـيي الحُب
@lI9ll9lll · 4,954
#40
☀️🌊🌬️🪴
@luv634 · 16,545
#41
عَراقيةة حُرةَ .
@llbl1r · 2,038
#42
إيلان.
@e0lann · 47,893
#43
هدايتي
@IIUYL · 16,766
#44
هوسَة مَشاعر
@TSSiX · 41,030
#45
اقتباسات عبارات ستوريات 0:0
@PPPJP · 3,183,684
#46
مَدينةُ النِّساءِ
@ezc11 · 16,466
#47
مَبتهمنيِش .
@Diilen · 114,956
#48
رُوقَ . ㅤ
@BIllIIl · 9,015
#49
وَهَج.
@nbjkvh · 12,651
#50
هَدير
@Imhadeer · 12,755
#51
تَصويرنا 🦋.
@Qiise · 21,486
#52
السَجَىٰ
@TSSj1 · 28,579
#53
رف عَتيـق
@L222_L · 3,182
#54
گُمرية
@MllMZ8 · 7,692
#55
فـرقان - جانم فدای رَهبر
@forqanwassam313 · 30,822
#56
منصة ابن بابل
@iraqed4 · 3,215,440
#57
مُحَـطَم.
@cckkxs · 15,093
#58
unreachable
@i611e · 13,581
#59

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

- لـ اميرَتي .
@M1140 · 103,699
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
طيف 𐦍
@DEPTH02 · 32,722
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 5 September 2026
خمرآئيل 405
@lqii_i · 22,655
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 September 2026
رُمان
@rman997 · 18,859
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 3 October 2026
شعر عربي فصيح
@fluent_poetry1 · 60,111
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
حيث أنا
@hayaa_0 · 72,770
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
غيوم
@Geoooom · 69,567
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
شفق:
@nr0lll · 79,071
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
سِيفدا
@smr120h · 102,805
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
- سِحرُ العُيُونِ
@sxserc · 27,352
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 10 September 2026
- مَجرّات .
@Majaraat · 58,703
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
١٩٩٨ .
@s_sssi · 19,386
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 30 September 2026
إيمان فارس
@emaan_faris · 27,160
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 10 September 2026
مزج حنيتلك .
@I8ii9ii · 35,229
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 3 September 2026
شَيءٌ قَديم
@wzzww · 33,988
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 2 September 2026
-نَرجسّيه.
@Ssll_77 · 47,338
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 26 August 2026
مُذكّرات 📚
@AnaoantmA · 30,791
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
رُمش عِيني .
@llA0lI · 55,086
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
شَيءٌ ما مُختلِف
@mokhtalifah · 70,738
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
شَمسك .
@IIU4F · 70,060
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
أبيات شعرية عربية
@o_o_7ii · 20,254
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 September 2026
بيت شعر عربي كل يوم
@Arabicpoet0 · 40,850
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 29 August 2026
بيلا || Bella
@Bella_0 · 60,191
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
أبيات فصحى ، قصائد حب ، غزل 🤎،
@szszs2 · 148,581
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 69 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“عتاب” (@bggcp), 36,960 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bggcp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.