- انتظر ما يستحق الانتظار، واترك ما يجعلك تنتظر بلا أمل.

Channel
اقتباسات ، عبارات ، كلام حب، خواطر
@PVVVV
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
824,682subscribers
+1,201 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001084324464 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PVVVV |
| Description | - الأوقات الصعبة تعلمنا دروس قيمة @ooaoovلتمويل . |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PVVVV |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:36 | 824,682 | -4,583 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 829,265 | -1,219 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:43 | 830,484 | -489 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:24 | 830,973 | -1,308 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 832,281 | -2,583 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 834,864 | -5,162 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:42 | 840,026 | +1,590 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 838,436 | +7,309 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 831,127 | -1,302 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 832,429 | -1,579 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 834,008 | -1,388 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:23 | 835,396 | -2,419 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 837,815 | -2,574 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:19 | 840,389 | +26,461 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 813,928 | +8,633 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 805,295 | +205 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 805,090 | -1,547 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:09 | 806,637 | -2,413 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 809,050 | -3,037 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 812,087 | first reading |
Engagement
241 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.17%
- avg views ÷ 824,682 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 9,620
- 178 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 178
- of 241 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 178 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 241 (26 July 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,713,002 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Sept 2026, 02:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,810
- Videos
- ≈2,260
- Links
- ≈710
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 11s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /2566906 Aug 2026, 21:38 UTC | 12 minutes – 2 minutes old | 16 viewsno reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /2566896 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC | 234 minutes – 64 minutes old | 384 viewsno reaction reading | 60 minutes: 359 interp. | not yet at 24h | 34 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 241 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PVVVV. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 241 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 9 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
- بعض الغياب اختبار، وبعض الرحيل درس، وبعض الانتظار قدر.
- هناك رحيلٌ يُوجعك، لكنه ينقذك من وجعٍ أكبر
بوت يعرف منو يراقب حسابج 🙂
- بوت تحميل من التيك توك 🖼 ⭐️ . - يمكنك تحميل الفيديوهات بصيغه HD . - يمكنك تنزيل فيديو + ملف صوتي . - فقط ارسل رابط الفيديو . - معرف البوت : ✅ . - فقط - https://t.me/STORETVBOT - https://t.me/STORETVBOT
- أحبك لأن وجودك يجعل قلبي أخفّ، وأيامي أحنّ.
- بعض الأشخاص نلتقيهم صدفة، ثم يصبحون أجمل أقدارنا
- أنتَ الطمأنينة التي جاءتني على هيئة إنسان
🟢دقيقة وأحذف أنضمو⏩️🟢
صـــــور عيــــون ♥️🧿.
غزل للعَيون الحلوة 🤩✨.
بسبب هالقناة حبيبي خطبني 💍🫂
Showing the 12 most recent of 241 posts we hold for @PVVVV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@lilyfo · 4,42236 postsبغدادي 🤎.
@B0BBB7 · 20,29217 postsبوت تنزيل من تيك توك
@Av9BoT · 30,5127 postsتمويل♡تمويلات ♡قنوات♡ كروبات ،
@ooaoov · 2,4907 postsوقت الأسترخاء
@vvv_8vv30 · 1,3766 postsازياء فاتنه 🔥 تسوق الكتروني
@NizakiTooll99 · 5,1964 postsشُووية مِني •
@abo_zubt1 · 1,1953 postsعذراء 𐙚
@Adh_1335 · 40,3873 postsمــلاڪ بيــوتــيے️ 369 🌹🛍
@malkm_43 · 40,3493 postsازياء رهف 👗 تسوق فساتين
@XD_DS · 20,6283 postsخيره ام مصطفى
@jsnsjxjdd · 3,7492 posts{ أَلا بذِكْر اللّهِ تَظْمَئِنّ الْقُلُوبُ }
@ra334dt · 11,2752 postsأميرتي.
@CCDTES · 4,1871 postروح
@ci2rrr · 14,4661 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@zzzzzz · 1,946,706#1
@zrzzzz · 1,430,052#2
@HH_H7S · 277,493#3
@en3_g · 365,362#4
@PPPJP · 3,218,085#5
@yypyy · 906,186#6
@STORS5 · 287,557#7
@myiyia · 191,428#8
@PPPPJ · 2,342,220#9
@Nh_NE · 83,717#10
@YYYYD · 1,694,876#11
@kwknss · 88,024#12
@llllahll · 116,724#13
@unfor2 · 249,580#14
@Diilen · 114,239#15
@AE_Hl · 111,585#16
@lRlTI · 75,130#17
@m3im3ii · 113,397#18
@zzuzz · 867,748#19
@hwjeki · 952,355#20
@iT64i · 75,640#21
@sdqgii · 31,245#22
@vc6Il · 133,477#23
@EN_QE · 819,834#24
@uuuuxcc · 202,129#25
@iaaaaa · 673,646#26
@XG_64 · 86,723#27
@IIU4T · 75,994#28
@nnKnn · 1,287,884#29
@vvpvvv1 · 104,984#30
@ERT8l · 130,306#31
@kkkkkkkhvc · 17,259#32
@dreamAA30 · 356,243#33
@Yosmo · 281,180#34
@kooora_land · 22,785#35
@c8orl · 44,079#36
@ececeo · 194,886#37
@afQ55 · 127,198#38
@STORYAT_11 · 544,643#39
@zno_42 · 57,005#40
@letna_jeran · 419,804#41
@yatmanqalbi · 104,072#42
@TTTTpT · 491,099#43
@SS2lS · 188,529#44
@nscsz · 89,736#45
@zz_zwz · 392,969#46
@lAlMosahfl · 775,195#47
@BasmaPress · 83,975#48
@zz_ve · 938,127 (as read 8 August 2026)#49
@HeB1H1 · 99,415#50
@trrteb · 66,668#51
@Lne_8 · 138,451#52
@zi_b6 · 551,001 (as read 8 August 2026)#53
@zn_d6 · 280,085#54
@HiEiND · 74,284#55
@Edu211 · 648,023#56
@asxtye · 54,193#57
@ET_ETu · 233,303#58
@ZZ_VVi · 14,885#59
@edu2iq · 1,179,074#60
@iraqed4 · 3,365,642#61
@iraqedu · 4,410,450#62
@errzzl · 548,561#63
@one_news2026 · 96,584#64
@v999v · 1,554,049#65
@Gif2022am · 45,398#66
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@HH_H7S · 277,493
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 August 2026
@rerrs · 317,399
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
@en3_g · 365,362
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026
@STORS5 · 287,557
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026
@shsvsbbs · 226,194
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
@unfor2 · 249,580
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
@kwknss · 88,024
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 17 August 2026
@vsv21 · 142,382
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
@nasme_t · 214,102
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
@iq1_iq · 322,884
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
@yypyy · 906,186
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 August 2026
@i4_3Q · 233,925
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 August 2026
@zr_dt · 294,950
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 10 August 2026
@V0VVV1 · 325,557
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
@zrzzzz · 1,430,052
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 8 August 2026
@yffdsa · 36,331
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 1 September 2026
@ececeo · 194,886
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
@ei_n0 · 206,459
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
@iraqed5 · 296,217
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
@STORYAT_11 · 544,643
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 August 2026
@iaaaaa · 673,646
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 8 August 2026
@thrthrat13 · 112,996
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
@zzzxz · 1,051,147
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 22 August 2026
@fraind_2 · 171,594
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 158 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اقتباسات ، عبارات ، كلام حب، خواطر” (@PVVVV), 824,682 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PVVVV.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.