كروبك يعطري طب اتونس واضحك تنمر بما يرضي الله. محتاجين مشرفين متنمرين😂😂

Channel
- اقتباسات حزينة 🖤 .
@zr_dt
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
266,190subscribers
-41,591 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001851535226 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zr_dt |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zr_dt |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 09:16 | 266,190 | -1,191 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 06:37 | 267,381 | -416 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 02:21 | 267,797 | -353 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:29 | 268,150 | -238 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 22:27 | 268,388 | -271 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 01:59 | 268,659 | -339 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 23:20 | 268,998 | -377 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 20:58 | 269,375 | -363 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 269,738 | -913 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:20 | 270,651 | -997 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:30 | 271,648 | -353 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 20:16 | 272,001 | -263 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 23:08 | 272,264 | -281 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:36 | 272,545 | -285 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 00:49 | 272,830 | -2,355 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 275,185 | -2,819 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:09 | 278,004 | -445 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 10:16 | 278,449 | -391 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 10:19 | 278,840 | -320 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 09:59 | 279,160 | first reading |
Engagement
516 posts held, back to 25 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 128 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 516 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 October 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 516 we hold a reading for · 0.2%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zr_dt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 516 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 January 2026 to 7 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
هلو تلي طبعا اليوم جبنالكمً شي مختلف كروب للونسه ول ضحك 🍓 احبكم تلي 🪷
ضايج و مجايك نوم ؟ 🤔 جبتلكم هل كروب بي طن ونسه 😂🔥 مختلط شباب وبنات و فاتحين اتصال 😊❤️🔥 https://t.me/+OI8hWBGXbeI4ZDUy https://t.me/+OI8hWBGXbeI4ZDUy
- بوت تحميل من التيك توك: @nzzbot 🌐. - بوت تنزيل ستوريات انستا: @xcxbot 🌐 - بوت تحميل من اليوتيوب: @ssgbot 🎞 .
- #دعم_انستا_حقيقيين_عراقيين 100%📺 👑. - الـ 500 متابع بـ 5 اسيا🟢 👑 . - #دعم_تيك_توك_حقيقيين_عراقيين %:🌐 👑 . - الـ 500 متابع بـ 5 اسيا🟢 👑 . - حساب التواصل : @zpzzz 👑🟢 .
- التمويل رجع بقوة: @zpzzz 👑 .
- بوت تحميل من التيك توك: @nzzbot 🌐. - بوت تنزيل ستوريات انستا: @xcxbot 🌐 - بوت تحميل من اليوتيوب: @ssgbot 🎞 .
- #دعم_انستا_حقيقيين_عراقيين 100%📺 👑. - الـ 500 متابع بـ 5 اسيا🟢 👑 . - #دعم_تيك_توك_حقيقيين_عراقيين %:🌐 👑 . - الـ 500 متابع بـ 5 اسيا🟢 👑 . - حساب التواصل : @zpzzz 👑🟢 .
- التمويل رجع بقوة: @zpzzz 👑 .
يريدون حتيت عمري تعو 🌚❤️🔥
محتاجين مشرفين متفاعلين ❤️ https://t.me/+MyoJRTKV0yRlMjAy
بس بنات ولد حظر 😭👆
Showing the 12 most recent of 516 posts we hold for @zr_dt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@ssgbot · 15,45771 posts_ بوُت تِحميلَ فيديوهات مَنٍ اُنْستُا
@XCXBOT · 11,80771 posts_ بوُت تنزيل ستوريات مَنٍ اُنْستُا
@ZozBot · 121,99343 postsدليل الثقة رشق محمد .
@eeeeme · 21,09742 postsبوتَ تٌحَِميلً مٍنَ التِيكً توكٍ
@ueebot · 57,87738 postsمـتجر ملو🥹💗
@ausbu22o · 7,5001 postكَِروبَ بَنَاتَ فقط دردشه شباب تعارف بنات
@Kingdom154 · 8,4301 postلمسة أنوثة
@msr257 · 3351 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 2
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@zr_dt named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 2 posts, 2 October 2026 – 4 October 2026 · confirmed gone 10 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 21 August 2026 – 21 August 2026 · confirmed gone 14 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@zzzzzz · 2,011,976#1
@zrzzzz · 1,425,308#2
@HH_H7S · 263,953#3
@EFSBOS · 105,972#4
@PVVVV · 817,149#5
@iaaaaa · 648,107#6
@Feeling088 · 132,548#7
@PPPJP · 3,186,857#8
@en3_g · 372,559#9
@PPPPJ · 2,319,206#10
@vvpvvv1 · 100,271#11
@kooora_land · 2#12
@voovvo · 71,403#13
@YYYYD · 1,631,121#14
@XG_64 · 6#15
@en_wk · 973,566#16
@OOT_T · 4,367#17
@TJ_H5 · 72,428#18
@zt_tz2 · 28,910#19
@eh_vo · 4,815#20
@SS2lS · 180,874#21
@poq0q · 588#22
@yypyy · 891,625#23
@XF_SX · 10,825#24
@llllahll · 124,564#25
@iT64i · 78,999#26
@hwjeki · 914,763#27
@lAlMosahfl · 780,680#28
@zx_em · 939,377 (as read 10 August 2026)#29
@zzuzz · 858,246#30
@zm_n7 · 543,163 (as read 10 August 2026)#31
@ip70k · 37,554#32
@F3BBF · 88,310#33
@aata_a · 112,091#34
@shabohte · 9,961#35
@zn_d6 · 279,399#36
@iraqed4 · 3,197,089#37
@iraqedu · 4,755,657#38
@errzzl · 478,322#39
@one_news2026 · 91,225#40
@HeB1H1 · 92,157#41
@Gif2022am · 43,533#42
@BasmaPress · 80,768#43
@torenl · 447#44
@mlazemna · 1,089,754#45
@B_a_r · 178,699#46
@v999v · 1,549,301#47
@U_1_20 · 1,372#48
@Edu211 · 667,387#49
@iiPiii · 55,271#50
@edu2iq · 1,166,173#51
@soi17 · 489,043#52
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@HH_H7S · 263,953
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 August 2026
@ET_ETu · 215,216
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
@en3_g · 372,559
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026
@STORS5 · 278,255
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026
@dreamAA30 · 337,056
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
@OX_5m · 274,959
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 10 August 2026
@zn_d6 · 279,399
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 10 August 2026
@x_x_xxxxxxxx_x · 39,814
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 28 August 2026
@c7_77c · 52,097
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 24 August 2026
@vv1996 · 224,409
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
@un_37 · 374,444
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@zz_zwz · 385,214
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026
@XXX8Z · 256,429
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
@op_35 · 291,835
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 August 2026
@nnZnn · 320,285
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 15 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“- اقتباسات حزينة 🖤 .” (@zr_dt), 266,190 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zr_dt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.