لطلب لتمويل 🦋✨ @ctttttz

Channel
سمَره 🩶.
@vvpvvv1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
104,273subscribers
+1,822 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001968345684 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vvpvvv1 |
| Description | يا سمـارچ يشـعل عيوني اعـله كيفـه. لتمويل : @ctttttz |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vvpvvv1 |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 104,273 | -223 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:15 | 104,496 | -114 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 104,610 | -182 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 104,792 | -192 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 104,984 | -354 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 105,338 | -277 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:41 | 105,615 | -69 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:08 | 105,684 | -82 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:28 | 105,766 | -89 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 105,855 | -76 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:06 | 105,931 | -75 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:28 | 106,006 | -74 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 106,080 | -43 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:28 | 106,123 | -96 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 106,219 | -100 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:11 | 106,319 | -43 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 106,362 | -67 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 106,429 | -112 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 106,541 | -211 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 106,752 | first reading |
Engagement
151 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.37%
- avg views ÷ 104,273 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,470
- 70 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 70
- of 151 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 151 (29 July 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 172,713 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 13:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,460
- Videos
- ≈6
- Links
- ≈15
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
عندج إنستا 🌐وحايرة شـَـنو تنشرين؟ تعالو لهل القناة بيها كلشي يخص الانستا خمطو گد متريدون ، ♥️♥️👇🏿 https://t.me/memes200720/18 https://t.me/memes200720/18
Photo, posted without a caption
وَطن مَ بي عَيونَك مَگبرة غُربة .
أحببتَك في مُنتَصف أيامي السَيئه وفي أزدحَام يومَي وبين جَميع أفكاري كُنت انتَ الفكَره الوحَيدهَ ألتي أتَمسك بِطرفهَا لأنجَو .
سوت التايكر 🐆
ملابسها تخبل عليها❤️ هذا هو شعار هذا الملابس❤️ كُلشي يخص البنات متوفر ملابس بيت،ملابس سهر،ملابس طلعه ،ملابس نوم وبأسعار تعجبكم وتوها نزلت عالبضاعه الصيفية تصفحوا❤️ https://t.me/koillll/143338 https://t.me/koillll/143338
شدسوون كاعدين ؟ @bb11r
المكان اللي تبرر فيه عفويتك ليس مكانك المناسب .
خليكي زي البحـر تتحبي ويتخـاف منـك .
من أعتاد النقص ظن بأن الكلام كله عليه .
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 151 posts we hold for @vvpvvv1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@vvpvvv1 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 13 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 13 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@ctttttz · 1,45332 postsلـ أبّا الفَضُل.
@Aba_Alfaddl · 9,8343 postsبوت تحميل من تيكتوك تنزيل فيديوهات🎬
@D6XBOT · 65,5903 postsالدراسة خارج العراق
@international_students_MBBS · 5,3993 postsازياءرهف للفساتين
@XD_DF · 6,4513 postsازياء تيجان 1👗
@koillll · 16,1542 posts⧼ ﮼ميمو | ᭡ ᗰ..
@memes200720 · 1992 postsالمسرة للأزياء والأناقه
@msr257 · 3822 postsسنرحل وسيبقى الاثر ....🕊🍃
@gx_99g · 3591 post♡ تراث استايل ♡
@hufnnwj · 1,3511 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@vvpvvv1 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 16 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@zzzzzz · 2,011,602#1
@AE_Hl · 111,344#2
@kooora_land · 22,609#3
@nscsz · 90,201#4
@ll6lI · 4,274#5
@zt_tz2 · 30,045#6
@Nh_NE · 83,811#7
@HiEiND · 73,477#8
@myiyia · 192,764#9
@lRlTI · 75,250#10
@zrzzzz · 1,426,469#11
@yatmanqalbi · 103,729#12
@IIU4T · 75,567#13
@vc6Il · 133,513#14
@PPPJP · 3,208,272#15
@Diilen · 114,194#16
@afQ55 · 129,906#17
@ZZ_VVi · 14,762#18
@yypyy · 894,458#19
@cckkxs · 14,712#20
@NO_6C · 33,038#21
@c8orl · 43,379#22
@Lne_8 · 138,115#23
@uuuuxcc · 220,502#24
@PVVVV · 813,726#25
@SUDEn_MOMEnt · 50,442#26
@nrrd3 · 63,982#27
@SS2lS · 187,114#28
@PPPPJ · 2,330,076#29
@kkkkkkkhvc · 17,129#30
@m3im3ii · 114,754#31
@citystop2 · 26,781#32
@spwnrz · 62,288#33
@SlSl2l · 114,697#34
@c7_77c · 54,045#35
@ERT8l · 130,016#36
@FCB_V · 90,090#37
@sdqgii · 31,064#38
@UIOIU0 · 105,342#39
@trrteb · 66,246#40
@asxtye · 54,012#41
@lAlMosahfl · 776,377#42
@llllahll · 118,437#43
@nrrd1 · 36,216#44
@rsr2z · 46,688#45
@FY_XG · 110,550#46
@t88q1 · 40,716#47
@en3_g · 359,723#48
@XG_64 · 34,406#49
@zb_6d · 938,559 (as read 15 August 2026)#50
@aprayer313 · 35,369#51
@shabohte · 10,080#52
@OOIIIEEE · 55,992#53
@ff2tm · 46,794#54
@YYYYD · 1,677,270#55
@Shamse01 · 32,577#56
@M1140 · 100,176#57
@eh_vo · 4,956#58
@ooaooos · 231,105#59
@NNNN0I · 11,782#60
@HH_H7S · 275,231#61
@iraqed4 · 3,333,171#62
@TTTTpT · 487,551#63
@IRT6I · 41,224#64
@ET_ETu · 229,878#65
@MemesRaqen · 27,430#66
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@nscsz · 90,201
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 17 August 2026
@c7_77c · 54,045
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 24 August 2026
@tttktt · 168,776
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
@zr_dt · 291,485
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 10 August 2026
@Uuu2X · 169,038
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 12 August 2026
@Feeling088 · 137,904
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 August 2026
@OJJIlll · 229,845
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
@ASEEEM2 · 160,198
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
@alym_2 · 95,661
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
@AE_Hl · 111,344
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 August 2026
@yvvovv · 138,980
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 August 2026
@SS2lS · 187,114
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
@yffdsa · 36,101
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 1 September 2026
@J777E · 267,544
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
@E_EEN · 278,964
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
@Xw_vp · 33,241
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 4 September 2026
@FOR6613 · 37,087
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 31 August 2026
@zzssz3 · 188,624
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
@zzssz6 · 91,938
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 August 2026
@ET_ETu · 229,878
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
@rerrs · 314,940
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
@admant1 · 408,138
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
@ip70k · 39,067
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 30 August 2026
@rro_orri · 26,065
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 98 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سمَره 🩶.” (@vvpvvv1), 104,273 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vvpvvv1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.