أمرَأة ذَكية لآ تُثير الشَفقة أنهَا دائِماً تُثير الأعجاب حَتى .. عرض المزيد

Channel
وحدة 🖤
@zzssz6
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
91,938subscribers
-1,720 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001250194422 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zzssz6 |
| Description | ربما لم يكن شيء مهما بالنسبة لك لكنه كان قلبي. للإعلانات @zzssz |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zzssz6 |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 91,938 | -102 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 10:37 | 92,040 | -66 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 92,106 | -74 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:36 | 92,180 | -80 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:56 | 92,260 | -133 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 92,393 | -154 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 92,547 | -87 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:48 | 92,634 | -38 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 92,672 | -42 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 92,714 | -61 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 92,775 | -67 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:09 | 92,842 | -43 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 92,885 | -15 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 92,900 | -74 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 92,974 | -41 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 93,015 | -35 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 93,050 | -86 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:19 | 93,136 | -62 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 93,198 | -33 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 93,231 | first reading |
Engagement
522 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.157%
- avg views ÷ 91,938 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 144
- 315 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 315
- of 522 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 522 (12 July 2026 – 20 September 2026) |
| Views total | 45,468 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 10:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 187
- Videos
- 7
- Links
- 130
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
«التجاهل يرد الأشياء الى ..للمزيد
يُليق بك أن تكون الشخص الذي أنظر له وكأنه كُلَّ انتصاراتي العزيز الذي عرض المزيد
الأنثى القارئة غالباً ما تفشل في الحب ، لأنها صعبة المنال فعقلها مليء بالحكايات ثم .. أضغط للتكملة
لَيتَني حَجَر لا أحِن إلى أي شيء فلا أمس يَمضي ولا للمزيد
— سُبحان مغير مقامات الناس في قلوبنا ، و سُبحان عرض المزيد
أمرَأة ذَكية لآ تُثير الشَفقة أنهَا دائِماً تُثير الأعجاب حَتى .. عرض المزيد
«التجاهل يرد الأشياء الى ..للمزيد
📷💬💬📺🎥🖼📷 بوت تحميل من جميع المواقع 😁🤬 @FCFFbot
الأنثى القارئة غالباً ما تفشل في الحب ، لأنها صعبة المنال فعقلها مليء بالحكايات ثم .. أضغط للتكملة
لَيتَني حَجَر لا أحِن إلى أي شيء فلا أمس يَمضي ولا للمزيد
— سُبحان مغير مقامات الناس في قلوبنا ، و سُبحان عرض المزيد
Showing the 12 most recent of 522 posts we hold for @zzssz6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@zzssz6 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 19 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 19 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
تحبّون نرجع نسوي تساؤلات مثل أول؟ 😈
- اي.82%
- لا.22%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 522 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 20 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Flc_l · 4,48747 postsعزيز المريسي .
@az0og · 22,70444 postsأمَل | 𝙰𝙼𝙰𝙻 .
@oee_eee · 54,18744 postsمحمد الجيلاني .
@M_Q_X · 33,67941 postsشعور .
@lIIM6 · 27,08728 postsاستراحة
@estraha_0 · 17,52125 postsشَمسك .
@IIU4F · 68,46822 postsحقيقة :
@literallyme8 · 29,34121 postsرُبما نَلتقي .
@DII_lID · 34,22620 postsفَتـّــــــاك...
@fattakk1 · 26,02219 posts𝗦𝗔𝗗𝗜𝗤
@IXXBB · 8,30519 postsريلاكس.
@RIlAKSI3 · 12,08514 postsعُ
@OAFL2 · 6,33913 postsثالث عيوني .
@Oh_RR · 38,39013 postsحيث أنا
@hayaa_0 · 73,47312 postsReal :
@No0ii · 32,29812 postsآخر قهوة ☕
@the_soul_7 · 1,9159 postsشَفَق
@lSolei_l · 7778 postsذواتا أفنان.
@ashoaky · 2,3386 postsمَلاك .
@llivrz · 17,8366 postsشعر عربي فصيح
@fluent_poetry1 · 60,1405 postsل
@KIING_4 · 15 postsهَـلاكـ .
@a20me2 · 1,8233 postsغريب الأطوار
@Yosmo · 281,4733 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@zzssz6 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 10 September 2026 – 10 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Yosmo · 281,473#1
@ARTW22 · 1,477#2
@zno_42 · 57,329#3
@Diilen · 114,194#4
@aklass_hd · 720#5
@uuuuxcc · 220,502#6
@zzssz3 · 188,624#7
@FY_XG · 110,550#8
@IIU4T · 75,567#9
@zzzzzz · 2,011,602#10
@ASEEEMM · 374,186#11
@TTTTpT · 487,551#12
@ma_L7ii · 19,416#13
@afQ55 · 129,906#14
@zrzzzz · 1,426,469#15
@H_do_y · 2,437#16
@nnZnn · 330,207#17
@vvpvvv1 · 104,273#18
@yatmanqalbi · 103,729#19
@NNNAA · 448,685#20
@oee_eee · 54,187#21
@TTTpT · 260,916#22
@like_llooosh · 3,855#23
@II8II5 · 8,699#24
@AMJJDI · 2,778#25
@maqay11 · 10,209#26
@CCPBB0 · 11,486#27
@t88q1 · 40,716#28
@nrrd3 · 63,982#29
@ggyul1234 · 1,656#30
@tv_wlil · 11,228#31
@cole_q · 2,478#32
@sultaniiiiii123 · 5,589#33
@EX2_0 · 6,055#34
@vc6Il · 133,513#35
@yypyy · 894,458#36
@zzssz8 · 45,654#37
@bomba_tymon · 36,799#38
@S_S_C_I · 5,595#39
@m3im3ii · 114,754#40
@myiyia · 192,764#41
@lRlTI · 75,250#42
@SlSl2l · 114,697#43
@PVVVV · 813,726#44
@FCB_V · 90,090#45
@ASEEEM2 · 160,198#46
@hayaa_0 · 73,473#47
@M1140 · 100,176#48
@Shamse01 · 32,577#49
@KIKIKL1 · 18,465#50
@mtd7knish · 228,964#51
@SUDEn_MOMEnt · 50,442#52
@fattakk1 · 26,022#53
@NO_6C · 33,038#54
@zzizi · 258,776#55
@N_N71 · 401,713#56
@zzzxx · 425,808#57
@alym_2 · 95,661#58
@estraha_0 · 17,521#59
@OOIIIEEE · 55,992#60
@qader2024 · 1,716#61
@ollr1 · 3,947#62
@ksa_gigi · 14,893#63
@MR_5_5O · 6,845#64
@unfor2 · 248,013#65
@wo_r3 · 12,450#66
@P2TTP · 12,959#67
@asxtye · 54,012#68
@mn_qv · 397,062#69
@HH_H7S · 275,231#70
@English_Hanan1 · 202,838#71
@ooaooos · 231,105#72
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@zzssz8 · 45,654
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 August 2026
@zeeee49 · 28,202
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 9 September 2026
@fattakk1 · 26,022
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 September 2026
@zzssz10 · 40,806
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
@zzssz3 · 188,624
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
@bomba_tymon · 36,799
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 1 September 2026
@Yosmo · 281,473
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
@zno_42 · 57,329
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 August 2026
@ASEEEM2 · 160,198
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
@snap_kato370 · 33,496
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 4 September 2026
@FOR6613 · 37,087
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 31 August 2026
@ZzIzZI · 42,074
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
@US_DTsa · 27,995
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 9 September 2026
@yffdsa · 36,101
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 1 September 2026
@alym_2 · 95,661
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
@ASEEEMM · 374,186
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
@boook_quotes · 37,950
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
@rerrs · 314,940
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
@nnZnn · 330,207
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
@k757kn · 335,679
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
@autumnSk · 46,782
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026
@zzzxx · 425,808
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
@NNNAA · 448,685
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
@oee_eee · 54,187
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“وحدة 🖤” (@zzssz6), 91,938 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zzssz6.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.