Channel
@boook_quotes
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
38,122subscribers
-969 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001661164826 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @boook_quotes |
| Description | هُنا ستقرأ مقتطفات رائعة ومُلامسة للقلب من كُتب جميلة ✍🏻📖 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/boook_quotes |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:21 | 38,122 | +180 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 11:59 | 37,942 | +264 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:56 | 37,678 | +229 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:22 | 37,449 | +276 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:06 | 37,173 | +214 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:21 | 36,959 | -28 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:19 | 36,987 | -23 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:30 | 37,010 | -19 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 01:20 | 37,029 | -31 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 37,060 | -14 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 20:07 | 37,074 | -14 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 20:54 | 37,088 | -26 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:55 | 37,114 | -26 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:26 | 37,140 | -34 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 14:45 | 37,174 | -24 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:59 | 37,198 | -13 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:49 | 37,211 | -20 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 37,231 | -18 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 18:00 | 37,249 | -41 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 14:37 | 37,290 | first reading |
311 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 178 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 311 (2 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 216,326 |
| Reactions total | 3,055 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 05:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
9,730 reactions across 301 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8,076 | 83.0% | |
| 💔 | 899 | 9.24% | |
| ❤🔥 | 451 | 4.64% | |
| 💯 | 304 | 3.12% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 306 of the 311 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,884 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 311 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @boook_quotes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 311 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 92 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
يا صاحبي، إن الأمور الصغيرة تخبرك عن الأمور الكبيرة، أشياء بسيطة، تفاصيل قد لا تحسبها مهمة، ولكنك لو تأملت فيها جيدًا، لو نظرت إليها بعين الفراسة، لوفرت على نفسك عناء معرفة الناس عن قرب! السلام عليك يا صاحبي 🤍".
❤17
Signed 𝐀𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐚 𐙚.🍂🤎
يا صاحبي، تعلمتُ باكرًا من هذه القصة أن بعض النبل لا يُدرك بسهولة، وأن لا أحكم على كل شيء من بعيد، وأن بعض الناس ينظرون أبعد بكثير مما ينظر بقية الناس! السلام عليك يا صاحبي 🤍".
❤22
Signed 𝐀𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐚 𐙚.🍂🤎
أحيانًا تتأخر الأمنيات يا صاحبي، لأنك لم تنضج بعد لتحافظ عليها، وتتأخر لأن تسليمًا في قلبك لم يكتمل بعد، وتتأخر بذنبٍ أنت مقيم عليه، فيريد الله منك أن تعطيه أولًا ليعطيك ثانيًا! وتتأخر لأنك لم تأخذ بما يكفي من السبب، وقد لا تأتي أبدًا، لأن الخير في أن لا تأتي، فأحسن الظن بالله! السلام عليك يا صاحبي 🤍".
❤31❤🔥2💯2
Signed 𝐀𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐚 𐙚.🍂🤎
هذه الدنيا دار امتحان يا صاحبي، والله ناظر إلى قلبك، فإذا نزل بك ما تكره، أو تأخر عنك ما تُحب، فلا يكن في قلبك إلا الرضا، فلا شيء أبغض إلى الله من أن يرى سخطًا من عبده على قدره! السلام عليك يا صاحبي 🤍".
❤34
Signed 𝐀𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐚 𐙚.🍂🤎
المرض إحدى هدايا الله يا صاحبي! وإنه يبتليك به ليغفر لك ذنوبًا، لم تكن لتبلغ غفرانها بطاعتك، ويبتليك به ليُرقق قلبك، فلا شيء أنفع للقلب من لحظة ضعفٍ، تريه الدنيا على حقيقتها! ويبتليك به ليقربك، فرُبَّ منزلة في الجنة خُلقت لها، وعباداتك أقل من أن تبلغها، فيُصيبك ليرفعك، ويبتليك به لأنه رأى أنك تبتعد عنه، فأراد أن يُعيدك إليه. السلام عليك يا صاحبي 🤍".
❤29
Signed 𝐀𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐚 𐙚.🍂🤎
السلام عليك يا صاحبي، يُرسل الله تعالى لنا الهدايا بطريقة لا نفهمها، هذا لأن فكرنا قاصر، ونظرتنا محدودة، تأتينا المنحة على شكل محنة، والعطاء في هيئة منع، والجبر في هيئة كسر، ولكن متى استقام لك الفهم علمتَ أنَّ الله أرحم بك منك، وأنَّ ربَّ الخير لا يأتي إلا بخير! السلام عليك يا صاحبي 🤍".
❤39
Signed 𝐀𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐚 𐙚.🍂🤎
هذه الحياة قاسية يا صاحبي، وكلُّ إنسان يخوضُ معركةً لا يدري بها أحد، خلف الضحكات المُدوّية جروح غائرة، ووراء صور النعمة حرمان قاتل، حتى الكتابات عن الحُب هي في أحيانٍ كثيرة شوقٌ لحبيبٍ مُنتظر، يحدثُ أن يكتبَ الناسُ عما يفقدونه أكثر مما يجدونه، فمرَّ هيّناً، وإياكَ أن لا ترى من الناس إلا الذي ترى! السلام عليك يا صاحبي 🤍".
❤40💔12💯6
Signed 𝐀𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐚 𐙚.🍂🤎
يا صاحبي، ليس كل من واساكَ خالياً من الحُزن، لعلّه عرف معنى أن يحزن المرءُ ولا يجد أحداً يواسيه! ولا كل من أعطاكَ ثريّ، لعلّه عرفَ جيداً معنى أن يحتاجَ المرءُ ولا يجد! ولا كل من ربّتَ على كتفكَ ليس له همّ، لعله أراد أن يدعو بطريقةٍ أخرى، فيقول صامتاً وهو يُطبطبُ عليكَ: ها أنا أربّتُ على أكتاف الناس فاربتْ على كتفي يا الله! السلام عليك يا صاحبي 🤍".
❤33💔8
Signed 𝐀𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐚 𐙚.🍂🤎
ليس بالضرورة أن تسجد لشيءٍ حتى تكون عبدًا له، يكفي أن تكون أسيره لتكون عبده! المنصب قد يُصبح معبودًا للمرء، والمال قد يُصبح إلهًا وإن لم يُسجد له! العادات والتقاليد هي الأخرى يحدث أن يجعلها الناس آلهة! السلام عليك يا صاحبي 🤍".
❤35❤🔥5
Signed 𝐀𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐚 𐙚.🍂🤎
بعض الناس أحرار فعلًا، وكثير منهم يظنون أنهم أحرار لمجرد اتساع الطوق قليلًا حول رقابهم! السلام عليك يا صاحبي 🤍".
❤39
Signed 𝐀𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐚 𐙚.🍂🤎
لا السّكير يعجب الناس ولا التّقي، ومن لم يجدوا فيه عيبًا، اخترعوا له واحدًا وعيّروه به! ألم تسمع ما قال قوم لوط: ﴿أَخْرِجُوا آلَ لُوطٍ مِنْ قَرْيَتِكُمْ إِنَّهُمْ أُنَاسٌ يَتَطَهَّرُونَ﴾ عندما لم يجدوا لهم خطيئة عيّروهم بطهارتهم! وما زلتَ أنتَ تسأل كيف السبيل إلى إرضاء الناس؟! لا سبيل يا صاحبي، لا سبيل! السلام عليك يا صاحبي 🤍".
❤54❤🔥2
Signed 𝐀𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐚 𐙚.🍂🤎
أسوأ ما في الأمر يا صاحبي أننا لم نعد نبحث عند الناس عن الغنيمة، وإنما عن السلامة! أن يُسدوا إليك أبسط حقوقك؛ يعني أن يدعوك وشأنك! ولكنك تكتشف أن هذا الأمر مستحيل! السلام عليك يا صاحبي 🤍".
❤49💔18
Signed 𝐀𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐚 𐙚.🍂🤎
Showing the 12 most recent of 311 posts we hold for @boook_quotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@boook_quotes edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 11 posts on @boook_quotes as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“في الكُتب إفادة” (@boook_quotes), 38,122 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/boook_quotes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.