والله والنعم

Channel
غُربة
@iisuii
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,021subscribers
-372 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001776437643 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iisuii |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iisuii |
Topic
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:05 | 27,021 | -20 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:50 | 27,041 | -6 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:05 | 27,047 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:55 | 27,054 | -14 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:29 | 27,068 | -11 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 06:54 | 27,079 | +17 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 04:20 | 27,062 | +29 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 04:30 | 27,033 | +60 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:49 | 26,973 | +89 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 23:17 | 26,884 | +54 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 23:45 | 26,830 | +66 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 20:51 | 26,764 | +69 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:19 | 26,695 | -33 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:35 | 26,728 | -14 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:49 | 26,742 | -22 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 06:10 | 26,764 | -22 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 03:05 | 26,786 | -16 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 03:37 | 26,802 | -27 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 01:46 | 26,829 | -17 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 01:57 | 26,846 | first reading |
Engagement
290 posts held, back to 30 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 148 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.19%
- avg views ÷ 27,021 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,130
- 156 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 156
- of 290 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 290 (30 April 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 176,649 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 04:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 156 posts held from the last 30 days (0.641%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
أهلًا وسهلًا الحمدلله بخير جيتي للمكان الصح هذي أفضل قنوات أتابعها https://t.me/llu8e https://t.me/vii2a https://t.me/ellis2005 https://t.me/IlRUIl https://t.me/IduzrI https://t.me/a3ilxl https://t.me/ICIIWS https://t.me/everythinginlifeisart https://t.me/PeaceOffering https://t.me/for1i1
سعودية
الله يطمن روحك ويلطف بحالك
أحس صوتك عالي الحمدلله بخير
قناتي الثانية
https://t.me/isiu1i
Photo, posted without a caption
أعرف الأيام التي أخذت شجاعتي.
🤔.
بوجهكِ كل شيءٍ فيهِ معنى وكم تحتاجُ للمعنى حياتي.
Showing the 12 most recent of 290 posts we hold for @iisuii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 16 posts on @iisuii as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 4 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 46 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@isiu1i · 6,06117 postsle printemps .
@IlRUIl · 7,5065 postsأديب.
@T2Tl7 · 45,1194 postsوضاءَة
@a3ilxl · 1,3034 postsخيرٌ وأبقى .
@iii9ni · 5,2024 postsمَثابة
@iiv1w · 1,7604 postsردهة.
@vii2a · 4,8734 posts𝑺𝒊𝒓𝒊𝒖𝒔.
@ICIIWS · 4,5523 postsعُمْق.
@wii_0i · 7182 postsإحسَاناً.
@AJJJ9 · 6,0101 postالشَّفَق
@ALpl13 · 1,0811 postبوحٌ من الذاكرة
@Bwh_00 · 6531 postمَحَبَّتِي
@Mmma086 · 2531 postسَجىٰ
@Sai_5h · 6101 postزَفِيرْ
@Zaafeer10 · 5761 postتِشرين.
@amanialborihi · 2,6031 postنَص اسـوَد
@blackteaxt · 9451 postهزائم
@hayamm9 · 1,4251 postBlack wings
@occtttt · 4,9141 postغَمــــرة وِدّ 🤎
@rssr66 · 2341 postسُهاد
@suiia1 · 4701 postوَجدُ النَجمةِ
@wjd22nj · 1531 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@isiu1i · 6,0615 postsمُتنفس
@reeia11 · 2823 postsوضاءَة
@a3ilxl · 1,3032 postsسُهاد
@suiia1 · 4702 postsأديب.
@T2Tl7 · 45,1192 postsإحسَاناً.
@AJJJ9 · 6,0101 postEllis
@ellis2005 · 2,8731 postEverything in Life is Art.
@everythinginlifeisart · 1,5431 post𝑺𝒊𝒓𝒊𝒖𝒔.
@ICIIWS · 4,5521 postضُـ
@IduzrI · 3,4051 postمَثابة
@iiv1w · 1,7601 postle printemps .
@IlRUIl · 7,5061 postصحيفة العاشقين
@llu8e · 8,2921 postهدنة مع التأريخ.
@PeaceOffering · 9,4301 postردهة.
@vii2a · 4,8731 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@isiu1i · 6,061#1
@IlRUIl · 7,506#2
@TTTTpT · 473,110#3
@industrious22 · 20,409#4
@ikjzc · 84,861#5
@Vllqlii · 4,851#6
@sh3rr2 · 1,583#7
@iivczy · 955#8
@by2mn · 2,348#9
@P2TTP · 12,434#10
@iii9ni · 5,202#11
@NNNO_1 · 1,423#12
@ollr1 · 3,895#13
@fet20011 · 6,254#14
@nnZnn · 320,753#15
@Vllaii · 3,374#16
@ror_c · 15,743#17
@llii_63 · 2,676#18
@elfno · 17,240#19
@tawheeb10 · 1,497#20
@ma_L7ii · 20,034#21
@iibiiii17 · 665#22
@Degaten · 362#23
@tv_wlil · 11,668#24
@ocxvx · 1,438#25
@llbtt0 · 4,155#26
@uuuuxcc · 206,279#27
@a_espresso1 · 8,685#28
@O_M_A_R_ALi · 695#29
@roodod · 524#30
@ee_ii7 · 2,702#31
@iiiaamr · 833#32
@Fi_dii · 17,347#33
@Massar_Ejbari · 2,263#34
@O8jol · 755#35
@yypyy · 891,050#36
@Di8rE · 115,472#37
@CCPBB0 · 11,420#38
@Yosmo · 270,510#39
@JllIQ · 1,365#40
@Huu_26 · 8,046#41
@noona_88 · 8,954#42
@lielo0 · 2,335#43
@thrthrat97 · 152,431#44
@phenax · 9,598#45
@tv_wil · 10,932#46
@mmssf5 · 13,110#47
@Diilen · 116,273#48
@i0tre · 5,034#49
@swagger15 · 1,153#50
@ayaa_al9 · 4,328#51
@shwriter7 · 2,424#52
@hiiiiillll77 · 16,080#53
@kiersp · 422#54
@non6d · 902#55
@NNNAA · 435,132#56
@papilloni1 · 8,713#57
@ilezih · 3,573#58
@i_i_b · 9,123#59
@home_v4 · 767#60
@sooo_0099 · 1,908#61
@oee_eee · 53,289#62
@WD_27 · 61,940#63
@mokhtalifah · 70,761#64
@boook_quotes · 38,122#65
@smr120h · 102,236#66
@ylIII1 · 993#67
@apeculiartale · 5,997#68
@NMHAI · 3,562#69
@ASEEEMM · 360,474#70
@piip511 · 12,179#71
@zzzxx · 415,101#72
@ARTW22 · 1,443#73
@on1y_you · 8,485#74
@zno_42 · 55,831#75
@KIKIKL1 · 17,952#76
@niillhs · 1,281#77
@hayaa_0 · 74,503#78
@SAF23io · 829#79
@lurc9 · 1,577#80
@zzizi · 250,644#81
@ajl1_1 · 17,514#82
@IIU4T · 73,305#83
@hopeahed · 1,697#84
@TTTpT · 253,198#85
@ra7llll · 536#86
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ikjzc · 84,861
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
@TTTTpT · 473,110
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 August 2026
@Di8rE · 115,472
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
@boook_quotes · 38,122
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
@nnZnn · 320,753
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
@H11_I · 26,557
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
@blackee2 · 87,745
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
@zzzxx · 415,101
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
@TTTpT · 253,198
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@zzizi · 250,644
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
@szszs2 · 147,674
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
@Gibran_Khalill · 50,839
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
@JBY21 · 45,970
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“غُربة” (@iisuii), 27,021 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iisuii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.