خمول روحي وأخلاقي لا راد له ، لا يُقاوم . لا أبتغي سوى السفر . تغيير المشهد . الرحيل إلى حيث لا يعرفني أحد !!. ولكن ، إلى أين الذهاب ؟ .. إذا كنتُ أحمل في داخلي بذرة مصيري كله كأنها جرثومة فتاكة ، فما الفائدة من دحرجة عروض حياتي الخاطئة !! كعربة سيرك جوالة ، عبر جميع المشاهد ! ... ـ خوليو رامون ريبيرو

Channel
Mustafa jaffar
@mmssf5
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,022subscribers
+92 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001467589011 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mmssf5 |
| Created | 23 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mmssf5 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 13,022 | -7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:47 | 13,029 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 13,026 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 13,024 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 13,025 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 13,021 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 13,019 | +7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 13,012 | +14 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 12,998 | +7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 12,991 | +12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 12,979 | +19 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 12,960 | +9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 12,951 | +8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 12,943 | -10 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 12,953 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 12,951 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 12,947 | +4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 12,943 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 12,942 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 12,940 | first reading |
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 23.1%
- avg views ÷ 13,022 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,010
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (18 July 2026 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 48,190 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 20:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
الحنان الحقيقيّ لا يُمكن خلطُه مع أيّ شيء، إنّه هادئٌ للغاية. ـ آنا أخماتوفا
Photo, posted without a caption
كلّ ما أرجوه هو لحظة التجلّي ؛ أن ينفتحَ شيءٌ مّا ، أو أحدٌ مّا ، على نحوٍ سحريّ مباغِت ، لأستطيع أخيراً أن أفهم معنى انتظاري . ـ أليخاندرا بيثارنيك | 'اليوميّات' (1962)
Photo, posted without a caption
“مُشكلة معظمنا أننا نُفضل أن يدمرنا المَديح على أن ينقذنا الإنتِقاد!”-فنست بيل
أنا شاردة وضائعة بعض الشيء ، كما لو أنّهم انتزعوا قلبي ، وحَلّ محلّه الآن هذا الغياب المباغت .. لا أشعر بشيء . لكنّه عكس التخدير تماماً . إنّه نمط أكثر خفّة و أكثر صمتاً للوجود . ـ كلاريس لسبكتور | 'تفّاح في الظلام' (1961)
Photo, posted without a caption
"وإنّكِ ماء وإنّ الماءَ قد يسقي وقد يَروي وقد يُغرق." - أحمد شوقي.
"لا يفزعنّك تشظي هذا العالم، فكل الأشياء تنكسر، وكلها تتصلح. لا يصلحها الوقت كما يقولون، بل العزيمة، ولذا قم، أحب بعزمٍ وبإسرافٍ وبلا قيود، هذا العالم المكسور ينتظر في الظلام النور الذي هو أنت." ـ ل. ر. نوست.
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @mmssf5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mmssf5 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 21 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 21 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Loiip · 32,958
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
@Mazreading · 80,144
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026
@Dostoyevsky_Kafka · 52,142
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 August 2026
@AnaoantmA · 31,337
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
@iuoeil · 103,832
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
@WD_27 · 62,313
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 August 2026
@Alkatah · 31,169
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mustafa jaffar” (@mmssf5), 13,022 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mmssf5.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.