Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mustafa jaffar

Channel

Mustafa jaffar

@mmssf5

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,022subscribers

+92 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001467589011
TypeChannel
Username@mmssf5
Created23 July 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mmssf5

Growth

12,93013,02912,979.57 August 2026 — 12,930 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,930 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,940 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,943 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,940 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,942 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,943 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,947 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,951 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,953 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,943 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,951 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,960 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,979 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,991 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,998 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,012 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,019 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,021 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,025 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,024 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,026 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,029 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,022 subscribers13,0227 August 20264 September 2026
24 measurements spanning 28 days, net +92. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,915–13,044 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 15:2013,022-7
3 Sept 2026, 00:4713,029+3
1 Sept 2026, 20:3813,026+2
31 Aug 2026, 17:5313,024-1
30 Aug 2026, 15:3713,025+4
29 Aug 2026, 19:0413,021+2
28 Aug 2026, 22:3413,019+7
28 Aug 2026, 00:4513,012+14
27 Aug 2026, 00:3312,998+7
25 Aug 2026, 23:5412,991+12
24 Aug 2026, 21:4812,979+19
23 Aug 2026, 10:1212,960+9
21 Aug 2026, 19:3412,951+8
20 Aug 2026, 15:0712,943-10
18 Aug 2026, 13:4312,953+2
17 Aug 2026, 12:5512,951+4
16 Aug 2026, 04:3812,947+4
14 Aug 2026, 15:3512,943+1
13 Aug 2026, 02:5812,942+2
12 Aug 2026, 00:3312,940first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.1%
avg views ÷ 13,022 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,010
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
16
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held36 (18 July 202631 August 2026)
Views total48,190
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 06:42 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 2 September 2026

خمول روحي وأخلاقي لا راد له ، لا يُقاوم . لا أبتغي سوى السفر . تغيير المشهد . الرحيل إلى حيث لا يعرفني أحد !!. ولكن ، إلى أين الذهاب ؟ .. إذا كنتُ أحمل في داخلي بذرة مصيري كله كأنها جرثومة فتاكة ، فما الفائدة من دحرجة عروض حياتي الخاطئة !! كعربة سيرك جوالة ، عبر جميع المشاهد ! ... ـ خوليو رامون ريبيرو

27 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC≈1,790 viewsread 2 September 2026

الحنان الحقيقيّ لا يُمكن خلطُه مع أيّ شيء، إنّه هادئٌ للغاية. ـ آنا أخماتوفا

24 Aug 2026, 23:52 UTC≈2,470 viewsread 2 September 2026

كلّ ما أرجوه هو لحظة التجلّي ؛ أن ينفتحَ شيءٌ مّا ، أو أحدٌ مّا ، على نحوٍ سحريّ مباغِت ، لأستطيع أخيراً أن أفهم معنى انتظاري . ـ أليخاندرا بيثارنيك | 'اليوميّات' (1962)

24 Aug 2026, 00:11 UTC≈2,160 viewsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @fernweh42

“مُشكلة معظمنا أننا نُفضل أن يدمرنا المَديح على أن ينقذنا الإنتِقاد!”-فنست بيل

24 Aug 2026, 00:09 UTC≈2,320 viewsread 2 September 2026

أنا شاردة وضائعة بعض الشيء ، كما لو أنّهم انتزعوا قلبي ، وحَلّ محلّه الآن هذا الغياب المباغت .. لا أشعر بشيء . لكنّه عكس التخدير تماماً . إنّه نمط أكثر خفّة و أكثر صمتاً للوجود . ـ كلاريس لسبكتور | 'تفّاح في الظلام' (1961)

20 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC≈2,580 viewsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @industrious22

‏"وإنّكِ ماء وإنّ الماءَ قد يسقي وقد يَروي وقد يُغرق." - أحمد شوقي.

19 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC≈7,220 viewsread 2 September 2026

"لا يفزعنّك تشظي هذا العالم، فكل الأشياء تنكسر، وكلها تتصلح. لا يصلحها الوقت كما يقولون، بل العزيمة، ولذا قم، أحب بعزمٍ وبإسرافٍ وبلا قيود، هذا العالم المكسور ينتظر في الظلام النور الذي هو أنت." ـ ل. ر. نوست.

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @mmssf5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@mmssf5 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

على شُرفَةِ الانْتِظار
@Loiip · 32,958
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
اكتئاب
@Mazreading · 80,144
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026
فيودور دوستويفسكي
@Dostoyevsky_Kafka · 52,142
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 August 2026
مُذكّرات 📚
@AnaoantmA · 31,337
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
خاتُون.
@iuoeil · 103,832
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
ودّ القيس
@WD_27 · 62,313
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 August 2026
كاظم اسماعيل الكاطع
@Alkatah · 31,169
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mustafa jaffar” (@mmssf5), 13,022 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mmssf5.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.