إِنَّ بَعَدَ الصَّبرِ بُشْرَىٰ إِنَ بَعدَ العُسرِ يُسِرَىٰ

Channel
مَلاذ 🦋، ادعية ، دينية ، المصحف
@thrthrat97
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
151,472subscribers
-2,434 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001620225179 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thrthrat97 |
| Description | - مِلاذ الانِسَان ربهُ🤍 تـ . @lllH55 . |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thrthrat97 |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:38 | 151,472 | -342 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 151,814 | -220 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 152,034 | -159 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:02 | 152,193 | -170 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:39 | 152,363 | -432 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:39 | 152,795 | -518 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 153,313 | +842 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:29 | 152,471 | +747 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:45 | 151,724 | +384 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:54 | 151,340 | -107 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 151,447 | -73 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 151,520 | -54 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 151,574 | -83 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 151,657 | -52 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 151,709 | -132 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 151,841 | -156 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 151,997 | -150 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 152,147 | -151 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 152,298 | -112 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 152,410 | first reading |
Engagement
81 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.42%
- avg views ÷ 151,472 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 11,200
- 48 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 48
- of 81 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 81 (30 July 2026 – 20 September 2026) |
| Views total | 539,582 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Sept 2026, 22:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,460
- Videos
- ≈9
- Links
- ≈125
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3m 02s
- Average length
- 1m 31s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🚀 عروض تمويل تليجرام 🌐 تمويل (بوت) - قنوات صغيرة 500 عضو بـ 5 اسيا او ماستر 1ك عضو بـ 10 اسيا او ماستر 1300 عضو بـ 15 اسيا او ماستر 🌐 تمويل (بوت) - قنوات كبار 350 عضو بـ 5 اسيا او ماستر 700 عضو بـ 10 اسيا او ماستر 1ك عضو بـ 15 اسيا او ماستر ⚠️ ملاحظة: لا أستقبل قنوات الأغاني أو الصور غير اللائقة. 📩 للتواصل: @aya9li
-
المُهذب يُربي المكان الذي يجلس فيه.💐 -
نحنُ المؤمنون.. لا نعرف النهايات المسدودة ولا الطرق المقطوعة ولا الضياع الطويل؛ دائمًا تشير بوصلة قلوبنا إلى السماء، هنالك الاتجاه الحقيقي الذي لا يُمكن الضلال عنه، لا نيأس ولا نحزن ولنا ﺭﺏٌ يقول 💟هُوَ عَلَيَّ هَيِّنٌ💟. -
- @bb_dtbot.
بوت تحميل من بينترست 🌐 @BB_DTBOT
Photo, posted without a caption
"لاتنسَ الغاية التي خُلقتَ لأجلها، أنت هنا وديعةٌ سترد إلى ربّها يومًا؛ فأحسن."
“سيغدو ما أتعبك ذكرى، وإن أيّامك ماضيةُ فامضِ معها."
"اللهم اجعل ما أسعى إليه يسعى إلي، يارب إني استودعتك نفسي وحياتي وأحلامي فهب لي من توفيقك ما يرضيني ."
عزيزي السيد قلبي🤍
Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @thrthrat97. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@iiiriiir · 75,704#1
@rrrrriir · 92,771#2
@NU_G5 · 126,730#3
@TTTTpT · 487,551#4
@FY_XG · 110,550#5
@uuuuxcc · 220,502#6
@rr_rrora · 187,549#7
@lAlMosahfl · 776,377#8
@TTTpT · 260,916#9
@oornnn · 62,194#10
@Diilen · 114,194#11
@zzzzzz · 2,011,602#12
@zrzzzz · 1,426,469#13
@vc6Il · 133,513#14
@a7ssi · 1,355 (as read 12 August 2026)#15
@afQ55 · 129,906#16
@lRlTI · 75,250#17
@llquraanll · 248,297#18
@Shamse01 · 32,577#19
@NNNAA · 448,685#20
@cf67c · 43,678#21
@ASEEEMM · 374,186#22
@FCB_V · 90,090#23
@mar_200m · 731#24
@PPPJP · 3,208,272#25
@e_33_m · 9,202#26
@sdqgii · 31,064#27
@mn_qv · 397,062#28
@Yosmo · 281,473#29
@HH_H7S · 275,231#30
@myiyia · 192,764#31
@ksa_gigi · 14,893#32
@mtd7knish · 228,964#33
@yatmanqalbi · 103,729#34
@OOIIIEEE · 55,992#35
@KIKIKL1 · 18,465#36
@M1140 · 100,176#37
@UIOIU0 · 105,342#38
@IIU4T · 75,567#39
@spwnrz · 62,288#40
@SUDEn_MOMEnt · 50,442#41
@The1Holy1Quran1 · 80,081#42
@asxtye · 54,012#43
@hayaa_0 · 73,473#44
@smr120h · 105,214#45
@ERT8l · 130,016#46
@aprayer313 · 35,369#47
@SlSl2l · 114,697#48
@PharmaTech_Academy · 12,192#49
@Majaraat · 58,943#50
@c8orl · 43,379#51
@nr0lll · 81,929#52
@PVVVV · 813,726#53
@nrrd3 · 63,982#54
@nnZnn · 330,207#55
@ASBRTO · 20,642#56
@Di8rE · 118,255#57
@vvpvvv1 · 104,273#58
@tumb1riq · 174,810#59
@asscac · 25,168#60
@AE_Hl · 111,344#61
@deved_iraq · 119,837#62
@Geoooom · 73,521#63
@oee_eee · 54,187#64
@ASH_TI · 25,344#65
@rsr2z · 46,688#66
@en3_g · 359,723#67
@t88q1 · 40,716#68
@m3im3ii · 114,754#69
@ff2tm · 46,794#70
@ollr1 · 3,947#71
@ahmed_aldahlaky · 7,573#72
@NO_6C · 33,038#73
@SS2lS · 187,114#74
@iraqed4 · 3,333,171#75
@ooaooos · 231,105#76
@MemesRaqen · 27,430#77
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@rrrrriir · 92,771
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 August 2026
@Mlath82 · 30,032
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 7 September 2026
@ASH_TI · 25,344
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 14 September 2026
@H_E_M_O19 · 30,374
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 7 September 2026
@omarFM1 · 65,139
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 August 2026
@Xw_vp · 33,241
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 4 September 2026
@iiiriiir · 75,704
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
@mn_qv · 397,062
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
@uv_93 · 88,584
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 August 2026
@FY_XG · 110,550
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026
@majarrahsky · 95,607
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 16 August 2026
@NU_G5 · 126,730
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
@ZzIzZI · 42,074
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
@aghar_sy7 · 196,749
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
@TTTpT · 260,916
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@ald_awa · 22,795
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 September 2026
@bomba_tymon · 36,799
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 1 September 2026
@rr_rrora · 187,549
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
@TTTTpT · 487,551
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 August 2026
@E_EEN · 278,964
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
@ll0UII · 29,233
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 8 September 2026
@thrthrat13 · 112,256
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
@JBY21 · 47,461
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
@EIEEEIl · 63,802
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 120 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مَلاذ 🦋، ادعية ، دينية ، المصحف” (@thrthrat97), 151,472 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thrthrat97.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.