اهلج ما يقبلون تحطين صورج؟ تردين يوميات تموتتت للبنات شوفي هاي القناه كلها حلالكم🎀💗📩 https://t.me/+XtJpSdg5Ff0wYjMy

Channel
كليشات ذكاء اصطناعي للبنات
@mtd7knish
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
221,584subscribers
-14,414 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001461744234 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mtd7knish |
| Created | 30 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mtd7knish |
Topic
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:48 | 221,584 | -184 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:51 | 221,768 | -90 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 17:18 | 221,858 | -151 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 19:57 | 222,009 | -163 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:54 | 222,172 | -195 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 19:11 | 222,367 | -172 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 222,539 | -172 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:00 | 222,711 | -182 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:40 | 222,893 | -233 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 17:14 | 223,126 | -136 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:01 | 223,262 | -152 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 16:19 | 223,414 | -145 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:26 | 223,559 | -241 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:19 | 223,800 | -289 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:47 | 224,089 | -178 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 06:21 | 224,267 | -144 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 07:17 | 224,411 | -132 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 10:27 | 224,543 | -169 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:08 | 224,712 | -113 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 14:41 | 224,825 | first reading |
Engagement
99 posts held, back to 28 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 185 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.288%
- avg views ÷ 221,584 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 638
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 99 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 99 (28 January 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 11,482 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 01:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 55s
- Average length
- 29s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (5.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
تردين قناه تربحين بيها نجوم او مميز 💗💗💗 مجاني تماما https://t.me/+t9FHmNG6YJUxNDQy
اهلج ما يقبلون تحطين صورج؟ تردين يوميات تموتتت للبنات شوفي هاي القناه كلها حلالكم🎀💗📩 https://t.me/+vD9vZAQPbnRhMTQ0
جميع الاسئله والحلول لجميع المراحل ✨✨✨ https://t.me/+zTxO7DZPEO5jNjZi
رخيصصصه بنات
تردين اكسسوارات كرستال انثويه شوفي متجرها حرفيا روعههههه🩷🩷🩷 اسعارها الف وألفين https://t.me/+o2aMDZT-TOAzMjcy
عززززززاااا بنات شوفن شكد حلوات !!! وكله سعرها الف اقوه شي خمسه 🍒🤩🤩 https://t.me/+WXLBiTU5of5lYWVi
تردين ملابس شي ان كلها مختلفه ومميزه🐾 شوفي متجر رهففففف 🩷 كله اسعار عشره وخمسطعش https://t.me/+bcBg8SImO3hjZWJi
اهلج ما يقبلون تحطين صورج؟ تردين يوميات تموتتت للبنات شوفي هاي القناه كلها حلالكم🎀💗📩 https://t.me/Me90cn/249035
كليشات ذكاء اصطناعي للبنات تموت 🥺
اليوم ح تسوي تاروت مجاني بنات 🩷🩷🩷 لحكنننن كتبن بالبوت اسمكم https://t.me/u7il3l
اهلج ما يقبلون تحطين صورج؟ تردين يوميات تموتتت للبنات شوفي هاي القناه كلها حلالكم🎀💗📩 https://t.me/JIIc6/181784
Showing the 12 most recent of 99 posts we hold for @mtd7knish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 5 posts on @mtd7knish as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 10 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 17 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@ll7cli · 39,4813 postsSkin care ويايه 🍓
@nooriskin · 55,8303 postsFor Women - للنساء 🍥.
@nrrd1 · 37,6783 postsأرشيف الأُغنية
@arshefag · 3,4471 postحُبچيات
@habibityi · 3,7911 postحَـــوراء🪞⋆˚
@hoari2004 · 24,4671 postزَينب .
@JIIc6 · 5,4631 postتعلم وياية ✨
@Makeup0i · 8,2091 postحَـوراء.
@Me90cn · 20,7261 postجاوي ستور ||Store
@merjzxhg13 · 31,6981 postلمة وردية 𐙚.
@NNM_JN · 17,5241 post١٩٩٨ .
@s_sssi · 19,2701 postAfterglow
@u7il3l · 2,7911 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@se_pm · 29,471#1
@FCB_V · 89,446#2
@H1HOD · 37,964#3
@uz_cz · 7,054#4
@Diilen · 116,221#5
@lAlMosahfl · 780,205#6
@cf67c · 44,703#7
@a_lia42 · 2,532#8
@asxtye · 51,378#9
@zahre2000 · 273,945#10
@elfno · 17,232#11
@SlSl2l · 121,136#12
@zzzzzz · 1,996,788#13
@PPPJP · 3,186,423#14
@vc6Il · 139,452#15
@SUDEn_MOMEnt · 48,457#16
@OOIIIEEE · 56,079#17
@cf67z · 85,816#18
@tv_wlil · 11,667#19
@PPPPJ · 2,319,201#20
@ma_L7ii · 20,023#21
@Fi_dii · 17,344#22
@rsr2z · 44,625#23
@povv4 · 126,759#24
@MOOQQ55 · 77,947#25
@spwnrz · 61,031#26
@zrzzzz · 1,395,578#27
@s54ou · 42,861#28
@a_espresso1 · 8,665#29
@llSPR · 20,066#30
@XG_64 · 6#31
@smr120h · 102,287#32
@deved_iraq · 117,029#33
@IIU4T · 73,330#34
@lRlTI · 76,201#35
@alhyunemia · 139,379#36
@ERT8l · 129,067#37
@nr0lll · 78,541#38
@RIlAKSI3 · 12,357#39
@shabohte · 9,913#40
@sdqgii · 29,871#41
@iT64i · 78,879#42
@noona_88 · 8,966#43
@M1140 · 106,360#44
@UIOIU0 · 103,127#45
@offmemz · 26,303#46
@ll_1225 · 1,222#47
@hayaa_0 · 74,298#48
@Y_memz · 3,265#49
@Kranj9 · 4,630#50
@YYYYD · 1,634,424#51
@afQ55 · 124,762#52
@U_1_20 · 1,371#53
@lI9ll9lll · 4,928#54
@HeB1H1 · 92,479#55
@szovl · 11,305#56
@uuuuxcc · 206,495#57
@sxserc · 27,316#58
@lBIBPl · 34,218#59
@LLU63 · 17,383#60
@ff2tm · 45,415#61
@ahmdssh · 1,697#62
@c8orl · 1#63
@nnKnn · 1,192,951#64
@FCB_35 · 1,095#65
@Pale313 · 27,198#66
@iraqed4 · 3,201,169#67
@iraqedu · 4,727,038#68
@iiPiii · 55,240#69
@errzzl · 483,224#70
@one_news2026 · 91,495#71
@Edu211 · 666,530#72
@MemesRaqen · 26,243#73
@rtte8 · 2,107#74
@llquraanll · 248,705#75
@HH_H7S · 264,450#76
@santer_sads · 359,834#77
@v999v · 1,552,545#78
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@se_pm · 29,471
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 6 September 2026
@H1HOD · 37,964
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
@JBY21 · 46,001
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
@alhyunemia · 139,379
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
@zahre2000 · 273,945
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
@iWritings · 44,911
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
@FCB_V · 89,446
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 August 2026
@lhkar · 110,231
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
@APR8IL · 41,769
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
@s54ou · 42,861
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
@BM_Channel · 118,592
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
@SACHERTI · 156,919
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
@aa02t · 26,534
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026
@bjnoo · 76,762
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
@Diilen · 116,221
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
@iraq11e · 305,315
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
@Qotrss · 43,090
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 31 August 2026
@tttktt · 163,899
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
@E_EEN · 270,118
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
@v_news_iq · 63,436
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
@lBIBPl · 34,218
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 3 September 2026
@cf67c · 44,703
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
@blackee2 · 87,805
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
@zz_zwz · 386,384
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 115 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كليشات ذكاء اصطناعي للبنات” (@mtd7knish), 221,584 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mtd7knish.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.