مرحبا ضايجين ؟ هذا گروبي مال سوالف تعالوا نسولف ونضحك على الزلم ننننن🫣 https://t.me/+g6zqdGIL7-FjZTIy

Channel
تواق
@IIU4T
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
76,871subscribers
-742 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001292958354 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IIU4T |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IIU4T |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 76,871 | -80 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 76,951 | -36 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 76,987 | -38 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 77,025 | -28 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 77,053 | -59 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 77,112 | -59 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 77,171 | -77 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 77,248 | -48 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 77,296 | -47 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 77,343 | -50 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 77,393 | -52 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 77,445 | -58 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:51 | 77,503 | -48 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 77,551 | -47 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:23 | 77,598 | -15 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 77,613 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 77,613 | first reading |
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.82%
- avg views ÷ 76,871 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,470
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 33 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (27 May 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 80,477 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 13s
- Average length
- 13s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 3
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 33 we hold a reading for · 9%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @IIU4T. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 May 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
تعالن والله ضوجة 😡
هلو بنات ضايجين وسهرانين هذا گروبي مال سوالف تعالوا نسولف ونضحك على الزلم ننننن🫣 https://t.me/+g6zqdGIL7-FjZTIy
جلسة دعائية لتحقيق الامنيات💖
قراءة تاروت للكراش 🙈
تاروت للطلاب السادس 💕
تاروت للمنفصلين😭
بنات اريد مشرفات يلزمن الكروب
هلو بنات هذا گروبي مال سوالف تعالوا نسولف ونضحك 🫣 https://t.me/+g6zqdGIL7-FjZTIy
تزعلج الدنيا وانا اراضيج 🥹
رخيييصهههه وهداياتها تخبلللل👼
جوي واجوائي هالبيج حرفياً يموووت البضاعة فدشي https://t.me/tghawwaa https://t.me/tghawwaa
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @IIU4T. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@IIU4T named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 2 posts, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@lRlTI · 75,367#1
@vc6Il · 132,621#2
@Diilen · 114,544#3
@SUDEn_MOMEnt · 51,124#4
@afQ55 · 127,305#5
@cf67z · 88,693#6
@asxtye · 55,094#7
@ERT8l · 130,109#8
@M1140 · 100,178#9
@Geoooom · 77,923#10
@spwnrz · 60,411#11
@Kd_kla1 · 40,134#12
@cckkxs · 14,423#13
@UIOIU0 · 107,379#14
@Nh_NE · 83,743#15
@cf67c · 44,309#16
@rsr2z · 46,496#17
@m3im3ii · 113,399#18
@FCB_V · 96,499#19
@SlSl2l · 117,547#20
@yatmanqalbi · 104,702#21
@nrrd3 · 65,231#22
@Narla2 · 70,959#23
@myiyia · 193,010#24
@huda_gallery · 53,870#25
@rrqeaa · 14,778#26
@llllTBi · 10,577#27
@sxserc · 27,958#28
@IIUYL · 17,549#29
@smr120h · 107,204#30
@T_16_7 · 50,920#31
@n_a2u · 12,860#32
@HiEiND · 75,396#33
@bggcp · 29,601#34
@hayaa_0 · 73,201#35
@nr0lll · 83,746#36
@povv4 · 125,680#37
@OOIIIEEE · 56,190#38
@AE_Hl · 112,002#39
@MOOQQ55 · 77,184#40
@lBIBPl · 34,454#41
@IIU4F · 67,058#42
@zzzzzz · 1,629,645#43
@DEPTH02 · 32,272#44
@sdqgii · 31,702#45
@PPPJP · 3,248,286#46
@yypyy · 860,763#47
@lAlMosahfl · 771,985#48
@HH_H7S · 279,388#49
@ssswvs · 19,689#50
@Firat25 · 12,987#51
@t88q1 · 41,725#52
@Majaraat · 59,424#53
@NO_6C · 33,383#54
@ksa_gigi · 15,198#55
@Lne_8 · 140,209#56
@FY_XG · 113,005#57
@DRT86 · 41,888#58
@cxarc · 24,735#59
@Shamse01 · 33,898#60
@ahmed_aldahlaky · 7,757#61
@vvpvvv1 · 106,541#62
@mtd7knish · 233,250#63
@uuuuxcc · 205,316#64
@nrrd1 · 37,736#65
@K27R99 · 31,207#66
@bbosha16 · 5,888#67
@LZDT5 · 4,667#68
@NNNN0I · 11,968#69
@ooaooos · 231,381#70
@citystop2 · 27,212#71
@nscsz · 90,163#72
@iraqed4 · 3,438,907#73
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@lRlTI · 75,367
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
@afQ55 · 127,305
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
@m3im3ii · 113,399
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
@IIU4F · 67,058
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
@Diilen · 114,544
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
@UIOIU0U · 188,004
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 August 2026
@Nh_NE · 83,743
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 August 2026
@yatmanqalbi · 104,702
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
@UIOIU0 · 107,379
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
@OJJIlll · 234,990
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
@Geoooom · 77,923
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
@zzssz6 · 93,198
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 August 2026
@FY_XG · 113,005
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026
@letna_jeran · 455,048
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 August 2026
@myiyia · 193,010
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
@nrrd3 · 65,231
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
@k757kn · 342,685
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
@vc6Il · 132,621
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
@SS2lS · 190,764
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
@zzssz3 · 192,291
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
@vvpvvv1 · 106,541
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 15 August 2026
@Lne_8 · 140,209
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 August 2026
@HiEiND · 75,396
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 August 2026
@AE_Hl · 112,002
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 103 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تواق” (@IIU4T), 76,871 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IIU4T.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.