كـلايش ذكاء اصطناعي تفيدكم بنات 🎀.

Channel
For Women - للنساء🧘🏻♀️
@nrrd1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
36,725subscribers
-1,441 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002092334472 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nrrd1 |
| Description | إنكُم مُحاطون بالله من كل جانب ، فاطمئنوا . للإعلان : @DDmmDm |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nrrd1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 20:21 | 36,725 | -267 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 36,992 | -172 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 37,164 | -148 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:53 | 37,312 | -56 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:08 | 37,368 | -37 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 37,405 | -35 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 37,440 | -25 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 37,465 | -50 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 37,515 | -22 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 37,537 | -29 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 37,566 | -50 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 37,616 | -52 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 37,668 | -68 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 37,736 | -33 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 37,769 | -22 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 37,791 | -48 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 37,839 | -42 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 37,881 | -24 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 37,905 | -50 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 37,955 | first reading |
Engagement
99 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.44%
- avg views ÷ 36,725 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,000
- 79 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 79
- of 99 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 99 (2 July 2026 – 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 157,895 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 01:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,560
- Videos
- ≈119
- Links
- ≈27
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 47s
- Average length
- 54s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 99 we hold a reading for · 1%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nrrd1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 99 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 July 2026 to 8 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
اصنع لي صوره واقعيه لامره لاتغير ملامح الوجه حافض عليهاا رجائا الفلتر الجودههه • الجودة: صورة فوتوغرافية عالية الدقة (High resolution)، مع وضوح ممتاز في التفاصيل. • الحبيبات: تكاد تكون معدومة، مما يشير إلى تصوير بكاميرا رقمية حديثة أو إعدادات منخفضة الـ ISO. اجعل هذا الفتاة في صور واقعية قدر الامكان بليزززز لاتبين ذكاء اصطناعي ولاتغير ملامحي ارجوك ابدا ابدا وللجودة استخدم دقة منخفضة جداً (Low resolution)، تكسير في ا…
مكياج ربيعي ناعم جداً (Fresh Spring Soft Glam)، بشرة زجاجية مشرقة (Glass Skin) بلمعة طبيعية وصحية، تغطية خفيفة إلى متوسطة مع لمسة مخملية، بلاشر وردي فاتح ممزوج مع خوخي يوضع بسخاء على الخدين ويمتد قليلاً إلى الأنف لإطلالة منعشة، هايلايتر ناعم على أعلى الخدين وطرف الأنف وعظمة الحاجب. ظلال عيون بدرجات البيج والخوخي الفاتح مع انتقالات ناعمة جداً، آيلاينر بني أو أسود رفيع ومرفوع بخفة، رموش طويلة وخفيفة تبدو طبيعية، الحواج…
:قم بأنشاء صورة لزوجين لكن اظهر وجوههم وحافظ على ملامح الوجه الحقيقية بنسبة 100 % . اصنع لي صوره واقعيه جدا لأمره لاتغير ملامح الوجه حافض عليهاا رجائا الفلترر • الجودة: صورة فوتوغرافية عالية الدقة (High resolution)، مع وضوح ممتاز في التفاصيل. • الحبيبات: تكاد تكون معدومة، مما يشير إلى تصوير بكاميرا رقمية حديثة أو إعدادات منخفضة الـ ISO. اجعل هذا الفتاة في صور واقعية قدر الامكان بليزززز لاتبين ذكاء اصطناعي ولاتغير ملا…
ميكب يناسب لون فستانك 🩷.
كلايش ذكاء اصطناعي ترند ♥️
دعاء لطلاب السادس ♥️
بسبب هذا البوت كشفت ناس تراقبني 😂🐍 @lnst4bot
منا تعرفين منو يشوف ستورياتج 👇🏻😂🐍 @lnst4bot :
مقتطفات قصص حقيقية ♥️
Showing the 12 most recent of 99 posts we hold for @nrrd1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
غيرت الاسم من ترتيبات لهذا الجديد مو تضيعوها🤍
- لانعرفها🩷39%
- عرفتها💚73%
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 8 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@HiEiND · 74,284
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 August 2026
@xo_bs · 171,501
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
@ooaooos · 231,740
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
@c7_77c · 54,602
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 24 August 2026
@fg_bz · 71,706
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 August 2026
@i4_3Q · 233,925
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 August 2026
@Iraq9Star · 146,982
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
@nscsz · 89,736
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 17 August 2026
@IIU4F · 68,179
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
@Sixth_Portal · 81,883
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 18 August 2026
@nrrd3 · 64,356
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
@ss_horror · 1
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
@SlSl2l · 116,101
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
@Lne_8 · 138,759
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 August 2026
@vvpvvv1 · 105,338
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 15 August 2026
@trrteb · 66,846
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 20 August 2026
@AE_Hl · 111,585
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 August 2026
@myiyia · 192,489
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
@trteb9 · 81,941
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 18 August 2026
@afQ55 · 127,643
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
@om_yp · 56,677
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 23 August 2026
@spwnrz · 60,513
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 22 August 2026
@m3im3ii · 113,397
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
@nn_41 · 340,036
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“For Women - للنساء🧘🏻♀️” (@nrrd1), 36,725 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nrrd1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.