صـور فطائر حلالكُم 🥪🤍.

Channel
مُختلفة .
@fg_bz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
71,185subscribers
-2,907 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001730785157 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fg_bz |
| Description | مُختلفة لا اشبهَ احد 🤍. لـ طلب التمويل : @NI999l . |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fg_bz |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 71,185 | -123 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:55 | 71,308 | -121 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:19 | 71,429 | -109 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 71,538 | -168 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:35 | 71,706 | -230 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 71,936 | -160 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 72,096 | -104 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 72,200 | -102 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:45 | 72,302 | -76 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 72,378 | -74 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 72,452 | -67 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:27 | 72,519 | -61 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 72,580 | -80 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 72,660 | -54 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 72,714 | -55 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:07 | 72,769 | -39 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 72,808 | -101 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 72,909 | -97 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 73,006 | -47 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 73,053 | first reading |
Engagement
112 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 91 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.50%
- avg views ÷ 71,185 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,070
- 62 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 62
- of 112 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 112 (9 July 2026 – 18 September 2026) |
| Views total | 66,181 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Sept 2026, 00:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,800
- Videos
- ≈129
- Links
- ≈20
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
دخلي كشفي يلفاهيه @QWGHUHVBOt 🔴
دخلي كشفي يلفاهيه @QWGHUHVBOt 🔴
دخلي كشفي يلفاهيه @QWGHUHVBOt 🔴
الي ممرتاح بالها وحابه تاخذ خيرة بالقرأن تجي لهاي البنوته خيرتها مجربه ومضمونه 💯 https://t.me/+qdbosHMRa2VjYjNh https://t.me/+qdbosHMRa2VjYjNh
Sticker, posted without a caption
لحظات ألادراك دائما مولمةً .
مشهد مقدس '' شخص يحاول لأجلي
Photo, posted without a caption
تَزهُر أيامي حُباً مَعك .
الي ممرتاح بالها وحابه تاخذ خيرة بالقرأن تجي لهاي البنوته خيرتها مجربه ومضمونه 💯 https://t.me/+qdbosHMRa2VjYjNh https://t.me/+qdbosHMRa2VjYjNh
تعالوا نتعلم شلون نقلل من التفكير السلبي🙎
Showing the 12 most recent of 112 posts we hold for @fg_bz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@INTJ_CYS · 3,1468 postsبوت تحميل من جميع المواقع 📥
@VVXN_BOT · 16,6977 postsبوت تحميل مقاطع تيك توك انستا
@QWGHUHVBOt · 17,5206 postsحَـــوراء🪞⋆˚
@hoari2004 · 20,0345 posts🦢
@laivl · 35,0725 postsZorelia Store
@nrzaot · 2,5765 postsاحساس وشعر .
@Hl_HII · 110,3713 postsAgree :
@Itstrueo · 35,2483 postsحِچايات أهَلنة .
@MOOQQ55 · 77,4463 postsتَصويرنا 🦋.
@Qiise · 21,8353 postsوقت الأسترخاء
@vvv_8vv30 · 1,2693 posts𝙰𝚈𝙾
@Ayooty20 · 21,3762 postsملجئي 🤍.
@HJ_YB · 19,6072 posts• سـالـفـة وگـمـرة •
@x_603 · 23,2392 postsتوهِين .
@eoivnr · 79,4821 postايومي ستور | Store𝜗𝜚
@ir7lg · 2,2211 post• Girl mood ☀️.
@n0n99n · 27,3801 postت
@theonlyheaventho · 21 postسفانا" (Savanna)🧸
@zh_11az · 7751 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Lne_8 · 138,115#1
@NNNN0I · 11,782#2
@NxNkwk · 3,179#3
@HiEiND · 73,477#4
@ZZ_VVi · 14,762#5
@AE_Hl · 111,344#6
@trteb9 · 81,410#7
@trrteb · 66,246#8
@vc6Il · 133,513#9
@huda_gallery · 52,763#10
@Nh_NE · 83,811#11
@nscsz · 90,201#12
@lRlTI · 75,227#13
@yatmanqalbi · 103,729#14
@myiyia · 192,764#15
@nrrd1 · 36,216#16
@zzzzzz · 1,988,172#17
@UIOIU0 · 105,342#18
@yypyy · 894,458#19
@NO_6C · 33,038#20
@c7_77c · 54,045#21
@fsbdys · 26,773#22
@ERT8l · 130,016#23
@Kd_kla1 · 41,099#24
@SlSl2l · 114,697#25
@llllahll · 116,296#26
@kooora_land · 22,609#27
@V_7_7_2 · 18,904#28
@vvpvvv1 · 104,273#29
@ssswvs · 19,304#30
@en3_g · 359,723#31
@afQ55 · 129,906#32
@m3im3ii · 114,754#33
@IIU4T · 75,567#34
@spwnrz · 62,288#35
@vnvvcs · 21,279#36
@PVVVV · 813,726#37
@rsr2z · 46,688#38
@cf67c · 43,831#39
@Diilen · 114,194#40
@zrzzzz · 1,425,862#41
@SS2lS · 187,114#42
@zt_tz2 · 30,045#43
@Qiise · 21,835#44
@nrrd3 · 63,982#45
@cf67z · 87,808#46
@Narla2 · 70,871#47
@STORS5 · 285,801#48
@FY_XG · 110,550#49
@iiirii4 · 36,303#50
@t88q1 · 40,716#51
@ooaooos · 231,105#52
@HH_H7S · 275,231#53
@IRT6I · 41,224#54
@iraqed4 · 3,338,467#55
@PPPJP · 3,208,272#56
@hr_73x · 4,325#57
@cckkxs · 14,679#58
@PPPPJ · 2,330,076#59
@om_yp · 56,308#60
@asxtye · 54,012#61
@citystop2 · 26,781#62
@FN_73 · 155,330#63
@SUDEn_MOMEnt · 50,442#64
@Gif2022am · 45,032#65
@FCB_V · 90,090#66
@MemesRaqen · 27,430#67
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Lne_8 · 138,115
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 August 2026
@xo_bs · 170,572
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
@trteb9 · 81,410
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 18 August 2026
@ss_horror · 211,151
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
@nscsz · 90,201
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 17 August 2026
@ecnoc · 63,417
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
@trrteb · 66,246
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 20 August 2026
@Uuu2X · 169,038
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 12 August 2026
@ooaooos · 231,105
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
@c7_77c · 54,045
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 24 August 2026
@i4_3Q · 232,125
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 August 2026
@iq1_iq · 319,817
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
@SSEN2 · 48,731
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
@z2_jj · 91,853
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 16 August 2026
@fraind_2 · 170,117
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026
@STORS5 · 285,801
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026
@bagda1d · 67,973
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 20 August 2026
@kwknss · 87,057
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 17 August 2026
@HiEiND · 73,477
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 August 2026
@Iraq9Star · 145,985
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
@om_yp · 56,308
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 23 August 2026
@AE_Hl · 111,344
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 August 2026
@FN_73 · 155,330
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 12 August 2026
@SS2lS · 187,114
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مُختلفة .” (@fg_bz), 71,185 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fg_bz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.