📶📶كل اللي فاتحين التليجرام هسه محظوظين ⌛️ دقائق ونحذف الرابط ⌛️ https://t.me/addlist/_c9S1nQF5bphYjcy https://t.me/addlist/_c9S1nQF5bphYjcy اشـتركوا فهي فرصة لكم انضمو 🔝 🔝

Channel
بغداد
@bagda1d
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
68,317subscribers
-1,172 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001310382495 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bagda1d |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bagda1d |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 68,317 | -116 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 68,433 | -84 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 68,517 | -51 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 68,568 | -73 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:48 | 68,641 | -15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 68,656 | -55 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 68,711 | -49 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 68,760 | -41 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 68,801 | -62 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:25 | 68,863 | -47 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 68,910 | -47 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:19 | 68,957 | -67 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 69,024 | -47 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 69,071 | -58 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 69,129 | -25 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 69,154 | -27 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 69,181 | -25 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 69,206 | -29 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 69,235 | -58 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 69,293 | first reading |
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 21 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.042%
- avg views ÷ 68,317 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 28.4
- 22 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 22
- of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (21 December 2025 – 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 625 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Sept 2026, 19:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 35s
- Average length
- 35s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
اختار برجك وشوف شو مخبيلك??
انت ولد ولا بنت .؟
اختار برجك وشوف شو مخبيلك??
📶📶كل اللي فاتحين التليجرام هسه محظوظين ⌛️ دقائق ونحذف الرابط ⌛️ https://t.me/addlist/_c9S1nQF5bphYjcy https://t.me/addlist/_c9S1nQF5bphYjcy اشـتركوا فهي فرصة لكم انضمو 🔝 🔝
اختار فنجان برجك وشوف شو مخبيلك😨??
وين الثور اقصد برج الثور 😹♉
انت ولد ولا بنت .؟
وين الثور اقصد برج الثور 😹♉
اختار فنجان برجك وشوف شو مخبيلك😨??
اختار فنجان برجك وشوف شو مخبيلك😨??
انت ولد ولا بنت .؟
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @bagda1d. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@lighimazih · 87,230#1
@A_Nl8 · 135,325#2
@zz_zwz · 392,969#3
@Iraq9Star · 146,982#4
@zzzzzz · 1,654,839#5
@Uppersadd12345 · 5,142#6
@llllahll · 116,991#7
@ERT8l · 129,994#8
@Ciof56 · 1,920#9
@vv1996 · 230,346#10
@vc6Il · 133,477#11
@eyurcmlk · 294#12
@rr_rrora · 186,540#13
@FM2008fm7_25 · 76#14
@B_MSAH · 354#15
@Narla2 · 70,842#16
@ll3llI · 38,278#17
@M1140 · 99,495#18
@yatmanqalbi · 104,072#19
@cf67z · 88,220#20
@nasme_t · 214,102#21
@sxii9 · 5,200#22
@sgkmbxi · 1#23
@fuy79ihh · 36,491#24
@K27R99 · 33,520#25
@trteb9 · 81,941#26
@SlSl2l · 116,101#27
@vvpvvv1 · 105,338#28
@nrrd3 · 64,356#29
@spwnrz · 60,513#30
@sabaa8n · 833#31
@rsr2z · 46,336#32
@lRlTI · 75,126#33
@aaeeyyp · 2#34
@wzzww · 35,381#35
@trrteb · 66,846#36
@fg_bz · 71,706#37
@UIOIU0 · 106,040#38
@FY_XG · 111,624#39
@teel_7 · 2,160#40
@t88q1 · 41,152#41
@povv4 · 124,360#42
@q_p_81 · 251,171#43
@Firat25 · 12,964#44
@mahameee1 · 12,783#45
@bareq224 · 1,075#46
@imamllali255 · 6,169#47
@sok_asin · 1,198#48
@wFYYY · 258,339#49
@sjanzjaja · 18,997#50
@zrzzzz · 1,430,052#51
@k_313_kk · 3,875#52
@HH_H7S · 277,493#53
@TGX97 · 332#54
@PVVVV · 824,682#55
@rkall12 · 8,018#56
@karar_vil · 254#57
@yypyy · 902,639#58
@Lne_8 · 138,759#59
@alimassan2003 · 1,440#60
@tixtf · 628#61
@JMFR5 · 1,124#62
@f_313_1900 · 2,708#63
@DDF_313 · 153#64
@Pale313 · 28,949#65
@almarfaa22 · 1,302#66
@F8F111 · 65,664#67
@iiPiii · 54,500#68
@ooaooos · 231,607#69
@A_18s2 · 854#70
@remaas12 · 1,130#71
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@lighimazih · 87,230
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026
@ll3llI · 38,278
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 31 August 2026
@Iraq9Star · 146,982
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
@A_Nl8 · 135,325
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 August 2026
@zz_zwz · 392,969
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026
@nasme_t · 214,102
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
@wFYYY · 258,339
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
@malga2y · 53,127
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بغداد” (@bagda1d), 68,317 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bagda1d.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.