Posted without readable text

Channel
علامة استفهام؟
@KIKIKL1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,929subscribers
-940 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001653750235 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KIKIKL1 |
| Description | لَا أَبْرَحُ حَتَّىٰ أَبْلُغَ . |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KIKIKL1 |
Topic
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 05:50 | 17,929 | -14 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 06:51 | 17,943 | -9 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:48 | 17,952 | -10 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:40 | 17,962 | -20 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:08 | 17,982 | -12 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 04:19 | 17,994 | -13 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:45 | 18,007 | -10 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 00:56 | 18,017 | -11 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:28 | 18,028 | -7 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 01:48 | 18,035 | -9 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 01:50 | 18,044 | -14 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:00 | 18,058 | -13 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 03:48 | 18,071 | -15 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 00:54 | 18,086 | -13 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:05 | 18,099 | -12 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:49 | 18,111 | -8 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:51 | 18,119 | -11 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:49 | 18,130 | -9 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:58 | 18,139 | -9 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 17:44 | 18,148 | first reading |
Engagement
69 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.72%
- avg views ÷ 17,929 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 846
- 23 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 24
- of 69 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 69 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 19,468 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 16:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 423
- Videos
- 74
- Links
- 28
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 35s
- Average length
- 35s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 166
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 4
- of 68 we hold a reading for · 6%
- Most on one post
- 120
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KIKIKL1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 69 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
جمعة مباركة عليكم اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ عَلَى مُحَمَّدٍ وَعَلَى آلِ مُحَمَّدٍ كَمَا صَلَّيْتَ عَلَى إِبْرَاهِيمَ وَعَلَى آلِ إِبْرَاهِيمَ إِنَّكَ حَمِيدٌ مَجِيدٌ . 🤍
Signed ياسين . 🤍
﴿ إِنَّهُمْ يَرَوْنَهُ بَعِيدًا وَنَرَاهُ قَرِيبًا ﴾. 🤍
Signed ياسين . 🤍
مطر كُلِش مُطر والشارع مغوش حچي.!🤍
Signed ياسين . 🤍
"في جميع حواراتي مع اللّٰه لم أكن أسمع أيّ مقاطعة كانت الساعات كلها لي، كما أنني بكيت دون حرج و لم أخجل أبدًا من الحديث عن مشاعري له، لقد تكلّمت كثيرًا و لم أسمع صوتًا يأمرني بالسكوت، كنت أشعر بالهدوء، وكل الفوضى التي بداخلي كان يُرتبها دائمًا." 🤍
Signed ياسين . 🤍
لا أجيد المنافسة، ستجدني دائمًا في الطرق الخالية أتسابق مع نفسي التي كنتُ عليها بالأمس. عيني لا تلمح غيري . 🤍
Signed ياسين . 🤍
ربما .. أنت ترى الأشياء للمرة الأخيرة، دون أن تعلم، 🤍
Signed ياسين . 🤍
صاحب الحدس الصائب يفتقد عامل الدهشة دائما لأن شعوره يستبق الأحداث . 🤍
Signed ياسين . 🤍
اريد ابالغ شوية 🗿 المحاسبة اصعب من الطب عمي شعلي بلضرائب ومدري شنو 🗿🗿🗿🗿
Signed ياسين . 🤍
من متناقضاتِ المنطق: "أن بُرود إنسان قد يتسبّبُ في غليان شخص آخر!"🤍
Signed ياسين . 🤍
🤍
Signed ياسين . 🤍
والله ترحون فدوة لقندرتها
Signed ياسين . 🤍
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @KIKIKL1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
بدون عاطفة ، توقعك للكلاسيكو؟ 🔥
- فوز ريال مدريد 🤍71%
- تعادل 🔥5%
- فوز برشلونة 💙27%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 69 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@yffdsa · 34,761
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 1 September 2026
@letna_jeran · 372,244
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 August 2026
@ald_awa · 21,293
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 September 2026
@x7xuu · 27,672
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 7 September 2026
@oee_eee · 53,206
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 August 2026
@FOR6613 · 35,142
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 31 August 2026
@zzssz8 · 45,927
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 August 2026
@W_H_5 · 26,700
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 10 September 2026
@tttktt · 163,570
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
@tumb1riq · 172,082
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
@wFYYY · 248,911
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
@US_DTsa · 1
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 9 September 2026
@NABD_E · 129,467
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 August 2026
@boook_quotes · 38,516
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
@Rival_fashion1 · 88,489
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 August 2026
@blackee2 · 87,563
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
@Arbic_2027_1 · 25,081
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 12 September 2026
@uuuuxcc · 205,707
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
@thrthrat97 · 152,185
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
@ip70k · 37,554
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 30 August 2026
@SSEN2 · 47,004
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
@ZzIzZI · 40,736
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
@zzizi · 250,245
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
@Xw_vp · 31,794
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 53 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“علامة استفهام؟” (@KIKIKL1), 17,929 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KIKIKL1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.