كلّ الأشياء التي أطلبها بسيطةٌ وسهلةٌ وتحدث للكثيرين ، ولكنها معي ، معي أنا لسببٍ ما لا تحدث. - احمد خالد توفقي

Channel
papillon
@papilloni1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,713subscribers
+80 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001460900268 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @papilloni1 |
| Description | لوحدي على حافةِ كل شيء. @Papillon1n_bot |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/papilloni1 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 04:21 | 8,713 | +4 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:46 | 8,709 | -5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 19:07 | 8,714 | +22 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:20 | 8,692 | +9 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:11 | 8,683 | +3 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 04:57 | 8,680 | +10 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 06:40 | 8,670 | +3 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 23:39 | 8,667 | +4 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 03:41 | 8,663 | -22 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 16:40 | 8,685 | +27 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:17 | 8,658 | +10 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 8,648 | +14 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 23:22 | 8,634 | +7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:46 | 8,627 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 8,636 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 8,638 | +6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 8,632 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 8,638 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 00:21 | 8,637 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 8,635 | first reading |
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 33.1%
- avg views ÷ 8,713 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,890
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 52 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 52 (2 June 2026 – 28 October 2026) |
| Views total | 23,090 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 10:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 9
- Videos
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 4
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 4
- of 52 we hold a reading for · 8%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @papilloni1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 52 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 June 2026 to 28 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
السعادة لن تأتي أبداً، لأولئك الذين لا يقدّرون ما لديهم . -ألبرت أنيشتاين
كلّ شيء يمكن احتماله، إلا أن تجد معنىً لحياتك ثم تكتشف أنّه لم يكن سوى وهم . - إميل سيوران
كلّما ازددتُ فهمًا للعالم، قلّت قدرتي على الانتماء إليه. - إميل سيوران
إنّ أكثر ما يُخيفني ليس الموت، بل أن أعيش طويلًا بما يكفي لأصبح غريبًا عن نفسي . - هرمان هِسّه
في مرحلةٍ ما، لا يعود الإنسان يرغب في أن يفهمه أحد؛ يصبح كل ما يريده ألّا يُساء تفسير صمته. - فرجينيا وولف
الانسان يتغير لسببين : حينما يتعلم أكثر مما يريد أو حينما يتأذى أكثر مما يستحق . - وليم شكسبير
حياتي، اختياراتي، أخطائي، مشاكلي، وحدتي، كل هذا بإختصار لا يعنيك. - تشارلز بوكوفسكي
ليس كل ما نفقده خسارة ، فالاستغناء عمن لا يدرك قيمتنا حياة جديدة . - يوهان غوته
هناك فقط نوع واحد من الفقر، وهو فقر العقل . - سقراط
انا لا شيء بالنسبة لأي شخص، وهذه هي أعظم حريتي . - فرانز كافكا
طوال حياتي عِندما يَتعلق بي شخص مَا, فإني أفعل كُل مَا في وسعي لجعله يتراجع . - ألبير كامو
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @papilloni1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 5 posts on @papilloni1 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 18 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 2 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Hwroni · 2,6771 postرَهينة أفكاري
@Narciiissist · 16,1651 postپنــاه
@Panahh25 · 3,5171 postرضويات | Razavi
@Radawiyat · 3,1741 postعالمي💙🌎
@aalami_1 · 2,7381 postإلٰهي؛
@iillahii · 3,0191 postقَمَر "
@kamar17 · 4,0671 postKhomeinia
@khomeiniaa · 3,4841 postلَهُ ☁️”
@malakmh22 · 4,3531 postكهيعص.🌻
@mryamads · 6,4611 postABDULLAH
@vip4qq · 2,6081 postأصـغَـران
@zahraadhr · 2,4491 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Loiip · 32,242
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
@for_ro_you · 24,917
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
@Jalal_Aldiyn · 29,803
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
@kafka2022 · 27,326
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026
@MahmoudDarwish_1941 · 20,146
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 September 2026
@artaway · 18,914
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 October 2026
@beauty_d3 · 26,276
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 September 2026
@iisuii · 27,021
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
@industrious22 · 20,409
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 September 2026
@Ghassan_kanfani · 20,132
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 September 2026
@Most102030 · 28,199
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
@lm_IlI · 21,612
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 September 2026
@iuoeil · 99,698
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
@WD_27 · 61,940
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“papillon” (@papilloni1), 8,713 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/papilloni1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.