Voice message, posted without a caption

Channel
m
@sswsee
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,550subscribers
+500 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001559048407 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sswsee |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sswsee |
Topic
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 17:08 | 6,550 | +15 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:16 | 6,535 | +16 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 16:26 | 6,519 | +15 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 14:25 | 6,504 | +169 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:45 | 6,335 | +10 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 00:00 | 6,325 | +17 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 20:55 | 6,308 | +18 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 10:40 | 6,290 | +12 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 17:04 | 6,278 | +34 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 00:42 | 6,244 | +19 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 13:35 | 6,225 | +25 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 6,200 | -5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 6,205 | +7 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 6,198 | +16 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 6,182 | +38 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:44 | 6,144 | +19 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 6,125 | +15 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 6,110 | +22 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:41 | 6,088 | +24 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 6,064 | first reading |
Engagement
42 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 39.6%
- avg views ÷ 6,550 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,590
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 42 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 42 (15 June 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 41,450 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 12:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 17s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
إلى أين ستمضين يا عزيزتي ومن سوف تشاركين أغانيك وأفكارك ومشاعرك من سيفهم أنك تائهة ووحيدة من بضع كلمات كما كنت أفهمك أنا من صوتك، وصمتك ربما .. لست سوى رفيق مزاجك العبثي ولكنك بالنسبة لي كنتِ دومًا أكثر من ذلك
Photo, posted without a caption
وديلي كلشي الچان من ريحتچ مشتاقلچ مرسى وشراع وبحر
ليتني لم أقترب من الاشياء التي اعجبتني حين لمحتها أول مرة وليتني بقيت أنظر لها فقط من بعيد
يفيض الجمال من وجهكِ وما باليد حيله القصائدُ تناديكِ فمن أين نبدأ يا جميلة ؟
Voice message, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
صباحي بدأ مُنذ إن قُلت لي صباح الخير لم تكن مُجرد كلمة كانت قادرة على رسم إبتسامتي
فعلاً الإنسان إذا طابت نفسه من شيء صعب جدًا يتقبله من جديد حتى لو حاول مايرجع نفس النظره او نفس الإحساس الي كان اول
لون تنباع أبيع الروح وأشريك وأفرح بيك عمري الجاي والراح
ما زلتُ أجرب الأيام من دونك كلها لا تناسبني
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @sswsee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@i_w_m · 854 postsلــِ قـمٛـࢪي"
@qmreeA1617 · 1864 postsⒽⓄⓅⒺⒻⓊⓁⓁ
@wwccbb · 254 postsانـحنـآ✘
@xrr5o · 104 posts﮼صدفة💕
@zahraFat14 · 584 posts00:00
@a_s_o2002g · 113 posts_♣ ﺂﯛڰسـِٰ̲ـﭵُﮧـينُي🦋♥️😻“ )⇣♡❥
@Ah96Al20 · 223 posts𝙂𝙀𝙕𝙀𝙂𝙀𝙉 🪐
@ani4l · 1713 postsَ
@Astoreat2000 · 353 postsلـَ ايَـو↻.
@ax_0xl · 503 posts00:00
@hf_i02 · 543 posts〖ࢪّيـﻧـآډآ𖤍᭄〗
@illinre · 143 postsاسراري...🖤
@liil66 · 173 postsثقافة فكر 🌊☔️.
@louisfantoz1 · 193 postsسـنيـورهہ💞
@mamnnam · 143 postsيوميات صيدلانية💊🩺👩⚕
@Noor_S20_jode · 483 postsعالم البنات🧖🏻♀️✨
@noork16 · 753 postsقناة منوعه ✨🌸
@ramjetw · 113 posts𓄼 لــ ڪـاتـــبᤠــهہ 𓄹
@RH_ih · 93 postsلـ سينہ .
@SARA_toma · 343 postsسمُـพـږهــ★
@smraa1o · 253 postsرمزيات،❤️خلفيات❤️،اقتباسات،❤️ بنات،❤ كيوت، ❤
@zahra12yyy · 53 posts.ꨄ لـ زوز
@ZXYY6 · 43 postsمَتىٰ؟
@ZAOCN · 1132 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@h5r66 · 46,200
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 28 August 2026
@EUEX3 · 106,005
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 August 2026
@Amrdieb · 24,617
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 15 September 2026
@viiiivil · 33,721
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 6 September 2026
@Dubovdu · 31,874
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 September 2026
@JJ3DA · 21,538
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 27 September 2026
@f0ctt · 31,129
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 6 September 2026
@fatima_005 · 19,760
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 October 2026
@inTrauma · 27,344
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 10 September 2026
@ceen6 · 18
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 1 October 2026
@llquraanll · 248,729
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 August 2026
@hajernazem90 · 19,772
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 2 October 2026
@lastgoodbye1 · 21,291
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 25 September 2026
@lAlMosahfl · 780,321
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 August 2026
@gabbarrasheed · 53,227
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“m” (@sswsee), 6,550 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sswsee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.