Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GIRLS FESS ✸ HIRING ADMINS!

Channel

GIRLS FESS ✸ HIRING ADMINS!

@GirlsFess

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

19,721subscribers

+283 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001545637162
TypeChannel
Username@GirlsFess
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GirlsFess

Growth

19,43819,76819,6036 August 2026 — 19,438 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,439 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,504 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,573 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,672 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,681 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,686 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,696 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,707 subscribers15 August 2026 — 19,731 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,749 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,763 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,768 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,764 subscribers21 August 2026 — 19,766 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,756 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19,751 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,763 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,751 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,752 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,749 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,748 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,726 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,714 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,701 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,707 subscribers4 September 2026 — 19,716 subscribers6 September 2026 — 19,721 subscribers19,7216 August 20266 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 30 days, net +283. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,389–19,818 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 09:1419,721+5
4 Sept 2026, 02:1719,716+9
2 Sept 2026, 13:3419,707+6
1 Sept 2026, 14:2519,701-13
31 Aug 2026, 11:5319,714-12
30 Aug 2026, 08:5719,726-22
29 Aug 2026, 07:0419,748-1
28 Aug 2026, 04:4219,749-3
27 Aug 2026, 07:1919,752+1
26 Aug 2026, 09:0519,751-12
25 Aug 2026, 05:4919,763+12
24 Aug 2026, 08:4419,751-5
22 Aug 2026, 17:0719,756-10
21 Aug 2026, 06:0419,766+2
20 Aug 2026, 09:3519,764-4
19 Aug 2026, 08:3519,768+5
18 Aug 2026, 11:5419,763+14
17 Aug 2026, 10:5619,749+18
15 Aug 2026, 20:5819,731+24
14 Aug 2026, 14:1719,707first reading

Engagement

420 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.788%
avg views ÷ 19,721 subscribers
Avg views / post
155
369 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
375
of 420 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 93 of 369 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held420 (6 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total57,329
Reactions total949
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,124 reactions across 96 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
46241.1%
🔥15714.0%
💘14713.1%
❤‍🔥1049.25%
🕊837.38%
💔534.72%
🐳363.20%
💋363.20%
🍓191.69%
🆒171.51%
😭100.89%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 101 of the 420 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,124 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 420 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
63
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 411 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
31
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GirlsFess. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 420 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 16:15 UTC69 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

A new chapter begins as @GirlsFess and @WesternFolk officially become affiliated through a network partnership! 🪽🏈 This affiliation allows both communities to support one another, share opportunities, and foster a stronger connection between our members while continuing to grow within our own unique spaces. Though we remain independent in our identities and directions, this partnership creates a meaningful bridge bu

🔥2🆒21💘1

2 Sept 2026, 16:11 UTC109 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

The evening has quietly come full circle Girlies and this shift has reached its end far sooner than we wished. Girlies thank you for leaving behind the lovely traces of your menfesses and thank you for helping preserve the warmth of our garden by keeping to our guidelines. For now, ROSEVE SOIRÉE will take a gentle step back. Until we meet again on another shift, bringing you a new moment of calm and bliss. Before yo

1💘1

2 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC102 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

CW // SKIN DISEASE #GirlsQuest jerawat gini harus diapainn yaah :(?? bingungg tumbuhnya deketan gt, tipe kulit aku combi to oily

2 Sept 2026, 15:59 UTC91 viewsread 3 September 2026

#girlsutter aku heran sekaligus sedih jg karena skrg banyak bgt yaa kebakaran di indo, makin lama makin nambah gitu pas liat berita. semoga cpt membaik, kemarau cpt selesai, dan ga ada bencana lagi yaa aamiin. stay safe girlies!💗

2 Sept 2026, 15:47 UTC106 viewsread 3 September 2026

#girlsquest moist eiem glow b3+ bisa buat kulit combi ga? anw aku juga ada bruntusan di jidat, closed comedo, pih, kusam sama ada chicken skin disekitar dagu... ada saran moist yang cocok nggaa?

2 Sept 2026, 15:45 UTC105 viewsread 3 September 2026

#girlsquest girliess tolong saranin hadiah buat bday mamaku

2 Sept 2026, 15:44 UTC109 viewsread 3 September 2026

#girlsquest mending beli ss dulu apa moist dulu ya? 😭 budget ku ga banyak huhuhu, tipe kulitku combi btw

2 Sept 2026, 15:43 UTC110 viewsread 3 September 2026

#girlsutter aku salah ga ya laporin temen aku yg piketnya cmn sebentar gak nungguin sampai selesai semua di gc? Jujur aku takut banget dijudge "ih apasih dia mah pengadu" T__T (konsekuensi nya harus nungguin piketnya beres baru boleh pulang semua yg piket)

Showing the 12 most recent of 420 posts we hold for @GirlsFess. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTCAnonymous Quiz2 voters

Dalam jurnalisme sains, 'Finkbeiner Test' dirancang untuk memastikan bahwa artikel tentang ilmuwan perempuan tidak...

  1. Menggunakan istilah teknis yang terlalu rumit bagi pembaca awam.0%
  2. Membandingkan hasil penelitian perempuan dengan hasil penelitian ilmuwan laki-laki.0%
  3. Mengutip riset yang belum melalui proses peer-review.0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTCAnonymous Quiz6 voters

Istilah 'Manic Pixie Dream Girl' (MPDG) merujuk pada trope karakter perempuan yang...

  1. Menggunakan manipulasi emosional untuk menjatuhkan saingan bisnisnya.17%
  2. Menjadi pimpinan perusahaan yang sangat tegas dan ditakuti oleh karyawan laki-laki.33%
  3. Diciptakan semata-mata untuk membantu protagonis laki-laki menikmati hidup tanpa memiliki tujuan.17%
  4. Memiliki kekuatan sihir eksentrik untuk menyelamatkan dunia fantasi dari kehancuran.33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTCAnonymous Quiz16 voters

Konsep 'Glass Ceiling' dalam industri media merujuk pada hambatan bagi perempuan untuk...

  1. Membeli peralatan kamera yang sangat mahal dan canggih.0%
  2. Bekerja di ruangan yang memiliki atap transparan atau kaca.13%
  3. Mencapai posisi kepemimpinan tingkat atas atau eksekutif.56%
  4. Mendapatkan asuransi kesehatan yang memadai dari perusahaan media.31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTCAnonymous Quiz18 voters

Apa kritik utama terhadap penggunaan trope 'Strong Female Lead' yang tidak memiliki kelemahan?

  1. Laki-laki menjadi enggan menonton film dengan karakter seperti itu.39%
  2. Biaya produksi untuk adegan aksi menjadi terlalu mahal bagi studio.6%
  3. Hal tersebut melanggar hukum alam tentang kekuatan fisik manusia.17%
  4. Karakter tersebut menjadi satu dimensi dan sulit untuk dihubungkan.39%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTCAnonymous Quiz20 voters

Istilah 'Symbolic Annihilation' dalam studi media menggambarkan keadaan di mana kelompok tertentu...

  1. Mendapatkan penghargaan tertinggi dalam festival film internasional.5%
  2. Dihapus, diremehkan, atau distereotipkan secara konsisten di media.45%
  3. Menggunakan simbol-simbol kuno untuk mengomunikasikan pesan rahasia.25%
  4. Memiliki kekuatan politik yang besar untuk menyensor konten media.25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTCAnonymous Quiz25 voters

Mengapa pendekatan 'Intersectionality' (interseksionalitas) penting dalam menganalisis representasi perempuan?

  1. Membandingkan gaji antara aktor perempuan dan aktor laki-laki.4%
  2. Menghitung berapa banyak dialog yang dimiliki oleh pemeran utama.4%
  3. Memastikan bahwa film tersebut dipasarkan ke berbagai negara berbeda.0%
  4. Mengetahui pengaruh ras, kelas, dan seksualitas terhadap pengalaman perempuan.92%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 420 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GIRLS FESS ✸ HIRING ADMINS!” (@GirlsFess), 19,721 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GirlsFess.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.