Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
MOVIE UNIVERSE.
@MovieUnifess
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,999subscribers
+592 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001731256979 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MovieUnifess |
| Description | Escaping reality through stories on screen. Send your menfess to: zZzz Rants: @FilmHeads Rules: @movieuniguides Partnerships: @MovieUniPS Personal bot: @.MovieUniFessBot |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 56 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MovieUnifess |
Topic
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 06:46 | 12,999 | +5 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:09 | 12,994 | +8 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:51 | 12,986 | +11 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:44 | 12,975 | +3 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:46 | 12,972 | +7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:04 | 12,965 | +10 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:38 | 12,955 | +6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 10:16 | 12,949 | +11 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:26 | 12,938 | +2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:19 | 12,936 | +9 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 07:46 | 12,927 | +16 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:28 | 12,911 | +13 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:05 | 12,898 | +7 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:34 | 12,891 | -10 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:16 | 12,901 | +9 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:07 | 12,892 | +9 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 01:46 | 12,883 | -3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 01:51 | 12,886 | +14 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 03:09 | 12,872 | -4 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 04:47 | 12,876 | first reading |
Engagement
833 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.911%
- avg views ÷ 12,999 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 118
- 128 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 5.67%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 131
- of 833 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 128 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 833 (6 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 15,153 |
| Reactions total | 248 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 18:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,990
- Videos
- ≈795
- Links
- ≈3,550
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4m 24s
- Average length
- 22s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,338 reactions across 163 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 537 | 40.1% | |
| 😭 | 252 | 18.8% | |
| 🔥 | 159 | 11.9% | |
| 💘 | 85 | 6.35% | |
| 💯 | 85 | 6.35% | |
| 🤩 | 70 | 5.23% | |
| 👏 | 33 | 2.47% | |
| 🕊 | 33 | 2.47% | |
| 🐳 | 31 | 2.32% | |
| ⚡ | 25 | 1.87% | |
| 🍓 | 20 | 1.49% | |
| 🎃 | 8 | 0.598% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 183 of the 833 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,338 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 833 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 131 posts held from the last 30 days (2.29%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
That’s all for tonight, Watchers. Thank you for spending your time and accompanying me throughout this shift. Feel free to visit @FilmHeads if you’d like to keep the conversations going. You can also find other interesting discussions over at @GirlsFess & @Cinafess And as always, let’s not turn our eyes away from what’s happening in Palestine—stay informed through @EyesOnPal 🇵🇸. Lastly, let's not turn a blind eye to …
❤2
Sticker, posted without a caption
izin off, disuruh tidur sama jarjit
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
Channel name was changed to «MOVIE UNIVERSE.»
#MovRandom cape bangettt seharian ini rasanya pengennn banget nonton film tapi cape ngerti gasih😭😭😭kaya pengen nonton film aja cape😭
#movpal moots letterboxd yuk, Watchers!
#movask kalian udah nonton backrooms belum?
#Moview Basically ini KHW
😭11
CW // SPOILER VISIONQUEST (2026) #Moview Marvel is evil if you think about it. This whole time, Vision is grieving for Wanda but he doesn't want to feel and even accepting the truth that is already being put into his mind space, because he's unwilling to be the Vision that Wanda used to knows. The parallel between these two really broke me. I need these two to be put back and together already. 😢
😭10
Showing the 12 most recent of 833 posts we hold for @MovieUnifess. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@MovieUnifess edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 25 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 6 November 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
5. Salah satu contoh karakter yang terkenal menggunakan Kubrick Stare adalah..
- A. Jack Torrance dalam The Shining93%
- B. Marty McFly dalam Back to the Future11%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
4. Bagian wajah mana yang paling menjadi ciri khas dari Kubrick Stare?
- A. Mata yang tertutup sambil tersenyum lebar15%
- B. Mata yang terlihat dari bawah alis karena kepala sedikit menunduk88%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
3. Dalam dunia perfilman, Kubrick Stare biasanya digunakan untuk menampilkan kesan..
- A. Hangat, romantis, dan menyenangkan4%
Shares as published, totalling 4%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
2. Siapa sutradara yang menjadi asal istilah Kubrick Stare?
- A. Stanley Kubrick93%
- B. David Fincher11%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
1. Berdasarkan penjelasan di atas, mana pernyataan yang tepat tentang Kubrick Stare?
- A. Tatapan karakter dengan kepala sedikit menunduk dan mata mengarah tajam ke depan.88%
- B. Teknik pengambilan gambar dari sudut rendah untuk membuat karakter terlihat lebih dominan.17%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
This or That.
- Be trapped in a movie you hate70%
- Only able to watch movie you hate and never able to watch good movie or movie you love26%
Shares as published, totalling 96%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 833 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 32 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@ngeadmin · 35,74632 postsDunia Cyber!
@duniacyber · 44,83211 postsCLOSE 😴 — KinciiFess
@KinciiFess · 50,3599 postsBEAUTY AND THE BASE HIATUS
@TheBeautyBase · 41,8878 postsGIRLS FESS: OPEEEN CEPET SEND MENFESS!
@GirlsFess · 19,9377 postsAREA RENTAL
@AreaRental · 23,5246 postsMOVIE UNIVERSE'S ARCHIVE.
@MUFsArchive · 165 postsRENTALENTFESS.
@RENTALENTFESS · 29,8034 postsRENTALGRAM
@Rentalgram · 25,9934 postsBUBBLEGUM PARTNERSHIP
@bgapartnership · 303 postsMUF GUIDELINES
@movieuniguides · 1303 postsRaceFess
@RaceFess · 16,2673 postsMOVIE UNIVERSE PARTNERSHIPS
@MovieUniPS · 182 posts🇵🇸🇵🇸
@plibisanja · 17,8522 postsBASE YAPPING
@yappingfes · 15,4412 postsARTSTRAY, HIATUS.
@artstrayy · 721 postAsosiasi.
@Asosiasif · 201 postDufan Fess Partnership
@DufessPs · 21 postGirlsFess Partnership.
@GirlsPartner · 111 postㅤㅤ
@ineffabld · 21 postOutrica : Open (sell ipv&psd icons)
@outrica · 1,0161 postPartnership
@ps_kpopmfess · 21 postTHE BEAUTY BASE PS & PP
@TBBPS · 721 postTimmy Fess.
@TimmyFess · 54,8191 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@filmheads · 40925 postsAREA RENTAL
@AreaRental · 23,5248 postsEyes On Palestine 🇵🇸
@eyesonpal · 13,0818 postsMUF GUIDELINES
@movieuniguides · 1308 postsCINAFESS
@CinaFess · 2,0917 postsCLOSE 😴 — KinciiFess
@KinciiFess · 50,3597 postsBUKU FESS
@BukuFess · 5,6026 postsRENTALENTFESS.
@RENTALENTFESS · 29,8036 postsBEAUTY AND THE BASE HIATUS
@TheBeautyBase · 41,8876 postsGIRLS FESS: OPEEEN CEPET SEND MENFESS!
@GirlsFess · 19,9375 postsRENTALGRAM
@Rentalgram · 25,9935 postsNgeadmin, Kuy!
@ngeadmin · 35,7463 postsBahasa.
@BahasaFess · 4,4362 postsDunia Cyber!
@duniacyber · 44,8322 postsMOVIE UNIVERSE'S ARCHIVE.
@MUFsArchive · 162 postsSafe Between Us, OPEN DISCUSS.
@SafeBetweenUs · 1362 postsArea Julid (bcnda)
@ArenaRental · 7061 postCosplayer Zone.
@CoserZone · 3,6341 postLGBTQ+ BASE.
@LGBTQBASE · 6,8631 postArea Rental's Internship
@MagangDiAren · 3421 postMUNtual!
@MUNtual · 84,2181 postRaceFess
@RaceFess · 16,2671 postTimmy Fess.
@TimmyFess · 54,8191 postBASE YAPPING
@yappingfes · 15,4411 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@TheBeautyBase · 41,887
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 13 here — alongside 12 others — read 28 August 2026
@mengmenfess · 49,565
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 8 here — alongside 7 others — read 29 August 2026
@EnglishFess · 51,143
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 12 here — alongside 11 others — read 26 August 2026
@InfoBeasiswaIDN · 68,124
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 7 September 2026
@joinksr_2026 · 99,853
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 15 here — alongside 14 others — read 1 September 2026
@kemarahan · 56,767
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 14 here — alongside 13 others — read 26 August 2026
@informasilomba · 29,082
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 7 September 2026
@indbeasiswa · 64,866
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MOVIE UNIVERSE.” (@MovieUnifess), 12,999 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MovieUnifess.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.