我这条信息有多少人跟了?是不是应该请吃一个🍗😄

Channel
Λ-Reading ♡
@GoReading
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,131subscribers
-277 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001006130365 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GoReading |
| Created | 24 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 5 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GoReading |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 15:01 | 15,131 | -23 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 15:54 | 15,154 | -56 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 12:55 | 15,210 | -11 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 15,221 | -4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:39 | 15,225 | +6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 15,219 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 15,221 | -21 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 15,242 | -31 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:14 | 15,273 | -9 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:34 | 15,282 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:26 | 15,285 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:46 | 15,294 | -16 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 15,310 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 15,316 | -11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 15,327 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:25 | 15,326 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 15,324 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:26 | 15,331 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:27 | 15,337 | -9 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 15,346 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5m 03s
- Average length
- 5m 03s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
477 reactions across 19 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 151 | 31.7% | |
| ❤ | 116 | 24.3% | |
| 🍾 | 66 | 13.8% | |
| 💯 | 50 | 10.5% | |
| 🤮 | 21 | 4.40% | |
| 😁 | 18 | 3.77% | |
| 😢 | 10 | 2.10% | |
| 😭 | 9 | 1.89% | |
| 💩 | 7 | 1.47% | |
| 😨 | 7 | 1.47% | |
| 🤗 | 7 | 1.47% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 0.839% | |
| 🗿 | 4 | 0.839% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 0.629% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.419% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.21% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 477 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2025 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
昨天清空了所有 AI 和数据中心的股票🤣
😁9
当各家发的最新模型性能连续性“没啥新意”“带不来任何兴奋”,唯有更便宜的时候,是不是AI 泡沫要被戳破的时候了?
❤10👍3
为了对抗 AI 带来的隧道视觉效应,我每天又开始读书了。☺️
👍39❤7🎉2
免费版模型落后付费版 1 年以上。可能形成一个新的信息和技术鸿沟。
👍4
“360龙虾一键安装助手”都出来了。 不得不惊叹,这真是一个魔幻的国度! 冷眼旁观吧!。
🤮21😁9👍4❤3🎉1💯1🗿1
今年在美国举行的世界杯估计会有一些“惊喜”吧?
👍5
折腾工作,但不要折腾工具。 这几天花费在折腾工具上的时间太多(建 memory、Skill、Soul、Router等等系统),被工具折腾了,失焦了。毅然决然放下了。 即便给你神级万能工具,又能怎么样那?
💯40❤5👍3👏2
朋友们,春节快乐!
❤38👍3
别忘记了,今天还是情人节哦! 🌹
😭9❤4👍4💩2💘1
大胆预测一下😄 Open AI 未来可能会破产。
❤13💩5👍4🗿3
https://t.me/GoReading/10302。 已经暴跌了两天了。😨
❤7👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GoReading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@readingclubus · 29,068
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 8 September 2026
@weekly_books · 38,214
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 31 August 2026
@MothLib · 34,894
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 3 September 2026
@TG_book_data · 30,383
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 8 September 2026
@TimeHorizonX · 20,984
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 25 September 2026
@jike_collection · 35,839
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 2 September 2026
@AppDoDo · 40,811
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
@piracy6 · 77,545
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 19 August 2026
@NewlearnerChannel · 67,653
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Λ-Reading ♡” (@GoReading), 15,131 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GoReading.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.