Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 59 days, net +675. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,035–40,912 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Oct 2026, 13:00
40,811
+86
26 Sept 2026, 02:21
40,725
+367
19 Sept 2026, 09:36
40,358
-5
17 Sept 2026, 00:41
40,363
+10
15 Sept 2026, 05:38
40,353
+17
13 Sept 2026, 15:19
40,336
+10
11 Sept 2026, 18:17
40,326
+2
9 Sept 2026, 02:58
40,324
-34
5 Sept 2026, 20:57
40,358
+9
2 Sept 2026, 10:56
40,349
+5
1 Sept 2026, 10:17
40,344
+10
31 Aug 2026, 06:44
40,334
-2
30 Aug 2026, 07:25
40,336
-3
29 Aug 2026, 08:35
40,339
+10
28 Aug 2026, 11:08
40,329
+6
27 Aug 2026, 13:44
40,323
+5
26 Aug 2026, 14:45
40,318
-7
25 Aug 2026, 17:58
40,325
+5
24 Aug 2026, 20:05
40,320
+22
23 Aug 2026, 07:55
40,298
first reading
Engagement
80 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 117 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 40,811 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,950
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.362%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 80 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026
Posts held
80 (26 July 2026 – 2 October 2026)
Views total
113,820
Reactions total
412
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Oct 2026, 15:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,300
Videos
≈21
Links
≈991
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 01s
Average length
1m 01s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,238 reactions across 74 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
389
31.4%
😱
213
17.2%
👍
194
15.7%
🍌
94
7.59%
👏
87
7.03%
🆒
82
6.62%
😍
71
5.74%
🍾
45
3.63%
🎉
25
2.02%
🤩
25
2.02%
⚡
13
1.05%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,248 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 75 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AppDoDo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 80 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 2 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.25%
1 of 80 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
4,340
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
4,390
over 74 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 2 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
#互联网观察
▎日本汽车共享公司 Times Car 遭未授权访问,约 660 万个账户资料确认外泄
日本停车及汽车共享服务集团 Park24 于 9 月 28 日确认,旗下 Times Car 的网站系统遭第三方未授权访问。调查显示,攻击者已取得系统中保存的部分个人信息,涉及约 660 万个账户,包括现有会员、退会会员、尚未完成入会手续的申请者,以及 Times Business Service 的相关会员。
泄露的信息因账户而异,可能包括姓名、住址、出生日期、电话、邮箱、驾照信息,以及驾照图像等身份核验资料。公告还将密码列入受影响数据类型,但表示密码以不可还原的形式保存;信用卡资料已确认没有泄露。目前,Park24 尚未发现这些资料被公开发布或用于不正当用途。
公司于 9 月 25 日上午发现异常,并在 9 月 26 日 7:25 前封堵访问路径。Times Car 服务目前正常运行,事件原因与完整影响范围仍在调查中…
Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @AppDoDo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@AppDoDo edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
小声读书 🙈 @weekly_books · 38,214 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 31 August 2026
Appinn Feed|小众软件 @appinnfeed · 33,700 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 4 September 2026
Time经济观察 @TimeHorizonX · 20,984 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 25 September 2026
即刻精选 @jike_collection · 35,839 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 2 September 2026
科技&趣闻&杂记 @kejiqu · 36,519 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 1 September 2026
Apple Nuts @AppleNuts · 37,139 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 1 September 2026
2019-nCoV疫情实时播报🅥 @nCoV2019 · 32,854 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 4 September 2026
少数派sspai @sspai · 38,283 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 31 August 2026
Newlearnerの自留地 @NewlearnerChannel · 67,653 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 August 2026
极客分享 @geekshare · 64,939 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 21 August 2026
Legado|开源阅读|频道 @Legado_Channels · 93,071 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 17 August 2026
Yummy 😋 @GodlyNews1 · 69,615 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 20 August 2026
看鉴中国 OutsightChina @OutsightChina · 41,381 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 August 2026
秀儿の科技软件|资源分享社🎀 @jianjiaoPD · 126,764 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 4 September 2026
iOS优质应用 @ioskk · 49,932 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 25 August 2026
油油の科技软件资源分享 @youyousharechannel · 90,939 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 17 August 2026
ahhhhfs|A姐分享 @abskoop · 305,760 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 17 August 2026
黑科技软件资源分享 @kkaifenxiang · 260,685 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 19 August 2026
APTV通知频道 @AptvPlayerChannel · 34,990 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 5 September 2026
FREE 中文 @freechinese · 27,586 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
风向旗参考快讯 @xhqcankao · 164,627 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 12 August 2026
蓝点网订阅频道 @landiansub · 45,562 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 28 August 2026
在花🎗️科技圈 @zaihuapd · 284,519 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 12 August 2026
Loon News @LoonNews · 48,128 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 39 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“APPDO 数字生活指南” (@AppDoDo), 40,811 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AppDoDo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.