🎁 Apple F&F EPP 状态更新 Apple 已为以下新品开启 F&F EPP. * iPhone Duo (NEW) * Apple HomeView * HomePod mini 2 * Apple TV 4K (第4代)
❤32😇2

Channel
@AppleNuts
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
37,538subscribers
+918 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001079757039 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AppleNuts |
| Description | 🍎 一个特别的 Apple 频道 💡Let’s Think Different. 讨论组 @OnlineAppleUserGroup |
| Created | 13 January 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 50 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AppleNuts |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 05:40 | 37,538 | +18 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 08:55 | 37,520 | +14 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:55 | 37,506 | -183 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:27 | 37,689 | +10 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 06:32 | 37,679 | +10 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:30 | 37,669 | +13 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 03:17 | 37,656 | +6 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 02:11 | 37,650 | -3 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 02:54 | 37,653 | +4 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 04:56 | 37,649 | +11 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 04:31 | 37,638 | +511 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 00:38 | 37,127 | -12 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 10:15 | 37,139 | +15 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 16:41 | 37,124 | +118 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:57 | 37,006 | +5 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 37,001 | +25 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 36,976 | +19 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:16 | 36,957 | +25 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:21 | 36,932 | +60 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 36,872 | first reading |
85 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 148 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 85 (8 June 2026 – 23 October 2026) |
| Views total | 155,670 |
| Reactions total | 800 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Oct 2026, 08:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,065 reactions across 78 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,429 | 28.2% | |
| 👍 | 589 | 11.6% | |
| 💩 | 425 | 8.39% | |
| 👎 | 339 | 6.69% | |
| 🤣 | 285 | 5.63% | |
| 😱 | 280 | 5.53% | |
| 🔥 | 259 | 5.11% | |
| 😁 | 204 | 4.03% | |
| 👌 | 152 | 3.00% | |
| 🙏 | 150 | 2.96% | |
| 🥰 | 136 | 2.69% | |
| 💯 | 99 | 1.95% | |
| 🥴 | 87 | 1.72% | |
| 😭 | 76 | 1.50% | |
| 🫡 | 75 | 1.48% | |
| 🤩 | 54 | 1.07% | |
| 🤔 | 53 | 1.05% | |
| 👨💻 | 45 | 0.888% | |
| 😴 | 44 | 0.869% | |
| 👀 | 37 | 0.731% | |
| 23 further kinds | 247 | 4.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,065 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 23 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AppleNuts. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 85 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 June 2026 to 23 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎁 Apple F&F EPP 状态更新 Apple 已为以下新品开启 F&F EPP. * iPhone Duo (NEW) * Apple HomeView * HomePod mini 2 * Apple TV 4K (第4代)
❤32😇2
📲 Apple 为 iPhone Duo 发布特殊的 iOS 27.2 RC 版本,build 是 24B91016,目前没有完整固件,只能通过 OTA 更新。 build 中的 1016 反映了 Apple 在 iPhone Duo 固件上的近乎疯狂的迭代,首次见到 build 如此巨大的固件…… 目的是为了解决用户的旧设备使用 iOS 27.2 RC,而 iPhone Duo 的出厂固件是 iOS 27.1 而导致的无法数据传输的问题。 因此,已经购入新设备且在 iOS 27.2 尝鲜的用户不必担心数据传输问题。更新到这个版本后 iPhone Duo 会支持 Apple Pencil。
📱📱 iPhone Duo 晒设备 🙌 iPhone Duo 今日首发,很多预购用户应该已经收到了设备,欢迎各位晒出自己的设备,供持币观望的用户参考。 ⚠️ 注意:不要在拆掉外包装纸后继续撕掉 iPhone Duo 内屏的类似磨砂的膜,它是屏幕的一部分。
👨💻45
🎵 Apple Music 的全新设计
❤54👎32🤔12🌚5🍓5🤨4😍4
🔓📱 iPhone Duo 的媒体评测视频已解禁。
❤36🐳8👻4💊1
Posted without readable text
👎47😁10❤4👍1
🧪 Apple 发布 [测试版] 软件更新 * iOS 27.2 RC (24B115) * iPadOS 27.2 RC (24B115) * macOS 27.2 RC (26B118) * tvOS 27.2 RC (24K120) * visionOS 27.2 RC (24N118) * watchOS 27.2 RC (24S116)
❤33👎2😁1
Channel photo updated
Photo, posted without a caption
👍91🤩17😡3❤2👎2🥴2😁1
全球 Apple 在线零售店 已经开始维护,为今晚 8 点的 iPhone Duo 预售做准备。
👍56❤9😱7
🧪 Apple 发布 [测试版] 软件更新 * iOS 27.2 beta 4 (24B5110a) * iPadOS 27.2 beta 4 (24B5110a) * macOS 27.2 beta 4 (26B5112a) * visionOS 27.2 beta 4 (24N5114a) * watchOS 27.2 beta 4 (24S5112a)
🤔27😁5🎃3🔥3😭3🤨2
🎵 Apple 发布全新 HomePod mini 2 * 这是唯一在中国大陆上市的新品 ⬆️ 重要更新 * 2 款全新颜色:粉色、绿色 * Apple S10 芯片(与 Apple Watch Series 10 芯片相同) * 与新 Apple TV 4K 组成四扬声器环绕声 * 无线协议升级为Wi-Fi 6 和 蓝牙 6.0 ⚠️ 中国大陆不可用功能 * Apple Intelligence 和 Siri AI 中国大陆新闻稿中,没有提及 声音光晕 Sound Glow,而香港新闻稿却有提及: HomePod mini 2 顶部屏幕使用 Sound Glow 技术 化为视觉画布,随音乐同步发光和闪烁,并即时因应高低音调整。歌曲专辑封面于「播放中」时会产生与每一首歌曲相配的独特灯光效果 💰 发售信息 售价 ¥1099 HomePod mini 售价为 ¥749,📈 价格涨幅 46.73% 可以立刻预订,1…
👎110😁22💊6❤5👻3👏2🌭1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @AppleNuts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@AppleNuts edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
你打算买哪些新品?(多选)
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 23 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 55 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ Apple Nuts” (@AppleNuts), 37,538 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AppleNuts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.