Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 瞎玩菌 #SFW

Channel

瞎玩菌 #SFW

@blindgamer

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,747subscribers

-33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001174453949
TypeChannel
Username@blindgamer
Created24 June 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/blindgamer

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,74710,78010,763.57 August 2026 — 10,780 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,780 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,777 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,778 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,776 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,779 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,777 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,775 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,772 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,765 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,771 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,773 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,772 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,771 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,766 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,762 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,753 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,754 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,757 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,751 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,753 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,749 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,755 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,748 subscribers9 September 2026 — 10,750 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,755 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,751 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,756 subscribers19 September 2026 — 10,747 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 44 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,742–10,785 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 17:1610,747-9
17 Sept 2026, 05:4010,756+5
15 Sept 2026, 03:0010,751-4
13 Sept 2026, 10:2110,755+5
9 Sept 2026, 00:3910,750+2
5 Sept 2026, 18:5710,748-7
1 Sept 2026, 08:3710,755+6
31 Aug 2026, 06:4310,749-4
29 Aug 2026, 10:5810,753+2
28 Aug 2026, 12:3410,751-6
27 Aug 2026, 14:5410,757+3
26 Aug 2026, 18:1210,754+1
24 Aug 2026, 20:3410,753-9
23 Aug 2026, 03:5510,762-4
21 Aug 2026, 14:5710,766-5
20 Aug 2026, 16:0610,771-1
19 Aug 2026, 13:2210,772-1
18 Aug 2026, 09:5310,773+2
17 Aug 2026, 11:4510,771+6
16 Aug 2026, 03:1810,765first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.33%
avg views ÷ 10,747 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,000
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.203%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 51 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held51 (22 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total12,038
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 20:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 53m
Average length
2m 46s

Measured directly from 41 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

86 reactions across 32 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2427.9%
💩1517.4%
😁1517.4%
🤣1112.8%
👍78.14%
🌭44.65%
👏44.65%
🤯22.33%
🥰22.33%
🆒11.16%
🤨11.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 07:02 UTC344 views1 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

老大,你的意思是我们吃饭吃的慢也得死吗? 原作者:@是橘长呀 📣 频道:@BlindGamer 💬 群聊: 点击加入 🚀 Telegram 会员点此助力

😁1

Signed 瞎玩菌 BlindGamer

31 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC632 viewsread 1 September 2026
Video

所有正脸已打码,放心观看 #生灵重塑 #搞笑 #抽象 #游戏 #恐怖游戏 原作者:@可爱者甚凡 📣 频道:@BlindGamer 💬 群聊: 点击加入 🚀 Telegram 会员点此助力

Signed 瞎玩菌 BlindGamer

30 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC718 viewsread 1 September 2026
Video

最高玩的一集 #植物大战僵尸 #游戏 #植物大战僵尸无伤版 原作者:@二战艺术家y 📣 频道:@BlindGamer 💬 群聊: 点击加入 🚀 Telegram 会员点此助力

Signed 瞎玩菌 BlindGamer

29 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC839 viewsread 1 September 2026
Video

逆转裁判之父巧舟,为何在逆转4后离开逆转正作? #逆转裁判 #逆转裁判4 #游戏杂谈 #主机游戏 #avg游戏 原作者:@几何的难题 📣 频道:@BlindGamer 💬 群聊: 点击加入 🚀 Telegram 会员点此助力

Signed 瞎玩菌 BlindGamer

28 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC945 views3 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

树又打我#游戏 #steam游戏 原作者:@Z贤者 📣 频道:@BlindGamer 💬 群聊: 点击加入 🚀 Telegram 会员点此助力

😁2💩1

Signed 瞎玩菌 BlindGamer

28 Aug 2026, 03:59 UTC980 viewsread 1 September 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJbzMqJGH4k

Signed 瞎玩菌 BlindGamer

27 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,080 views2 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

豆包忽悠奸奇大魔 #战锤40k #孙悟空 #毁灭战士 #战锤#搞笑 本短片为粉丝非商业创作,灵感源自对毁灭战士DOOM,战锤40K,西游记,豆包的热爱,无任何商业用途。如有错误,欢迎指出。🥹 原作者:@像不像刚学Ai的你 📣 频道:@BlindGamer 💬 群聊: 点击加入 🚀 Telegram 会员点此助力

1🤨1

Signed 瞎玩菌 BlindGamer

26 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,160 views3 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

依旧上号! #游戏 #内容过于真实 原作者:@泽文_ 📣 频道:@BlindGamer 💬 群聊: 点击加入 🚀 Telegram 会员点此助力

3

Signed 瞎玩菌 BlindGamer

25 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,220 views4 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

《印度模拟器》 推上一老哥拿AI做的,评论区不亚于世界大战 原作者:@BS Foods 📣 频道:@BlindGamer 💬 群聊: 点击加入 🚀 Telegram 会员点此助力

😁4

Signed 瞎玩菌 BlindGamer

24 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,490 views1 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

我保持健康就是为了多活几年打游戏 #一人分饰多角 #内容过于真实 #精神状态belike #超能演剧场2026 #00后 原作者:@岳母阿蹲 📣 频道:@BlindGamer 💬 群聊: 点击加入 🚀 Telegram 会员点此助力

1

Signed 瞎玩菌 BlindGamer

23 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC≈1,340 views1 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

#Talk 这是一个聊天帖:这周玩了啥? 📣 频道:@BlindGamer 💬 群聊: 点击加入 🚀 Telegram 会员点此助力

1

Signed 瞎玩菌 BlindGamer

23 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,290 views3 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

对不起了护子哥 俺爹一个红都没了 我没能力但也不想让俺爹吃苦#三角洲行动 原作者:@大壮和二国 📣 频道:@BlindGamer 💬 群聊: 点击加入 🚀 Telegram 会员点此助力

😁3

Signed 瞎玩菌 BlindGamer

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @blindgamer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

即刻精选
@jike_collection · 35,819
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 2 September 2026
少数派sspai
@sspai · 38,228
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 31 August 2026
Appinn Feed|小众软件
@appinnfeed · 33,361
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 4 September 2026
Newlearnerの自留地
@NewlearnerChannel · 67,412
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 August 2026
TG吃瓜黑料八卦
@baguabox · 33,433
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 4 September 2026
科技&趣闻&杂记
@kejiqu · 36,460
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 1 September 2026
赛博忏悔室
@cyber_confessional · 40,109
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 30 August 2026
每日沙雕墙
@woshadiao · 115,324
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 14 August 2026
秀儿の科技软件|资源分享社🎀
@jianjiaoPD · 124,426
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 4 September 2026
APPDO 数字生活指南
@AppDoDo · 40,358
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
Yummy 😋
@GodlyNews1 · 68,855
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 20 August 2026
如何与沙雕相处
@ruheyushadiaoxiangchu · 28,742
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 9 September 2026
极客分享
@geekshare · 64,669
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 21 August 2026
每日消费电子观察
@CE_Observe · 74,794
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 19 August 2026
树洞🌳群友问❓有点意思🗳
@qunyouwen · 89,462
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 17 August 2026
小声读书 🙈
@weekly_books · 38,148
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 31 August 2026
平壤卫视
@pingrangTV · 29,178
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 8 September 2026
2019-nCoV疫情实时播报🅥
@nCoV2019 · 33,065
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 4 September 2026
上班划水之无聊图
@goworkbitch · 24,812
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 15 September 2026
Solidot
@solidot · 47,464
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 28 August 2026
看鉴中国 OutsightChina
@OutsightChina · 41,309
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 August 2026
竹新社
@tnews365 · 164,267
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 12 August 2026
 Apple Nuts
@AppleNuts · 37,006
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 1 September 2026
飛蛾書庫
@MothLib · 34,658
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“瞎玩菌 #SFW” (@blindgamer), 10,747 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blindgamer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.