Technology — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
69 measurements spanning 44 days, net +1,479. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 67,151–69,102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 69
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 01:00
68,855
-22
17 Sept 2026, 14:16
68,877
+15
16 Sept 2026, 19:41
68,862
+39
15 Sept 2026, 13:57
68,823
+17
14 Sept 2026, 20:39
68,806
+56
13 Sept 2026, 20:18
68,750
+56
13 Sept 2026, 07:15
68,694
+14
12 Sept 2026, 04:02
68,680
+22
11 Sept 2026, 10:02
68,658
+10
9 Sept 2026, 20:36
68,648
+29
8 Sept 2026, 17:39
68,619
+93
6 Sept 2026, 16:17
68,526
+53
5 Sept 2026, 11:55
68,473
+23
4 Sept 2026, 02:15
68,450
+12
3 Sept 2026, 16:02
68,438
+20
2 Sept 2026, 17:55
68,418
-4
2 Sept 2026, 11:35
68,422
+33
1 Sept 2026, 14:44
68,389
+4
1 Sept 2026, 13:44
68,385
+44
31 Aug 2026, 14:17
68,341
first reading
Engagement
223 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.69%
avg views ÷ 68,855 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,990
148 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.954%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
149
of 223 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
223 (4 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
886,031
Reactions total
8,449
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 01:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈11,200
Videos
≈809
Links
≈8,270
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 14m
Average length
3m 32s
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13,814 reactions across 217 posts, in 60 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
2,756
20.0%
👎
2,229
16.1%
👍
2,051
14.8%
😁
1,910
13.8%
❤
1,142
8.27%
👀
286
2.07%
🌚
208
1.51%
🐳
204
1.48%
😭
204
1.48%
🤯
192
1.39%
🔥
191
1.38%
💅
183
1.32%
😢
160
1.16%
😱
159
1.15%
🤬
147
1.06%
💊
137
0.992%
😨
132
0.956%
😡
113
0.818%
🙏
110
0.796%
🥰
92
0.666%
40 further kinds
1,208
8.74%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 222 of the 223 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,014 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 223 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 222 we hold a reading for · 0.9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GodlyNews1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 223 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Anthropic发布Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic表示,正在增加Pro、Max和Team订阅用户的五小时使用额度,还将提供额度重置,您可以保存重置次数随时取用。
Anthropic今天推出了Claude Opus 5.5,这是全新Claude 5.5系列中的首个模型。Opus 5.5在大多数任务的表现上达到了Fable 5.1的水平,并且运行成本比Opus 5低了40%。
在默认思考强度下,Opus 5.5通常优于其他模型在最高思考强度下的表现,它的输出生成速度比Opus 5快了30%以上。
Opus 5.5的沟通更自然,解决了Anthropic在Opus 5中最常听到的反馈意见。它会将最重要的信息放在最前面,并遵循您给它的写作规则,使得长时间的会话更容易跟进。
Claude Opus 5.5现已在所有平台上推出,包括AWS、Google Cloud和Microsoft Azure。API价格为每…
OpenAI正式发布GPT-6 Sol 和 GPT-6 Luna
缓存和推理更加高效,Sol 和 Luna 的 API 价格比 GPT‑5.6 促销定价低 50%。
GPT-6 Sol 和 Luna 今天在 ChatGPT Work 和 Codex 中推出,适用于 Plus、Pro、Business、Enterprise 和 Edu 用户。
两者也可在 API 中使用。免费和 Go 用户可以在桌面应用中试用 GPT-6 Luna。
🗒 标签: #OpenAI #GPT #AI
📢 频道: @GodlyNews1
🤖 投稿: @GodlyNewsBot
动视将接手《光环》等项目,微软裁撤268名Xbox员工,《极限竞速》的团队将合并成一家工作室,Ninja Theory工作室可能被关闭
微软今天宣布对 Xbox 工作室进行大规模重组
微软今天将裁减约 260 名 Xbox 员工,这是其持续推进游戏业务“重置”计划的一部分。今年 7 月,已有 1600 名 Xbox 员工受到裁员影响。
本次裁员光环工作室、其他第一方工作室,以及 XGS 的管理层和中央职能部门。
Playground Games 与 Turn 10 Studios 的员工今后将共同负责开发《极限竞速:地平线》和《神鬼寓言》。
在最新调整中,动视将接手《光环》《盗贼之海》和《帝国时代》等系列。
Xbox 重组还包括微软出售四家 Xbox 工作室,这是其大幅削减游戏业务计划的一部分。其中,Double Fine 和 Compulsion Games 已经成功独立,但出售 Ninja Theory 的交易最…
新版Mac Mini 不支持升级存储:SSD 焊入逻辑主板
两年前Apple推出的 M4 Mac mini 内置 SSD 并未焊死在逻辑主板上,因此,用户可以自行升级存储容量。
Expand Mac mini 团队在一篇博文中透露,搭载 M6 和 M5 Pro 芯片的新款 Mac mini ,NAND 闪存芯片像 M1 和 M2 版 Mac mini 一样,直接焊接在逻辑主板上。这意味着 SSD 模块将无法再拆卸。
"没有插槽,就没什么可更换的,留给我们升级的空间也几乎没有了。我们在八月曾表示,等实际测试硬件后会继续跟进报道。现在结果出来了,但并不是我们所期待的那样。"
"我们会继续寻找机会,但目前看来,支持 M6 和 M5 Pro 的可能性已经不大。如果有任何变化,会第一时间通知大家。"
🗒 标签: #Apple #Mac
📢 频道: @GodlyNews1
🤖 投稿: @GodlyNewsBot
Mark Gurman对Apple发出锐评:越来越注重于网红
彭博社的Mark Gurman表示,苹果对其活动和产品的评论越来越注重于网红,这些人只会说积极的话,从不对苹果高管提出任何严肃问题,以此换取免费设备、旅行和其他好处,这是一个严重的问题。这种回音室效应将导致苹果的平庸。
via 匿名
🗒 标签: #Apple
📢 频道: @GodlyNews1
🤖 投稿: @GodlyNewsBot
👍66🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 223 posts we hold for @GodlyNews1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@GodlyNews1 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 September 2026
Most recent edit
20 September 2026
Mentions
Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
极客分享 @geekshare · 64,669 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 21 August 2026
即刻精选 @jike_collection · 35,819 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 2 September 2026
科技&趣闻&杂记 @kejiqu · 36,460 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 1 September 2026
Apple Nuts @AppleNuts · 37,006 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 1 September 2026
APPDO 数字生活指南 @AppDoDo · 40,358 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
ahhhhfs|A姐分享 @abskoop · 306,586 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 17 August 2026
在花🎗️科技圈 @zaihuapd · 282,472 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 12 August 2026
FREE 中文 @freechinese · 27,568 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
秀儿の科技软件|资源分享社🎀 @jianjiaoPD · 124,426 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 4 September 2026
小声读书 🙈 @weekly_books · 38,148 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 31 August 2026
Newlearnerの自留地 @NewlearnerChannel · 67,412 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 August 2026
LoopDNS资讯播报 @DNSPODT · 71,856 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 20 August 2026
Widget🏂软件工具资源分享 @WidgetChannel · 99,840 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 17 August 2026
风向旗参考快讯 @xhqcankao · 163,238 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 12 August 2026
ChatGPT / AI新闻聚合 @AI_News_CN · 21,862 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 22 September 2026
少数派sspai @sspai · 38,228 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 31 August 2026
蓝点网订阅频道 @landiansub · 44,850 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 28 August 2026
cnBeta.COM中文业界资讯站 - 总频道(精选新闻) @cnbeta_com · 27,529 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
XP Digital Lab @rocCHL · 36,047 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 28 here — alongside 27 others — read 3 September 2026
zaobao.sg 早报 @zaobaosg · 36,845 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 1 September 2026
Solidot @solidot · 47,464 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 28 August 2026
Loon News @LoonNews · 45,634 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 27 August 2026
每日消费电子观察 @CE_Observe · 74,794 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 19 August 2026
Odyssey+ @odysseyplus · 24,933 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 102 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Yummy 😋” (@GodlyNews1), 68,855 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GodlyNews1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.