KIMI 目前的个人积分已经超过了其他车手在剩余比赛中能够获得的最大积分,提前锁定2026年的WDC,成为F1历史上最年轻的世界冠军车手。 此外,Ocon因为与Haas车队发生矛盾被提前斩杀,剩余分站能否出场暂不可知,不过车队和选手在之前都对外宣告2026赛季结束后不再续约。 勒克莱尔目前排在车手个人积分榜第五名,根据围场玄学,勒克莱尔将发动被动,在赛季末重归第四,所以前面的第四名要小心了(拉塞尔)。 #F1

Channel
心灵魔法站
@personal_hub
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,582subscribers
+23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001405848225 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @personal_hub |
| Description | 爱玩单机游戏,偶尔也玩网游。 本频道无任何交流群,频道主和管理员不会私聊任何人。 频道14天以上无更新即可视为频道主已经失去对telegram账号的控制。 友链: @opencfdchannel |
| Created | Between 1 February 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 53 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/personal_hub |
Topic
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:16 | 11,582 | +6 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 02:09 | 11,576 | +2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 03:49 | 11,574 | -5 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 05:29 | 11,579 | +1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:26 | 11,578 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 06:49 | 11,581 | +6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 07:36 | 11,575 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 07:37 | 11,577 | +1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 08:56 | 11,576 | +1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:00 | 11,575 | -1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:49 | 11,576 | +2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:40 | 11,574 | -2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:46 | 11,576 | -2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:07 | 11,578 | +1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 12:46 | 11,577 | +2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:18 | 11,575 | -1 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 15:31 | 11,576 | -3 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 15:54 | 11,579 | +2 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 17:50 | 11,577 | +6 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 08:28 | 11,571 | first reading |
Engagement
42 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 23.0%
- avg views ÷ 11,582 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,660
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.373%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 42 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 42 (27 May 2026 – 2 November 2026) |
| Views total | 15,970 |
| Reactions total | 55 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 07:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,210
- Videos
- ≈80
- Links
- ≈3,070
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 10m 37s
- Average length
- 3m 32s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
577 reactions across 37 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 120 | 20.8% | |
| 👍 | 97 | 16.8% | |
| 😁 | 81 | 14.0% | |
| 🤡 | 61 | 10.6% | |
| 😢 | 51 | 8.84% | |
| 🤮 | 40 | 6.93% | |
| 🥰 | 32 | 5.55% | |
| 🕊 | 20 | 3.47% | |
| 💩 | 17 | 2.95% | |
| 👎 | 13 | 2.25% | |
| 🤯 | 11 | 1.91% | |
| 🙏 | 9 | 1.56% | |
| 👌 | 7 | 1.21% | |
| 🍌 | 5 | 0.867% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 0.867% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 0.347% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 0.347% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.347% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.173% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.173% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 577 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 42 we hold a reading for · 2%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @personal_hub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 42 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 May 2026 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
RIP,珍惜还能在荧幕上看到甘道夫,万磁王的机会吧,两位都是高龄老人了。 #人物
🕊8🙏2❤1
自从主线离开凯尔莫罕之后我就很少回去,只有一两次回去找图纸。凯尔莫罕曾经是个充满幸福回忆的地方,杰洛特,兰伯特,维瑟米尔,柯恩,艾斯凯尔和特莉斯一起和小希里度过了一段短暂平静的生活。如今凯尔莫罕变得冷清破败,每次回去都有一种孤独感,游戏中,杰洛特能在陶森特安定下来我觉得是个很好的结局,不必再回去凯尔莫罕过冬了。 猎魔人这个职业终有一天会和凯尔莫罕一样只存在吟游诗人的故事中。 #巫师3 #游戏
❤5🫡2
https://www.cyberpunk.net/zh-cn/edgerunners2 赛博朋克边缘行者2 10月20日在Netflix独家播出,官方此前透露本作整体叙事基调比第一季将更加悲伤,黑暗,血腥。 #动漫 #赛博朋克
👎4
能想出华删派,零评之的网友天赋绝对是遥遥领先的。 #互联网观察
👍26😁3❤1
各种雷霆发言! #巫师3
🥰2😁1
用Super Intelligence 超级智能替代人工智能和用词元取代token的叫法一样蠢。 #魔幻现实
👍22👎3🤡3
巫师3重制版施放法印在手柄操作舒服多了,之前的怎么都难受,右下角也增加了对应的法印提示。 #巫师3 #游戏
👏4
「好汉歌」- 刘欢 专辑: 中国民歌荟萃NO.1 #网易云音乐 #mp3 19.53MB 889.23kbps via @Music163bot
🕊12😁5🙏3
暴雪的基本功还是扎实啊,氛围太到位了 部分画面可能令人感到不适,酌情观看。 #游戏 #暗黑破坏神4
💩5👎1
以前是在自己咽下最后一口气之前删除自己的浏览器记录。 现在不一样了,现在是要注销ai账号了。 #AI
😁25💩3
huchenfeng404.com 没想到iPhone折叠屏一出来网络上又兴起了户晨风文学。 #互联网观察
😁7
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @personal_hub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@chxpd · 157,108
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 17 August 2026
@TimeHorizonX · 21,036
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 25 September 2026
@iyouport · 27,626
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 49,084
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 August 2026
@cdtchinesefeed · 51,923
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 29 August 2026
@Guanshuitan · 33,885
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 1 October 2026
@mightyflame · 25,445
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 13 September 2026
@jike_collection · 35,851
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 2 September 2026
@piracy6 · 77,947
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 19 August 2026
@cyber_confessional · 40,920
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 30 August 2026
@OutsightChina · 41,833
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 August 2026
@tnews365 · 166,183
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 12 August 2026
@xhqcankao · 167,747
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 12 August 2026
@kejiqu · 36,755
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 1 September 2026
@weekly_books · 38,254
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 31 August 2026
@AppDoDo · 40,957
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
@geekshare · 65,382
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 21 August 2026
@cnbeta_com · 27,446
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
@DNSPODT · 73,205
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 20 August 2026
@hgclhyyb · 19,848
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 1 October 2026
@jianjiaoPD · 132,238
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 4 September 2026
@ppbuzz_pro · 37,962
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 20 here — alongside 19 others — read 1 September 2026
@qunyouwen · 89,086
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 17 August 2026
@XueXi_China · 86,424
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 49 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“心灵魔法站” (@personal_hub), 11,582 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/personal_hub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.