Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
44 measurements spanning 76 days, net -1,021. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,482–26,809 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 44
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Oct 2026, 09:36
25,635
-11
21 Oct 2026, 04:47
25,646
-4
20 Oct 2026, 02:58
25,650
-13
19 Oct 2026, 03:47
25,663
-10
18 Oct 2026, 00:47
25,673
-11
17 Oct 2026, 03:04
25,684
-16
16 Oct 2026, 02:49
25,700
-10
15 Oct 2026, 02:41
25,710
-26
13 Oct 2026, 21:27
25,736
-57
10 Oct 2026, 11:01
25,793
-77
6 Oct 2026, 04:37
25,870
-65
1 Oct 2026, 01:42
25,935
-146
18 Sept 2026, 06:21
26,081
-29
16 Sept 2026, 01:19
26,110
-14
14 Sept 2026, 09:40
26,124
-28
12 Sept 2026, 16:15
26,152
-30
10 Sept 2026, 18:19
26,182
-28
7 Sept 2026, 16:59
26,210
-46
4 Sept 2026, 15:00
26,256
-27
2 Sept 2026, 23:05
26,283
first reading
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 24 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
398 reactions across 4 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
115
28.9%
🤡
104
26.1%
😁
65
16.3%
🤮
55
13.8%
👍
31
7.79%
👏
11
2.76%
🎉
7
1.76%
😡
5
1.26%
🤣
5
1.26%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 398 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2025 to 26 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @mightyflame. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
☠️三战快报☠️一级战备 @endofxi · 21,758 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 23 September 2026
Ruters乳透社🐻 @Ruters0615 · 25,278 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 14 September 2026
学习墙国🐸 @XueXi_China · 86,709 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 17 August 2026
「VoP」維尼之聲 - Voice of Pooh🔊 @VoiceofPooh · 22,322 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 20 September 2026
中国数字时代 @cdtchinesefeed · 51,217 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 29 August 2026
电报时报 @times001 · 84,450 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 18 August 2026
【李老师不是你老师】官方电报 @lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 48,903 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 August 2026
敏感经济信息分享 @pelosi3 · 71,940 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 20 August 2026
轻口味时间 @lightrekt · 48,590 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 25 August 2026
如何与沙雕相处 @ruheyushadiaoxiangchu · 28,463 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 9 September 2026
影音中国（中国被禁的视频） @TwtVideoOfChina · 77,085 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 20 August 2026
中国悲剧档案官方频道 @newszg_official · 158,815 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 12 August 2026
平壤卫视 @pingrangTV · 29,303 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 8 September 2026
简中互联网废物大赏 @fucku_idiot · 41,189 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 30 August 2026
FREE 中文 @freechinese · 27,679 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
🥗 视讯快报~密接巨变时代 @shixun160 · 22,770 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 September 2026
美国之音 @voachinese · 41,507 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
777文宣傳播稿件大合集 @hkposter777 · 22,493 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“知乎暴论” (@mightyflame), 25,635 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mightyflame.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
