39岁工人突发热射病倒在岗位上,劳动关系无人认领,母亲此前替他交了15年社保 #钢塑 王强在工厂车间劳作时突发热射病,至今未恢复意识。家属需确认其劳动关系以便工伤认定,但工厂称与人力公司签约,责任归属推诿。王强母亲多年来一直以灵活就业人员身份为其代缴社保,医疗费已累计27万元,家属自筹部分但仍欠费。(来自网易-澎湃新闻26/08/27) 阅读全文 原链接 备份1

Channel
工劳快讯:关注当代打工人
@laborpower
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,908subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001785416223 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @laborpower |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/laborpower |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:21 | 8,908 | +12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:45 | 8,896 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 8,895 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 8,893 | -12 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:09 | 8,905 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 8,907 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 8,906 | +5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 8,901 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:28 | 8,908 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 8,912 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 8,915 | first reading |
Engagement
172 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.36%
- avg views ÷ 8,908 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 210
- 142 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.793%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 143
- of 172 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 74 of 142 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 172 (3 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 29,882 |
| Reactions total | 138 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
164 reactions across 90 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 56 | 34.1% | |
| 👍 | 34 | 20.7% | |
| 🤬 | 27 | 16.5% | |
| 🤯 | 25 | 15.2% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 8.54% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 1.83% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.83% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 1.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 172 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 164 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 172 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
外卖员凌晨跨城如厕,媒体:公共设施岂能“到点下班”? #群体 近期,一则“外卖员凌晨跨城如厕”的新闻引发关注。一名在广东佛山送餐的骑手,深夜内急时连找四间市政公厕都是大门紧锁,无奈之下只得赶回广州解决。夜间将公厕“一锁了之”,以牺牲群体权益为代价换取管理便利,公共服务供给与劳动者需求存在“时间差”和……(来自网易-澎湃新闻26/08/28) 阅读全文 原链接 备份1
星宇股份强硬劝退170名应届生员工后续:已向离职者发放补贴,留岗员工仍在工厂一线日干11小时且无转正承诺 #应届生 星宇股份以“经营效益不好”等理由,要求新入职应届生离职或调岗至生产线,未给出法定解除理由,提供“主动离职或下放产线”选项。留岗员工被安排到基础工序,每天工作11-12小时,公司未承诺转正,员工普遍面临身份受损、补偿难、求职受阻等困境。(来自搜狐-中国青年网26/08/28) 阅读全文 原链接 备份1
越用AI,游戏开发者越焦虑:54%担心被替代,37%称工作流没变快 #开发者 报告显示,54%的游戏开发者担心岗位安全或角色冗余,54%存在伦理方面的担忧,39%认为AI降低了创造力或人的参与。37%的受访者表示,AI并没有让他们的工作流获得任何可衡量的加速。(来自搜狐-钛媒体APP26/08/28) 阅读全文 原链接 备份1
即时配送用工五年追踪报告:平台始终隐身,呼吁确立共同劳动关系 #骑手 王福民(化名),一位安徽农民,在某快餐连锁店做驻店配送骑手近12年。2026年1月10日,他在送餐途中发生交通事故致颅脑损伤,但他却找不到自己的“用人单位”,救济问题迟迟得不到解决。这是当下即时配送行业用工现状的真实缩影。(来自网易-界面新闻26/08/28) 阅读全文 原链接 备份1
37岁工程师猝死未认定工伤,家属行政复议已立案 #工伤认定 张亮生前为北京某智能科技有限公司电子工程师,长期高强度工作,事发当日虽为星期六,仍远程处理工作事宜,在ICU抢救时手机上也收到工作消息。考勤记录显示,其每月休息不超过3天,仅有的休息日也需在住处远程办公。(来自网易-界面新闻26/08/28) 阅读全文 原链接 备份1
【深度】外包员工困在“待岗”里:企业用工趋于灵活,劳动者权益如何保障? #外包员工 多位受访者表示,部分承揽外包业务的企业与外包员工协商解除劳动关系未果后,安排员工进入期限不明的待岗状态,此期间的多种要求呈现出软性逼迫员工离职的特征。待岗期间需前往远离住所的办公地,工位狭小,未配备空调及通风设施,每日需多次打卡并接受监控管……(来自网易-界面新闻26/08/28) 阅读全文 原链接 备份1
医疗保障法明年1月1日起施行:鼓励灵活就业人员参保,特困人员、最低生活保障家庭成员等个人缴费部分按规定予以资助 #灵活就业 医疗保障法规定,特困人员、最低生活保障家庭成员、符合条件的防止返贫致贫对象参加城乡居民基本医疗保险,个人缴费部分按规定予以资助。特困、低保等困难群众经济能力有限,如果完全自行缴费,很可能被挡在医保的门外。通过资助个人缴费,消除参保经济门槛……(来自腾讯网-极目新闻26/08/28) 阅读全文 原链接 备份1
“当民工”五日记 #民工 “这里好像一个独立王国,没有什么劳动法、劳工权益,劳动时间,也没有这个法院,哪个公安,有的只是老板、工头的发号施令。民工只是根据他们的指令,除了睡觉,就是干活,干活、干活”。这就是五天打工经历留给这位老编辑的深切感受。(来自红歌会网26/08/23) 阅读全文 原链接 备份1
【昨日重点目录 2026-08-28】 1. 星宇裁应届生被告到欧盟?00后果然是来整顿职场的! 投稿请见:https://t.me/auto_archive_publish_bot 订阅小报:https://fed.laborinfocn6.com/ #工劳快讯每日重点
星宇裁应届生被告到欧盟?00后果然是来整顿职场的! #应届生 7月初大力招人几百名应届生。结果这刚入职一个月就开始批量集中约谈,搞极端二选一处置方案。应届生若主动以“个人原因”签字离职,可获得半个月薪资补偿;若拒绝离职,公司将单方面强制调岗,安排其从事一线流水线装配、车灯插接、螺丝紧固等基础操作工岗位……(来自腾讯网-路极KJCK26/08/27) 阅读全文 原链接 备份1
❤1
【昨日重点目录 2026-08-27】 1. 前程无忧报告:超三成应届生已感知AI的就业替代效应 2. 求职背调乱象调查:花100多元就能查求职者婚姻、前科、未公开诉讼记录等,背调公司称通过“法院接口”直接调取 3. 顺丰被曝「变相降薪」:15%固定月薪划为季度绩效 4. 官方通报“长沙一建筑工地3人坠亡”:在拆除防护设施作业过程中,3名工人从高处坠落,送医救治无效死亡,事故原因正调查 5. 知名企业“羞辱式劝退应届生”,当地成立调查组开展全面调查:企业深表歉意,已对人力资源总监作出停职处理 6. 谁来为“应届生”身份买单?星宇股份“批量清退”背后的制度与监管之问 投稿请见:https://t.me/auto_archive_publish_bot 订阅小报:https://fed.laborinfocn6.com/ #工劳快讯每日重点
Showing the 12 most recent of 172 posts we hold for @laborpower. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 48,287
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 August 2026
@youarenotalonehk · 48,378
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“工劳快讯:关注当代打工人” (@laborpower), 8,908 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/laborpower.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.