2026年11月5日《#VOA今日焦点》重点新闻内容包括:特朗普总统宣布“反共周”,强调美国绝不会成为共产国家;黄之锋被加判10年监禁,美国强烈谴责并要求立即释放;第一夫人梅拉尼娅接待俄乌代表,呼吁实现更持久的乌克兰停火;法国再掀抗议潮,马克龙吁停止示威;台湾国防部长:持续与美国会沟通,确保军售案如期进行。 点击收看👉 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euonLOIKT5M
❤1

Channel
@voachinese
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
42,194subscribers
+7,661 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001639726765 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @voachinese |
| Description | 美国之音中文网 您可靠的信息来源 - 通晓美中大事 锁定美国之音 美国之音中文网 VOAChinese.com X.com/voachinese YouTube.com/voachinese Facebook.com/voachinese Instagram.com/voachinese |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/voachinese |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 19:18 | 42,194 | +39 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:08 | 42,155 | +36 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 14:48 | 42,119 | +22 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:40 | 42,097 | +81 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:45 | 42,016 | +380 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:17 | 41,636 | +20 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:06 | 41,616 | +16 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 10:06 | 41,600 | +25 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 06:06 | 41,575 | +48 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 04:01 | 41,527 | +1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:17 | 41,526 | +21 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:16 | 41,505 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:55 | 41,509 | +2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 06:58 | 41,507 | +20 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:55 | 41,487 | +2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 20:37 | 41,485 | +27 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:49 | 41,458 | +12 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 18:40 | 41,446 | +1 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 13:16 | 41,445 | +17 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 16:14 | 41,428 | first reading |
1,119 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 168 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 154 of 366 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,119 (6 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 275,029 |
| Reactions total | 293 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 13:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 409 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
727 reactions across 339 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 311 | 42.8% | |
| 👍 | 251 | 34.5% | |
| 🤣 | 84 | 11.6% | |
| 👎 | 16 | 2.20% | |
| 🤮 | 15 | 2.06% | |
| 🤩 | 11 | 1.51% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 1.10% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 1.10% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 0.825% | |
| 🤓 | 4 | 0.55% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.413% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.413% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.413% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.275% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.275% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 400 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 727 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 52 of 366 posts held from the last 30 days (14.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
2026年11月5日《#VOA今日焦点》重点新闻内容包括:特朗普总统宣布“反共周”,强调美国绝不会成为共产国家;黄之锋被加判10年监禁,美国强烈谴责并要求立即释放;第一夫人梅拉尼娅接待俄乌代表,呼吁实现更持久的乌克兰停火;法国再掀抗议潮,马克龙吁停止示威;台湾国防部长:持续与美国会沟通,确保军售案如期进行。 点击收看👉 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euonLOIKT5M
❤1
法国各地正在举行罢工和示威,工会和教师加入其中,声援高中生抗议运动。里昂和斯特拉斯堡发生警民冲突,凸显紧张局势不断加剧。抗议者要求提高工资、降低生活成本,并增加教育经费。
“最近我们接待了中国国家主席,在那之前,我们接待了查尔斯国王。他们两人都说,“哇,这就是椭圆形办公室,”特朗普总统11月5日签署了一项公告,将白宫椭圆形办公室和内阁会议室指定为国家纪念地,防止未来政府在未经国会批准的情况下对其进行改动或拆除。
❤1👍1
美国民主党预计在中期选举赢得国会参众两院控制权后,一笔仍待美国政府批准的140亿美元对台军售案再度受到关注。台湾国防部长顾立雄星期四(11月5日)表示,将持续与美国国会议员及战争部保持沟通,确保相关军售按计划推进。 更多报道 : https://www.voachinese.com/a/8219427.html
👍2
因担心国家安全,美国众议院三个重要委员会主席星期三(11月4日)联名致函英伟达执行官黄仁勋要,求其赴国会作证,以了解他与疑似中国情报人员、总部设在新加坡的数据中心公司Megaspeed高级主管爱丽丝·黄(Alice Huang,黄小乐)的关系。 更多报道 :https://www.voachinese.com/a/8219421.html
民主党在美国中期选举中预计夺回国会两院控制权,为特朗普总统的对华政策带来新的监督压力。但新一批参议员的公开立场显示,这种变化难以简单概括为对中国“更强硬”或“更温和”。更多报道:https://www.voachinese.com/a/8219405.html
❤1
星期二(11月3日)美国中期选举将使民主党从明年1月起在美国参议院和众议院均占据多数席位,此后一些共和党领导人就导致这个党在此次选举中失利的原因发表了看法。 https://www.voachinese.com/a/8219393.html
❤1
中国民政部刚刚公布的数据显示:2026年前三季度,全国结婚登记仅有464.8万对。人口学家预测,这意味着2027年的出生人口将暴跌。 更多报道:https://www.voachinese.com/a/8219391.html
👍3
总部位于瑞士苏黎世的ABB集团星期四(11月5日)表示,中国政府已通知日本投资集团软银,反对其以约54亿美元收购ABB旗下在中国的机器人业务的交易。 更多报道:https://www.voachinese.com/a/8219366.html
一名在美国申请庇护的中国公民认罪,承认参与一起在全美范围的诈骗活动,该骗局涉及盗窃礼品卡。 更多报道:https://www.voachinese.com/a/8219363.html
【60万英伟达芯片滞留香港,凸显中国想要又不敢要的矛盾】 路透社星期四(11月5日)披露,一批英伟达(Nvidia)的先进芯片由于北京未批准放行,目前仍滞留在香港。这凸显了尽管中国科技公司对芯片的需求强劲,美国也已经批准出口,但中国当局对芯片进口的“卡脖子”做法,成为这批英伟达芯片进入中国的主要障碍。 路透社援引知情人士的说法,大约有60万枚英伟达H200先进超级智能(通常称人工智能或AI)芯片,由于北京尚未批准进口,目前仍存放在香港,等待被运往中国。 ... ... 点击阅读完整报道👉 https://www.voachinese.com/a/8219355.html
【特朗普宣布“反共周”,强调美国绝不会成为共产国家】 美国总统唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)本周签署公告,将11月1日至7日定为“反共产主义周”。白宫星期三(11月4日)发文强调,特朗普总统将始终致力于反对国家权力主导的专制,“美国绝对不会且永远不会成为共产主义国家”。公告指出,一个多世纪以来,共产主义和社会主义意识形态一直威胁人类自由,剥夺个人机会,使人民屈从于国家权力,并侵犯人民与生俱来的基本权利。 ... ... 点击阅读完整报道👉 https://www.voachinese.com/a/trump-designated-anti-communism-week-20261105/8219254.html
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,119 posts we hold for @voachinese. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@voachinese edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 3 posts on @voachinese as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@voachinese named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“美国之音” (@voachinese), 42,194 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/voachinese.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.