#突发事件:比特派钱包服务器崩了! 🔔订阅东南亚大事件: @DBAW911 ☎️免费投稿猛料有奖: @ww444

Channel
东南亚大事件-聚焦时事
@pp854
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
68,511subscribers
-15,916 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001163917486 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @dbaw911 @pp854 |
| Description | #迪拜 #柬埔寨 #泰国 #缅甸 #金三角 ✅东南亚大事件 频道专注于东南亚华人最新动态资讯,生活故事分享,海外华人求助,让你看尽海外华人大小事。 本频道谢绝任何政治敏感新闻,新闻仅供参考,无刻意引导~~避免我们的评论区火药味变得更重。本频道鼓励尊重友好的交流方式,进一步发表有意义的评论内容。 👉 @ww444 👉 @DBAW911_bot |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 72 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pp854 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026, 12:37 | 68,511 | -21 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 10:28 | 68,532 | -337 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 02:21 | 68,869 | -29 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 21:06 | 68,898 | +5,713 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 21:40 | 63,185 | -54 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 08:42 | 63,239 | -593 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 10:22 | 63,832 | -55 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 23:18 | 63,887 | -1,239 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 21:02 | 65,126 | -88 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 65,214 | -694 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:36 | 65,908 | -272 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:19 | 66,180 | -883 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:36 | 67,063 | -43 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 67,106 | -1,170 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 68,276 | -54 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 68,330 | -2,318 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 70,648 | -20 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 70,668 | -1,370 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 72,038 | +4,876 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 67,162 | first reading |
Engagement
1,402 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 142 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.38%
- avg views ÷ 68,511 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,680
- 580 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.035%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 580
- of 1,402 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 254 of 580 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,402 (7 August 2026 – 14 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,136,947 |
| Reactions total | 323 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Oct 2026, 18:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈85,700
- Videos
- ≈9,270
- Links
- ≈21,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 5h 08m
- Average length
- 57s
Measured directly from 326 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
597 reactions across 426 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 206 | 34.5% | |
| ❤ | 141 | 23.6% | |
| 😁 | 82 | 13.7% | |
| 🎉 | 81 | 13.6% | |
| 🥰 | 66 | 11.1% | |
| 🤣 | 9 | 1.51% | |
| 💩 | 5 | 0.838% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 0.503% | |
| 🤮 | 3 | 0.503% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.168% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 455 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 597 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 August 2026 to 14 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#群友回复:本来不打算投稿,也不想把事情闹大,但刚刚看到有人投稿曝光马来西亚的黑公司,我觉得,有些事情,既然已经发生了,就不应该一直沉默。总要有人站出来,把自己经历过的事情说出来 马来西亚现在的环境已经够紧张了,我真的不明白,为什么还有一些公司敢这样操作,一步一步消耗别人对这里的信任,破坏原本就不稳定的平衡。 今天要说的是一家位于马来西亚某别墅区、做日本盘的公司 1. 当初承诺不收护照,入职后却以办理签证为由收走护照。 当初谈的时候,明明说好不收护照。结果人过去几天后,公司就以办理签证为由,要求我们交出护照,还说办完就会归还,结果呢?护照一交就是两三个月。 这期间我们不是没有问过,也不是没有催过,而是反复询问了很多次。每次得到的答复几乎一模一样:放心,公司会处理,别担心,问一次是这个答案,问十次还是这个答案。没有明确的时间,没有实际的进展,更没有人给出一个能够兑现的承诺。 公司内部涉及所谓的保护费、资源费等各种费用,整体…
❤1
FBI:“断电行动”取得显著成效 美国联邦调查局发起的代号为“断电行动 OPERATION BLACKOUT”的全球性打诈行动,对全球诈骗中心的大力打击持续取得显著成效。 🔺查扣了约170亿美元的资产与加密货币 🔺逮捕了数百名涉嫌诈骗人员 🔺解救了数千名遭贩运的劳工 🔺在一万多名美国人蒙受财产损失之前向其发出预警 🔺避免了约6.7亿美元的损失 🔺20多个国家目前正协同参与这场打击行动。 联邦调查局称,决不罢休,直至这些犯罪分子受到法律制裁,美国人民及其资产免遭诈骗分子侵害。 🔔订阅东南亚大事件: @DBAW911 ☎️免费投稿猛料有奖: @ww444
❤1
#突发事件:🇰🇭金边市 Kok Roka 分区刚刚发生枪击事件,造成有人受伤。目前,嫌疑人仍在逃,警方正在追捕。 🔔订阅东南亚大事件: @DBAW911 ☎️免费投稿猛料有奖: @ww444
❤1
500多人掉进“高收益投资”陷阱,1.6亿养老钱被骗走 10月14日,央视披露一起针对老年人的集资诈骗案。北京一家公司把马术俱乐部、果园、林地、和牛、红酒等项目包装成“稳赚不赔”的投资生意,吸引500多人参与,募集资金超过1.6亿元,其中约九成为老年人。 2018年至2021年,冯某伙同他人,利用自己实际控制的多家公司,对外推出十多个投资项目,承诺年化收益12%至36%。 为了让老人相信项目真实,公司不仅开宣讲会、发传单,还组织投资人坐大巴去外地考察马场、果园等项目。考察过程中,有人出面讲解项目规划,公司还摆出所谓担保、产权证等材料,让投资人以为项目有官方背景、资金有保障。 冯某还公开展示自己的身份证、房本和家庭住址,反复强调自己不会骗人。很多老人因此放下戒心,把几十万元甚至上百万元养老钱投进项目。 这些合同大多是一年或两年期。合同快到期时,业务员又会劝投资人把钱转进下一个项目,重新签合同继续投资。冯某还多次录视频、开…
👍1
#付费广告 💎🎰🙌💵 😀💰💸💸 💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳 💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳 🧐专业服务 超高限红 毫秒出款 ❤️视讯 — 索莱尔/DB/CQ9高限红 ❤️电子 — PG/PP/CQ9 一注2000 ❤️彩票 — 独家综艺28/哈希区块彩 🏆OK游戏中心 公群9 入驻300万U 🏆新币担保 公群999 入驻100万U 官方网址 ➔ 9Y.COM 官方飞投 ➔ @GF9Y 官方唯一客服 ➔ @KF9Y 官方唯一频道 ➔ @WWW9YCOM 💎🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋💎
#紧急呼吁:为缅甸 Koe Maa Nee 园区的印度受害者伸张正义! 缅甸 Koe Maa Nee 园区据称仍有大量印度人被困并遭受剥削,相关情况亟需引起关注。 一名印度幸存者表示,为了获得释放,他被迫支付了 9,000 美元。由于家庭经济状况困难,他不得不向家人和朋友借钱。他还声称,自己在园区内遭受了严重的虐待和折磨。 如今,他要求园区管理方退还这笔钱,但据称管理方拒绝退款,并表示无法处理此事。 他已准备好公开 WhatsApp 聊天记录、照片、视频及其他相关证据,希望揭露涉嫌虐待和经济剥削的行为,并为自己及其他可能仍被困的人争取正义。 这不仅仅是 9,000 美元的问题,更关乎人的尊严、责任与无数家庭所承受的痛苦。 沉默不应成为涉嫌施害者的保护伞,获救的受害者不应被抛弃! 呼吁印度政府、媒体及人权组织关注此案,展开公正、严肃、独立的调查,追究相关责任,并帮助受害者获得应有的公正与支持。请转发,让更多人关注此事…
#群友投稿:马来西亚现在很多黑公司都不帮员工弄签证,还有一些离职的时候打着有保护的名义进行多要赔付 如果遇到这样的情况,大家可以直接打报警电话【999】,打过去马放人 ,提醒大家来马来西亚人要慎重 🔔订阅东南亚大事件: @DBAW911 ☎️免费投稿猛料有奖: @ww444
柬埔寨高官回应半岛电视台报道:绝不否认诈骗存在 正坚决清剿电诈窝点 针对半岛电视台关于国公省“长湾”涉诈报道,柬埔寨打击网络诈骗委员会常务副主席蔡西那烈表示,柬政府从未否认网络诈骗的存在,但一直采取最高度负责的法律手段予以坚决打击。 蔡西那烈强调,媒体报道中的涉诈画面均发生于大清剿行动之前,这恰恰证明了柬方随后清剿行动的成功。柬政府正全面摧毁诈骗窝点、追捕幕后头目,并深化国际合作,坚决防止网络犯罪卷土重来。 也就是,以后绝不可能有了~~ 🔔订阅东南亚大事件: @DBAW911 ☎️免费投稿猛料有奖: @ww444
#付费广告 ☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️ 😘😘😘😘😪😮💨😵 🌟 品牌运营 · 公平透明 🈴 上亿储备 · 实力品牌 · 放心娱乐 😀官方网址: 6G.com 📌柬埔寨专用域名: 6G.VIP 🦧🦣🐘🦛🦏🐪🐫🦒🦘 😔 持续积累口碑,平台实力看得见 ➡️ 新人注册即送🔡 36U体验金 💎 原平台VIP等级 · 无条件转移 💎 返水😀.😀😀起·无需打码 💎 代理全线抽水+负盈返佣高达50% 💎 邀请好友奖励🍌🍌🍌U 🦬🐃🐂🐄🫏🐎🐖🐏🐑 😔 大额处理更迅速,服务体验更稳定 😃 爆庄实录|3天狂揽1086万U 😃 新客首存6万U,豪提209万U 😃 500一拉,PG实力兑现133万U 😀 官网: 6G.COM 😀 彩票: 6G567.COM 😕飞投 @AA6G 💻客服 @KF6G 1️⃣代理 @daili6g 🤑 爆奖 @ceo6g 🔓 实力无需解释 · 出款快就是证明!
#付费广告 🫤😐🫥😶🤥🫠🤫🫡🫢 😑 N9 国际认证 | 信誉平台 支持5倍验资 【验资:@N9KF】 担保域名:N9.TOP 点击查看 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 💝 新会员好礼 注册就送28.8U 新人首存/二存/三存最高赠送8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣U 💝 老会员好礼 电子狂欢每日存款赠送10% 充值笔笔送3%无上限 夜间充值最高可优惠8888U ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 香港六合彩 4️⃣8️⃣.8️⃣ 倍 加拿大28全网返水最高 ⚡️注册网址:N9.PRO 😇🧐🧐😗🧐😙😄 ⚡️ 官方客服: @N9KF ⚡️ 官方飞投: @N9N9 ⚡️ 彩票客服: @N9CP ⚡️ 彩票飞投: @N9N9N9 ⚡️ 福利频道: @N9pd888 ⚡️ 注册网址: N9.COM【USDT】 ⚡️ 注册网址…
币安将在11月10日关闭矿池及相关服务 加密货币交易所币安发布公告宣布,将在 2026 年 11 月 10 日 15:00 (UTC+8) 停止币安矿池及其相关服务。受影响的项目包括币安矿池宝、云算力、交易加速以及矿池 API、Telegram 算力提醒以及邮件通知等功能。 🔔订阅东南亚大事件: @DBAW911 ☎️免费投稿猛料有奖: @ww444
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,402 posts we hold for @pp854. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@pp854 edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 30 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 4 September 2026
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@daqun24 · 1,26260 posts66U机器人
@xihuvipbot · 17,23447 posts182体育-官方频道
@TY_182 · 2,00346 posts122体育-官方频道
@tz228 · 6,87336 posts【122体育】官方合营
@QSTY7 · 50730 postsN9.COM|官方频道
@N9_com1 · 12,90523 postsN9.COM 福利频道导航
@n9pd888 · 7,29923 posts🔥金贝娱乐场-jinbei.com-【官方招商】🔥
@jbzhaoshang · 4,95316 posts8K国际官方
@PG8K8K · 3,54315 posts182体育 合营中心
@DLHY182 · 56214 posts东南亚大事件@hwdsj2
@ww222 · 104,9519 postsUU国际丨赢钱俱乐部
@WWW6ACOM · 4,6659 posts6G全球丨官方爆奖俱乐部
@ceo6g · 2,0096 postsSpam Info Bot
@SpamBot · 35,499,2841 post东南亚大事件-聚焦时事 @TX100
@tx100 · 152,6951 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@pp854 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 39 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 October 2026 · confirmed gone 18 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@sucai1 · 59,748#1
@wgsb · 207,996 (as read 19 August 2026)#2
@Sucaiyo · 100,122#3
@sucai177 · 99,880#4
@sucai277 · 102,838#5
@hc_sucai · 4,872#6
@tp111 · 54,349#7
@meishisc · 29,834#8
@USCA0 · 17,484#9
@TGSCRC · 12,795#10
@sucai6655 · 52,919#11
@bx666 · 463,633#12
@suvsvip · 4,152#13
@wqbysc98 · 27,821#14
@usd1 · 253,497 (as read 19 August 2026)#15
@sucai518 · 18,303#16
@YTT786 · 102,519#17
@sucai_wenle · 17,937#18
@wenan888 · 62,820#19
@ygxw3 · 148,539#20
@huachsc · 1,743#21
@sucai557 · 3,889#22
@dj17 · 109,793#23
@wenanhs1 · 30,427#24
@TG508 · 14,730#25
@gedan · 10,465#26
@chiguahs · 108,919#27
@dubai0 · 94,481#28
@QQSCG8899 · 4,007#29
@ppbbb · 21,763#30
@telonews_cn · 81,785#31
@sck888 · 92,935#32
@caisulai · 1,356#33
@xianggang188 · 10,260#34
@xylianmengsucai · 2,447#35
@Burmese_1991 · 26,461#36
@jjjjeuaaa · 41#37
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@tp111 · 54,349
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 23 August 2026
@sucai277 · 102,838
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 15 August 2026
@sucai177 · 99,880
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 15 August 2026
@YTT786 · 102,519
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026
@sucai1 · 59,748
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 14 August 2026
@sck888 · 92,935
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 19 August 2026
@wenan888 · 62,820
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 20 August 2026
@guawa9 · 87,020
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 17 August 2026
@chigua6680 · 236,141
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 11 August 2026
@FinanceNewsDaily · 58,428
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
@qqneQJ · 31,506
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 31 August 2026
@AQzx_7 · 33,250
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 23 August 2026
@TG_DJ777 · 117,044
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 12 August 2026
@chigua_e · 236,945
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 11 August 2026
@hyxw4 · 79,403
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 19 August 2026
@fenchacaij · 241,871
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
@chiguahs · 108,919
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 14 August 2026
@chiguadog · 154,596
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 12 August 2026
@onlychigua · 201,111
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 14 August 2026
@aichiguaba · 211,737
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 14 August 2026
@cgbg8 · 101,995
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 15 August 2026
@DNYQWCG · 77,955
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 19 August 2026
@telonews_cn · 81,785
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
@voachinese · 41,428
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚大事件-聚焦时事” (@pp854), 68,511 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pp854.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.