🏅ai短剧赞助: 全网火爆的ai短剧,每日更新,剧情多样,高清原画质,女优颜值高。全是精品ai短剧资源 已更新 《母子同欢》 《母上攻略》 《女友帮我操闺蜜》 《 兄弟妈妈好好操》 《我的岳母苏佩真》 《 榨精病栋》 《 从地狱归来:深渊调教》 《 我在办公室被她们榨干》 《 夹着精液回家的女人》 《爸爸不在家》 《艳母献身记 》 《萝莉学姐是我妈?》 等等精品ai短剧 👉点我立即加入观看👈 每天更新不断~
❤3👍2🥰2

Channel
@chiguadog
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
154,050subscribers
-696 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001402318624 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chiguadog |
| Description | 吃瓜新闻 沙雕视频 如有侵权请联系删除 @dogcgbot |
| Created | Between 1 October 2018 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chiguadog |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:38 | 154,050 | -14 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 154,064 | -53 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:02 | 154,117 | +29 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 154,088 | -109 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 154,197 | -143 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:00 | 154,340 | -55 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 154,395 | +27 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:42 | 154,368 | +14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:42 | 154,354 | -146 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:07 | 154,500 | -190 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 154,690 | +66 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 154,624 | +233 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 154,391 | +134 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 154,257 | +286 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 153,971 | +208 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 153,763 | -114 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 153,877 | -117 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 153,994 | -85 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 154,079 | +57 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 154,022 | first reading |
339 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 111 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 194 of 198 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 339 (4 August 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,427,770 |
| Reactions total | 2,044 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 03:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 245 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,156 reactions across 326 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 932 | 29.5% | |
| 👍 | 794 | 25.2% | |
| 🙏 | 337 | 10.7% | |
| 💩 | 216 | 6.84% | |
| 🤮 | 194 | 6.15% | |
| 🤡 | 118 | 3.74% | |
| 😁 | 114 | 3.61% | |
| 😱 | 97 | 3.07% | |
| 🫡 | 87 | 2.76% | |
| 🤣 | 80 | 2.53% | |
| 🤬 | 52 | 1.65% | |
| 👎 | 28 | 0.887% | |
| 👏 | 24 | 0.76% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 0.444% | |
| 💅 | 13 | 0.412% | |
| 🌭 | 9 | 0.285% | |
| 🤷♂ | 7 | 0.222% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 0.19% | |
| 🤷♀ | 6 | 0.19% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 0.19% | |
| 11 further kinds | 22 | 0.697% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 330 of the 339 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,156 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 339 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏅ai短剧赞助: 全网火爆的ai短剧,每日更新,剧情多样,高清原画质,女优颜值高。全是精品ai短剧资源 已更新 《母子同欢》 《母上攻略》 《女友帮我操闺蜜》 《 兄弟妈妈好好操》 《我的岳母苏佩真》 《 榨精病栋》 《 从地狱归来:深渊调教》 《 我在办公室被她们榨干》 《 夹着精液回家的女人》 《爸爸不在家》 《艳母献身记 》 《萝莉学姐是我妈?》 等等精品ai短剧 👉点我立即加入观看👈 每天更新不断~
❤3👍2🥰2
搜索更多吃瓜、看片等资源 👉点此进群
👍5❤1
苹果手机销量也赢麻了 iPhone 18 Pro 系列在中国大陆首销日的销量约为 32.28 万台,达到了 iPhone 17 Pro 系列同期的 130%。 其中,iPhone 18 Pro 占比约 44.5%,iPhone 18 Pro Max 占比约 55.5%。 加入吃瓜dog‘
👍5🤮5❤3
赢麻了 加入吃瓜dog‘
👍7🤬4💩3
武汉男子就医之后死亡,家属质疑遗体被强行拖走火化 湖北武汉江夏区第一人民医院一名36岁男子就医期间死亡。家属认为可能涉及医疗事故,并称在双方尚未协商一致的情况下,医院保安将遗体从电梯等区域强行拖走,随后送去火化。 家属对这一处置方式表示强烈不满,认为既未经同意,过程也十分粗暴。 加入吃瓜dog‘
🤬11❤4👍4
小车司机👍外卖小哥差点一天又白干 加入吃瓜dog‘
👍6💩1
女的先动手的😑 加入吃瓜dog‘
👍8❤4
身材颜值完美 加入吃瓜dog‘
👍4
#黑丝 屁股 散散味~ 加入吃瓜dog‘
❤4👍2
福利时刻 是个好屁股 #弹力测试 加入吃瓜dog‘
❤4👍2
9.20日京昆高速(往西安方向)秦岭1号隧道,因发生交通事故,对西安方向在秦岭服务区,林场停车区交通管制 加入吃瓜dog‘
❤5👍1
#挑情丑闻 韩剧《挑情丑闻》上线就引发轰动。池昌旭与林珍娜贡献出道以来最大尺度戏份 加入吃瓜dog‘
❤6👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 339 posts we hold for @chiguadog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@chiguadog edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“吃瓜群众【 猎奇】” (@chiguadog), 154,050 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chiguadog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.