皮皮虾🦐搞笑吃瓜 pinned a photo

Channel
皮皮虾🦐搞笑吃瓜
@pipixia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,326subscribers
-238 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001792237267 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pipixia |
| Created | Between 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pipixia |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 12,326 | -8 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 12,334 | -5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 12,339 | -11 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:36 | 12,350 | -18 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 12,368 | -17 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 01:21 | 12,385 | -20 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 12,405 | -9 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:29 | 12,414 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:53 | 12,417 | -15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 12,432 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 12,433 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 12,442 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 12,450 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 12,447 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 12,455 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:59 | 12,460 | -10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 12,470 | -7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 12,477 | -12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 12,489 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 12,490 | first reading |
Engagement
381 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.671%
- avg views ÷ 12,326 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 82.8
- 149 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.76%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 162
- of 381 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 149 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 381 (7 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 12,332 |
| Reactions total | 17 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 21:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2h 46m
- Average length
- 47s
Measured directly from 212 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
26 reactions across 22 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 34.6% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 30.8% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 11.5% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 7.69% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 7.69% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 3.85% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 3.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 381 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 381 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🅥开云体育作为亚洲最大持有合法牌照的投注平台 🅥 致力于为玩家提供专业,安全,丰富的游戏服务 🅥 体育,真人,电竞,棋牌,电子等上千款服务应有尽有。 🅥 开云体育邀请你共创财富。 🅥 开云官方频道: @kaiyun 🅥 开云官网链接: http://43kyty.com 🅥 优惠福利: 首存+官网+复存 彩金 等级平移 空降嫩模 🅥 温馨提示: 国外IP限制 点击 下载VPN
#火烧鸡 感受灼热 🔥
🎉1
实力雄厚,百年好合! #结婚 订婚 收收小米 🤏
🎉1
各国称号
9.1 广州鹤洞路,大树倒了压到人 #树倒 #砸人 #倒霉
👍1
新一代理想MEGA,今晚 发布
😁1
简单吃点 👎
守株待兔 就差你了 🤔
👍1🤩1
教人赚钱的作家,已经负债 12 亿了。畅销金融科普书富爸爸穷爸爸的作者 Robert Kiyosaki,承认自己正在用房产,做抵押借钱,再把钱拿去投资,不断滚动杠杆。 他说这是富人玩法,用债务撬动能赚钱的资产,而不是自己攒现金慢慢买,目前和朋友已经堆到 1500 套出租房产,并以此为荣。
👍1🥰1
宇树科技正式跌破 550 元价格,股价腰斩。 较开盘价 1100 元,已下跌 50.3%
🤩1😁1
这么简单的骗术,居然能骗到100多名女生!
Showing the 12 most recent of 381 posts we hold for @pipixia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@meitian · 28,671
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 20 here — alongside 19 others — read 9 September 2026
@GQSP9 · 90,528
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 14 August 2026
@cggxhhh · 267,452
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 August 2026
@chigua_a · 214,714
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 12 August 2026
@GXduanzi1 · 91,095
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 13 August 2026
@nh888 · 175,539
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 12 August 2026
@onlychigua · 200,649
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 14 August 2026
@neihanduanzi1 · 225,435
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 11 August 2026
@ay2028 · 79,466
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 18 August 2026
@aichiguaba · 247,493
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 14 August 2026
@chigua_e · 234,360
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 11 August 2026
@miandianDS · 45,525
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 27 August 2026
@z055q · 55,875
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 19 August 2026
@chiguadog · 154,050
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 12 August 2026
@pdsss · 54,442
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 23 August 2026
@cgbg8 · 107,027
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“皮皮虾🦐搞笑吃瓜” (@pipixia), 12,326 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pipixia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.