✅导航频道 https://t.me/xouche 🆘想搜啥就搜啥【万能搜索】 点击加入👉 https://t.me/+cdWO2LqFFmtiNjll
❤1

Channel
@chigua_e
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
210,133subscribers
+515 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001807595378 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @chigua97 @chigua_e @tgso66 @tgso88 @xbkfb |
| Description | Hello @Telegram My channel has not violated the rules and policy of using Telegram. 广告投放 @KLOWX |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 118 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chigua_e |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 210,133 | -27 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 210,160 | -683 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:16 | 210,843 | -182 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 211,025 | -937 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 211,962 | -910 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 212,872 | -234 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:20 | 213,106 | -398 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:16 | 213,504 | -76 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:40 | 213,580 | -1,014 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:42 | 214,594 | -191 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 214,785 | -44 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:16 | 214,829 | -166 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 214,995 | -75 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:03 | 215,070 | -250 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:35 | 215,320 | -127 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:12 | 215,447 | -206 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:46 | 215,653 | -18 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 215,671 | -153 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:47 | 215,824 | -351 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:54 | 216,175 | first reading |
591 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 199 of 513 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 591 (7 August 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 425,251 |
| Reactions total | 276 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Sept 2026, 05:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 414 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
319 reactions across 198 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 127 | 39.8% | |
| ❤ | 103 | 32.3% | |
| 💩 | 14 | 4.39% | |
| 👎 | 13 | 4.08% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 3.45% | |
| 🤮 | 9 | 2.82% | |
| ⚡ | 8 | 2.51% | |
| 🖕 | 7 | 2.19% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 1.88% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 1.25% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 1.25% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 0.94% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.627% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 0.627% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 0.627% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.627% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.313% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.313% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 224 of the 591 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 319 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 591 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✅导航频道 https://t.me/xouche 🆘想搜啥就搜啥【万能搜索】 点击加入👉 https://t.me/+cdWO2LqFFmtiNjll
❤1
几位辽宁丹东小哥在店门口吃饭,外地游客瞅见桌上花生,问卖不卖! 小哥说:不卖,自己吃的! 听口音不太一样,随口问了句哪里来的?对方说是台湾来旅游的同胞。 小哥一听是台湾同胞,立马招呼:抓!随便抓! 大陆人民听说是台湾同胞,比对待大陆人民自己还亲切,希望台湾同胞们也多学习学习
守时是人生第一课! 三位学生拼网约车去上学,司机已经原地等候十多分钟,这时先出来两位女孩,还希望司机继续留下来等候剩下的那一名同学。 司机表示无法继续等待,让两名女生下车重新下单。此话一出两个女孩当场哭了,紧接喊家长下来理论,据悉这一单还是价格低廉的特惠一口价订单
❤2
给游戏的角色过生日,这都是什么价值观啊?
集美 #偷外卖 是吃不起了吗 ?
知情者描述:女的出轨手机被男的拿到了,女的不给走就一直抓着男的阻挠厮打,男的没办法才选择出手
❤1
简直把不要脸发挥到了极致!! 被4岁孩童摸臀部的女当事人哭诉:被男童碰臀气得进了两次急抢救室,期间肢体不受控制、手脚僵硬抽筋、呼吸不上来。 律师说对方家长愿意互相道歉解决问题,但她拒绝,原因是男童脖子上的勒痕是他自己心虚挣扎导致的!现在完整监控都出来还在那里嘴硬…… 一个天天碰瓷制造纠纷的网红,还好意思装委屈!
💩3❤1
iPhone 18 Pro Max 开机
❤1
“安卓苹果”荣耀Magic 9 Pro Max 9 月 28 日发布。
四年前,孟晚舟乘坐中国政府包机,抵达深圳宝安国际机场;四年后,华为刚在纽约联邦法院,接受刑事审判,面临敲诈勒索、银行及电信欺诈、洗钱、违反美国对伊朗制裁等多项指控。华为否认指控,并推翻孟晚舟的证词。孟晚舟在加拿大被捕时,携带iPhone手机、iPad和MacBook电脑。
习近平致电祝贺朝鲜建国78周年 愿加强中朝关系战略引领
美国财政部长贝森特: 我认为他们的第一个问题是:我们该如何监管它?如何监管? 想想看,就比如云服务,我们有微软、亚马逊、谷歌;中国有阿里巴巴和腾讯。 欧洲却没有一家大型云服务公司,为什么会这样?这些都是高度受教育的社会,但欧洲没有生态系统。
Showing the 12 most recent of 591 posts we hold for @chigua_e. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
8 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“吃瓜群众🍉” (@chigua_e), 210,133 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chigua_e.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.