#新闻 #最新新闻 #热点新闻 #社会新闻 #每日吃瓜 银行卡上的金色卡片是真金? 网友纷纷尝试银行卡炼金 专家:芯片部分含金 属功能性镀层 含量极低 几乎没有回收价值 #银行卡 #芯片 #炼金 #黄金

Channel
新闻哥头条吃瓜每日热点
@yewaiTQ
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,485subscribers
+5,010 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001951979971 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yewaiTQ |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yewaiTQ |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 21,485 | -41 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:59 | 21,526 | -13 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 21,539 | -16 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:41 | 21,555 | -20 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:16 | 21,575 | +446 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 21,129 | -304 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 21,433 | -22 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:35 | 21,455 | -12 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:09 | 21,467 | -13 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:05 | 21,480 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 21,491 | -14 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 21,505 | -22 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 21,527 | -16 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 21,543 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 21,554 | +9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 21,545 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 21,546 | -18 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 21,564 | -11 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 21,575 | +4,951 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 16,624 | first reading |
Engagement
436 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.16%
- avg views ÷ 21,485 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 250
- 163 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.394%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 163
- of 436 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 163 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 436 (6 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 40,706 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2h 51m
- Average length
- 36s
Measured directly from 286 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
17 reactions across 17 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 16 | 94.1% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 436 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 436 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#新闻 #最新新闻 #热点新闻 #社会新闻 #每日吃瓜 美袭击伊一婚礼至少4死50伤其中包括一名4岁儿童死亡,遭袭现场曝光:建筑碎片散落一地,伊方:再次体现美国的“道德沦丧”
#新闻 #最新新闻 #热点新闻 #社会新闻 #每日吃瓜 危急关头,竟弹出开屏广告!深圳市民因邻居家起火报警,点击消防提供的链接上传现场视频,跳转的却是自己浏览器的开屏广告,耽误了半分钟,所幸火势未造成严重后果
#新闻 #最新新闻 #热点新闻 #社会新闻 #每日吃瓜 逃亡50年 被抓时已71岁!男子涉嫌与已婚女子发生婚外情 杀害其丈夫后 隐姓埋名娶妻生子 三代刑警从未放弃 将其抓获
#新闻 #最新新闻 #热点新闻 #社会新闻 #每日吃瓜 中国女篮主力李月汝因护照在邮寄途中丢失,无缘本届世界杯,李月汝回应:很遗憾不能和姐妹们并肩作战,虽无法到场,但心一直和大家在一起!姐妹们加油,中国女篮加油!
#媒体原创 要把霍尔木兹海峡改名“特朗普海峡”?特朗普:就随口一说 当地时间9月2日,美国总统特朗普在社交媒体平台发帖称:“既然我们已经将其置于美国掌控之下,我们要不要把霍尔木兹海峡改名为‘特朗普海峡’?”同日,特朗普在白宫接受媒体采访时,又称自己提议冠名霍尔木兹海峡,只是“随口一说”。
😔注册即领😇🙃🙃🧐😗🙃🙃 充值礼包 🎰电子 🐠捕鱼 🃏棋牌 🙋🏼♀️真人 ⚽️体育 /场馆齐全 各种出入款方式 🧐😛😕😊😟 😉 支持:😎😀🥰😘😎🥸😒☺️😛 😉😗😇😊🤩😗😟😉😞😊 不限IP,菲律宾、迪拜、柬埔寨随便玩! 😀实时返水最高享受😗😟😙🤨优惠返点 😀实力大盘,无限代模式 6月18日某集团大佬当天提现58万USDT 7月13日某集团大佬靠实力再次喜提550万USDT 😉东南亚线路: https://174.35.80.6:5029/?id=693057943 😉官方客服: @xpj9085 😉官方频道: @qwbf88 注册即领😇🙃🙃🧐😗🙃🙃充值礼包 😔😟🥺😟😞😔🧐🤓😀🧐🥸😎🥸😎🧐
9月2日,河北保定,校方回应家长在班级群自曝干部身份 :关注到此事,会对所有学生一视同仁。
#新闻 #最新新闻 #热点新闻 #社会新闻 #每日吃瓜 黄金大搬家!价值120亿美元!荷兰把86吨黄金从美国加拿大转运到伦敦 为什么搬?担忧美国可"轻易阻断"荷兰支付交易
#新闻 #最新新闻 #热点新闻 #社会新闻 #每日吃瓜 北京一大学生地铁摔倒碰女乘客,送医检查无异常后,仍被索误工费3000元。#北京 #地铁 #误工费 #大学生
#新闻 #最新新闻 #热点新闻 #社会新闻 #每日吃瓜 9月3日报道,#河南项城失联母女三人已找到 ,丈夫:已将三人接回家,妻子索要现金,双方争吵后离家出走。
#新闻 #最新新闻 #热点新闻 #社会新闻 #每日吃瓜 9月3日,河北保定,医院回应家长在班级群自报纪委身份 :确实是我院纪委书记,院领导正探讨解决方案。
Showing the 12 most recent of 436 posts we hold for @yewaiTQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@qwbf88 · 3,72638 postsN9.COM|官方频道
@N9_com1 · 12,35823 postsN9.COM 福利频道导航
@n9pd888 · 7,71523 postsY3国际 五大联赛 推单频道
@TYtuijian8 · 10,49223 posts🅨𝟛国际官方频道
@Y3duchang0 · 10,14523 posts182体育 招商中心,共创辉煌
@GC182TY · 53521 posts𝟏𝟖𝟐体育官方频道
@S182TY · 9,75521 posts182体育 体育赛事 推单频道
@td182TY · 10,34721 posts极搜🔍资源搜索@JISOU
@jisou2 · 1,747,98012 postsG7环球|官方福利俱乐部
@wwwG7com · 4,3333 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@JShangrong · 24,860
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 September 2026
@tuigsc · 69,020
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 21 August 2026
@qq2023bg · 63,892
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“新闻哥头条吃瓜每日热点” (@yewaiTQ), 21,485 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yewaiTQ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.