Channel
@n9pd888
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
7,162subscribers
-1,360 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002745829003 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @n9pd888 |
| Created | 9 July 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/n9pd888 |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:36 | 7,162 | +1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 04:59 | 7,161 | -8 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:19 | 7,169 | -19 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:59 | 7,188 | -19 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:01 | 7,207 | -19 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 01:37 | 7,226 | -35 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 20:50 | 7,261 | -38 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 13:00 | 7,299 | -66 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 08:59 | 7,365 | -85 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 13:35 | 7,450 | -265 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 7,715 | -99 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 7,814 | -147 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 7,961 | -165 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 8,126 | -124 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 8,250 | -162 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 8,412 | -89 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 8,501 | -7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 8,508 | -6 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 8,514 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 8,515 | first reading |
2 posts held, back to 9 July 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
931 reactions across 1 post, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 281 | 30.2% | |
| 😍 | 107 | 11.5% | |
| 🎉 | 87 | 9.34% | |
| ❤🔥 | 75 | 8.06% | |
| 👍 | 72 | 7.73% | |
| 🤩 | 69 | 7.41% | |
| 🔥 | 67 | 7.20% | |
| 🥰 | 67 | 7.20% | |
| 💯 | 65 | 6.98% | |
| 💩 | 22 | 2.36% | |
| 👎 | 19 | 2.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 2 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 931 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 2 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2025 to 9 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😀🤠🤑🤕🤒😷🤧🤮🥴🤐 N9.COM N9国际 官方频道 音乐·电影·美女·文案·DJ舞曲 😀 N9.COM·宝藏女孩 🔥 😀 N9.COM·深夜文案 🔥 😀 N9.COM·国漫聚合 🔥 😀 N9.COM·MV歌曲 🔥 😀 N9.COM·DJ舞曲 🔥 酷我音乐|经典老歌|抖音流行 🫢🫡🤫🫠注册网址： N9.COM 新闻热点 东南亚|迪拜大事件|最新热点资讯 东南亚|华人大事件 热搜·黑料·关键词 调教母狗｜萝莉｜少妇 糖心vlog 八月未央 …
❤281😍107🎉87❤🔥75👍72🤩69🔥67🥰67
Channel created
Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @n9pd888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@n9pd888 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Named by 376 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“N9.COM 福利频道导航” (@n9pd888), 7,162 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/n9pd888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.