菲律宾大事件 全球曝光🚀 pinned a video

Channel
菲律宾大事件 全球曝光🚀
@feilvbin198
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
93,676subscribers
-453 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001909718355 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @feilvbin198 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 49 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/feilvbin198 |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Oct 2026, 23:19 | 93,676 | -861 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 02:26 | 94,537 | -1,300 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:05 | 95,837 | -1,273 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:21 | 97,110 | +9,336 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:18 | 87,774 | -1,422 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 05:38 | 89,196 | -2,089 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:09 | 91,285 | -757 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:40 | 92,042 | -878 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 92,920 | -724 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:28 | 93,644 | -1,351 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 16:46 | 94,995 | +8,979 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 86,016 | -1,428 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 16:36 | 87,444 | -3,364 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 07:37 | 90,808 | -3,626 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 03:01 | 94,434 | +10,082 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 18:02 | 84,352 | -12,656 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 97,008 | +5,243 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 91,765 | -3,152 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 94,917 | +10,968 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 83,949 | first reading |
Engagement
2,545 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 163 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.84%
- avg views ÷ 93,676 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,660
- 618 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.031%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 970
- of 2,545 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 75 of 618 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,545 (7 August 2026 – 26 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,645,777 |
| Reactions total | 72 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Oct 2026, 16:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 59m 13s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 255 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
89 reactions across 78 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤩 | 15 | 16.9% | |
| ⚡ | 12 | 13.5% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 13.5% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 12.4% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 10.1% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 8.99% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 8.99% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 7.87% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 6.74% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.12% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 82 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 26 September 2026 to 26 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🫤😐🫥😶🤥🫠🤫🫡🫢 😑 N9 国际认证 | 信誉平台 支持5倍验资 【验资:@N9KF】 担保域名:N9.TOP 点击查看 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 💝 新会员好礼 注册就送28.8U 新人首存/二存/三存最高赠送8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣U 💝 老会员好礼 电子狂欢每日存款赠送10% 充值笔笔送3%无上限 夜间充值最高可优惠8888U ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 香港六合彩 4️⃣8️⃣.8️⃣ 倍 加拿大28全网返水最高 ⚡️注册网址:N9.PRO 😇🧐🧐😗🧐😙😄 ⚡️ 官方客服: @N9KF ⚡️ 官方飞投: @N9N9 ⚡️ 彩票客服: @N9CP ⚡️ 彩票飞投: @N9N9N9 ⚡️ 福利频道: @N9pd888 ⚡️ 注册网址: N9.COM【USDT】 ⚡️ 注册网址: N9.C…
菲律宾大事件 全球曝光🚀 pinned a photo
🏆【Wellbet 吉祥坊 · 五大联赛 本金翻倍】🏆 🎁【新人福利包】 💥 注册送 28元 体验金 · 免费体验 · 可提现 💥 首存100送100 · 资金安全 · 大额无忧 ➡️ [立即点击领取] 🔗 📺 弯弯妹子主播 · 五大联赛 免费直播 🔗 小七直播 x7zb.vip 💬 彩金小助理 : @webt01
菲律宾大事件 全球曝光🚀 pinned a photo
🇿🇼🇿🇲🇾🇪🇪🇭🇼🇫🇻🇳🇻🇪🇺🇿🇻🇮🇺🇾 🥚 8T娱乐城 · 全球数字网投领导者 🥚 实力老品牌 · 信誉保障 · 放心赢 🥚 NO钱包担保1000万U—实力雄厚 🚗 官网:8T.COM 【 铸就人生奇迹】 😀经过多年稳定运营、已成为玩家信赖的首选平台 😀东南亚线上第一盘口、公开透明、高额返水 😀官方游戏+极速出款、认准信誉实力老平台 😀选平台不必四处观望、选我们就是最稳的答案 😁😅😂😇🙃😉🥰😘😛🤪 ♠️ 首存最高赠送 18888U ♠️ 二存三存相赠 8888U ♠️ 大额提款加赠 18888U ♠️每月逢8必发尊享豪礼 ♠️ APP每日抢红包不停! ♠️亿U现金大回馈天天领豪礼 ♠️尊享会员等级+周俸禄+月俸禄 🍏🍎🍐🍊🍋🍋🟩🍌🍉🍇 🔠8T.COM|实力铸就信誉,品质赢取未来 🔠8T.COM|公正公平无私彩,华人首选娱乐 🔠8T.COM|一站式顶级体验,尊享非凡品牌 4️⃣5️⃣6️⃣7️⃣ 8T.CO…
缅媒称妙瓦底恒升四期诈骗园区加强安保秘密复营 据当地消息来源透露,位于克伦邦妙瓦底市BGF一号码头内、由貌莫吞少校控制的恒升四期网络诈骗园区,自10月20日起全面加强安保并秘密恢复运营。 该园区此前被媒体曝光后曾暂停营业,现仅召回部分核心缅籍员工复工,并将部分建筑转租给中国诈骗小老板,相关人员已转移至DKBA和KNA控制区。留守园区的中国人被严密囚禁,夜间用黑色遮阳网围挡后秘密作业。园区由4台发电机昼夜供电,燃油经附近加油站高价采购、按3个月用量囤积。 目前园区由三名改用缅文名字的经理近身监管,中国大老板已于2024年底迁居曼谷。园区设两层安保共60余人,其中BGF士兵约20人武装值守主要出入口,缅籍安保38至45人负责围墙和建筑大门,每日上班前须列队受检。 当地民众向论坛抱怨称,缅甸年轻人出行受限、动辄被查,而中国诈骗分子却在武装组织保护下为所欲为,这些组织名不副实,实则成了“诈骗警卫队”。 消息来源指出,在国际压力…
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 缅甸缅北东南亚新闻曝光 📢 东南亚大事件|大事件曝光 📢 东南亚吃瓜新闻资讯 📢 东南亚大事件 📢 东南亚大事件 📢 soso东南亚-百科🌍 📢 东南亚新闻网 📢 菲律宾资讯◒《菲律宾曝光》菲律宾新闻 📢 东南亚每日新闻报 📢 博彩新闻头条|大事件 ------------------------------ 🤝 加入互推 · 获得曝光,赚邀请奖励
招聘陷阱 月薪3500美元,还不用支付招聘费! 菲律宾一名50岁男子被高薪工作吸引,准备经越南前往俄罗斯担任K9训犬员,却在宿务国际机场被移民官拦截。 菲律宾移民局10月25日通报,男子通过WhatsApp联系招聘人员,对方不仅承诺高薪,还要求他隐瞒赴俄工作计划,假装游客出境,引起当局怀疑。 进一步调查后,男子承认俄罗斯才是真正目的地。目前,案件已移交菲律宾跨部门反人口贩运委员会调查,招聘是否涉及非法招工或人口贩运仍有待确认。 =============================== 💎😑🫤😐🫥😶🤥🫠🤫🫡🫢 ⚡️ 人民币注册 ⚡️ USDT注册😑注册就送28.8u =============================== 💎🌈🌈🌈 8K国际 免实名, 无风控,反水无上限,大额无忧! =============================== 💎2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣8️⃣⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 体育PG爆大…
电诈团伙转用缅甸通信网络 “断星链”难止诈骗 调查显示,缅甸电诈园区并非只靠星链运作。在国际压力下泰国切断边境供电供网后,诈骗团伙转而使用发电机及星链,如今更 increasingly 使用缅甸本土通信网络(MPT、Ooredoo、Mytel、ATOM)上网。研究人员指出,部分边境地区缅甸信号可轻易接收,“他们正在使用军政府的通信系统”。 2026年美联社与PBS调查发现,25个新建或扩建诈骗园区中约13个仍有星链连接,意味着近半数已不再依赖星链。若计入迁入缅甸内陆、使用本地网络的园区,星链依赖比例极低。 文章指出,只切断单一技术而不打击犯罪网络、资金链及军方保护体系,只会迫使诈骗团伙低成本转型。军政府反复炒作“星链”叙事,实则意在限制革命团体和民众通信。 2026年7月,缅甸数百家民间组织曾呼吁勿全面切断星链,以免影响紧急医疗、人道援助和空袭预警,国际社会应认清问题根源,针对犯罪网络而非民用通信采取行动。 ======…
#小姐姐爆料:此人真名:“王呈呈”,山东青岛人,他的圈子朋友都叫他“小黑”。 2025年11月份,我一个04年的女孩子,第一次出国,落地金边没几天,他在金边蓝天超市门口见色起意,加我的联系方式。因为我没有飞机,他加了我的微信。那时候,他请我吃饭,还带我去了他的炳发城别墅。第一印象挺好的,见过两次面,后面断联一年不到,我们又联系上了。 我在柬埔寨待了七八个月,然后我回国几个月,我们就用手机联系。我记忆里面,那时候他挺好的,请一个初来乍到的女孩子吃了顿饭,我就和他聊了两个月。他说他现在人在金边,我人却在国内。 在手机屏幕聊天的几个月里,他给我塑造了他这么多年在东南亚打拼的四年里的起起落落,还有他的原生家庭。他说他母亲早年病逝,在他16岁的时候,然后父亲不挣钱,还对他不管不顾。对他来说,父亲就是个废人。他说他当年在特种兵部队历练,当过警察,然后因为国内工资低,不安于现状,一气之下闯东南亚。 还说来到东南亚,三四年里,三年保镖,…
菲律宾大事件 全球曝光🚀 pinned a video
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,545 posts we hold for @feilvbin198. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@tg8g · 19,213445 posts8T娱乐城 官方-频道
@www8tcom · 29,732142 postsN9.COM|官方频道
@N9_com1 · 13,261138 postsN9.COM 福利频道导航
@n9pd888 · 7,188138 postsN1国际官方频道
@n1svip · 20,55194 posts2028体育综合台官方频道
@pg2028ty · 25,09292 posts8K国际官方
@PG8K8K · 3,41252 posts极搜🔍中文搜索@JISO
@jiso · 383,94251 postsSOSO搜搜
@sooo · 458,50136 posts中文站|高清影院|国产动漫|DJ舞曲
@DnyRm1 · 3,64628 posts你好,彦祖、亦菲
@mgame9527 · 2128 postsY3国际娱乐城官方频道
@y3guojicheng · 19,24626 posts78.COM-官方频道@DF78
@tg78com · 27,45521 posts2028122.COM- 2028体育官方频道
@pg115 · 15,81516 postsSOSO搜搜
@sosoo · 512,9127 postsSOSO搜搜🔞
@SosoCnBot · 244,8446 postsSOSO搜搜
@sososo · 556,7345 postsSOSO搜搜
@souso · 593,6565 posts海外大事件
@ct666 · 236,4744 posts东南亚头条曝光㊖
@bg888 · 336,6082 posts东南亚大事件
@djs123 · 194,6171 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@BG2288 · 125,942#1
@xinwen118 · 125,193#2
@vip35r · 34,176#3
@iiiik · 35,098#4
@baoheitai · 1,115#5
@vipn8888 · 59,116#6
@huohu158 · 196,847#7
@baoguang212 · 6,135#8
@hrs166 · 38,772#9
@BG_BG8 · 38,249#10
@dny1577 · 5,138#11
@tg89aa · 121,067#12
@anwei2 · 34,259#13
@DNYBG234 · 92,022#14
@dashijian01 · 29,295#15
@jinritoutiao6 · 13,339#16
@heicaibaog · 8#17
@baoguangqun110 · 71,061#18
@quanqiubaoliao · 131,357#19
@tghuarenba · 25,449#20
@cctv_dy · 26,285#21
@toutiao_4 · 1,119#22
@xinwenhc · 195,743#23
@feilvbinghuarenriji · 15,216#24
@makatinews · 34,180#25
@dubai0 · 91,050#26
@BG886 · 53,687#27
@xinhuaribao · 913#28
@Dzx199 · 27,189#29
@xbbg8 · 254#30
@nnccqq · 37,717#31
@bodu08 · 56,985#32
@dny099 · 144,574#33
@a0159 · 96,569#34
@redianxinwenpindao · 3,898#35
@phda11 · 3,843#36
@woaiui · 8,512#37
@baoguang821 · 48,132#38
@toutiaoshijian · 67,346#39
@gouzaibaoliao · 2,053#40
@sssvip2 · 271,938#41
@TGPG999 · 4,602#42
@baoguangi · 11,490#43
@mgldpd1 · 1,097#44
@jiuboo · 14,282#45
@taiguohuarenzixun · 76,269#46
@toutiao331 · 355#47
@baoguangba088 · 238,476#48
@quanwangbaoguangb · 110,737#49
@redian3 · 75,156#50
@tg04277 · 56,443#51
@Banma_xinwen · 88,154#52
@ke5689 · 260,249#53
@feilvbinhuarenzixun · 71,534#54
@baoguangqun999 · 69,704#55
@baoguang85 · 295#56
@dxdb001 · 5,125#57
@svipzz · 70,780#58
@toutiao43 · 582#59
@phnews · 15,767#60
@sii76 · 199,437#61
@BG423 · 30,011#62
@miandianhuarenzixun · 72,162#63
@dsj0161 · 1,995#64
@HR8877 · 337,411#65
@mlshxzs · 8,449#66
@baoguang211 · 10,390#67
@baoguangqun888 · 11,583#68
@HH9915 · 133,046#69
@ttkb0 · 94,878#70
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@nnccqq · 37,717
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 23 here — alongside 22 others — read 31 August 2026
@jiuboo · 14,282
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 21 September 2026
@bg888e · 41,160
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 25 August 2026
@baoguang988 · 96,369
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 17 August 2026
@iiiik · 35,098
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 26 August 2026
@BG6668 · 106,127
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 14 August 2026
@bbsooo · 55,230
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 August 2026
@Dubaiqzzp · 94,903
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 17 August 2026
@GGooGG66 · 160,908
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 August 2026
@nx123 · 777,463
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
@xinwenhc · 195,743
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 August 2026
@dny099 · 144,574
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
@sssvip2 · 271,938
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 August 2026
@bocaishen8 · 111,598
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 August 2026
@taiguohuarenzixun · 76,269
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
@quanqiubaoliao · 131,357
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
@huohu158 · 196,847
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
@PHDA15 · 91,216
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
@gtkx1 · 157,141
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 August 2026
@HH9915 · 133,046
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
@hyxw3 · 62,952
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
@hrs166 · 38,772
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
@xinwen118 · 125,193
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 August 2026
@DNYBG234 · 92,022
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“菲律宾大事件 全球曝光🚀” (@feilvbin198), 93,676 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feilvbin198.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.