#菲律宾资讯:甲美地省警方围剿武装抢劫团伙,枪战击毙5人,2名嫌犯在逃 11月3日下午,菲律宾甲美地省描科沃市(Bacoor)发生一起警匪枪战事件。警方根据情报,对一个涉嫌策划入室抢劫的武装犯罪团伙展开围剿,双方在追车过程中多次交火,最终造成5名嫌疑人死亡,另有2人逃脱。 据警方通报,11月3日下午约1时,警方接获情报,称一伙武装人员计划闯入甲美地省Town and Country住宅区,对一名黄金交易商及当地富商实施抢劫。 警方随后部署情报人员、特警及巡逻警力展开监控。调查发现,嫌疑人分别乘坐摩托车及丰田Vios轿车活动,其中一人涉嫌穿着保安制服,试图伪装成小区保安进入住宅区踩点,但其服装与小区正规保安制服不符,引起警卫怀疑。 警方尝试拦截检查时,嫌疑人突然开枪,击中一辆警车,随后驾车逃窜,双方展开高速追逐,最终在Molino高架桥一带发生激烈枪战。 追捕过程中,嫌疑车辆失控翻覆,车内两名嫌疑人死亡。随后,部分嫌疑人持…

Channel
菲律宾⚜️大事件
@dashijian01
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,177subscribers
-5,085 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001824478868 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dashijian01 |
| Description | 🔆菲律宾大事件,疑难杂症来问我 🔆商务爆料: @beiwan0 🔆为您提供菲律宾最新的新闻大事件 为华人分享菲律宾文化,一起看菲律宾大小事 #菲律宾 #新闻 #大事件 #生活资讯 备用频道: @jinrirediang 菲律宾🇵🇭趴赛生活社区: @pasay00 求职招聘频道: @hrg798 红人⚜️文案馆: @wenan00 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dashijian01 |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 14:26 | 26,177 | -382 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:48 | 26,559 | -446 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:19 | 27,005 | -271 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 20:09 | 27,276 | -129 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 20:54 | 27,405 | -251 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:50 | 27,656 | -213 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 27,869 | -268 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 20:36 | 28,137 | -233 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 23:00 | 28,370 | -112 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:09 | 28,482 | -683 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:36 | 29,165 | -130 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:04 | 29,295 | -135 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 03:19 | 29,430 | -101 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:30 | 29,531 | -78 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 04:41 | 29,609 | -121 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:09 | 29,730 | -233 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:07 | 29,963 | -143 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 22:40 | 30,106 | -228 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 01:06 | 30,334 | -275 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 23:55 | 30,609 | first reading |
Engagement
1,945 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 168 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.766%
- avg views ÷ 26,177 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 200
- 497 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.445%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 500
- of 1,945 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 49 of 497 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,945 (7 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 99,623 |
| Reactions total | 40 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 14:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈89,500
- Videos
- ≈13,500
- Links
- ≈32,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4h 40m
- Average length
- 1m 08s
Measured directly from 248 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
264 reactions across 212 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 50 | 18.9% | |
| ❤ | 45 | 17.0% | |
| 😁 | 35 | 13.3% | |
| ⚡ | 24 | 9.09% | |
| 🎉 | 23 | 8.71% | |
| 🤩 | 23 | 8.71% | |
| 🥰 | 23 | 8.71% | |
| 👏 | 22 | 8.33% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 7.20% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 223 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 264 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 September 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 500 posts held from the last 30 days (1.20%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#群友投稿:不管你是过来打工、投资开公司,还是想来老挝找伴侣成家 下面这些坑,一旦踩进去,轻则亏几万,重则坐牢,都是我亲眼接触的真实案例,按时间线跟大家说清楚。 第一,办邀请函别贪便宜。为省一两百拿到假邀请函,入境直接被遣返;还有的邀请函没有劳工审批,入境之后拿到的是系统查不到的假工作证,遇上检查直接出大事。 第二,入境的时候,核对签证类型和邀请函批文,确认盖好入境章!当场检查,有问题马上找出入境,别等到后面出境、被查才发现。 第三,国内车带到老挝想上当地车牌,小心假牌照、假完税证,交警系统一查就露馅,罚款上万甚至直接扣车。 第四,代办老挝结婚证是高危大坑!很多证公章签名全是伪造的,一旦查到,人先被拘留,还可能被控伪造公文、涉人口贩卖,起步量刑5年。 第五,工作证、暂住证假证特别多。中介层层转包,纸质证看着没问题,系统没有记录,被查到照样带走问话,语言不通百口莫辩,证件真假不能只听中介说。 第六,网上号称能办假中国护…
#群亿酒店澄清:尊敬的各位客人及社会各界朋友: 针对近日网络上有关群亿酒店“卷款跑路”“不退还客人房租”等相关言论及曝光信息,我酒店对此高度重视,现郑重作出以下澄清: 首先,网络上所传播的我酒店卷款跑路、恶意拖欠客人租金等说法,与实际情况不符,相关言论存在不实及误导之处。 其次,对于客人提出的退租及退款需求,我酒店一直在积极沟通和妥善处理。截至今日,我酒店已陆续安排办理退款,绝大部分客人的租金已通过群亿酒店名义退还到账,剩余个别退款也正在积极跟进处理。 群亿酒店始终重视每一位客人的合法权益。对于给客人带来的不便,我们深表歉意,也感谢大家的理解与耐心。 我们理解客人对退款进度的关注,但希望大家在了解完整事实之前,不要轻信和传播未经核实的信息,以免造成不必要的误解。 对于尚未收到退款的客人,请通过酒店官方渠道与我们联系,我们将积极核实并尽快处理,确保每一位客人的退款问题都得到妥善解决。 群亿酒店郑重声明:我们没有逃避责任…
#网友分享 戏里戏外皆魔幻:看懂菲律宾“一地鸡毛、唯有嘴硬”的底层脑回路】 Buhay Teleserye: Pag-unawa sa Kaisipang ”Gulo na ang Buhay, Pero Matigas Pa Rin ang Mukha” Kapag nag-scroll ka sa Facebook, madalas kang magugulat sa kakaibang takbo ng utak ng ilang Pilipinong netizen: Sa isang sandali, todo-bardagulan at akala mo hindi na magbaba-bati, pero sa susunod na segundo, biglang magpapakita ng matinding lambingan at tila walang nangyari. Nakakahilo a…
#网友投稿:在柬埔寨说生意不好的,多做做本地人的生意,本地有钱土豪也很多,中国人不赚中国人,要赚外国人的钱,才算真本事! 你赚不到外国人的钱,就说明你根本不适合出国!既然出国了,就要勇敢赚外国人的钱
#马来西亚资讯:雪兰莪士毛月突袭6处住宅,117人被捕,109名外国人涉嫌卷入网络诈骗 11月3日,马来西亚移民局联合马来西亚通讯及多媒体委员会(MCMC),在雪兰莪州士毛月展开联合执法行动,对6处涉嫌被用作网络诈骗据点的住宅进行突击检查,最终逮捕117人,其中包括109名外国人及8名马来西亚籍人士。 马来西亚移民局总监扎卡里亚·沙班指出,此次行动是在接获公众投诉后,由执法人员经过约两周情报收集与调查而展开。行动于当天上午11时50分正式进行,共出动77名移民局执法人员及10名通讯及多媒体委员会工作人员。 被捕人员包括98名外籍男子、11名外籍女子,以及7名马来西亚籍男子和1名马来西亚籍女子。外籍人员分别来自中国、日本、韩国、柬埔寨及越南。 初步调查发现,这6处住宅涉嫌被用作网络诈骗集团的运作据点,主要涉及虚假投资、虚假招聘及电子商务诈骗等活动。执法人员突袭时,部分人员据称正在通过社交媒体平台与受害者进行联系。 行动期间…
#群友分享:这些年走过了许多国家,同样也端过盘子擦过桌,见过太多的勾心斗角尔虞我诈,现在能平安健康的也感到欣慰,刚刚出来的时候总是立志要出人头地衣锦还乡,但拼了那么多年结果也还不是一无所有,至少也被累着了,停下来时不敢回头去看我逝去的青春,现在回到农村过着与世无争安静的生活反而觉得十分满足。 幸福不属于穷人同样也不属于富人,而是属于知足的人、此时我就是知足的那个人、祝各位还在打拼的同胞马到成功万事如意。
#群友反馈:老挝万象中心商场警察步行抓人,看见中国人就查护照,没证件就带走,万象的同胞们小心了。
#网友反馈:金边市吐古区桑卡特特拉乡布永市大楼被围了,楼下全是警察守着,不知道又得抓多少人。
#小菲投稿 对中国男友毫无性欲 Hi mga sis! Ganito rin ba ang Chinese boyfriend niyo? 😭 Lately, parang nawalan na talaga ako ng sexual desire sa Chinese boyfriend ko. Wala na akong gana or excitement pagdating sa sex. Minsan may mood naman ako, pero kailangan pa ng sobrang habang foreplay at lambingan bago ako ma-turn on. Usually once a month na lang, minsan nga wala pa talaga. Hindi ko alam kung dahil ba sa ex ko na American. Ka…
高加索暗流:亚美尼亚与格鲁吉亚,正在崛起的跨境电诈新据点 当东南亚多国持续高压清剿电信网络诈骗、网赌灰产之后,跨国犯罪集团开启新一轮迁徙。地处南高加索的格鲁吉亚、亚美尼亚,凭借独特的地缘位置、博彩法律漏洞、宽松金融环境与签证便利,逐步成为跨境电信诈骗、虚假博彩、杀猪盘、虚假投资盘的新兴大本营,正在上演东南亚电诈园区曾经走过的老路。 一、两地电诈业态:模式分化,目标市场清晰 格鲁吉亚和亚美尼亚的诈骗窝点,并非简单复刻缅北“封闭式园区”,而是演化成两种不同的运营形态。 格鲁吉亚:呼叫中心模式为主,混合网赌视讯盘 格鲁吉亚本土允许合法博彩,线上博彩牌照制度存在监管盲区。很多团伙以正规呼叫中心、科技公司、游戏推广公司作为外壳,在第比利斯、巴统等城市写字楼、酒店内设立窝点,隐蔽性极强。 国际调查组织OCCRP曾经曝光位于第比利斯、距离格鲁吉亚国家安全部门不远的AK Group诈骗呼叫中心。短短三年时间,从全球六千多名受害者身上骗取超…
#网友投稿:当初菲律宾严厉打击POGO,整个行业都人心惶惶,都怕被冲楼,就跑到了柬埔寨来,以为柬埔寨是最后的归宿 结果到了现在,当初发生在菲律宾的冲楼,现在又在柬埔寨重演一遍,到底什么地方才是狗推最后的归宿?
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,945 posts we hold for @dashijian01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@MK888bot · 10,5141,227 posts122体育福利中心 - 电子百家乐
@QSTY288 · 4,097501 postsY3国际 u台 福利中心 - 电子百家乐
@Y3111111 · 1,623495 posts182体育福利中心 - 电子百家乐
@lz5288 · 4,009494 posts菲律宾修车🇵🇭马尼拉修车 (逍遥宫)
@xiaoyaogong888 · 3,595429 posts8T娱乐城 官方-频道
@www8tcom · 29,08560 postsSOSO搜搜
@sooo · 482,37450 posts122体育 世界杯 体育推单 足球推单
@sjb0101 · 1,81127 postsUSDT.VIP_官方频道
@uuss1 · 10,40527 posts淘宝娱乐@Taobao
@taobao · 16,00826 postsY3国际 官方频道
@ai038 · 1,50320 posts182体育 足球推单 🫥 足球比赛 体育电竞
@OB200000 · 1,44520 postsY3国际推单频道
@Y31133 · 1,85820 posts6U.com|客服中心
@PG6U_com · 6894 posts6U.com|保证金查验教程
@WWW_6Ucom · 2874 posts2028体育 官方频道
@PGGF01 · 2,0022 posts东南亚大事件 东南亚新闻 柬埔寨新闻 马达加斯加
@PP430 · 186,7362 posts8K国际福利中心 - 电子百家乐
@GJ8K1 · 2,0701 post🔥辉煌娱乐城-93.cc-超高返水1.6%起🔥官方频道
@hhylc8888 · 4,3161 post🔥KK娱乐城-18.vip-🔥官方招商
@kkyl5000 · 4,1681 post东南亚无小事
@ll111 · 50,8811 postN1国际官方频道
@N19955 · 2,0501 post唯一频道·甜心家|甜品 小吃 生日蛋糕 饮品
@tianxinsugar · 1,5101 postX6宝马会-官方频道
@x6x6 · 12,9331 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 6
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 5
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@dashijian01 named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 10 posts, 9 August 2026 – 31 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 39 posts, 12 August 2026 – 6 October 2026
named in 23 posts, 8 August 2026 – 2 October 2026
named in 2 posts, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
named in 1 post, 21 October 2026 – 21 October 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@sssvip2 · 268,077
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 August 2026
@hrs166 · 37,822
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
@qqhrdsjbg · 163,165
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
@vipn8888 · 57,998
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
@quanqiubaoliao · 108,890
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
@mianbeiy · 58,608
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 August 2026
@xinwen118 · 121,577
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 August 2026
@quanwangbaoguangb · 127,623
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
@AoneExp · 117,259
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 August 2026
@heicaibaog · 10
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026
@DNYBG234 · 89,056
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
@dyy83 · 128,621
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026
@a0159 · 89,813
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 August 2026
@DNYXW008 · 74,015
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
@HR8877 · 326,279
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
@feilvbinhuarenzixun · 68,872
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
@ttkb0 · 89,675
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
@BG6668 · 113,184
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 14 August 2026
@nx123 · 766,354
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
@feixingzhe_cgzx · 151,870
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026
@baoguang988 · 100,602
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 17 August 2026
@gtkx1 · 152,085
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 August 2026
@hyxw3 · 61,530
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
@TGDSJ110 · 170,405
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 55 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“菲律宾⚜️大事件” (@dashijian01), 26,177 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dashijian01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.