SOSO 搜搜 把 Telegram 搜索和发现放在一个入口。 想继续找频道、群组、帖子或贴纸,直接输入关键词。 也可以从发现页继续浏览同类入口。 🔗 本频道专属邀请链接 https://t.me/sooo?start=autopromo_-1001824478868_6237500418_soso_81c95cc1

Channel
菲律宾⚜️大事件
@dashijian01
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,559subscribers
-4,703 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001824478868 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dashijian01 |
| Description | 🔆菲律宾大事件,疑难杂症来问我 🔆商务爆料: @beiwan0 🔆为您提供菲律宾最新的新闻大事件 为华人分享菲律宾文化,一起看菲律宾大小事 #菲律宾 #新闻 #大事件 #生活资讯 备用频道: @jinrirediang 菲律宾🇵🇭趴赛生活社区: @pasay00 求职招聘频道: @hrg798 红人⚜️文案馆: @wenan00 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dashijian01 |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:48 | 26,559 | -446 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:19 | 27,005 | -271 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 20:09 | 27,276 | -129 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 20:54 | 27,405 | -251 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:50 | 27,656 | -213 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 27,869 | -268 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 20:36 | 28,137 | -233 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 23:00 | 28,370 | -112 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:09 | 28,482 | -683 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:36 | 29,165 | -130 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:04 | 29,295 | -135 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 03:19 | 29,430 | -101 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:30 | 29,531 | -78 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 04:41 | 29,609 | -121 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:09 | 29,730 | -233 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:07 | 29,963 | -143 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 22:40 | 30,106 | -228 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 01:06 | 30,334 | -275 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 23:55 | 30,609 | -394 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 20:34 | 31,003 | first reading |
Engagement
1,932 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 167 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.777%
- avg views ÷ 26,559 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 206
- 502 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.412%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 506
- of 1,932 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 62 of 502 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,932 (7 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 103,650 |
| Reactions total | 53 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 02:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈89,500
- Videos
- ≈13,500
- Links
- ≈32,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4h 33m
- Average length
- 1m 07s
Measured directly from 246 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
266 reactions across 214 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 50 | 18.8% | |
| ❤ | 47 | 17.7% | |
| 😁 | 35 | 13.2% | |
| ⚡ | 24 | 9.02% | |
| 🎉 | 23 | 8.65% | |
| 🤩 | 23 | 8.65% | |
| 🥰 | 23 | 8.65% | |
| 👏 | 22 | 8.27% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 225 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 266 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 September 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 506 posts held from the last 30 days (1.19%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#群友反馈:西港金贝1后面的永盛酒店有宪兵进入检查,在附近的注意了。
#马来西亚资讯:吉打警方捣毁7个网络诈骗呼叫中心,87人落网,荒废酒店及度假村沦为诈骗据点 11月4日报道,马来西亚吉打州警方公布,今年1月至10月期间,通过多项执法行动,成功捣毁7个网络诈骗呼叫中心及诈骗集团,共逮捕87名嫌疑人。 吉打州总警长拿督阿兹里(Datuk Adzli Abu Shah)指出,落网人员包括27名马来西亚籍、33名巴基斯坦籍、15名中国籍、8名印度籍及4名孟加拉籍人士,其中75人为男性,12人为女性。 警方调查发现,诈骗集团近期逐渐改变运营方式,开始租用店屋、荒废酒店以及经营不善的度假村作为诈骗据点,利用通讯设备及科技工具实施跨境诈骗。部分荒废酒店和度假村不仅被用作呼叫中心,还被安排作为集团成员的住宿场所,以减少外界察觉。 涉案诈骗手法包括滥用银行金融交易、虚假网上万字投注、爱情诈骗、虚假工作招聘,以及冒充执法人员实施电话诈骗。 警方在行动中起获大批涉案物品,包括手机、电脑、数据机、路由器、提款…
#群友爆料:一个黑公司,在交克山上,就在离新泰昌不远的地方,坐标:(16.4605845, 98.6503078)。 他们现在在缅甸妙瓦底交克山上的一个小院子,不是园区,就是那种平房伪装起来的。物业老板瘦瘦的,叫阿龙、龙哥,听说和那边部队领导关系很好。 原来公司在新泰昌园区,后来因为打仗,就搬到了山上避难。幕后的老板听说原来有三个,不认识,后面公司被其中一个老板吞掉了。 公司被吞掉后,幕后老板把原来的管理赶走了,现在的管理叫阿来,福建龙岩人,员工都叫他来哥。上山的时候,阿来跟我朋友他们说,下山就放人回去;下山后又说要做到明年才能回去。我朋友说,其实根本不会放人!我朋友他们已经在公司做了三年了,还不放人回家! 阿来不懂业务,现在公司没业绩,只会给下面的人搞高压。里面现在天天体罚、打人,之前就听说公司有跳楼的。 前段时间,跑了几个人。现在除了阿来,现在谁也不能出园区。自从上次我朋友发来信息,现在已经联系不上了。现在连我朋友是…
CZ:能跟朝鲜谈的,大概只有美国或中国! 遭黑客攻击后的首次专访中透露:他本人尚未就此事与特朗普总统或华盛顿任何方面沟通过。他表示,自己、Binance 以及整个行业都非常希望得到美国政府的协助。 “如果真有谁能跟朝鲜对话,那大概率是美国或中国。”
西港警方昨晚继续夜查 昨晚,西港警方出动武器弹药管理、抗毒品、交通、刑警及特警等多个部门开展联合行动,在西哈努克市主要公共道路实施严格查缉,重点排查非法枪支弹药及各类违法犯罪行为。
#马来西亚资讯:柔佛麻坡多地展开移民突击检查,38人被捕,包括36名外国人及2名本地人 11月4日,马来西亚柔佛州移民局通报,当局于11月2日凌晨3时起,在柔佛州麻坡县多个地点展开联合执法行动,共检查108人,逮捕38人,其中包括36名外国人及2名马来西亚籍人员。 此次行动由柔佛州移民局麻坡执法分局展开,分别实施“Ops Belanja”“Ops Sapu”“Ops Hijau”及“Ops Selera”四项特别行动。 执法人员根据公众举报及前期情报,同时突袭多个商业场所、住宅及榴莲种植园,重点调查涉嫌非法雇用或窝藏无证外国移民的场所。 被捕的36名外国人年龄介于16至54岁,人员构成为:13名印尼籍男子、10名缅甸籍男子、3名孟加拉籍男子、2名印尼籍女子、1名越南籍女子及7名缅甸籍女子。 此外,另有2名马来西亚籍人员被捕,警方怀疑两人担任相关场所管理人员。 柔佛州移民局表示,所有被捕外国人涉嫌违反《1959/63年移…
#菲律宾资讯:帕赛市捣毁跨国包裹诈骗窝点,159名外国人获救,3名嫌疑人被捕 11月3日,菲律宾国家警察刑事调查与侦查组(PNP-CIDG)在马尼拉大都会帕赛市(Pasay City)展开突击行动,捣毁一处涉嫌经营跨国包裹诈骗的窝点,共有159名外国人获救,3名涉嫌运营该窝点的人员被捕,其中包括1名中国籍男子和2名马来西亚籍人员。 行动地点位于帕赛市 Cuneta Avenue 一栋大楼的15楼。获救人员包括中国、印度尼西亚、马来西亚及越南籍人士。据警方调查,部分人员原本以为赴菲律宾从事虚拟助理(VA)工作,抵达后却被安排参与网络诈骗活动。 警方调查发现,该团伙主要利用虚假包裹实施诈骗。诈骗人员首先冒充快递公司工作人员,通知受害者有包裹等待签收,随后另一名成员冒充警察,谎称包裹内含有毒品或违禁品,导致受害者涉嫌犯罪。之后,团伙再安排所谓的高级警官出面,以银行账户可能被冻结、个人财产可能被查封为由,诱骗受害者将资金转入指定的所…
#清华留英硕士 #电诈失联 #平安归来 清华留英硕士失联风波平息:母亲报平安,盼孩子走出阴影 11月4日,备受关注的“清华留英硕士疑遭电诈后失联”事件迎来最新进展。这位毕业于清华大学、在英国伦敦大学学院(UCL)攻读硕士的中国留学生,终于安全了! 其母亲通过微信向外界报平安,并在朋友圈发文确认,孩子目前已安全回家。此前,该学生的安危牵动着多方心弦,引发广泛担忧。如今尘埃落定,母亲表示,孩子需要时间面对自我,调整状态,希望他能尽快从这段经历的阴影中走出来,重拾阳光生活。
越南海防涂山赌场改头换面,鸿运资本操盘成跨境杀猪重灾区 曾坐落于越南海防涂山悬崖沿岸、一度沉寂的老牌涉外赌场,近期完成资本更迭与场地搬迁。原越南芒街鸿运赌场资本全面接手运营涂山唯一合法博彩牌照项目,将赌场从悬崖旧址整体迁移至景区酒店三楼,重新低调开业。 不同于常规境外赌场多元外籍客源的模式,翻新后的涂山赌场无任何外籍游客,全场清一色中国赌客。依托线下黑箱作弊赌台+跨境飞投网赌双线运作,已沦为专门收割中国公民的跨境赌博黑产窝点,大量国内家庭因此深陷债务与破碎危机。 一、场地全面翻新,旧貌换新局,精准锁定中国客源 据实地走访核查,海防涂山老牌赌场完成重大调整:彻底废弃临崖老旧场地,整体搬迁至当地星级酒店三楼。场内布局隐蔽低调,摒弃了大型豪华赌厅的公开模式,仅摆放数张百家乐赌台,台面数量极少、私密性极强,专门对接私人入局与线上飞投业务。 按照越南当地法规,持证涉外赌场仅限外籍人士入场,严禁本地人参与。但目前该赌场已形成专属潜规…
#柬埔寨资讯:柴桢省巴域市展开联合突击行动,多名涉嫌网络犯罪人员被捕 11月3日下午,柬埔寨柴桢省当局根据皇家政府第3号法令,奉柴桢省省长彭波萨阁下之命,在省副省长门恩先生带领下,联合省级及地方执法力量,对巴域市巴域城区多处地点展开突击搜查。 此次行动由柴桢省法院检察院副检察官波芙·特维女士协调,参与人员包括省警察局副局长斯伦·胡奥特上校、巴域市副市长,以及巴域市行政联合指挥部和治安警察部队。 行动中,警方逮捕了多名涉嫌从事网络犯罪活动的人员。 目前,涉案人员的具体数量、国籍及案件详细情况尚未公布,相关部门将进一步调查处理。
包括三星在内的中国安卓手机都预装“反诈程序” 11月2日,有网友在社媒发文称,手机预装的联通设备管理程序SystemHelper,不只出现在小米手机中,OPPO、vivo的公开历史记录里也能找到,而且使用非联通手机卡也可能触发信息上报。 他展示的程序代码截图中,还出现三星(DeviceInfoReaderSamSung)、一加(DeviceInfoReaderOnePlus)、真我(DeviceInfoReaderRealme)等品牌的设备信息读取标记。 按其引用的分析报告,在所分析的小米系统版本中,只要手机里的卡全部属于中国大陆运营商,连接Wi-Fi即可满足上报的网络条件。 报告提到,这套程序会检测手机是否已经完成开机激活,而且不会再单独弹出窗口,让用户针对这项数据采集进行确认同意。 程序能够读取手机里安装了哪些软件、各款软件的使用时长、消耗流量,同时还可以获取手机本身以及电话卡的识别信息。
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,932 posts we hold for @dashijian01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@MK888bot · 10,5141,227 posts122体育福利中心 - 电子百家乐
@QSTY288 · 4,097501 postsY3国际 u台 福利中心 - 电子百家乐
@Y3111111 · 1,623495 posts182体育福利中心 - 电子百家乐
@lz5288 · 4,009494 posts菲律宾修车🇵🇭马尼拉修车 (逍遥宫)
@xiaoyaogong888 · 3,595429 posts8T娱乐城 官方-频道
@www8tcom · 29,10960 postsSOSO搜搜
@sooo · 482,37449 posts122体育 世界杯 体育推单 足球推单
@sjb0101 · 1,81127 postsUSDT.VIP_官方频道
@uuss1 · 10,58527 posts淘宝娱乐@Taobao
@taobao · 16,00826 postsY3国际 官方频道
@ai038 · 1,47520 posts182体育 足球推单 🫥 足球比赛 体育电竞
@OB200000 · 1,44220 postsY3国际推单频道
@Y31133 · 1,85820 posts6U.com|客服中心
@PG6U_com · 6784 posts6U.com|保证金查验教程
@WWW_6Ucom · 2874 posts2028体育 官方频道
@PGGF01 · 2,0022 posts东南亚大事件 东南亚新闻 柬埔寨新闻 马达加斯加
@PP430 · 185,7282 posts8K国际福利中心 - 电子百家乐
@GJ8K1 · 2,0751 post🔥辉煌娱乐城-93.cc-超高返水1.6%起🔥官方频道
@hhylc8888 · 4,3161 post🔥KK娱乐城-18.vip-🔥官方招商
@kkyl5000 · 4,3241 post东南亚无小事
@ll111 · 50,8811 postN1国际官方频道
@N19955 · 2,0501 post唯一频道·甜心家|甜品 小吃 生日蛋糕 饮品
@tianxinsugar · 1,5101 postX6宝马会-官方频道
@x6x6 · 12,9501 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 6
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 5
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@dashijian01 named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 10 posts, 9 August 2026 – 31 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 39 posts, 12 August 2026 – 6 October 2026
named in 23 posts, 8 August 2026 – 2 October 2026
named in 2 posts, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
named in 1 post, 21 October 2026 – 21 October 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@sssvip2 · 268,443
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 August 2026
@hrs166 · 37,822
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
@qqhrdsjbg · 163,472
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
@vipn8888 · 58,004
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
@quanqiubaoliao · 108,890
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
@mianbeiy · 58,661
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 August 2026
@xinwen118 · 121,577
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 August 2026
@quanwangbaoguangb · 127,678
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
@AoneExp · 117,259
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 August 2026
@heicaibaog · 10
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026
@DNYBG234 · 89,364
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
@dyy83 · 129,197
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026
@a0159 · 89,143
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 August 2026
@DNYXW008 · 74,015
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
@HR8877 · 328,064
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
@feilvbinhuarenzixun · 68,956
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
@ttkb0 · 88,628
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
@BG6668 · 113,617
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 14 August 2026
@nx123 · 766,354
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
@feixingzhe_cgzx · 152,131
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026
@baoguang988 · 100,602
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 17 August 2026
@gtkx1 · 152,605
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 August 2026
@hyxw3 · 61,530
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
@TGDSJ110 · 170,405
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 55 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“菲律宾⚜️大事件” (@dashijian01), 26,559 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dashijian01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.