Channel
@mianbeiy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
66,039subscribers
-12,129 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001360960816 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @mianbeiy @xwx1w |
| Description | 东南亚最知名【曝光新闻】之一 ，每日最新生活资讯、狗推日记、行业新闻、吃瓜曝光、币圈资讯、突发事件、商业服务、资源对接...让您看尽东南亚大小事。 #曝光 #新闻 #东南亚 #吃瓜 #资讯 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 55 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mianbeiy |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 66,039 | -208 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 66,247 | -325 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:16 | 66,572 | -147 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:01 | 66,719 | -92 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:04 | 66,811 | -56 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 66,867 | -127 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:26 | 66,994 | -69 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:15 | 67,063 | -95 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 67,158 | -57 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 67,215 | -79 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 67,294 | -53 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 67,347 | -118 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 67,465 | -27 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 67,492 | -189 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 67,681 | no change |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 67,681 | -92 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 67,773 | -69 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 67,842 | -25 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 67,867 | -33 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 67,900 | first reading |
609 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 512 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 609 (6 August 2026 – 10 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,093,958 |
| Reactions total | 39 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Sept 2026, 08:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 142 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
48 reactions across 44 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 15 | 31.3% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 20.8% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 18.8% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 16.7% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 8.33% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 2.08% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 2.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 609 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 609 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#柬埔寨 #电诈头目 柬埔寨电信网络诈骗组织头目，电诈大盘总马建军。 此人马建军早期前往柬埔寨盘踞西港开设电信诈骗公司起家。中途转移柬埔寨菩萨园区开设盘口，之后转移至柬埔寨波贝园区继续开设盘口。旗下巅峰时期有超200名直属诈骗人员。据称他来自甘肃兰州，但还不能确认。 此人马建军在2024年9月30日残忍销户一名来自山东的菏泽的电诈人员。 该园区位于柬越边境，里面很多公司做国内盘口，更是有很多被绑架强行带走。卖到的就是这个园区，非常的黑暗。现在他已经潜逃缅甸东部，继续开设电诈盘口。目前长期盘踞在外。
#群友投稿 原支付名称（鑫源 ） 现名称（ 新旺支付 ） 地址： TSkyAT1hwMfuUELuzBmDnou1k692vp7BYU 从始至终合作不间断有2-3年之久，最早支付宝通道改成为偷摸掺料 色刷一道常规资金直入， 群里P图支付宝回单 司法投诉几乎隔天不间断来找。 从支付宝风控稍微松懈了一点 9月初他们负责人来找我们谈合作继续开启对接，本着合作长久不需要再上担保群合作，一天给他们入款几十万的代付量，结果换来的是变本加厉的搞偷梁换柱这一套， 9月初对接开始直到4号目前不间断有来反馈司法，都是一道常规刷单料直接转账打款，联系群内客服装疯卖傻，咬死一直跑的支付宝BC代收付（实际是银行卡转卡 p图支付宝回单），查询对方地址一天只有几万U冲提跑量多为卡转卡资金，司法反诉很快，目前群里客服纯脑瘫，没有权限处理问题，联系新旺负责人后只在群里赔付系统充值分 都是假账数字，不实际退款退U，天眼司法图直出 也不处理 一直推卸责任只说…
#随着电诈园区悉数被关闭， #一位在西港的本地人发帖感叹： #再见了，中国城！再见了，一个月700-800美元的薪水～～
#我之前是 #KS #的一名人事招聘， #在5月份招聘了一个人去KS体育A部9组， #部长 #泽总 ，#组长 #代丰。 原本公司的人事提成是推广满两个月发放，结果等到7月时一直拖欠。然后等到8月份，眼看8月快结束，再次联系泽总，他说等两天就会发了。 然后问题出在9组组长因在公司业绩不佳，负债很多，小组解散。泽部长以小组解散跑路为借口，拒绝发放人事提成。我们人事也是完成了我们的招聘任务，但是人事提成一直拖欠。 目前KS公司在海悦23楼，已被开云某股东收购，台子再推开云包括旗下的包网。据说某部长还在南海后面的USD酒吧有股份。 如果此事不给我们人事一个交代，只是以跑路为由的话，我会把你们某些领导照片以及犯罪证据发送给国内的公安局进行备案处理。
#福建 #建阳 “ #东东 ” #收2万U后跑路拉黑，区块链留痕，人跑不掉。 网友曝光福建南平建阳人“东东”，称其于8月初以兑换为由收取2万U后失联，拉黑所有联系方式，至今无任何回应。爆料人称因信任朋友先行转币，不料对方收钱即跑。并警告：区块链有痕迹，躲不掉。 2万U买断一个人的人品，这笔账怎么算都是东东亏了。 线下换汇本就风险极高，更何况是网上临时对接的“朋友”。拉黑装死是没用的——钱包地址链上可查，真要追，只是想不想花力气的问题。提醒所有人：大额兑换尽量走正规渠道，别因“熟人介绍”就放松警惕。东东，2万U跑得了你的钱包，跑不了你妈，跑不了一辈子。
#曝光 #后续：以永胜为首的诈骗集团，骨干鲨鱼贩卖人口、吸毒、赌博、欺瞒上面，之前居住在金三角特区永恒物业、泰和公寓，此二人都是贵州籍。 鲨鱼之前在金三角泰和公寓长期诈骗，手下人数众多，后转移永恒物业，高峰期诈骗人员高达 200-300 人，多数是以高价买来的。 原委托我帮他从柬埔寨转移 20 个手底下的人到老挝，有 14 个人在老挝万象跑路，有 8 个人滞留在巴色。 永胜鲨鱼我们都是贵州人，不要跟我玩这种花花肠子，而且我也不是个省油的灯，希望你看到尽快联系我处理，要不然我安排人去你家里。 东南亚说大也不大，说小也不小，这个东西很简单，把该给我的钱给我就好了，其他多的一份我也不要。 如果不及时处理那不好意思了，我就让你家里面替你还了，让你亲戚朋友知道这些事情，还有我也有你的照片，我也不害怕你这个草包丝儿。 （看到找小编拿我联系方式与我进行协商和处理，要不然我把你们所有人的家庭信息弄出来，我一个一个去找你家里面要这个…
#A级通缉令 #电诈头目 #公安部行动 公安部发布A级通缉令，悬赏缉捕电信诈骗重大头目 #张诗龙。张诗龙，男，1987年11月20日出生，户籍地址为福建省德化县南镇西山村寨尾下14号，身份证号码为350526198711203013。2022年6月，公安部对12名电信网络诈骗集团重要头目及骨干人员公开发布A级通缉令，张诗龙位列其中。现公开征集其藏匿线索，凡提供有效线索协助缉捕者，公安机关将依法予以保护和奖励。公安机关敦促张诗龙认清形势，主动投案以争取宽大处理。举报请拨打110或联系当地公安机关。
#缅甸资讯：蛇头涉嫌贩卖人口 这个蛇头是广西合浦人。2025年8月，我朋友在缅甸想通过他走小路前往柬埔寨。刚开始当天我还一直和朋友保持联系，对方也和我们说有一个当兵的带他去吃饭，但第二天就彻底失联。 随后，这个蛇头告诉我们，我朋友是在缅甸过泰国边境的时候被抓了。但我们找关系去打听后，发现泰国方面根本没有抓到过我朋友，也从来没有见过这个人。 这个蛇头一直让我们等消息。直到一个月后，我朋友在黑公司里面打电话给家人报平安，我们才知道他是被卖到了缅甸黑公司。如果我朋友没有打电话出来，我们可能还一直被蒙在鼓里。 之后，我们打听到我朋友被卖到的地方，并要求这个蛇头去救人，但他一直没有实际行动。他还以我朋友被抓为由，找缅甸那边的蛇头要钱捞人。 我们认为，这其中涉及严重的人口贩运及相关纠纷。你当初说会负责到底，如今一年过去了，却一直不管不顾，我朋友因为这件事至今仍在黑公司受苦。 你可以不回国，但这件事不会因此结束。我们会通过报警、举…
#网友爆料 此人在缅甸万邦地区，涉嫌 #买卖人口 手底下员工没业绩就卖 专门干黑心事 里面的人想回家都没有办法回 老板贵州人外号叫做：#渔父 专门做国盘军包冒充军人身份，去欺骗国内女性还有做香港盘居多 专门骗中国人 现在国家执法 请求国家严查，清扫该地区的诈骗和买卖人口行为 不要让这些黑心老板有生路 这个渔父与缅甸军队同流合污 里面的人全部是被骗来的 只要没有业绩就打就卖掉 #缅甸 #莱卡 #万海 #万邦 #当阳 这些隐藏在山中的园区，请求中央政府出手打击救救里面的同胞
#网友曝光 今年二月初通过朋友介绍认识浩哥，从柬埔寨过来亚太的。 晚上定了包厢认识他们公司的这个王童和大侠，二三月份天天开包厢，包厢能送的都送，天天捧场，我也没赚你们什么钱。 王童开始买单还挺洒脱的，后面说挂单，我也信了，一直慢慢在结账，我也就不逼着他们买单。 公司催，我也跟他们说了很多次结账，说公司分红没到，给他们时间，女孩子工资我都在垫付，拖到现在没买单！ 这个王童联系不上，这个大侠说话语气更气人，说让去抓他，还说不就是欠的钱吗，又不是别的什么，很牛逼哇，那你倒是把包厢的单买了哇…… 我也不理解，几个大老爷们儿出来玩，包厢费扶手费用让订房人承担吗？我只是个打工的，何苦为难我呢？ 挂了那么多账，每一笔我都算得清清楚楚，结果他们后面剩的这些在扯皮赖账，玩消失，是男人吗？丢不丢人？ 白嫖，出来玩各种装逼，挂了一百多万，买单拖拖拉拉，时间也给了，单没结清，去其他地方各种消费。 后面你王童剩 241300 泰铢，人玩…
欢迎收看98年小学老师的开学第一天 #小学老师
精神情侣街头互殴，这精神小妹战斗力真不行
Showing the 12 most recent of 609 posts we hold for @mianbeiy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“曝光新闻🪸” (@mianbeiy), 66,039 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mianbeiy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.