🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 0审核|包出款🤩🤩🤩 东南亚大事件联合担保🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩(电子) 🤩亿级域名|78.COM 🤩官方飞投|充提自由 🔝实力派:78.COM 数字够短 品牌够大 🔥香港六合彩 · 独家盈利无上限! 🤩所有的特码🤩🤩倍 🤩连码三中三🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩百家乐全网最高起步返水🤩% 🤩电子|棋牌|捕鱼起步返水🤩.🤩% 🤩十三水|德州自主组队,无抽佣; 🏆电子单注🤩🤩🤩🤩U一拉; ⭐️百家乐真人视讯台红🤩🤩万U; 🚩诚招代理合作 1.打码返佣,限指定平台; 2.可叠加占成,自选占成比例及游戏平台; 🤩🤩🤩🤩:@DL78 💥高额战绩,巅峰记录持续刷新: 🥇PP电子|极速糖果1000 玩家游戏中购买30000u超级免费旋转,高倍爆奖,最终拿下378万U,已出款; 🥈PG电子|麻将胡了 又又又欧气爆棚,5000U一拉,连番触发,单局斩获233万U; 🥉香港六合彩|特码49倍 爱拼才会赢,大佬单码下注18万U, 一注直接拿下本期最…

Channel
曝光新闻 78.com 【独家冠名】(接广告合作)
@mianbeiy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
58,307subscribers
-19,861 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001360960816 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @mianbeiy @xwx1w |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 96 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mianbeiy |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:25 | 58,307 | -5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:10 | 58,312 | -119 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 58,431 | -16 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:48 | 58,447 | -202 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:45 | 58,649 | -38 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:09 | 58,687 | -232 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:57 | 58,919 | -16 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:48 | 58,935 | -337 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:37 | 59,272 | -16 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:58 | 59,288 | +828 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:07 | 58,460 | no change |
| 20 Oct 2026, 12:50 | 58,460 | -217 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 14:57 | 58,677 | -7 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 14:26 | 58,684 | -163 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 58,847 | -116 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:21 | 58,963 | -55 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:38 | 59,018 | -27 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 20:17 | 59,045 | -42 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 12:16 | 59,087 | -58 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 20:54 | 59,145 | first reading |
Engagement
1,299 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 163 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.46%
- avg views ÷ 58,307 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,440
- 378 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.073%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 378
- of 1,299 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 378 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,299 (6 August 2026 – 25 October 2026) |
| Views total | 542,826 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Oct 2026, 08:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5h 03m
- Average length
- 1m 06s
Measured directly from 276 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
75 reactions across 74 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 21.3% | |
| ⚡ | 9 | 12.0% | |
| 🎉 | 9 | 12.0% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 12.0% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 10.7% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 10.7% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 8.00% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 6.67% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 5.33% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 1.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 23 August 2026 to 25 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#缅媒报道 亚太水沟谷电诈园区传出虐杀事件 一名缅甸籍女性遭杀害,数千外国人疑遭拘禁强迫劳动 据克伦邦军事消息人士透露,10月22日晚,水沟谷 Yulong Bay(玉龙湾)电诈园区内,从事清洁工作的女性 KNA 士兵持刀刺杀,身中十余刀。 消息称,死者遗体当晚被运至万克村火化,涉案士兵目前被关押,死者家属则受到压力,被要求不得泄露消息。 该园区关押约6,000名外国人,包括中国籍人员,并存在强迫劳动、殴打、虐待及人员死亡等情况,园区老板据称身处泰国曼谷指挥业务,园区内部安保严密,手机进出受到限制,以防内部信息外泄。 消息人士指出,尽管缅甸军方声称正在打击妙瓦底地区的电诈活动,但 DKBA、BGF、KNA 及 PC 等武装组织仍被指继续大规模经营相关业务。
#缅北实录:这个1999年出生,才27岁的年轻人,管着缅北魏家电诈园区里所有的中国人,他叫 #廖景芳。 缅北的园区里,廖景芳是那个制定规则和执行惩戒的人。而在长沙的街头,他是那个开着豪车,谈笑风生的“正经商人”。 网上有张他照片,站一辆长沙牌路虎车旁边,戴着眼镜斯斯文文,丢人堆里根本认不出来,背后他却是缅北魏家犯罪集团的核心心腹,是魏怀仁手下掌管整个电诈园区运转的“大管家”。 2026年10月13日,廖景芳被判死刑。 当听到宣判结果的那一刻,廖景芳直接吓软在了法庭之上,廖景芳当庭吓晕的那一刻,和他昔日开着豪车在长沙街头“走路都带风”的样子,形成了最刺眼的对比。
#总统推荐的迷因币暴跌 法院最终认定无诈骗证据 阿根廷总统米莱去年曾在X推荐迷因币LIBRA,币价短暂暴涨后迅速崩盘,他随后删除帖子并否认与项目存在关联。 联邦法官现已撤销对米莱、其妹妹及项目顾问的刑事调查,认为没有证据证明他们参与诈骗。链上研究人员此前称,与发行方有关的八个钱包曾撤走约9900万美元。
事情经过他说 #西港 #菲律宾 #泰国, 新家波有房子,员工700多个人,然后跟很多人借钱,也找员工借700美金,借完钱然后拉黑,此人现在在西港,偷渡,没护照,我有详细地址,以各种理由骗取钱财,得手后直接拉黑失联,有往来的朋友注意提防,切勿被骗, 他的名字叫许清南,外号啊楠,安溪湖头人
#马来西亚新闻 马来西亚愿向也门提供人道援助 呼吁各方重返谈判 2026年10月24日,马来西亚外交部长莫哈末哈山在森美兰芙蓉市出席活动后表示,马来西亚愿尽力参与救援任务或向有需要的国家提供援助。他指出,也门外长阿夫拉·阿卜杜勒阿齐兹·祖巴于周四通过电话向他通报了也门最新局势。莫哈末哈山对也门民众在长期内战中承受饥荒和基本生活物资短缺表示同情,并强调冲突必须结束,因为这对约2200万受影响民众毫无益处。他呼吁外国相关方发挥建设性作用,重返谈判桌,优先通过外交努力防止冲突拖延并损害地区稳定。
#香港机场查毒 一名36岁中国内地男子从柬埔寨金边经泰国曼谷转机抵港,被查获约3公斤疑似大麻花,以及疑似含受管制药物成分的产品和未完税香烟。 根据香港法律,贩运危险药物一旦罪成,最高可判终身监禁及罚款500万港元。目前,案件已进入司法程序,相关指控仍须依法审理。
#曝光这些所谓的国内救援团队 现在国内的那些救援团队以妙瓦迪救援的名义专门骗那些家属钱,基本上一单都能搞几十万人民币。 他们的套路就是先通过发布寻人或者曝光联系到所在的公司,公司赔付十万,报给家属就是20万起步。 然后收了家属的钱后又不想给公司赔付,就搞2个账号自导自演p图转账,公司那边没收到钱自然就不会放人。 结果这些骗子救援团队就拿着假的聊天记录和p图记录通过曝光试图让公司放人,如果公司放人了,那么家属给他们的几十万赔付就全部被骗子救援团队黑吃了。 后面这些骗子救援团队就会和家属说人是他们联系公司赔付就出来的,建议群里的警察叔叔们真的🉐严查这些所谓的救援团队。 这种骗家属的钱简直是灭绝人性。
#国内新闻 湖北男孩偷拿超市饮料 父亲带孩子到警局“自首” 中国湖北宜昌一名男孩因偷拿超市的一瓶冰红茶并藏在校服里带回家后,被父亲拿戒尺送到警局“自首”。经警方教育后,男孩在警员的陪同下返回超市,用自己攒下的零用钱赔偿并道歉,最终获得店主谅解。 这起事件于上周四(15日)傍晚发生,男孩放学途中路过小区门口超市时,趁店主招呼其他顾客,从门口冷藏柜拿了一瓶冰红茶,塞进衣服里并带回家中。 男孩的行为很快便被父亲发现,父亲认为不能轻视小事,错了就得承认,且不能让孩子形成偷拿别人东西无所谓的认知,于是牵着孩子直奔当地警局。 值班警员在了解事情的经过后,蹲下身对男孩说,“今天拿一瓶饮料是小事,但一旦养成习惯,长大了就可能犯下大错。” 警员随后拿出一副手铐,轻放在男孩的手上,并解释男孩现在年幼,犯了错还有改正的机会,并说:“等16岁或18岁再犯错戴上它,就不是今天这样的性质了。” 经教育后,警方陪同父子返回超市。在父亲的坚持下,男…
#网友曝光 此人莫离(真名: #梁晨),黑龙江佳木斯人。2025年,他在柬埔寨木牌泰坦园区担任印度盘主管。公司曾用心培养他,从普通员工提拔为主管,提供优厚的福利待遇和工作条件,使其赚取了不少收入,并赋予其较高的权限。 遗憾的是,此人不仅不知感恩,还勾结外人将公司客户引至其他场所进行杀害,并挖走公司近20名员工,导致当场损失十余万美元,间接损失近30万美元。 据悉,他在离开其他公司前,还将公司客户资金转入个人账户,金额约10万U。 现曝光此等忘恩负义之人,建议有合作意向的老板们尽快远离这种不知感恩的人。
#小菲投稿 I know hindi lang ako yung mabilis ma-overstimulate, especially sa mga tulad kong temporarily living with in-laws. Paano niyo hina-handle kapag yung MIL niyo is naturally loud, super energetic, and maligalig? 😭 Especially sa car, kasi minsan ang lakas talaga ng boses hahaha. I’m trying my best to adjust and get used to it kasi I know this is normal for them, and I understand na iba-iba talaga tayo ng personali…
#国际新闻 国际刑警组织展开“塞伦盖蒂三号”行动 大肆打击非洲网络犯罪 在国际刑警组织协调下,21国执法机构于2026年6月29日至8月31日联合开展“塞伦盖蒂三号”行动(Operation Serengeti III),重创非洲网络犯罪网络。 行动共逮捕1,462名嫌疑人,摧毁10,909个恶意网络,追回逾1.05亿美元非法资金,涉及受害者超6.5万人,损失达3.85亿美元。其中,乌干达查获涉及跨国投资诈骗的365名外籍人员;安哥拉捣毁2个非法加密货币挖矿中心;尼日利亚则抓获多名涉钓鱼邮件与投资诈骗的骨干。
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,299 posts we hold for @mianbeiy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
无间道三部曲中,你觉得哪个主演的演技最差?
- 刘德华0%
- 黎明0%
- 梁朝伟50%
- 吴镇宇0%
- 曾志伟50%
- 黄秋生0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 23 August 2026 to 25 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@bx666 · 463,020#1
@toutiaoshijian · 67,610#2
@anwei2 · 34,507#3
@dashijian01 · 29,430#4
@svip40 · 126,751#5
@jinritoutiao6 · 13,619#6
@aza520 · 3,261#7
@xinhuaribao · 913#8
@vip35r · 34,230#9
@iiiik · 32,074#10
@cctv_dy · 26,535#11
@toutiao_4 · 1,119#12
@jiuboo · 14,295#13
@baoheitai · 1,115#14
@heicaibaog · 8#15
@feilvbinghuarenriji · 15,535#16
@kaleminews · 197,114#17
@SB919 · 121,527#18
@tghuarenba · 26,263#19
@dny1577 · 5,138#20
@baoguangba088 · 238,922#21
@tg04277 · 56,678#22
@xinwen118 · 126,067#23
@quanqiubaoliao · 133,540#24
@huaxuncnn · 953#25
@Banma_xinwen · 88,264#26
@svipzz · 72,403#27
@dxdb001 · 5,125#28
@baoguangee · 192,759#29
@dsj0161 · 2,000#30
@BG886 · 53,700#31
@ke5689 · 260,578#32
@dnyawtt · 50,342#33
@gouzaibaoliao · 2,053#34
@baoguang821 · 48,355#35
@dubai1588 · 821#36
@tx100 · 150,502#37
@feilvbinhuarenzixun · 71,762#38
@vipn8888 · 59,100#39
@huaren_zixun · 87,511#40
@ZLWBG · 88,990#41
@qqdsj · 186,733#42
@Dzx199 · 27,345#43
@xinwenhc · 196,030#44
@baoguangqun110 · 71,177#45
@cctvPH · 160,061#46
@redian3 · 75,771#47
@bg855 · 287,767#48
@feilongwang · 76,584#49
@quanwangBG1 · 1,650#50
@woaiui · 8,512#51
@HR8877 · 300,427#52
@tg89aa · 121,254#53
@quanwangbaoguangb · 111,088#54
@xinwenba · 3,669#55
@Dubaihuarenzixun · 68,220#56
@baoguang212 · 7,084#57
@baoguangqun999 · 69,811#58
@DNYTJL3 · 89,365#59
@miandianhuarenzixun · 72,301#60
@baoguang85 · 227#61
@aa144 · 34,917#62
@sssvip2 · 270,813#63
@VCaa8 · 345#64
@laowohuarenzixun · 72,251#65
@DNYXW008 · 75,186#66
@bominwang18 · 4,576#67
@a0159 · 97,181#68
@flbhuarenquan · 87,802#69
@ac666 · 339,087#70
@bodu08 · 57,092#71
@BG_BG8 · 38,270#72
@jsj62 · 21,974#73
@dny099 · 145,227#74
@BG2288 · 126,089#75
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@qiusu664 · 48,892
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 24 August 2026
@tuigsc · 69,885
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 21 August 2026
@pdsss · 55,345
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 23 August 2026
@cggxhhh · 265,758
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 August 2026
@AoneExp · 119,729
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“曝光新闻 78.com 【独家冠名】(接广告合作)” (@mianbeiy), 58,307 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mianbeiy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.