#国内资讯:内蒙古一女子感觉时运不济找“大仙儿”转运,遭对方以“鬼附身”“家人将遭灾祸”恐吓,先后被骗转账近百万元 内蒙古自治区公安厅9月1日对外发布案件通报:今年1月5日,王女士、苏女士等多名受害人前往赤峰市公安局松山分局刑侦大队报案,称遭到梁某某以封建迷信的方式诈骗。接到报案后,分局立即开展侦办工作。 经查,2025年2月至10月,受害人王女士因生活不顺,自认时运不济,经他人介绍找到梁某某,希望借助其帮忙转运消灾。 梁某某通过焚香请仙上身塑造自身“身怀仙家”的人设,谎称自己能够消灾解难,又编造王女士被鬼怪缠身、家人即将遭遇灾祸、其母亲寿命堪忧等话术恐吓王女士,并以驱鬼、续命、化解灾厄为借口,多次向王女士索要高额法事费用。 受恐惧心理驱使,王女士先后向梁某某转账近百万元。 同一时期,苏女士等人因遭遇车祸、生意受挫,也前来找梁某某“看事”,同样被梁某某使用同类封建迷信说辞骗取钱财。 犯罪嫌疑人梁某某并无固定生活来源,…

Channel
东南亚闯荡记🪐
@ac666
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
319,420subscribers
-8,895 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001956665373 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @ac666 @uu134 |
| Description | 东南亚闯荡记: @ac666 投稿爆料合作: @tx011 专注于东南亚华人最新动态资讯,生活故事分享,海外华人求助,让你看尽海外华人大小事。 #东南亚 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #缅甸 #泰国 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 53 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ac666 |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 319,420 | -95 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 319,515 | -813 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:48 | 320,328 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 320,338 | -637 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:46 | 320,975 | -15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:12 | 320,990 | -709 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 321,699 | -14 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 321,713 | -537 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 322,250 | -62 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 322,312 | -449 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 322,761 | -114 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 322,875 | -604 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 323,479 | -145 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 323,624 | -533 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 324,157 | -177 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 324,334 | -1,559 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 325,893 | -454 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 326,347 | -489 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 326,836 | -143 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 326,979 | first reading |
Engagement
899 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.442%
- avg views ÷ 319,420 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,410
- 899 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.23%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 899
- of 899 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 685 of 899 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 899 (7 August 2026 – 5 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,268,422 |
| Reactions total | 11,995 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Sept 2026, 13:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈61,200
- Videos
- ≈12,700
- Links
- ≈19,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3h 02m
- Average length
- 39s
Measured directly from 281 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,995 reactions across 680 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7,116 | 59.3% | |
| 🔥 | 3,151 | 26.3% | |
| 👍 | 1,654 | 13.8% | |
| 😁 | 18 | 0.15% | |
| 🤩 | 12 | 0.1% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 0.1% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 0.067% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 0.058% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 0.058% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.025% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.025% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.017% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.017% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 685 of the 899 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,995 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 899 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
曝光!所谓圈子大哥君子君哥毫无底线 今天公开此事,并非意气用事,而是长期包容换来得寸进尺,彻底心寒,特此如实曝光,让圈内所有人看清君子君哥的真实人品。 君哥在圈子里一直以仗义、有格局、懂人情世故的大哥人设示人,深受身边朋友信任。我曾经也真心敬重他,待人以诚、处处包容,从未有过半分算计,始终相信其标榜的担当与情义。 可真正涉及利益得失时,他的虚伪本性彻底暴露。早前世界杯期间,君哥在我这里下注,顺利赢走二十多万美金,当时结算干脆利落,风光体面、谈吐大方,一副靠谱大哥姿态。 但后续账目结算后,君哥累计欠下16万美金款项。念及相识一场、顾及他的名声颜面,我从未当众逼迫,一直耐心体谅、给他时间缓冲。为了好聚好散,我主动让步,自损利益为他减免5万美金,最终仅剩11.6万美金欠款,已是仁至义尽、最大限度给他台阶。 可我的包容和退让,换来的只有无尽拖延、敷衍和耍赖。时至今日,他始终以别人欠他钱、自己资金紧张为借口,一味逃避责任,分文不…
#温馨提示:现在西港检查几乎到了最严的时候,大家带好合法证件,不要违法。 简单的消息,月底结束,不是不查,是没有这么严厉了,检查还会是常态化。大家保重🙏请遵守当地的法律。 【频道广告赞助商】 😀🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟U存U取 首存送16666U 返水1.3%起 飞机投注: @X6YL 😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM 全球布局 实力保障 😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城 ☀️关注闯荡记频道 ➡️@ac666 投稿:@bq666
❤5👍2
#网友投稿:缅甸东枝今天下午,军车上载着大多数都是年轻人17/8岁 看到他们脸色估计都是抓去当兵的,每一张车上有四名警察拿着枪,车队已经路过二十多辆了。 PS:小编表示,缅甸这内战得让川普打个电话解决下😄😄 【频道广告赞助商】 😀🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟U存U取 首存送16666U 返水1.3%起 飞机投注: @X6YL 😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM 全球布局 实力保障 😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城 ☀️关注闯荡记频道 ➡️@ac666 投稿:@bq666
❤9🔥4👍2
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀【贵宾会 750.cc 】 强势启航 集团背书 信誉担保 全网首发,引爆彩票娱乐新纪元!六合彩49倍 挑战全网心水 加拿大28全网最高赔率 挑战全网公式 合营代理 独立后台 佣金周结 自主赚赔 层级保护,官方零接触用户 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀【辉煌】业界最高返水 1.6%无上限 😀【辉煌】免实名不限地区 日提千万U 😀【辉煌】U投第一品牌 公正公平无私彩 😀【辉煌】10亿😂奖池 大奖根本爆不停 😀【辉煌】福利天花板 入款笔笔赠送3% 😀【辉煌】盘总来辉煌娱乐 享辉煌人生 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😕助您辉煌人生,雪中送炭不如锦上添花: 😀单笔出款😀😀😀万 额外奖励18888 😀单笔出款😀😀😀万 额外奖励58888 😘狗庄落泪:昨日幸运玩家仅用800u返水PG大爆193万u,0审核0卡款 财务秒出 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😘 全网上押5500万u,大集团,大品牌,实力派。别人…
☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️ 🌟 官方网址: 6G.com 😀 6G 全球娱乐|资金安全 🈴 百亿护航 · 全球公认最稳 👩❤️👨👩❤️👩💑👨❤️👨👩❤️💋👨🪢🧶🧵🪡🧥 🔥 上押1000万U + 💵亿万储备金 🌊 大额秒提,放心赢 🔎点击查验 👍 电子每日狂送16% 加赠福利 😀 官网数据同步 · 公平 · 公正 · 公开 · 无私彩 🔤 新人 · 首存豪礼返利 · 每月逢 6 现金大反馈 😃 爆庄实录|3天狂揽1086万U 😃 新客首存6万U,豪提209万U 😃 500一拉,PG实力兑现133万U 🇭🇰 彩票入口: 6G123.com 😀 加拿大 · PC28 · 超高赔率 📌柬埔寨地区请访问专用域名 6G.VIP 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 6G.com 😕1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ @AA6G 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ @KF6G 🔓 真正的实力,不需要解释,稳定出款,就是最好的名片。
#柬埔寨资讯:12名嫌疑人涉嫌网络诈骗和洗钱,被法院下令羁押 9月4日,金边市初级法院调查法官洪·玛丽尼奇作出决定,下令对12名涉案人员实施临时羁押。他们涉嫌在柬埔寨境内从事网络诈骗和洗钱活动。 12人中包括6名柬埔寨人、4名中国人、1名马来西亚人和1名巴基斯坦人。 法院以“网络诈骗及洗钱”罪名对12人提起指控,并将他们分别送往 1号和2号改造中心(M1、M2)羁押,等待后续法律程序。柬埔寨当局表示,将继续打击跨国犯罪,特别是利用现代科技实施的网络犯罪。 ☀️关注闯荡记频道 ➡️@ac666 投稿:@bq666
❤10🔥4👍3
澜湄执法合作中心实地调研缅甸“平安澜湄2026”联合行动 8月24日至28日,澜湄执法合作中心副秘书长李大吴率工作组赴缅甸,实地调研“平安澜湄2026”联合行动工作进展。泰国皇家警察一名警务专家应邀参与联合调研。 工作组首先在内比都会见缅甸警察总部第一副总监温博少将,随后与缅甸警察总部禁毒局、反人口贩运局、刑侦局及打击跨国犯罪局等部门会谈,研判电信网络诈骗、DU品贩运及人口贩运等犯罪态势,总结涉诈园区与窝点治理成果,并就完善常态化多边执法合作机制深入交换意见。 期间,工作组向中心设在缅甸警察总部的国家联络办公室移交一批办公设备。 在缅期间,工作组在内比都走访缅甸刑侦局司法物证鉴定中心,实地考察电子物证提取与刑事技术应用;赴勃固省考察鸟卡谢综合检查站,深入了解一线违禁品查缉查验与装备运维保障需求;赴仰光省实地踏查查获的涉诈窝点,听取缅方对窝点清剿、作案手段及涉案通信设备扣押情况的现场介绍,并就现场勘验与处置流程深入交流。 …
❤10🔥5👍4
#边境新闻:缅方难民想违法偷入中国 被我方边防发现。 ☀️关注闯荡记频道 ➡️@ac666 投稿:@bq666
❤12🔥5👍4
#群友反馈:西港这栋大楼今天被宪兵队照顾了,据说里面很多都是搞线上博彩的,不知道有没有抓人。 ☀️关注闯荡记频道 ➡️@ac666 投稿:@bq666
❤10🔥6👍4
#网友投稿:🇰🇭西港凯旋也顶不住了,刚刚物业下达通知说20号之前要全部清场 至此,西港又一个神话倒下 ☀️关注闯荡记频道 ➡️@ac666 投稿:@bq666
❤8🔥7👍3
🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 🙂 全网广告费每月投入500万u 包出款! 🙂 东南亚上押500万u全网上押5000万U 🙂 煮酒论英雄 广告论实力 资金储备5亿U 😁【贵宾会 750.cc 】 强势启航 集团背书 信誉担保 全网首发,引爆彩票娱乐新纪元!六合彩49倍 挑战全网心水 加拿大28全网最高赔率 挑战全网公式 合营代理 独立后台 佣金周结 自主赚赔 层级保护,官方零接触用户 ✨超高爆率,大额爆奖喜讯 包出款😦 🥇尊贵VIP【da***】盈利提款 468万U 🥈尊贵VIP【qq***】盈利提款398万U 🥉尊贵VIP【aa***】盈利提款 303万U 🙂尊贵VIP【ni***】 盈利提款 277万U 🙂尊贵VIP【niubi*】盈利提款 239万U 🙂尊贵VIP【KH***】 盈利提款 199万U 🙂尊贵VIP【uu***】盈利提款 160.3万U 🙂尊贵VIP【sh***】盈利提款 105.6万U 🙂尊贵…
Showing the 12 most recent of 899 posts we hold for @ac666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@fw2009 · 8,13941 postsX6宝马会-官方频道
@x6x6 · 13,12338 postsH.CC 爱马仕国际
@h7788 · 11,40226 posts九博国际 · 公群导航
@jbgj · 13,59423 posts🏆九博国际@JBGJ🏆上下分群 总押900万美金
@jiubovip · 8,85723 posts66U机器人
@xihuvipbot · 16,31610 postsV6娱乐
@HT_V6 · 3,9916 posts🔥金贝娱乐场-jinbei.com-【官方招商】🔥
@jbzhaoshang · 5,0566 posts柬埔寨大事件|东南亚大事件—实时报道🌎
@bx155 · 53,6452 postsSpam Info Bot
@SpamBot · 34,238,2571 post头条事件
@toutiaoshijian · 78,1871 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@bx666 · 474,414#1
@jpz_888 · 12,803#2
@jianpuzhaidashijian · 45,360#3
@svip40 · 112,699#4
@toutiaoshijian · 78,187#5
@xpppp · 306,401#6
@aa144 · 35,274#7
@dubai0 · 79,751#8
@tx100 · 164,207#9
@MGHDSJ · 14,249#10
@mupai77 · 4,515#11
@pyzcn · 220,887#12
@jinritoutiao6 · 27,090 (as read 10 August 2026)#13
@dnyggg · 42,865#14
@bx777 · 45,209#15
@ygxw3 · 142,261#16
@ab100 · 145,290#17
@chigua2022 · 201,939#18
@bodutt · 52,347#19
@bg833 · 301,330#20
@baoguangee · 196,249#21
@kanxia · 476,520#22
@aza520 · 3,300#23
@feilongwang · 72,131#24
@qqdsj · 189,503#25
@xinwen1 · 88,885#26
@redian3 · 59,568#27
@baoheitai · 1,165#28
@dxdb001 · 9,940#29
@usd1 · 250,059 (as read 10 August 2026)#30
@cctvPH · 207,278#31
@baoguangqun999 · 39,554#32
@DNY_hasj · 186,556#33
@iiiik · 47,893#34
@quanqiubaoliao · 172,758#35
@DNYXW008 · 105,003#36
@TG_368 · 23,736#37
@flb00 · 13,104#38
@dnygplm1 · 23,812#39
@HR8877 · 318,573#40
@xinwen118 · 115,953#41
@blj77 · 148,190#42
@xinwen811 · 212,399#43
@tghuarenba · 46,874#44
@taiwansucai223 · 12,057#45
@xinhuaribao · 947#46
@jianpuzhaihuarenzixun · 80,913#47
@feilvbinhuarenzixun · 75,904#48
@toutiao_4 · 1,211#49
@dsj0161 · 2,042#50
@svipzz · 31,019#51
@gouzaibaoliao · 2,193#52
@JYGJBG · 54,242#53
@baoguang211 · 24,192#54
@quanwangbaoguang0 · 85,800#55
@vipn8888 · 76,995#56
@baoguang85 · 33,232#57
@baoguangba088 · 245,985#58
@jpz39 · 10,100#59
@CG887 · 111,499#60
@sucai1 · 106,336#61
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@DNY_hasj · 186,556
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 11 August 2026
@baoguang7 · 43,278
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 24 August 2026
@JYGJBG · 54,242
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 23 August 2026
@vhhhh · 208,932
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 20 here — alongside 19 others — read 11 August 2026
@jianpuzhaidashijian · 45,360
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 27 August 2026
@bx666 · 474,414
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 10 August 2026
@bx777 · 45,209
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 27 August 2026
@MB_149 · 128,578
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 16 August 2026
@kanxia · 476,520
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 August 2026
@xigang8I8 · 145,315
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 24 August 2026
@hyxw4 · 77,380
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 19 August 2026
@xpppp · 306,401
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 10 August 2026
@TGDSJ110 · 107,801
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 14 August 2026
@pyzcn · 220,887
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 11 August 2026
@dnyxsp · 84,008
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 16 August 2026
@DNYTJL3 · 113,092
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 14 August 2026
@tx100 · 164,207
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 12 August 2026
@chiguak · 48,499
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 23 August 2026
@SB919 · 150,794
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 August 2026
@bodutt · 52,347
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 August 2026
@CG887 · 111,499
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@dny2023dbg · 110,385
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
@qq2023bg · 125,413
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 13 August 2026
@jpzdny · 169,168
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 47 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚闯荡记🪐” (@ac666), 319,420 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ac666.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.