#群友投稿:在柬埔寨一年,终于明白了什么叫人走茶凉。 来柬埔寨一年了。这一年,说长不长,说短也不短。原本以为,换一个地方生活,换一个环境打拼,只要肯吃苦、肯努力,总能闯出一点名堂。可现实却给我上了一课,而且这一课,学费交得有点贵。 以前总觉得,出门在外,多个朋友多条路。来到柬埔寨以后才发现,有时候,朋友只是利益的另一种称呼,感情只是有利用价值时的一种表现。 你有钱的时候,身边的人笑脸相迎;你有资源的时候,别人主动靠近;你能帮上忙的时候,电话一个接一个。可一旦你落魄了,遇到困难了,需要别人帮一把的时候,才发现,原来很多人早就不认识你了。 成年人的世界,没有那么多雪中送炭,更多的是锦上添花。 在这里待久了,慢慢也看明白了一些事情:不要高估自己在别人心里的位置,不要轻易相信酒桌上的承诺,更不要把别人的客气当成真心。 有些人,平时称兄道弟,真遇到事情的时候,跑得比谁都快;有些人,嘴上说着有福同享、有难同当,真正有难的时候,却…

Channel
缅甸新闻头条
@hyxw4
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
57,026subscribers
+30,102 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002178499505 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hyxw4 |
| Description | #东南亚 #柬埔寨 #缅甸 #泰国 #菲律宾 《缅甸大事件》官方电报频道,聚焦缅甸,专注于东南亚华人最新新闻动态资讯,生活故事分享。 其他缅甸大事件均为模仿盗版!请注意识别,防止被诈骗或敲诈勒索! 商务合作: @feihang |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hyxw4 |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:38 | 57,026 | +764 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:16 | 56,262 | -94 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:35 | 56,356 | -190 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:56 | 56,546 | -213 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:56 | 56,759 | -26 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:00 | 56,785 | -171 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 11:31 | 56,956 | -683 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:35 | 57,639 | -11,003 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:21 | 68,642 | -6,872 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:26 | 75,514 | -54 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:56 | 75,568 | -101 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:56 | 75,669 | -45 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:38 | 75,714 | -1,777 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 07:40 | 77,491 | -321 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:04 | 77,812 | -30 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 05:31 | 77,842 | -50 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 02:05 | 77,892 | -97 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 22:28 | 77,989 | -42 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:05 | 78,031 | -296 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 20:36 | 78,327 | first reading |
Engagement
2,384 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 180 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.63%
- avg views ÷ 57,026 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 931
- 739 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.086%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 739
- of 2,384 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 739 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,384 (8 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 687,829 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 19:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈56,700
- Videos
- ≈11,500
- Links
- ≈36,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 6h 41m
- Average length
- 1m 19s
Measured directly from 306 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3 | 42.9% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 28 September 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 739 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
超实用控制技巧,#男生必看 🔔华人头条:@FFFFG ✅投稿爆料:@feihang
超级巨大的巨女OL小姐们的咖啡时光…… AI 🔔华人头条:@FFFFG ✅投稿爆料:@feihang
中领馆紧急提醒:误入印度境内也可能坐牢!一名中国公民在尼泊尔边境被印度边防部队拘捕 近日,一名在尼泊尔的中国公民在尼泊尔与印度边境地区活动时,因误入印度境内,被印度边防部队拘捕。 11月6日,中国驻加尔各答总领事馆发布安全提醒,通报上述事件,并再次警告在尼泊尔的中国公民,切勿擅自前往尼泊尔与印度接壤的边境地区,以免因误入印度境内而承担严重法律后果。 领馆指出,尼泊尔与印度边境属于开放边境,部分区域国界标识较少,中国公民在边境地区活动时,很容易在不知情的情况下进入印度境内。一旦没有提前取得有效的印度签证,就可能被印度边防部队或警方拘捕。 领馆特别强调,印度对非法入境行为处罚严厉,不论是有意越境还是无意误入,一旦被发现,都可能遭到拘捕并移送司法机关,面临2年至8年监禁及罚款,而且获得保释的难度较大。 此外,领馆还提醒,即使持有有效印度签证,进入印度后,未经印度官方书面许可,也不得擅自前往外国人限制进入的区域。同时,必须在签…
#网友投稿:今天路过一个园区,发现门口竟然有一条狗保安! 真的是严丝合缝,门上的小洞不大不小,刚好就是为狗狗量身打造的专属岗位。 看来这扇门从设计之初,就考虑好了狗狗的工作需求 24小时站岗,随时监控外面的一举一动! PS:真狗保安,一月多少工资🤣 🔔华人头条:@FFFFG ✅投稿爆料:@feihang
#群友投稿:我们在菲律宾Tagaytay(大雅台)开设的度假村,尚未正式营业,前后装修了半年之久,眼看就要完工了,没想到竟遭遇一场噩梦。 20至30名蒙面歹徒持枪闯入实施抢劫。晚上10:57分入室,直到凌晨3:30分才离开。劫匪自称是警察,并声称只要钱,不伤害性命。最初索要1000万披索赎金,经过一番商谈,最终确定为200万披索,另外还索要了70克黄金。 事发当日天亮后,我们紧急赶往马尼拉Pasay的NBI总部OTCD部门报警。由于始终联系不上中国驻菲使馆,只好联系中国外交部。外交部提交资料信息后约10分钟,使馆才打来电话询问情况,但也只是简单问询,并叮嘱我们注意安全。 最后,我们把所有希望都寄托在NBI-OTCD部门和Tagaytay地区警方身上。 然而,得知我们返回马尼拉报警后,当地竟然还发短信质问,说案件发生在他们辖区,却没有向他们报警,甚至称我们越权报警。对此,我们只能感到可笑。 NBI-OTCD在当晚便成立调…
柬埔寨向各国外交官及国际组织介绍打击网络诈骗进展与后续计划 2026年11月6日下午,柬埔寨负责特别任务的国务部长、打击网络诈骗特别委员会(G.B.C.B.)常务副主席兼秘书处主任蔡西纳里(Chhay Sinarith),与外交与国际合作部国务秘书乌特索菲亚(Ouch Sophea)共同主持会议,向各国外交使团及国际组织代表介绍柬埔寨打击网络诈骗的最新进展及下一步行动计划。 此次会议主要围绕柬埔寨打击网络诈骗工作的成果、当前进展及后续部署展开。 🔔华人头条:@FFFFG ✅投稿爆料:@feihang
#越南资讯:警方捣毁跨省色情直播网络,4人被起诉,涉案资金流水超4.189万亿越南盾 11月5日,越南老街省公安机关通报,警方成功捣毁一个跨省色情直播犯罪网络,4名涉案人员被依法提起刑事诉讼。 经调查,该团伙自2025年以来在老街省及越南多个省市组织色情直播活动,通过境外色情网站建立直播账号,并利用Telegram、Zalo、Facebook等社交平台招募女性参与色情表演。 据悉,该团伙通过虚拟Token收费,观众可通过银行转账或购买手机充值卡获取Token,用于观看色情直播,并向主播提出指定表演要求。相关资金经过多个银行账户及电子钱包转移,随后兑换成USDT,再向参与直播的女性支付报酬。 警方查明,与该团伙相关的银行账户累计资金流水超过4.189万亿越南盾。截至目前,警方已追回16.5亿越南盾。 目前,Lý Lở Mẩy(23岁)、Lò Tả Mẩy(28岁)、Phạm Văn Trọng(37岁)以及Nguyễn …
#群友爆料:此人外号“啊光”,真名何胜,湖北人。 事情的起因是,他说自己在马来西亚搞了一个海外股票项目,然后我这边就给他介绍了一些员工过去。提前跟他说得很清楚,现在安排人员会产生一些费用,有的代理每个月也需要一些生活费。 当员工到了之后,他就开始找各种理由推脱。所有人员前往马来西亚之前,都是我这边先垫付费用。他自己装逼,请别人吸毒、包厢消费,十几天了,小费也没有给妹子,共计7900马币。拿着一个报销机票的转账,一直在扯淡。到了之后,报销的一些款项大部分也都没有给。 人员来来回回,我自己花了2万美金左右,最后全部都是自己亏。 然后他又说海外股票的人员满了,要叫我们的人去做国内的A股。我说我这边的人不做国内的。 然后他就开始挖底下的代理。给了你时间让你处理,你就是要玩包吃! 你让我损失了金钱、信用,还白忙一场,倒贴20000多美金。那么,大家都别好好玩了! 此人大家一定要注意,满嘴口嗨,公款吸DU,毫无诚信可言,切勿上当…
#印尼资讯:移民局突袭丹格朗两地,11名外国人被扣留,其中8人为中国籍 11月6日报道,印尼苏加诺哈达机场特别移民局联合相关执法部门,11月4日在万丹省丹格朗(Tangerang)的Cengkareng及Kosambi地区展开联合执法行动,重点检查当地企业办公场所及公寓,核查外国人的居留许可及实际活动是否合法。 此次行动共调动77名执法人员,共扣留11名外国人,其中包括8名中国籍人员、2名巴基斯坦籍人员及1名尼日利亚籍人员。 初步调查显示,5名中国籍人员涉嫌滥用居留许可,2名巴基斯坦籍人员涉嫌未按规定申报居住地址,其余4人仍在接受进一步调查。 目前,11名外国人均已被移民部门带走审查。有关部门将根据调查结果,依法决定是否采取进一步移民行政措施,包括遣返等处理。 🔔华人头条:@FFFFG ✅投稿爆料:@feihang
#马来西亚资讯:古晋发生持刀入室抢劫案!4名蒙面匪深夜闯民宅,绑架华裔一家三口,掠走约10万令吉财物! 116日报道,马来西亚砂拉越州古晋发生一起骇人听闻的入室抢劫案!4名蒙面男子趁凌晨时分潜入住宅,持刀威胁屋主一家三口,并将他们捆绑控制,随后大肆搜刮屋内财物,抢走现金、金饰、手表等贵重物品,总损失估计约10万令吉。 据了解,案件发生于10月31日凌晨约4时38分,地点位于古晋查纳路(Jalan Chanara)TT3住宅区。 根据警方调查,4名嫌犯事先潜入住宅范围,随后利用工具强行破门进入屋内。进入住宅后,匪徒先在一楼搜寻财物,之后进入厨房拿取菜刀,再前往二楼卧室。 当时,屋主夫妇及孩子正在家中休息,突然遭到持刀匪徒威胁。4名嫌犯随后将一家三口捆绑,控制现场后开始翻找屋内财物。 经过一番搜掠,匪徒抢走现金、金饰、手表及其他贵重物品,财物损失估计约10万令吉。 所幸,受害者一家三口在事件中没有受到身体伤害。匪徒得手后…
#群友投稿:近期看新闻,马来西亚一直在抓人,被举报后直接突击打野团队的公寓。 本人在马来西亚也有两年时间了,深度了解关于被抓后外交方面的问题。 首先要明确的是,如果被移民局抓到,先看你的护照。如果护照逾期,那么基本上没办法操作,是一定要被遣返回国的。 护照正常的情况下,哪怕被抓,现场一般开完庭,稍微运作一下就会放出来了,没有任何影响。 护照逾期90天是一个分水岭。90天内逾期,补缴罚款即可;如果超过90天,需要重新激活,市场价大概在2500RM左右。激活后等于你重新入境了,又可以在马来西亚待30天,然后可以续签2个月左右,加起来就是3个月的时间。 在这期间,哪怕在电脑前面被抓,也会很容易出来的。 所以奉劝那些公司的员工,不要想着出境的时候公司在替你去处理护照的问题就可以了。如果能早日处理护照逾期的问题,哪怕被抓都没有什么大问题。 如果在逾期的时间内被抓,哪怕在马来西亚不会坐牢,遣返回去大概率也是落地被盘问、带走的。…
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,384 posts we hold for @hyxw4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@dubai0 · 88,858#1
@w9519 · 43,969#2
@mlxy458 · 48,725#3
@bx666 · 462,295#4
@uae918 · 78,024#5
@hyxw6 · 77,721#6
@th769 · 58,262#7
@flb00 · 16,616#8
@VN704 · 60,085#9
@dnyshijian · 8,871#10
@flb608 · 70,950#11
@toutiaoshijian · 66,813#12
@svip40 · 131,427#13
@tx100 · 148,702#14
@miandianDS · 41,838#15
@malaixiyahuarenzixun · 66,313#16
@jpz9118 · 73,624#17
@HQDSJ · 4,772#18
@dk789 · 144,220#19
@ac666 · 308,544#20
@nnccqq · 37,575#21
@gtkx1 · 151,715#22
@kk4568 · 106,315#23
@dibaiTT · 159,753#24
@MB104 · 55,405#25
@baoguangqun110 · 69,284#26
@dnyxinwen668 · 13,772#27
@bbb1b · 315,375#28
@DNYXW008 · 73,964#29
@jpz39 · 13,753#30
@gedan · 10,445#31
@qq2023bg · 55,886#32
@dny2023dbg · 64,384#33
@dubai1w · 156,607#34
@flbhuarenquan · 79,251#35
@feilongwang · 70,621#36
@pp854 · 61,061#37
@kanxia · 438,456#38
@xigang13 · 58,172#39
@dibaif · 12,155#40
@nb688 · 318,884#41
@huaren_zixun · 83,605#42
@quanwangbaoguangb · 127,488#43
@xinwen1 · 97,339#44
@cn789 · 19,942#45
@SB919 · 122,936#46
@aa144 · 34,707#47
@dj17 · 71,534#48
@sharesinfo4u · 3,655#49
@ferm_yiyi · 6,974#50
@bodutt · 66,825#51
@hyxw2 · 55,238#52
@WingoProJuforecast · 131#53
@bingo101_official1 · 340#54
@wqsndm8 · 1,697#55
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@hyxw2 · 55,238
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 19 August 2026
@hyxw6 · 77,721
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
@nb688 · 318,884
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 13 August 2026
@VN704 · 60,085
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 27 August 2026
@dnyxinwen668 · 13,772
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
@th769 · 58,262
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@uae918 · 78,024
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“缅甸新闻头条” (@hyxw4), 57,026 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hyxw4.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.