Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 迪拜新闻大事件

Channel

迪拜新闻大事件

@uae918

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

78,872subscribers

-19,080 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001955891212
TypeChannel
Username@uae918
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/uae918

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@MB104/1010607 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC@uae918/86305 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC1.00under a minute
@MB104/1010637 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC@uae918/86309 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC1.00under a minute
@MB104/1010647 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC@uae918/86310 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC1.00under a minute
@MB104/1010707 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC@uae918/86316 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC1.00under a minute
@MB104/1010717 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC@uae918/86317 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC1.00under a minute
@MB104/1010747 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC@uae918/86320 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@MB10416 (6/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@MB104 (15–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 15 of the 15 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 32 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @MB104. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

78,76797,95288,359.57 August 2026 — 97,952 subscribers8 August 2026 — 97,712 subscribers9 August 2026 — 97,526 subscribers10 August 2026 — 97,089 subscribers11 August 2026 — 96,769 subscribers11 August 2026 — 96,478 subscribers13 August 2026 — 96,320 subscribers14 August 2026 — 96,033 subscribers16 August 2026 — 95,777 subscribers17 August 2026 — 95,250 subscribers18 August 2026 — 94,978 subscribers19 August 2026 — 97,131 subscribers20 August 2026 — 97,055 subscribers22 August 2026 — 96,912 subscribers23 August 2026 — 96,755 subscribers25 August 2026 — 96,640 subscribers26 August 2026 — 96,451 subscribers27 August 2026 — 96,411 subscribers28 August 2026 — 96,350 subscribers29 August 2026 — 96,277 subscribers29 August 2026 — 96,119 subscribers31 August 2026 — 95,989 subscribers1 September 2026 — 95,767 subscribers2 September 2026 — 95,625 subscribers3 September 2026 — 95,442 subscribers5 September 2026 — 92,432 subscribers9 September 2026 — 93,565 subscribers11 September 2026 — 92,878 subscribers13 September 2026 — 92,270 subscribers14 September 2026 — 92,159 subscribers16 September 2026 — 91,957 subscribers19 September 2026 — 91,667 subscribers25 September 2026 — 87,186 subscribers4 October 2026 — 78,767 subscribers8 October 2026 — 95,555 subscribers13 October 2026 — 95,228 subscribers14 October 2026 — 95,139 subscribers15 October 2026 — 94,455 subscribers16 October 2026 — 92,757 subscribers17 October 2026 — 92,741 subscribers18 October 2026 — 92,435 subscribers19 October 2026 — 92,389 subscribers20 October 2026 — 92,339 subscribers21 October 2026 — 92,307 subscribers23 October 2026 — 92,232 subscribers24 October 2026 — 92,169 subscribers25 October 2026 — 91,303 subscribers25 October 2026 — 91,273 subscribers26 October 2026 — 91,197 subscribers28 October 2026 — 91,119 subscribers29 October 2026 — 87,130 subscribers30 October 2026 — 81,344 subscribers31 October 2026 — 80,318 subscribers1 November 2026 — 80,126 subscribers1 November 2026 — 79,926 subscribers2 November 2026 — 79,594 subscribers3 November 2026 — 79,411 subscribers4 November 2026 — 78,872 subscribers78,8727 August 20264 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 89 days, net -19,080. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75,889–100,830 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 18:2078,872-539
3 Nov 2026, 21:4679,411-183
2 Nov 2026, 22:5179,594-332
1 Nov 2026, 23:3679,926-200
1 Nov 2026, 00:2880,126-192
31 Oct 2026, 03:0680,318-1,026
30 Oct 2026, 04:2781,344-5,786
29 Oct 2026, 02:1887,130-3,989
28 Oct 2026, 02:2191,119-78
26 Oct 2026, 23:1491,197-76
25 Oct 2026, 22:2791,273-30
25 Oct 2026, 01:1891,303-866
24 Oct 2026, 04:0792,169-63
23 Oct 2026, 02:1992,232-75
21 Oct 2026, 23:3892,307-32
20 Oct 2026, 15:2092,339-50
19 Oct 2026, 11:5892,389-46
18 Oct 2026, 13:5492,435-306
17 Oct 2026, 16:1092,741-16
16 Oct 2026, 17:2792,757first reading

Engagement

2,536 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 182 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.06%
avg views ÷ 78,872 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,410
751 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.038%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
751
of 2,536 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 37 of 751 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held2,536 (7 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total1,812,100
Reactions total36
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 18:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5h 41m
Average length
1m 08s

Measured directly from 303 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 40 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
⚡820.0%
🥰615.0%
❤512.5%
🎉512.5%
👍512.5%
🤩410.0%
👏37.50%
🔥25.00%
😁25.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 27 September 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
2.30%
23 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
1,340
over 23 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,500
over 977 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 27 September 2026 to 4 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 751 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 15:49 UTC≈2,290 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

#马来西亚新闻:雪兰莪士毛月突袭6处住宅,117人被捕,109名外国人涉嫌卷入网络诈骗 11月3日,马来西亚移民局联合马来西亚通讯及多媒体委员会(MCMC),在雪兰莪州士毛月展开联合执法行动,对6处涉嫌被用作网络诈骗据点的住宅进行突击检查,最终逮捕117人,其中包括109名外国人及8名马来西亚籍人士。 马来西亚移民局总监扎卡里亚·沙班指出,此次行动是在接获公众投诉后,由执法人员经过约两周情报收集与调查而展开。行动于当天上午11时50分正式进行,共出动77名移民局执法人员及10名通讯及多媒体委员会工作人员。 被捕人员包括98名外籍男子、11名外籍女子,以及7名马来西亚籍男子和1名马来西亚籍女子。外籍人员分别来自中国、日本、韩国、柬埔寨及越南。 初步调查发现,这6处住宅涉嫌被用作网络诈骗集团的运作据点,主要涉及虚假投资、虚假招聘及电子商务诈骗等活动。执法人员突袭时,部分人员据称正在通过社交媒体平台与受害者进行联系。 行动期…

4 Nov 2026, 15:38 UTC≈2,280 viewsread 4 November 2026
Video

#网友投稿 各位网友们,兄弟姐妹们,有没有发现木牌越来越冷清了? 好久没有听到、看到木牌那些熟悉的精彩大瓜了!以前的木牌可热闹了,今天不是这个男的出轨,明天就是那个时间管理大师同时和几个女生交往;还有你抢我女朋友、我抢你男朋友,甚至女女之间互撕、争风吃醋的各种剧情,简直每天都有新瓜吃! 可是最近不知道怎么回事,这些熟悉的场面越来越少见了,感觉整个木牌都安静了不少 说真的,还有点怀念以前那个每天都有瓜吃、这家商家菜放少了,哪家商家不给筷子,每天都有热闹看的亚太啊!好怀念啊 兄弟姐妹们,你们有没有这种感觉?以前的木牌是不是比现在精彩多了? 🛎华人新闻:@GFFFF ☎️投稿爆料:@yantou

4 Nov 2026, 15:34 UTC≈2,280 viewsread 4 November 2026
Video

弟弟被朋友骗到缅甸园区,姐姐独自跨国营救。 一个“好项目”,一趟“收款”,刘修洪被认识十几年的朋友骗上了飞往泰国的航班。女司机很和善,他还特意录了车牌、拍了司机的脸——直到换车后不到一百米,十个人围上来,开门就是枪口。 他38岁,园区嫌他太老“卖不掉”,反倒捡回一条命;又靠学了四年的中医,从兵站一路被调到将军身边,成了整个缅东都认识的“Chinese doctor”。可水牢里吊着的两个中国人、边哭边给自己挖坑的20多岁小伙,让他明白:没有医术,他大概也是那个下场。但不久后,刘修洪又从兵营被卖到电诈园区。 弟弟失联54天,姐姐刘霜早上跑大使馆、下午跑调查局,每周四天都往边境跑,把舆论闹到园区老板扛不住。30万赔付,她一口答应,却死活不肯把钱打进园区——她见过太多人财两空的同胞。赌了10天,赌回了弟弟隔着手机喊出的那声“老姐”。 刘修洪说:“十几万人,上千个园区,我从没想过能被找到。给我第二生命的,是我姐。” 🛎华人新闻:…

4 Nov 2026, 15:34 UTC≈2,310 viewsread 4 November 2026
Video

每日一抓 又一个大兄弟被绿了 老子在外面累死累活 你在家里偷汉子 看看这个女的跟若无其事一样 放弃吧兄弟 #抓奸 #吃瓜 #出轨 🛎华人新闻:@GFFFF ☎️投稿爆料:@yantou

4 Nov 2026, 15:25 UTC≈2,310 viewsread 4 November 2026
Video

有些人真是天生吃这碗饭的 🛎华人新闻:@GFFFF ☎️投稿爆料:@yantou

4 Nov 2026, 15:22 UTC≈2,550 viewsread 4 November 2026
Video

#国内新闻:🇨🇳山西太原“最稳取现车队”覆灭 9人落网 山西太原警方近日打掉一个号称“最稳、最安全、最快”的取现团伙。该团伙专门为诈骗、违法资金转账取现、走流水,被称作“取现车队”。 此次行动共有9人落网,其中6人被刑拘、2人被捕、1人被行政处罚。 所谓“稳”,并不是真的安全,而是帮违法犯罪资金过账洗白。帮人转账、取现、走流水均属违法犯罪,再好听的名头也逃不过法律制裁。 🛎华人新闻:@GFFFF ☎️投稿爆料:@yantou

4 Nov 2026, 15:15 UTC≈2,550 viewsread 4 November 2026
Video

这个好,还得是少妇 🛎华人新闻:@GFFFF ☎️投稿爆料:@yantou

4 Nov 2026, 15:09 UTC≈2,570 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

#网友曝光:这两个杂种,一个是老板,一个是管理,原菲律宾3R被抓放出来的,3R老板叫校长赌博输了不少钱,输了钱就克扣员工工资。 现在的老板叫悍马,悍马你妈的你以为飞机换号了就找不到你了?你妈的臭逼,5月份在马来开盘,招40个人离职30个,公司用园区管理模式,傻逼一个这是什么地方,员工吃饭吃不饱,还禁足,操你妈,员工干几个月底薪和提成不发,留着钱给你爸妈买棺材吗,40个人将近干了4千万,到现在两个月提成一分不发,底薪也不发,操你马逼,把员工不当人看,离职一分都不发, 赵高,你个杂种,你管人真牛逼,你没有离开办公室下面员工不能下班,做股票的加班有什么用,做精聊公司时间上班,整个东南亚公司就你这黑公司上班时间最长,老实的员工天天被你骂,典型的欺软怕硬,说话嘴巴能喷血,就这样的公司不给发底薪和提成了,公司把你们管理当炮灰明白吧,在职的提成只发30%,离职的一分不发,现在有多少人要搞你们,股票圈子只有这么大,你们在菲律宾出事,在新山出…

4 Nov 2026, 15:05 UTC≈2,570 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

#非洲南部内陆小国斯威士兰(Eswatini),仍是整个非洲唯一保留绝对君主专制王权的国家。 全国逾六成居民处于贫困线以下,人均预期寿命也不到 60 岁。 然而掌权的国王姆斯瓦蒂三世,却年年操办规模盛大的“芦苇节”选秀,眼下已娶进 15 位王妃,并育有 30 多名王子、公主。 为避免后宫王妃因争风吃醋而起争执,这位国王又做出一桩让劳斯莱斯英国原厂都瞠目的批量采购:#他一次性向劳斯莱斯订购 19 辆定制版幻影与库里南(价值超过 1500 万美元),#另加 120 辆全新宝马轿车与摩托车,浩浩荡荡运入王宫,为每位王妃配齐专属劳斯莱斯及开道警车队。 面对全国民众抗议,王室直接通过紧急法令:严禁任何本国公民在街头用手机拍摄国王豪车车队,违者直接按危害国家安全罪名抓捕判刑! ps:买车和我买水果一样, 🛎华人新闻:@GFFFF ☎️投稿爆料:@yantou

4 Nov 2026, 15:00 UTC≈2,580 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🇿🇼🇿🇲🇾🇪🇪🇭🇼🇫🇻🇳🇻🇪🇺🇿🇻🇮🇺🇾 🥚 8T娱乐城 · 全球数字网投领导者 🥚 实力老品牌 · 信誉保障 · 放心赢 🥚 NO钱包担保1000万U—实力雄厚 🚗 官网:8T.COM 【 铸就人生奇迹】 😀经过多年稳定运营、已成为玩家信赖的首选平台 😀东南亚线上第一盘口、公开透明、高额返水 😀官方游戏+极速出款、认准信誉实力老平台 😀选平台不必四处观望、选我们就是最稳的答案 😁😅😂😇🙃😉🥰😘😛🤪 ♠️ 首存最高赠送 18888U ♠️ 二存三存相赠 8888U ♠️ 大额提款加赠 18888U ♠️每月逢8必发尊享豪礼 ♠️ APP每日抢红包不停! ♠️亿U现金大回馈天天领豪礼 ♠️尊享会员等级+周俸禄+月俸禄 🍏🍎🍐🍊🍋🍋‍🟩🍌🍉🍇 🔠8T.COM|实力铸就信誉,品质赢取未来 🔠8T.COM|公正公平无私彩,华人首选娱乐 🔠8T.COM|一站式顶级体验,尊享非凡品牌 4️⃣5️⃣6️⃣7️⃣ 8T.CO…

4 Nov 2026, 14:57 UTC≈2,580 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

高加索暗流:亚美尼亚与格鲁吉亚,正在崛起的跨境电诈新据点 当东南亚多国持续高压清剿电信网络诈骗、网赌灰产之后,跨国犯罪集团开启新一轮迁徙。地处南高加索的格鲁吉亚、亚美尼亚,凭借独特的地缘位置、博彩法律漏洞、宽松金融环境与签证便利,逐步成为跨境电信诈骗、虚假博彩、杀猪盘、虚假投资盘的新兴大本营,正在上演东南亚电诈园区曾经走过的老路。 一、两地电诈业态:模式分化,目标市场清晰 格鲁吉亚和亚美尼亚的诈骗窝点,并非简单复刻缅北“封闭式园区”,而是演化成两种不同的运营形态。 格鲁吉亚:呼叫中心模式为主,混合网赌视讯盘 格鲁吉亚本土允许合法博彩,线上博彩牌照制度存在监管盲区。很多团伙以正规呼叫中心、科技公司、游戏推广公司作为外壳,在第比利斯、巴统等城市写字楼、酒店内设立窝点,隐蔽性极强。 国际调查组织OCCRP曾经曝光位于第比利斯、距离格鲁吉亚国家安全部门不远的AK Group诈骗呼叫中心。短短三年时间,从全球六千多名受害者身上骗取…

4 Nov 2026, 14:52 UTC≈2,570 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

真的假的?哪个盘总这么有家国情怀?😂 🛎华人新闻:@GFFFF ☎️投稿爆料:@yantou

Showing the 12 most recent of 2,536 posts we hold for @uae918. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

迪拜新闻🇦🇪
@dubaixinwen2 · 207,197
#1
迪拜大事件|迪拜新闻|Dubai生活资讯攻略
@dubai0 · 89,159
#2
缅甸新闻大事件
@MB104 · 53,453
#3
柬埔寨新闻大事件
@jpz9118 · 73,983
#4
东南亚安危曝光|西港日记
@ZYWX6 · 86,949
#5
菲律宾新闻大事件
@flb608 · 72,454
#6
迪拜新闻|华人资讯曝光|dubai news
@Dubaihuarenzixun · 65,310
#7
越南新闻大事件
@VN704 · 60,612
#8
东南亚大事件(热点新闻)
@dnyshijian · 8,899
#9
迪拜黑料大曝光
@kk4568 · 107,633
#10
全网曝光|东南亚日记
@bbb1b · 318,327
#11
东南亚曝光/大事件
@dny099 · 171,281
#12
🇦🇪迪拜大事件|迪拜新闻|DuBai News
@Gaosl · 1,014
#13
马来西亚新闻大事件
@mlxy458 · 52,341
#14
曝光频道
@baoguang_w · 74,983
#15
🌏迪拜新闻曝光-安危头条🇦🇪迪拜通🔥
@dibaiTT · 161,930
#16
菲律宾华人大事件
@ke5689 · 255,347
#17
博度-东南亚曝光新闻
@bodu08 · 54,974
#18
今日头条 曝光频道
@jrttbg · 108,523
#19
特区信息|技术频道
@VP2130123 · 3,745
#20
🅥世界TG华人曝光吧吃瓜社🇨🇳
@BG576 · 299,198
#21
中文安危曝光🌸海外华人日记
@tghuarenba · 20,648
#22
全球资讯曝光大事件
@nnccqq · 37,597
#23
【曝光频道】迪拜菲律宾东南亚最新资讯
@baoguang212 · 4,624
#24
菲龙网头条新闻资讯
@flwph66 · 199,078
#25
东南亚新闻|斑马曝光|news
@Banma_xinwen · 85,243
#26
缅甸新闻头条
@hyxw4 · 56,356
#27
迪拜大事件【阿Q资讯】
@AQzx_3 · 81,729
#28
东南亚大事件/曝光头条
@dnybgtt · 49,921
#29
迪拜大事件【新闻曝光】
@kz692nn · 125,385
#30
博彩曝光【菲行者】菲律宾新闻/黑台曝光/东南亚大事件❤️❤️
@feixingzhe0 · 46,632
#31
东南亚
@dubai1w · 158,688
#32
东南亚曝光吧⚠️吃瓜爆料
@baoguangba088 · 237,283
#33
东南亚大事件 @svip
@bx666 · 462,461
#34
⚔️吃瓜曝光《缅北缅甸泰国》
@qqt13 · 201,230
#35
东南亚安危头条事件🅥
@AnWei08 · 63,828
#36
菲律宾大事件
@dnydxw · 46,805
#37
最前线大事件曝光
@cctv_dy · 23,261
#38
亚太大事件【阿Q资讯】
@AQzx_2 · 73,463
#39
菲信全网曝光台
@quanwangBG1 · 1,641
#40
海外大事件(猎奇-吃瓜)
@aa144 · 34,771
#41
柬埔寨大事件【阿Q资讯】
@AQzx_1 · 152,353
#42
东南亚头条曝光频道(菲龙网)
@bgxinwen200 · 26,674
#43
bg99599
@bg99599 · 25
#44
柬埔寨新闻《柬埔寨曝光》
@sii76 · 203,588
#45
东南亚大事件
@kanxia · 438,856
#46
东南亚大曝光 ❖盈丰娱乐冠名🅥
@oxkkk · 10,628
#47
东南亚头条吃瓜
@svipzz · 63,468
#48
柬埔寨波贝曝光📰
@ChiGua8999 · 6,863
#49
菲律宾新闻|华人资讯曝光|philippine news
@feilvbinhuarenzixun · 68,956
#50
《迪拜曝光》迪拜新闻
@baoguangi · 10,639
#51
头条事件
@mv111 · 50,674
#52
安危事件
@flbhuarenquan · 80,357
#53
西港日记 / 东南亚新闻
@xigang13 · 58,408
#54
缅北悬赏通缉令(曝光)
@xinwen811 · 207,352
#55
华人大事件-吃瓜新闻
@baoguang821 · 45,893
#56
东南亚热点资讯
@rdzx0 · 88,218
#57
新闻资讯
@BG_BG8 · 32,603
#58
博民网官方曝光频道
@bominwang18 · 4,554
#59
柬埔寨西港大事件
@BG423 · 27,354
#60
heicaibaog
@heicaibaog · 10
#61
点亮曝光吧️💥
@baoguangba0 · 120,750
#62
博彩黑平台曝光🔍
@uuuuuf · 183,101
#63
【菲律宾新闻】最新爆光
@baoguang211 · 8,501
#64
东南亚今日头条.
@mbhl1 · 2,590
#65
东南亚曝光社
@Aa090100 · 921
#66
亚太新闻 | 缅甸新闻 | 东南亚新闻 | 爆料 | 吃瓜
@ygxw3 · 149,617
#67

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

缅甸新闻大事件
@MB104 · 53,453
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 August 2026
迪拜新闻🇦🇪
@dubaixinwen2 · 207,197
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
越南新闻大事件
@VN704 · 60,612
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 27 August 2026
泰国新闻大事件
@th769 · 58,315
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
缅甸新闻头条
@hyxw4 · 56,356
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 19 August 2026
菲律宾新闻大事件
@flb608 · 72,454
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
柬埔寨新闻大事件
@jpz9118 · 73,983
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
东南亚安危曝光|西港日记
@ZYWX6 · 86,949
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 22 August 2026
东南亚新闻|缅北|金三角
@xigang1 · 40,785
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 24 August 2026
🇦🇪迪拜大事件I九尾曝光I全球新闻IDuBai生活资讯攻略🇦🇪
@Dubai1817 · 118,331
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 18 August 2026
东南亚
@dubai1w · 158,688
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 12 August 2026
迪拜新闻头条
@hyxw6 · 77,167
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
迪拜黑料大曝光
@kk4568 · 107,633
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
东南亚大事件丨78.com冠名
@w1666 · 37,216
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
迪拜大事件【阿Q资讯】
@AQzx_3 · 81,729
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 August 2026
全网曝光|东南亚日记
@bbb1b · 318,327
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 10 August 2026
东南亚缅北菲律宾迪拜大曝光|大事件|悬赏令
@dny2023dbg · 65,213
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
菲律宾大事件
@dnydxw · 46,805
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 16 August 2026
🌏迪拜新闻曝光-安危头条🇦🇪迪拜通🔥
@dibaiTT · 161,930
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 12 August 2026
东南亚大事件/曝光头条
@dnybgtt · 49,921
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 23 August 2026
🅥世界TG华人曝光吧吃瓜社🇨🇳
@BG576 · 299,198
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 10 August 2026
菲律宾新闻头条
@hyxw2 · 54,598
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 19 August 2026
亚太大事件【阿Q资讯】
@AQzx_2 · 73,463
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 August 2026
迪拜新闻|华人资讯曝光|dubai news
@Dubaihuarenzixun · 65,310
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 56 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“迪拜新闻大事件” (@uae918), 78,872 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uae918.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.