Channel
@dibaiTT
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
194,738subscribers
+32,793 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001892746324 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dibaiTT |
| Description | 联系： @annibaobei520 甩人 @dibaiSB 新闻 @dibaiTT 二手 @dibai246 吃瓜 @chiguazhongxin3 修车大全 @dibaiyuepao 红楼会所 @dibaihonglou |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dibaiTT |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 14:19 | 194,738 | -3,511 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 198,249 | -2,430 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 200,679 | -3,652 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 204,331 | +15,482 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:37 | 188,849 | +76,292 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 112,557 | -4,954 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 117,511 | -3,033 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 120,544 | -1,723 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:44 | 122,267 | -1,297 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:08 | 123,564 | -1,839 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 125,403 | -2,202 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 127,605 | -1,409 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 129,014 | -1,705 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 130,719 | -916 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 131,635 | -2,685 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 134,320 | -2,835 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 137,155 | -1,040 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:06 | 138,195 | -1,010 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 139,205 | -812 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 140,017 | first reading |
1,130 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 93 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 371 of 700 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,130 (7 August 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 216,842 |
| Reactions total | 645 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Sept 2026, 08:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 234 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
838 reactions across 472 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 130 | 15.5% | |
| 🤩 | 104 | 12.4% | |
| 👍 | 95 | 11.3% | |
| 👏 | 93 | 11.1% | |
| 🔥 | 90 | 10.7% | |
| 😁 | 88 | 10.5% | |
| 🥰 | 83 | 9.90% | |
| 🎉 | 78 | 9.31% | |
| ⚡ | 77 | 9.19% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 477 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 838 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 13 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
国内外媒体进“8号园区”采风 今天上午，柬埔寨新闻部联合波罗勉省政府，带领来自39家机构的国内外媒体记者，前往位于波罗勉省棉芷国际口岸的前网络诈骗窝点“8号园区”进行实地采风。 今年2月初，柬埔寨警方对8号园区展开打击行动，并于2月中旬将其全面捣毁。随后，法院调查法官于同年4月3日执行搜查令，对该地点实施了全面封条查封。 PS：请不要假装努力 因为电棍不会陪你演戏 👻😇🥰😘🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥💩✍️🍡🎈 ✅👩💻我要投稿 😘安妮宝贝： ——————————————————— 😳求职招聘 📑迪拜新闻 ✴️二手市场 🍉吃瓜中心 💻搭建开发
⚡1❤1😁1
#网友爆料：很多人听过KK园区、卧虎山庄，但缅北还有一处从未对外曝光的绝密电诈黑园区，位置藏在深山里面，隐蔽性极强！ 这座山上园区，现在足足关押着1000多名被困人员，这里的管控，恐怖到超出想象！ 整座山头全部封锁、重兵看守，唯独老板和几名核心股东，可以自由进出、来去自如，里面所有被困人员，没有任何人有资格踏出园区一步，完全与世隔绝！ 更黑暗的是，这个隐秘园区，曾发生过多起恶性事件，其中就有4名中国籍人员，直接在这里被销户， 这件事外界几乎没人知情，属于深埋内幕！因为位置偏僻、加上当地保护伞层层兜底，这个黑窝点长期隐身、没人清查、没人曝光。 一千多人被困深山，每天被高压管控、强制诈骗，不听话、想逃跑、完不成业绩，等待他们的，就是殴打、禁闭，甚至是消失、销户！ 大家要清楚！现在明面上的大园区虽然被端得差不多了，但是深山隐秘小黑窝，依然大量存在！ 这些隐蔽园区，才是最恐怖的地方，没人关注、没人救援、监管盲区、肆意妄为。…
🤩2😁1
#网友爆料：“独角兽翻译器”偷客户，这个翻译器我们公司使用一年多了，不存在下载错误或者是点陌生链接被入侵电脑。 因为我们电脑只有这个独角兽翻译器，谷歌浏览器几个软件，也不存在连接什么陌生wifi的风险！ 今天休息时间，我们还在熟睡之际，独角兽就使用我们的whatsapp给客户发消息，说加另外一个ws，客户都发给我们看了，然后独角兽客服还装模作样问我们有下载杀毒软件吗，我们都没中毒，怎么需要下载？ 大家小心独角兽翻译偷客户，还会用我们的whatsapp骂客户！！！ 👻😇🥰😘🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥💩✍️🍡🎈 ✅👩💻我要投稿 😘安妮宝贝： ——————————————————— 😳求职招聘 📑迪拜新闻 ✴️二手市场 🍉吃瓜中心 💻搭建开发
🔥2
24岁女主播赴泰旅游后失联，家属遭索60万元赎金 9月20日，有消息称，一名24岁中国籍女子赴泰国旅游后疑遭绑架，并被转移至缅甸境内，家属随后遭到绑匪索要60万元人民币赎金。 据家属介绍，女孩名叫王然，哈尔滨人，此前在南京从事带货主播工作。9月12日，她独自乘坐飞机前往泰国曼谷，抵达后不久便疑似落入圈套，随后被人控制并转移至缅甸境内。 期间，疑似绑匪联系女孩家属，索要60万元人民币赎金，并威胁称如果无法支付赎金，将把女孩卖到会所。 家属提供的视频显示，女孩当时精神状态较差，所处环境十分简陋，房间内摆放着上下铺，窗户还被黑色塑料布封闭。家属担心其人身安全，目前已紧急报警。 据悉，警方接到报案后，相关反诈工作人员已经与家属取得联系，目前多方正在协调，并尝试开展营救工作。 👻😇🥰😘🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥💩✍️🍡🎈 ✅👩💻我要投稿 😘迪迪周： ——————————————————— 😳东南亚招聘 📑东南亚大事件 ✴️…
🔥1
#网友投稿 斯里兰卡机场附近（满月园酒店坐标754 Colombo Rd, Katunayake 11410）是一个酒店改为电诈园区的酒店，酒店全部封闭式关着上500人。里面全部是中国盘口，有空降，色粉，军包，股票等纯诈骗模式每天dj响不停拥有很多内保，3楼办公室还存在打人电棒伺候。希望斯里兰卡中国大使馆关注这个地方解救中国同胞 👻😇🥰😘🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥💩✍️🍡🎈 ✅👩💻我要投稿 😘迪迪周： ——————————————————— 😳东南亚招聘 📑东南亚大事件 ✴️柬埔寨二手 🍉吃瓜中心 💻搭建开发
🎉1👏1
穷人家的孩子，凭什么不能翻身？ 我们都是穷人家的孩子，出生的时候，手里没有筹码，身后也没有什么背景。有人出生就在终点，有人却连起跑线都找不到。可命运给你的牌差，不代表你这一辈子只能这样。 如果你选择认命，那就只能接受现在的生活；如果你不甘心，就得想办法改变。穷人最怕的不是吃苦，而是吃了一辈子苦，最后还是站在原地。没有资源，就一点点积累；没有机会，就自己去寻找机会。 这个世界从来不缺有钱人，真正难的是从一无所有开始的人。富人可以输很多次，因为身后有退路；穷人输一次，可能连重新开始的资格都没有。所以才更要有目标、有胆量，也要为自己的选择承担后果。 兄弟，我们手里的牌或许不好，但至少还有重新洗牌的机会。别把“穷”当成命，也别把“没背景”当成一辈子的借口。真正能改变生活的，不是一句豪言壮语，而是你每天愿意比昨天多走一步。 说到底，大家都是普通人，谁也不是天生就该站在别人脚下。既然一无所有，就更应该珍惜每一次改变自己的机会。但路…
🥰1
泰国洛坤府凌晨发生枪击：2人涉案，一人开枪一人拍摄 泰国洛坤府：2026年9月19日凌晨4时05分，洛坤府市区库旺十字路口“Klang Chan Chao”店铺前发生一起枪击事件。 据现场监控画面显示，事件涉及2名嫌疑人，其中一人负责开枪，另一人则负责拍摄视频。 目前案件具体原因及后续情况尚待进一步调查。 之前泰国说禁枪，禁到现在是一个打枪，一个打视频 👻😇🥰😘🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥💩✍️🍡🎈 ✅👩💻我要投稿 😘迪迪周： ——————————————————— 😳东南亚招聘 📑东南亚大事件 ✴️柬埔寨二手 🍉吃瓜中心 💻搭建开发
#网友分享：我有柬埔寨、老挝、越南多次出入境记录，这次入境泰国不到两分钟就顺利过关，什么都没有检查。 来之前刷到很多帖子，说有柬埔寨入境记录就容易被带进小黑屋甚至遣返，我觉得这纯粹是无良中介在制造焦虑。 以我自己的经历来看，只是单纯来泰国旅游的话，遣返的几率无限接近于0。 👻😇🥰😘🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥💩✍️🍡🎈 ✅👩💻我要投稿 😘迪迪周： ——————————————————— 😳东南亚招聘 📑东南亚大事件 ✴️柬埔寨二手 🍉吃瓜中心 💻搭建开发
🌏迪拜新闻曝光-安危头条🇦🇪迪拜通🔥 pinned a video
🍑国际城金海湾会所🍑 优质0⃣️0⃣️后，越南🇻🇳资源，中国人开的店，出勤30➕（质量问题，包退包换） ✈️看妞频道：https://t.me/UAEchina6688 营业时间：7*24小时 三人以上🚘包接包送 单独主卧（舒适，安全） ⬇️欢迎👏咨询以下联系方式⬇️ 唯一客服@yy7794 微信img3339
#马来西亚资讯：森美兰连查7处扣41名非法移民 7名中国人被带走调查 9月19日凌晨，马来西亚森美兰州移民局在芙蓉、汝来一带连续检查7处地点，共检查178名外籍人员，最终扣留41人。 41人年龄18至58岁，包括33名男性、8名女性。缅甸籍18人、孟加拉国籍8人、中国籍7人、印度尼西亚籍3人，巴基斯坦、越南、印度和菲律宾籍各1人，另有1名无国籍人士。 其中17人在汝来一处工人宿舍被扣。主要问题包括没有有效准证或旅行证件、逾期居留等。41人随后被送往森美兰冷冷移民拘留中心接受进一步调查。 👻😇🥰😘🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥💩✍️🍡🎈 ✅👩💻我要投稿 😘安妮宝贝： ——————————————————— 😳求职招聘 📑迪拜新闻 ✴️二手市场 🍉吃瓜中心 💻搭建开发
🤩1🥰1
🌏迪拜新闻曝光-安危头条🇦🇪迪拜通🔥 pinned Deleted message
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,130 posts we hold for @dibaiTT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@dibaiTT named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 40 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌏迪拜新闻曝光-安危头条🇦🇪迪拜通🔥” (@dibaiTT), 194,738 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dibaiTT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.