National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
29 measurements spanning 38 days, net +16,258. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71,753–93,863 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 08:42
91,312
+1,873
16 Sept 2026, 00:20
89,439
+712
14 Sept 2026, 09:21
88,727
-928
12 Sept 2026, 15:37
89,655
+631
10 Sept 2026, 18:01
89,024
+5
7 Sept 2026, 18:41
89,019
+1,788
4 Sept 2026, 23:00
87,231
+524
3 Sept 2026, 10:16
86,707
+567
2 Sept 2026, 08:04
86,140
+1,863
1 Sept 2026, 06:05
84,277
-388
31 Aug 2026, 07:44
84,665
+1,329
30 Aug 2026, 06:32
83,336
-482
29 Aug 2026, 04:46
83,818
+1,982
28 Aug 2026, 01:54
81,836
+1,409
27 Aug 2026, 02:02
80,427
-162
26 Aug 2026, 01:05
80,589
-733
24 Aug 2026, 23:37
81,322
+4,724
23 Aug 2026, 11:43
76,598
+1,072
21 Aug 2026, 19:35
75,526
+1,042
20 Aug 2026, 15:12
74,484
first reading
Engagement
637 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.36%
avg views ÷ 91,312 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,070
406 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.209%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
406
of 637 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 323 of 406 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
637 (10 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
1,244,602
Reactions total
1,851
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 07:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈28,800
Videos
≈4,080
Links
≈15,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 35m
Average length
47s
Measured directly from 274 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,513 reactions across 552 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
902
25.7%
❤
678
19.3%
🔥
510
14.5%
🎉
332
9.45%
🙏
254
7.23%
🤩
135
3.84%
🤔
127
3.62%
🥰
117
3.33%
👏
101
2.88%
😁
98
2.79%
👀
79
2.25%
⚡
75
2.13%
💯
41
1.17%
❤🔥
36
1.02%
😍
28
0.797%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 553 of the 637 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,513 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 637 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Showing the 12 most recent of 637 posts we hold for @DNY88880. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
东南亚大事件|柬埔寨新闻|头号玩家生活资讯 @dny12378 · 97,053 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 August 2026
迪拜新闻|华人资讯大曝光 @xinwen118 · 114,190 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 August 2026
🌏迪拜新闻曝光-安危头条🇦🇪迪拜通🔥 @dibaiTT · 194,738 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 12 August 2026
东南亚 @dubai1w · 180,161 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 12 August 2026
迪拜/东南亚/大事件曝光生活资讯攻略 @tingyu0002 · 212,208 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 11 August 2026
今日头条 @huarentt · 42,039 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 19 here — alongside 18 others — read 2 September 2026
头条大事件 @alqxzs · 49,097 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 28 August 2026
🇦🇪迪拜大事件I九尾曝光I全球新闻IDuBai生活资讯攻略🇦🇪 @Dubai1817 · 52,390 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 18 August 2026
迪拜新闻|海豹资讯曝光|dubai news @dibai_01 · 148,439 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 15 August 2026
迪拜大事件|迪拜新闻|Dubai生活资讯攻略 @dubai0 · 77,364 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 19 August 2026
东南亚大事件|全球华人大事件(担保交易) @miandianDS · 45,525 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 27 August 2026
生活素材包装🔊 @AQzx_7 · 38,133 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 23 August 2026
🇦🇪迪拜大事件/东南亚新闻 @YYL333 · 96,484 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 17 August 2026
东南亚大事件🅥 @dashijianx · 225,021 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 11 August 2026
柬埔寨新闻《柬埔寨曝光》 @sii76 · 200,317 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 11 August 2026
迪拜新闻|华人资讯曝光|dubai news @Dubaihuarenzixun · 67,684 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 August 2026
迪拜大事件【新闻曝光】 @kz692nn · 139,774 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
西港日记|柬埔寨大事件|东南亚大事件 @xigangz · 91,884 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 15 August 2026
越南新闻大事件 @VN704 · 61,239 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 27 August 2026
迪拜黑料大曝光 @kk4568 · 128,782 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
菲律宾大事件灰产新闻/曝光 @tg89aa · 142,617 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🥇东南亚华人大事件” (@DNY88880), 91,312 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DNY88880.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.