Channel
@BG886
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
54,835subscribers
-2,145 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001835254716 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BG886 |
| Description | 🍉吃瓜: @BG888 💬东南亚交流 @ty888 ☎️投稿/曝光: @T3333 发财助手 © 2018-2026 祝商祺 🎉 #曝光 #吃瓜 #黑平台 #黑佣金 #不出款 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BG886 |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:57 | 54,835 | -104 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 54,939 | -48 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 54,987 | -29 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:01 | 55,016 | -93 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:41 | 55,109 | -148 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:19 | 55,257 | -244 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 55,501 | -111 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 55,612 | -46 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 55,658 | -47 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:54 | 55,705 | -105 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 55,810 | -67 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 55,877 | -61 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 55,938 | -41 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 55,979 | -30 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 56,009 | -38 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 56,047 | -56 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:54 | 56,103 | -49 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 56,152 | -93 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 56,245 | -46 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:14 | 56,291 | first reading |
64 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 89 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 43 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 64 (5 August 2026 – 19 September 2026) |
| Views total | 7,994 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Sept 2026, 03:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#网友投稿 黑台名称:【 #T1体育】 黑台链接:www.t100507.cc 被黑金额:1000， 会员账号:jiaming512 最近刚出来的这个平台原来是杀猪台啊，难怪不用绑定名字，手机号那些，只能存款，提不了款的台，大家注意了，客服也是不处理事的，只要钱充值进去了，你要提款的话各种理由，五大联赛已经开始，开始收割。冲了1000进去，代理答应的彩金也不送，提款也提不了，纯纯傻猪台
#网友投稿 #开云 黑平台 黑我会员两万八 本月拉到九游一个会员 zzzzc88888 打了20多万流水盈利两万八 被扣除盈利 投注全是五大联赛 我的代理线是这个月新注册的 会员这个流水和盈利加上注码也不大 说刷负的嫌疑应该不大 我看了一下会员的注单 没有小赛事 看起来普遍是2.0开外的水位 我想判定应该说我的会员打水吧 但是那是初盘呀 ob场馆普遍比其他场馆水位高这会员代理都知道 场馆盘口开的水位高还不准会员买了是吧 每单都是赛前下注 初盘打水 你打给我看 贵司做这么大 应该有一套检测会员是否打水套利的系统吧 请检查一下 这到底是打水还是说单纯的水位高 这到底是底下人为了个人业绩乱黑会员呢 还怎么样 公司老板这是做套吗 自营场馆把水拉高一点 一对比比分网 哦 比其他站赔率高一点嗷 这肯定是打水 要么是优势投注 那直接和完美一样得了呗.直接说黑了.还干嘛扯东扯西的 搞一些傻了吧唧的理由 …
#鼎盛娱乐 这台子是真的杀猪，赢了7000多不给出款。 正常下注，正常玩，结果提现的时候突然跟我说“下注异常”，还让我等待“三方排查”。妈的，打个麻将胡了，怎么就成投注异常了？平时下注的时候不说异常，赢了要提现了就开始各种理由。 然后就是一直让我等，说什么三方排查，排查个鬼。提现之后更离谱，游戏直接进不去了，账号也跟着各种限制。结果我用其他飞机重新注册的账号，游戏反而可以正常进去，唯独这个赢了钱、申请提现的账号进不去。 这不就是摆明了不想让我出款吗？ 不想出款就直说，别一边让人正常下注，一边输了正常收，等赢了要提现就开始说投注异常、三方排查，然后直接限制账号。 鼎盛娱乐，自己好好看看吧。7000多块钱都不愿意出，吃相是真难看。 鼎盛娱乐杀猪盘，大家自己注意避雷，别等到赢了钱提现的时候才发现进不去了。 客服账号：@dsvkf 机器人：@dsylcobot
#网友投稿 #致启航娱乐老板及股东 近期有玩家反映，平台游戏过程中出现大量“放水”情况，随后又发生玩家登录密码被更改对于这些情况，老板及股东是否知情？怀疑，账户中的相关资金可能存在异常流转或被内部人员口袋。如老板或股东愿意调查，我们可以提供相关玩家的账户信息、操作记录及资金数据，配合核查具体情况。 启航娱乐地址:JG7Q+35H, ផ្លូវលេខ ៨១៤, Preah Sihanouk, 柬埔寨 ## 一、投诉内容 1：充值及提现问题 投诉人称，曾向平台充值约900元，并成功提现约1600元；之后再次申请提现时出现问题，后续提现无法正常处理。 2：代理佣金无法结算 有代理人员投诉称，平台存在佣金无法正常结算的问题，并被要求提供护照、视频及支付相关资料。 3：以“同IP多个账户”为由冻结账户 投诉人称，下注后平台以“同IP存在多个账户”为由冻结账户，并要求等待48小时处理。之后投诉人重新注册账户，但新注册的账…
#网友投稿 #V8体育 V8体育 狗代理网名二叔黑款 每日正常下二串一，红了总计50个左右，昨天冲了5个中了，里面余额14.7万 早上提现一直卡审核，然后拖了一天给我账号封了，把safex的聊天记录双向删除了 说我违规操作
老缅台 #CC国际 0564.cc 充值明着黑不到账 USDT区块链记录都说有假 黑的理直气壮直接双清记录 120u都黑避雷黑台
#网友投稿 2026年9月18日，凌晨5点40多的时候， 我从9085 新普京的平台 提款到账， 到NO钱包的USDT地址里面。 然后我通过 NO钱包的USDT充值 200U到 9085新普京， 显示提币失败， 然后给我整个NO钱包 全部冻结了。 NO钱包 USDT进来的钱，是需要等待 10分钟后才可以转出的， 我也是等了 10分钟，才进行转账的 我钱进来是 9085新普京，要充值进去 也是9085新普京，现在我的NO钱包被冻结了， 9085新普京不作为， 我好歹你也是 9085新普京 一个 V10的玩家，说什么让我联系钱包的客服。 NO钱包的客服更搞笑， 说什么怀疑不是本人，需要提供手持身份证，（我说你钱包在转账的时候， 是支付密码， 邮箱，手机号码）你验证不验证邮箱，不打电话验证，就直接手持身份证？ 更搞笑的是，骂他几句， 直接把我IP拉黑了，直接进不去客服了， 也不知道是不是要黑吃黑 我在NO钱包进2个月的交易记录…
#网友曝光 9月13日，我在 #英博体育 平台注册并充值三万元RMB，成为该网站会员。14日，我尝试提款33,000元失败，联系客服后，客服让我联系我的上级，即推广人员“三条小鹿”及左右两位推广人员（微信号：xiaoluya888，yy120119）。 随后，“小鹿”回复称检测到我的账户有问题，让我多打流水。我未加防备，继续玩球及百家乐。第三天，即9月15日下午，我手机突然收到异常短信，随即登录英博体育App，发现有人更改了我的账户密码，并登录我的账户投注百家乐。这些均为大额且高赔率的投注（例如：闲对、和），方向均指向输赢，导致账户余额三万多元在几分钟内归零！ 随即我质询“小鹿”，他声称去找运营及管理，并向我回复称：我的账户系被他人盗号，与平台无关，让我自行承担责任！在此，我向英博平台及亚博系列平台提出质问： 1. 他人是如何获取我的个人信息，登录我的英博平台，并修改我的密码？ 2. 如果是他人盗号，通常是为了钱财，而不是故意…
#网友投稿 #万达哈希 在万达哈希玩了一年多，少说输十几万U了，然后昨天赢了一点不给反奖了，一共9748U不给了，一直回复处理中，处理中，要不然就是不回复了
#网友投稿 #JJ娱乐 以前的土豆公群80040 然后新币88888皇冠公群 三国 现在没做后 自己改了个群名字叫做 JJ娱乐 没玩的时候说的很好听 特意去咨询过他，出现非投怎么办 ，他说会酌情处理，然后有一个号赢了71000出现一个5000的非投他直接给他清零，麻烦注意这个群 现在没有任何的担保 自己在做 随时跑路 聊天记录随时都有 飞机号一直在换来换去 名字一直在换来换去
#网友投稿 #大发娱乐 【曝光大发娱乐4888｜赢钱不给提现】 本人通过大发宣传的 USDT无风控通道充值3万多元，正常玩百家乐赢钱后申请USDT提现，却被拒绝。 客服随后要求我下载 ABPay 才能提款，我完全按要求注册绑定，申请提现 202,380元，结果再次被取消，理由变成“部分注单系统稽查”，而且客服连审核多久都说不清楚。 更离谱的是，不给提现的同时，客服还让我继续充值、继续游戏增加活跃度。 期间我又正常赢了约 4万元，结果情况更严重：账户一度被设置 还需投注1,205,395元才能提现，之后甚至直接显示 “已被禁止领取”。 我累计已经有 816,821元有效投注。充值3万多、打了80多万流水，现在20多万不给提，还让我继续充钱继续玩？ 所有充值、投注、提款取消、客服聊天及账户限制截图全部保留。 大发如果认为我违规，请公开具体违规注单和规则；如果没有，请正常出款。
#网友曝光 #黑平台 N9.com 大家千万避雷！ 我在N9平台先后充值两笔，一共10000U。前期5000U直接输掉，后续再充值5000U，打到账户20001U，而且打了20000多左右流水结果平台只退回10000U本金，所有盈利直接克扣不给提现！ 我玩的三公，规则写明开6点胜利赢一半，平台还会抽水，一把下注三门200，开出6点直接抽走300水，抽水高达0.5倍！ 等赢钱准备提款，平台就凭空扣钱，安上“流水套利”的理由。 输钱的时候平台一言不发，赢钱提现就随便扣盈利，下注方式也要被平台管控。“套利”已经变成黑平台拒绝出款的万能借口！ 顺带曝光某些合作广告商，完全不保护玩家，不分对错偏袒平台方，只收广告费，玩家资金安全根本没有任何保障。
Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @BG886. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 54 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“曝光黑平台&黑佣金” (@BG886), 54,835 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BG886.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.