Channel
@BG886
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
53,092subscribers
-3,888 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001835254716 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BG886 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BG886 |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:19 | 53,092 | -92 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:59 | 53,184 | -72 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:39 | 53,256 | -72 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:29 | 53,328 | -59 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 07:46 | 53,387 | -97 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:37 | 53,484 | -36 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:10 | 53,520 | -64 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:26 | 53,584 | -53 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 06:00 | 53,637 | -28 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:15 | 53,665 | -22 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:06 | 53,687 | -13 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 09:10 | 53,700 | -17 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:17 | 53,717 | -19 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:50 | 53,736 | -18 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:06 | 53,754 | -43 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 10:59 | 53,797 | -37 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 06:35 | 53,834 | -19 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 09:26 | 53,853 | -25 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 12:57 | 53,878 | -18 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 53,896 | first reading |
119 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 181 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 119 (5 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 5,844 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 11:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
16 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 75.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 12.5% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 6.25% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 119 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 119 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 38 posts held from the last 30 days (5.26%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#网友曝光 这个平台以前叫 #天空之城，温暖那个群里还在打他们的广告！ 今天我cq9爆分22万，我退出去提现的时候直接被他们把分数清零。这些狗杂种，提供他们人员信息或者办公地点核实有效的，奖励1万美金！ 这个是他们给我的专属地址，也就是只有我充值的，玩儿过的应该都知道。 下面这个他们给我配的充值地址，我之前玩儿两个星期就输了几十万，这一次又送了不少 此平台的电子完全后台控制，下大必死，而且你赢大了给你分秒清零，大家一定要注意！ 妈的真无语，选择了这么一个垃圾平台，估计现在环境难，拿这个钱要给他们全体员工的父母买棺材吧！ 附带部分转账记录！
🎉1
#网友曝光 #黑平台 #鼎信 客服粗爆 平台吃相太难看了 黑平台： 鼎信 会员账号： yb112233 事件经过： 本金充值 1200U，游玩内容：加拿大28 正常游戏打流水约 15000，提现申请 5500人民币 提现提交后约20分钟未到账，客服让我打20倍流水 询问客服具体违反哪条规定，客服无法说明任何细节，全程只会发固定话术：“由于您的账号被系统检测出有异常违规行为，所以系统自动关闭您的账号，无法再次开启。感谢您对平台的支持，祝您生活愉快。”——毫无解释， 核心问题： 全程正常游戏，无对刷、无套利、无违规操作，别以为我拿你们没办法 你们想杀就杀是不是 菲律宾索莱尔赌场 没有后续处理结果 明天我就爆你公司楼层 一点一点来 你跟我玩 光脚还怕你穿鞋的
#网友投稿 #曝光杀猪盘 #乐邦体育 #黑款5966 前几个月狗代介绍来到这个叫乐邦体育玩，打的百家乐，刚开始玩输赢不大，也都正常出款了，昨天和今天一直在玩，处于盈利状态，玩了几个月赢利了一万来块吧，结果在今天凌晨充值5000提现5966一直不到账，问客服就是审核，问狗代就是无了，玩的乐邦百家乐和买的pg电子乐邦电子免费游戏，垃圾平台，还好没充值多
#网友曝光 一个黑台，流水打够不给下。 #金乐 今天收到了金乐的活动申请，之前也听别人说过这个平台是柬埔寨那边的平台，就去打试了一下，最开始流水显示有问题，找客服，客服说再打三百u流水才可以提现，后面流水一千多u了，找客服提现，客服又拒绝了，说要充值同等才能提。但是客服赠送彩金的时候，在活动规则根本没有提交，别人打起来了提现的时候反而叫别人充值才给提。这是什么鸡巴大黑台，这点垃圾格局还出来开平台，送不起就不要送，送了活动规则写的清清楚楚，最后提现无缘无故给玩家增加了同等这个条件
#网友投稿 曝光一个假的台子 222.BOT ，其前身是天天娱乐，只进不出，只吃不拉，恶心至极。10月30日，我收到了来自天天娱乐VIP客服的信息，称他们已经更换了新平台经营。由于我之前在天天娱乐玩得较久，提现基本没被卡过，所以没多想，直接注册并充值了100 USDT。我也没多虑，毕竟该客服之前与我沟通良好。打着打着，不知不觉总计充值了1468 USDT。因太困准备睡觉，便将游戏账户上的1100 USDT申请提现。我以为会和之前一样，十来分钟就能到账，结果下分后等了一个多小时，钱仍未到账。我先是联系客服询问提现未到账的情况，没想到客服直接已读不回；后来找其他人也不给出明确的处理结果，只是敷衍地回复了一句“会出款”。大家以后玩赌博台子一定要擦亮眼睛，这种台子做不大是有原因的，连1100 USDT都出不起。
#事情经过：上个月我通过朋友介绍来到这个叫 #金贝娱乐城 玩的u台子，打的百家乐，刚开始玩输赢不大1-2万u，也都正常出款了，昨天和今天一直在玩，处于盈利状态，账户总资产为109000u，结果在刚才11的时候，我的账号突然就被强制下线了，然后客服要求我提供上述资料，就明显已经被黑了，（有跟他们台子有合作或者正在玩的玩家避坑，知道他们股东信息地可以联系我，有偿）上述有聊天对话跟录屏！耽误大家的时间了
#曝光杀猪盘 #西港娱乐城 #黑款320000 #群友反馈：西岗娱乐城说的是金山集团名下的三个大台子，刚开始玩就玩的PG，昨天第一天玩，朋友介绍的之前几万十万的都可以提现。 结果我今天凌晨爆了一个超级巨奖，200一拉直接爆了33W人民币约，等于50000u，结果提现的时候告诉我我下款U地址风控 ，需要审核等24小时，中间也一直在催促，结果我的账号突然就被强制下线冻结了，然后客服要求我提供上述资料，就明显已经被黑了。 这个西岗娱乐城完全就是输不起，前面我朋友赢了1/2万给我朋友正常出我才来玩的，后面看我赢多了直接把我找借口黑掉了。 PS：现在大环境不好了 很多野鸡平台爆点分就给噶了
#曝光杀猪盘 #金贝娱乐 #黑款10万u #群友反馈：上个月我通过朋友介绍来到这个叫金贝娱乐城玩的u台子，打的百家乐，刚开始玩输赢不大1-2万u，也都正常出款了，昨天和今天一直在玩，处于盈利状态，账户总资产为109000u，结果在刚才11的时候，我的账号突然就被强制下线了，然后客服要求我提供上述资料，就明显已经被黑了。 另外我本人在大事件也玩了几个平台，平时都是以小博大的玩法，几千赢几万u也从来没被黑过，这个金贝完全就是输不起，前面赢了1/2万给我正常出，后面看我赢多了直接把我找借口黑掉了。 （有跟他们台子有合作或者正在玩的玩家避坑，知道他们股东信息地可以联系我，有偿）上述有聊天对话跟录屏！
#网友曝光 #Kgame99 这个Kgame99.com马来西亚平台连翘100块洗分钱客服都要吭打去银行核实完了钱都退回去他们银行了。。这些客服还要忽悠人家整10天
#澳门新普京 平台本金都黑。存款200人民币，6块一拉打赏金女王。进夺宝之后余额800，流水也够了，提款失败☹️ 垃圾平台，800块给风控部门集体买一副金棺材吧。
#网友曝光 一个黑平台，最近在这个平台输了几十万，今天充值了70000直接说没到账转账记录都发出来了结果客服一直拖，就是不给上分最后还消失不回复，平台叫做 #博88 网址 betb8801.com
#黑平台： #U米娱乐 ，几千U都能找借口，这是黑平台！！！呼吁全网抵制该鲨鱼平台！！！不玩不知道，玩了吓一跳。 本人ID 73805597，10月25号凌晨12点在该平台上分1000，苦战90分钟才赢几千U，流水有1万多，提款无人回应，找客服也没回应。半个小时后客服说停电，财务马上处理打款；私聊财务，财务却说“套利”，太搞笑了！1000送58（提款需5倍流水）也说是套利，简直没天理！垃圾平台！！！！ 输给了平台3、4天，天天能领福利，稍微赢点钱就说“套利”。没钱就别开，转转本来就很难玩了，你TM还玩鲨鱼！！！冻结账号，找不到理由就说“系统封控”。还在该平台的兄弟姐妹们注意啦，今天能“鲨鱼”我几千，明天就可能“鲨鱼”你几万！！！ 请广大转友多多转发，守好自己的钱包，不要！！！！U米黑平台！！U米杀猪平台！！转友们避雷
Showing the 12 most recent of 119 posts we hold for @BG886. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 54 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“曝光黑平台&黑佣金” (@BG886), 53,092 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BG886.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.