#菲律宾新闻 菲律宾 #机场移民官 每人收4万p放小菲出境被抓‼️‼️ 菲律宾国家调查局9月17日通报,一名菲律宾移民局官员因涉嫌参与非法招工和人口贩运,于9月11日至12日在马尼拉尼诺伊·阿基诺国际机场1号航站楼的一次拦截行动中被捕。 国家调查局称,这起案件最初来自一名准备前往泰国工作的菲律宾女子举报。调查人员随后顺藤摸瓜,发现一个涉嫌通过非法招工,将证件不完整的菲律宾人送出境前往泰国工作的网络。 按照国家调查局的说法,该团伙主要向菲律宾人提供所谓泰国“客服”岗位,承诺月薪最高可达5万比索。举报女子称,自己通过Telegram接触到招工人员,对方介绍她前往泰国从事客服工作。后来她决定退出,但招工方仍要求她支付2万比索所谓“办理费”,她随后向国家调查局求助。 国家调查局介入调查后发现,部分准备出境的人员并不具备完整旅行文件,但仍有人可以安排他们通过机场移民检查。 调查人员进一步指控,一名移民官员涉嫌利用自己的岗位,为…

Channel
新闻资讯
@BG_BG8
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
32,573subscribers
+21,440 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002073746333 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BG_BG8 |
| Description | #迪拜 #泰国 #菲律宾 #柬埔寨 #缅甸 #中国 #老挝 #斯里兰卡 #新闻资讯 #博彩 #狗推 投稿,爆料 👉 @qiqiqiqiqiqq22 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BG_BG8 |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 17:20 | 32,573 | -6 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 19:46 | 32,579 | -16 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:49 | 32,595 | -8 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 23:08 | 32,603 | -9 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:56 | 32,612 | +4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:56 | 32,608 | -3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:39 | 32,611 | -5,577 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:37 | 38,188 | -6 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:58 | 38,194 | -19 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 02:07 | 38,213 | -18 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:56 | 38,231 | -10 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:49 | 38,241 | -8 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 18:16 | 38,249 | -12 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:26 | 38,261 | -9 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:47 | 38,270 | -12 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:19 | 38,282 | -7 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:20 | 38,289 | -8 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 12:31 | 38,297 | -3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 09:54 | 38,300 | -6 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 09:31 | 38,306 | first reading |
Engagement
544 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 212 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.46%
- avg views ÷ 32,573 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,430
- 178 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 178
- of 544 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 544 (6 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 432,802 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 10:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈15,600
- Videos
- ≈1,720
- Links
- ≈5,650
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 37m
- Average length
- 36s
Measured directly from 163 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
22 reactions across 21 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 5 | 22.7% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 18.2% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 13.6% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 13.6% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 9.09% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 9.09% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 544 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 544 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 18 of 178 posts held from the last 30 days (10.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#产业新闻 一中国籍男子在 #巴基斯坦 #搞杀猪盘 被法院判刑7年⚠️⚠️ 巴媒报道:伊斯兰堡法院9月17日就一起网络投资诈骗案正式宣判,3名被告人被控欺诈罪与电子诈骗罪,依据巴基斯坦《刑法典》第420条、《2016年电子犯罪预防法》第14条合并量刑,中国公民Bai Xiaoming与另外两名巴基斯坦籍被告人各获刑7年。该案另有9名巴基斯坦及外国籍涉案人员仍在逃,3人因证据不足获释。 案件经过:伊斯兰堡一男子在Facebook上刷到一个冒充英国巴克莱银行的投资广告,随后被拉进WhatsApp群,还下载了对方推荐的“投资APP”。 一开始他只投了1.2万卢比(约合42.86美元),对方很快返了900卢比利润(约3.21美元),让他以为真的能赚钱,于是一步步加大投入,最后累计被骗约1939万卢比(约合69250美元)。警方顺着钱查下去,发现资金流进了多个个人和公司账户,其中就包括中国公民Bai Xiaoming名下的BXM …
#群友投稿 #马卡蒂 #欢乐颂中国超市 出事了,被抓了‼️‼️ 店关了,然后刚才我本来是想过去买东西,但是有很多条子堵了门。 我没进去,就走了,怕惹事
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 AI短剧动漫&真人 📢 东南亚吃瓜悬赏令 📢 东南亚悬赏曝光 📢 妈妈 母子 乱伦 新闻 📢 东南亚时报|柬埔寨大事件|爆料|吃瓜 📢 缅北老街吃瓜中心 📢 东南亚华人曝光 📢 东南亚曝光新闻[78.com独家冠名] 📢 soso头条-曝光 📢 东南亚吃瓜百科🤪 ------------------------------ 🤝 加入互推 · 获得曝光,赚邀请奖励
新群变化快,手动找很容易漏。 SOSO 会展示最近同步的新群入口,适合快速补充新的群组来源。 🔗 本频道专属邀请链接 https://t.me/sooo?start=autopromo_-1002073746333_6870891144_newgroups_e0377b3d
#群友投稿 国内被通缉的,小心联合执法!现在中国和其他国家信息共享了‼️‼️ 现在中国跟越南、韩国、泰国、缅甸、台湾有联合合作,只要在自己本国家有被挂网逃的,被查到一律抓,再被遣返回国。 把这个报道出来 #希望广大的中国同胞们在越南的时候不要登记自己的个人护照信息 目前所有抓的人都是通过酒店登记、租房登记个人信息被查到的,上门抓捕的。抓最多的就是中国人,第二就是韩国人,第三就是台湾人,第四就是缅甸人。 在里面所有的食物、洗漱用品、个人物品都是要自己花钱买的。15号的时候,在7郡这里有抓进来3个贵州的小伙子,从柬埔寨刚过来10来天,希望他的朋友看到能给他寄点钱进去,要不然在里面就很苦。535 Tran xuan soan,这是他们关的地址,只能帮你们到这了。里面有钱还能买通一些保安传点话之类的。 如果被抓,最少要关3.4个月才能遣返回国。还有个漳平的朋友也在里面,外号教授,16号被送去移民局了。他在7郡有开一家三月三中国…
#柬埔寨资讯 #柬埔寨 近三年驱逐逾7万非法外国人 中国籍居首‼️‼️ 柬埔寨内政部今天通报,2023年9月1日至2026年9月13日间,共依法驱逐来自96个国家的72426名非法外国人,多涉及网络诈骗及非法居留。 被驱逐者中中国籍人数最多,达32395人(含13619人涉网诈);其次为印尼(10568人)和越南(8737人)。仅2026年前8个月,移民局即驱逐52224人(含18393人涉网诈)。目前各地遣返中心仍收容1605名待驱逐人员。
#泰国资讯 中国男子曼谷涉电诈收钱换USDT被抓‼️‼️‼️ 泰国曼谷警方9月15日抓获一名36岁中国籍男子杨某,其涉嫌参与一起电信诈骗资金转移案,目前被指控“共同敲诈勒索”。 案件源于一名泰国学生被骗。9月2日,曼谷警方接到线索后救下一名正在遭遇电诈的学生。受害者此前被诈骗团伙诱骗,误以为自己涉及洗钱犯罪,并按照对方要求陆续交出现金,累计损失约85万泰铢。 警方随后追查资金去向发现,9月1日前往现场领取受害者现金的是一名中国籍男子。该男子拿到钱后,当天就离开泰国。不过警方调取其逃离前的活动轨迹发现,他曾前往曼谷Meng Jai路口,与另一名中国男子见面。警方怀疑,这次见面就是将从受害者手中拿到的现金转交给后续资金处理人员。经过进一步调查,警方最终锁定这名接钱的中国男子为36岁的杨某,并向法院申请逮捕令。 调查人员同时发现,杨某长期居住在曼谷辉煌区Meng Jai路口附近一栋建筑内。 这栋建筑外观看起来类似普通办公室…
🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 0审核|包出款🤩🤩🤩 东南亚大事件联合担保🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩(电子) 🤩亿级域名|78.COM 🤩官方飞投|充提自由 🔝 实力派:78.COM 数字够短 品牌够大 🔥香港六合彩 · 独家盈利无上限! 🤩所有的特码🤩🤩倍 🤩连码三中三🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩百家乐全网最高起步返水🤩% 🤩电子|棋牌|捕鱼起步返水🤩.🤩% 🤩十三水|德州自主组队,无抽佣; 🏆PG电子单注🤩🤩🤩🤩U一拉; ⭐️百家乐真人视讯台红🤩🤩万U; 🚩 诚招代理合作: 1.打码返佣,限指定平台; 2.可叠加占成,自选占成比例及游戏平台; 🤩🤩🤩🤩:@DL78 💥高额战绩,巅峰记录持续刷新: 🥇PP电子|极速糖果1000 玩家游戏中购买30000u超级免费旋转,高倍爆奖,最终拿下378万U,已出款 ; 🥈PG电子|麻将胡了 又又又欧气爆棚,5000U一拉,连番触发,单局斩获193万U ; 🥉香港六合彩|特码49倍 爱拼才会赢,大佬单码下注18万U,一注直接拿…
#菲律宾新闻 #帕拉纳克市 查获多名中国人,现场发现非法毒品及吸DU工具‼️‼️ 菲律宾帕拉纳克市(Parañaque City)一处公寓遭国家调查局(NBI)网络犯罪处突查。行动中,执法人员在公寓内发现并查获数名中国人士,同时现场搜出多种疑似非法DU品,以及包括吸食、使用DU品在内的各类工具。 目前,相关外籍人士已被执法部门控制,案件正在进一步调查处理中。
#泰国资讯 #越南女 偷走中国游客20万,在 #曼谷 落网‼️‼️ 9月15日,泰国旅游警察、素万那普机场安保人员及素万那普机场警署人员联合抓获一名27岁的越南籍女子。她因涉嫌在机场夜间盗窃,被北榄府法院签发逮捕令后落网。 这起案件源于9月7日一名中国游客的报案。受害人称,自己抵达曼谷素万那普机场行李提取区后,发现一只粉色Rimowa行李箱失踪。箱内装有一块价值超过20万元人民币的手表,另外还有现金及个人物品,折合总价值约100万泰铢以上。 警方调取机场监控后,锁定了一名当天从胡志明市飞抵曼谷的越南女子。调查显示,这名嫌疑人离开机场后乘坐出租车前往曼谷汇权区一带,并在多家酒店之间辗转停留,之后又前往春武里府博温地区活动。 警方继续追查其行踪,直到9月15日在曼谷素坤逸一带一处豪宅外将其拦下,并当场出示逮捕令实施抓捕。 据警方通报,嫌疑人落网后承认拿走了这只行李箱,并交代将箱子藏在曼谷汇权区一处公寓内。随后,警方搜查该…
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 Ⓜ麻豆国产剧情看片 📢 缅甸缅北吃瓜新闻曝光 📢 78.COM冠名东南亚中文吃瓜事件【大曝光】 📢 【柬埔寨】新闻吃瓜 📢 合肥女奴库 📢 东南亚全网曝光✨新闻✨头条✨悬赏 📢 东南亚DJ俱乐部 📢 吃瓜娱乐资讯🔥 @SSBYQ 📢 『财富圈研究所』曝光吧 📢 东南亚大小事曝光 ------------------------------ 🤝 加入互推 · 获得曝光,赚邀请奖励
Showing the 12 most recent of 544 posts we hold for @BG_BG8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 131 posts on @BG_BG8 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 7 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 32 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 54
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@sooo · 483,84177 posts【2028126.com】赌王之王
@pgdzr · 6,10536 posts2028122.COM- 2028体育官方频道
@pg115 · 15,38626 posts涩涩备用群💋(防丢失)
@SSBYQ · 40223 postsUZ娱乐 电子捕鱼彩票世界杯真人棋牌
@UZcom_789 · 1,33815 postsUZ.com | 中文官方频道®️
@uzcom_cn · 3,75415 posts182体育官方频道
@ty182gf · 4,48914 postsN1娱乐城-赌王之王
@N1YLC8 · 5,00310 postsSOSO搜搜
@sososo · 584,42110 postsSOSO搜搜🔞
@SosoCnBot · 241,3789 postsSOSO搜搜
@souso · 593,1156 postsbolai.com铂莱世界杯冠名
@blzhaoshang · 4,3195 posts🔥金贝娱乐场-jinbei.com-【官方招商】🔥
@jbzhaoshang · 4,3365 postsPG娱乐 92.cc 官方频道
@pgyx8_com · 1,8955 posts🔥西湖娱乐城-xihu.cc-【实力招商】🔥
@xihuzs · 4,8454 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 2
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@BG_BG8 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 24 posts, 24 August 2026 – 24 September 2026 · confirmed gone 27 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 6 posts, 30 September 2026 – 4 November 2026 · confirmed gone 27 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@BG576 · 294,939
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 10 August 2026
@bbb1b · 313,035
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 10 August 2026
@dnydxw · 66,738
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 16 August 2026
@dny099 · 204,737
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
@jrttbg · 108,204
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
@bodu08 · 55,928
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
@junzhang02 · 25,027
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 16 here — alongside 15 others — read 20 August 2026
@baoguang_123 · 175,840
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
@xigang1 · 40,002
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 24 August 2026
@MB104 · 54,470
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 August 2026
@dnysj · 173,093
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 13 August 2026
@dongnanya108 · 109,199
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 August 2026
@tghuarenba · 32,426
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 26 August 2026
@feixingzhe0 · 46,494
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
@bg99599 · 25
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 August 2026
@kz692nn · 124,383
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
@baoguangba0 · 120,599
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026
@mv111 · 52,460
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@DNYKX · 53,013
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@dnyxinwen668 · 13,733
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
@cggx33 · 82,997
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
@Banma_xinwen · 84,706
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
@flwph66 · 231,625
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026
@miandianhuarenzixun · 68,770
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 112 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“新闻资讯” (@BG_BG8), 32,573 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BG_BG8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.