😍😍😍 telegram 灰色圈子交易首选 - 西瓜皮 😀电报交易需谨慎, 交易想安心,选西瓜皮 😀找资源,找渠道,找盘口,找车队,到西瓜皮 😀灰色圈子流量聚集地,一切你想要的资源这里都有 🥰🥰🥰🥰 🥰🥰🥰🥰 😀公群列表 @xgpgq 😀供需盘口 @xgpyw 🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰 😀开通公群联系:@qiaosi 😁 金融级安全交易 · 创新 web3 担保生态 😘😘😘😘 😘😘😘😘

Channel
菲律宾大事件
@dnydxw
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
86,987subscribers
-12,158 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001017926995 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dnydxw |
| Description | #菲律宾 #东南亚 #新闻 #资讯 #曝光 菲律宾大事件频道专注于东南亚华人最新动态资讯,生活故事分享,海外华人求助,让你看尽海外华人大小事。 ✅发布信息联系: @zhuanren 商务合作: @geren |
| Created | Between 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dnydxw |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 86,987 | +9,160 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 77,827 | -543 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 78,370 | -591 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:02 | 78,961 | -1,047 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 21:38 | 80,008 | -2,831 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 21:40 | 82,839 | -10,256 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 93,095 | -1,341 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:35 | 94,436 | -902 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:22 | 95,338 | -645 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 95,983 | -608 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 96,591 | -299 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 96,890 | -280 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 97,170 | -100 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 97,270 | -128 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 97,398 | -37 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 97,435 | -84 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 97,519 | -117 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 97,636 | -91 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 97,727 | -53 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 97,780 | first reading |
Engagement
1,076 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 90 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.49%
- avg views ÷ 86,987 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,160
- 720 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.054%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 720
- of 1,076 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 720 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,076 (7 August 2026 – 19 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,557,285 |
| Reactions total | 26 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Sept 2026, 23:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈25,500
- Videos
- ≈1,330
- Links
- ≈15,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 10m 36s
- Average length
- 23s
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
28 reactions across 21 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 6 | 21.4% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 17.9% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 14.3% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 10.7% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 10.7% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 10.7% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 3.57% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 August 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
校园枪击案后,菲教育部出手!拟全面加强校园安全 南哥打巴托省班加国立高中发生枪击事件后,菲律宾教育部迅速启动后续措施。9月19日,教育部长孙尼·安加拉赶赴学校,与校方、家长、警方及地方政府协调,并提出进一步加强校园安保和心理支持。 安加拉当天查看校园安全情况,并前往遇难者家属灵堂、探望受伤学生。教育部已安排心理急救团队,为受到事件影响的学生、教师及工作人员提供心理和社会支持。 在校园安保方面,教育部希望地方政府加强学校周边巡逻,尤其是没有专职保安的学校。同时,安加拉提出成立由教育部、内政和地方政府部以及菲律宾国家警察共同参与的“联合校园安全工作组”,根据不同学校的实际情况开展安全风险评估,而不是所有学校采用同一套方案。 教育部还将进一步加强校园心理健康干预。安加拉表示,需要提高学校识别学生异常心理和行为信号的能力,并扩大心理辅导人员配置。教育部同时表示,将与警方等部门合作调查此次枪击事件涉及的相关问题。 值得注意的是,…
南哥打巴托省中学爆发枪击案,2死7伤枪手身亡,数月内第三起校园枪击,当地紧急停课 2026年9月18日下午13时18分,菲律宾棉兰老岛南哥打巴托省邦加国立中学发生枪击,造成两人死亡、七人受伤,死者之一便是枪手。接到报案后救援人员迅速到场,伤者紧急送医救治。现场网传消息提及可能存在第二名枪手,相关说法仍待警方核实。 事发后当地立刻宣布全校停课,菲律宾教育部紧急介入,一方面协调地方与警方核查案情,为受害者提供心理疏导,同时呼吁民众不要转发现场血腥视频,避免伤害家属隐私,防止不实消息扩散。这也是短短数月内菲律宾发生的第三起校园枪击案件。 接连发生的校园枪击事件敲响安全警钟。当地虽开展枪击应急演练,但校园安防仍存在短板,相关部门将彻查本次案件,保护在校师生安全。 😍 订阅菲律宾大事件频道 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+5KMoYfiPPRozYWQ0 😀 投稿爆料联系:@zhuanren
菲参议院遭警告:修改弹劾投票门槛或将承担刑事责任 2026年9月19日,菲律宾前总统发言人帕内洛发出警示,在副总统莎拉·杜特尔特弹劾案审理过程中,如果参议员调整弹劾定罪所需的三分之二投票门槛,相关行为或将遭遇法律诉讼,甚至触犯刑法承担刑责。 帕内洛不认同退休首席大法官达维德等人提出的16票门槛并非固定的观点,坚持弹劾法庭无权依靠内部规则改动宪法条文。他表示,三分之二的定罪门槛是宪法硬性规定,下调门槛等同于绕开法定程序变相修宪。 帕内洛援引修订刑法典第204条说明,倘若参议员明知投票门槛被改动,依旧据此作出定罪裁决,有可能构成不公正判决。此次弹劾案的投票规则争议,也让菲律宾政坛的博弈进一步升温。 😍 订阅菲律宾大事件频道 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+5KMoYfiPPRozYWQ0 😀 投稿爆料联系:@zhuanren
南哥打巴托校园枪击案,枪手用其父亲手枪作案 2026年9月18日下午1时左右,菲律宾南哥打巴托省邦加国立中学发生枪击事件,一名九年级学生持枪开火,造成包括枪手在内3人死亡、8人受伤,死者中有2名学生。 内政部长雷穆拉表示,枪手父亲是教育部减灾官员,家中有3把持照枪支,枪手打开保险柜取出枪支作案。 总统马科斯对遇难者家属表示哀悼,并下令教育部、内政部和国家警察调查此案,以及此前塔克洛班和三宝颜发生的校园枪击事件。 😍 订阅菲律宾大事件频道 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+5KMoYfiPPRozYWQ0 😀 投稿爆料联系:@zhuanren
代孕背后疑藏人口贩运,菲律宾国家调查局逮捕代孕机构负责人。 抓捕行动发生在马尼拉大都会曼达卢永市,涉案负责人及其丈夫此前已经收到潘帕嘉省瓜瓜市法院签发的逮捕令。 案件来源于一名前代孕母亲的投诉,指控该机构招募经济困难女性充当代孕母亲,很多女性并未充分了解协议条款。 机构还涉嫌协助将新生儿转交收养方并从中牟利,牵扯人口贩运与儿童权益问题。涉案人员被捕后已被告知自身法定权利,案件后续等待调查与法院审理认定。 😍 订阅菲律宾大事件频道 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+5KMoYfiPPRozYWQ0 😀 投稿爆料联系:@zhuanren
1 亿披索投入航天项目!菲律宾探空火箭计划明年开展发射测试。 菲律宾航天局相关众议员约翰・叶透露,火箭飞行模型正在组装测试,预计今年 10 月完工运回菲律宾。早在 8 月,菲航天局工程师已经前往韩国,接受为期 10 周的探空火箭建造实操培训。 这项探空火箭项目预算约 1 亿披索,发射地点选定加牙鄢省拉尔洛机场,未来可用于大气、太空物理、通讯等科研探测。有议员担忧项目牵涉美军,官方明确表示美军并未参与本次火箭计划。 😍 订阅菲律宾大事件频道 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+5KMoYfiPPRozYWQ0 😀 投稿爆料联系:@zhuanren
马尼拉这家市场被查!厕所里竟然放猪肉鸡肉! 9月18日上午,马尼拉布伦特里特市场遭国家肉类检验局等部门联合突击检查,现场查获超过1.2吨问题猪肉和鸡肉,总重量达1217.66公斤,涉案金额近30万比索。 其中,鸡肉约777.8公斤、猪肉约439.86公斤。执法人员发现,部分肉类未经检验,甚至存在鸡只未去除内脏就直接销售等问题。 更让人震惊的是,部分肉类竟被存放在厕所等不卫生场所。国家肉类检验局表示,冷冻肉必须全程保持在适当低温环境,否则容易受到污染,无法确保食用安全。 执法部门表示,查获的违规肉类将送往认可化制厂集中销毁。首次违规的商贩可能受到警告,屡次违规者则可能面临10万至100万比索罚款,以及6至12年监禁。 目前,国家肉类检验局正与马尼拉市兽医办公室合作,推动建设符合标准的家禽屠宰处理设施,并加强公共市场肉类检验,减少未经检验产品流入市场。 😍 订阅菲律宾大事件频道 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+5KMoYfiPP…
69岁美国男子在菲涉家暴被捕!法院准予2.4万比索保释 9月17日,菲律宾警方在帕赛市逮捕一名69岁美国籍男子。警方称,该男子涉嫌违反菲律宾《2004年反对暴力侵害妇女及其子女法》,此前已被法院签发逮捕令。 警方在帕赛市亚洲商城附近一处住宅区展开行动,将该男子拘捕。帕赛市地区审判法院第109分庭于9月14日签发逮捕令,并将保释金额定为2.4万比索。 目前,警方尚未公布男子姓名、具体涉案行为以及所谓受害人与其关系等细节。由于菲律宾第9262号法案涉及身体、性、心理及经济等多种形式的家庭或亲密关系暴力,因此具体指控仍有待司法程序进一步确认。 被捕后,该男子已按照程序接受后续司法处理。警方强调,此次逮捕是依据法院正式签发的逮捕令进行,在案件最终裁决前,相关指控仍属于涉嫌。 😍 订阅菲律宾大事件频道 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+5KMoYfiPPRozYWQ0 😀 投稿爆料联系:@zhuanren
哥打巴托省山洪致1死3失踪,4人获救 哥打巴托省卡巴坎周四发生山洪。一名11岁男孩与7名同伴在普兰吉河钓鱼时,被来自高地的洪水冲走。 当地救援队在巴朗盖卡亚加附近的普兰吉河发现男孩遗体,另有3人失踪。4名男孩则在村委会官员的救援下获救。 😍 订阅菲律宾大事件频道 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+5KMoYfiPPRozYWQ0 😀 投稿爆料联系:@zhuanren
政府花数十亿却可能买到“假软件”?菲律宾“幽灵网络”被调查 菲律宾监察专员办公室正在调查所谓“幽灵网络”事件,重点核查政府IT系统是否存在软件未安装、使用过时软件,甚至可能以假软件冒充合规产品的情况。 监察专员助理专员米科·克拉瓦诺9月18日表示,菲律宾政府每年为符合技术要求的IT系统支付数十亿比索,但现有验收流程可能更关注硬件和设备,对软件是否真正安装、是否符合合同要求缺乏充分核查。 这意味着,一些承包商可能以较低成本安装廉价或过时软件,却按照完整规格向政府收费。部分问题甚至可能直到系统发生故障或接受调查时才被发现。 目前,监察专员办公室正重点调查涉及菲律宾信息与通信技术部的相关项目,包括合同约定的网络站点是否真正建成并运行、政府是否为未提供的网络服务付款,以及硬件、软件和服务是否存在价格虚高等问题。 调查还将追查相关项目由谁批准、验收和放行付款,以及是否存在项目没有实际交付却已经完成付款的情况。 不过,目前调查仍…
菲律宾出租公寓惊现冰箱藏尸案!女尸蜷缩倒地冰箱内,颈部缠绳索,男子持假证失联 (马尼拉 18 日综合电)菲律宾黎刹省罗德里格斯镇一处出租公寓爆出冰箱藏尸案。公寓内一台倒地冰箱中发现一具蜷缩女尸,死者颈部缠绕绳索,警方正追查案发前和死者一同现身的男子。 公寓业主芒古拉德介绍,上周三(9 日)死者与一名男子前来咨询租房,谈妥付款后当天入住。业主隔天上门想让二人签署租约,敲门无人应答;上周五再次上门依旧无人回应。直到本周二(15 日)业主重返公寓,闻到阵阵恶臭,起初以为只是食物腐烂。 业主察觉异味不对劲,周三立刻报警。警方破门后,刺鼻臭味扑面而来,现场一台冰箱倒在地上,表面盖着衣物。打开冰箱,赫然发现一具女性尸体蜷缩在内,颈部缠着绳索。 罗德里格斯镇警方初步判断,女子疑似遭绳索勒毙后被凶手塞进冰箱。根据初步检验,死者在遗体被发现约 5 天前遇害。 调查发现,两人租房使用的身份证件存在问题,证件姓名和警方资料库记录不符,暂时无…
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,076 posts we hold for @dnydxw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@bx666 · 471,642#1
@BG_BG8 · 38,943#2
@cctv_dy · 39,682#3
@AQzx_3 · 93,113#4
@kanxia · 500,222#5
@baoguangba0 · 157,783#6
@heicaibaog · 83,485 (as read 16 August 2026)#7
@BG576 · 432,047#8
@baoguang_w · 48,104#9
@baoguang212 · 17,644#10
@uu888u · 1,744#11
@ke5689 · 167,871#12
@dny099 · 60,992#13
@MB_149 · 125,094#14
@flwph66 · 148,371#15
@aa144 · 35,337#16
@nnccqq · 38,630#17
@uae918 · 91,667#18
@quanwangbaoguangb · 149,935#19
@bg99599 · 95,505 (as read 16 August 2026)#20
@tx100 · 161,401#21
@DNYTJL3 · 95,275#22
@BG423 · 33,388#23
@quanwangBG1 · 1,701#24
@baoguang85 · 31,656#25
@dnyxst · 81,683#26
@AQzx_1 · 180,899#27
@sii76 · 200,317#28
@dongnanya108 · 161,350#29
@bominwang18 · 4,673#30
@flbhuarenquan · 43,235#31
@dnybgtt · 53,254#32
@xinwen811 · 207,543#33
@bbb1b · 348,524#34
@jrttbg · 159,574#35
@kk4568 · 128,782#36
@kz692nn · 139,774#37
@tghuarenba · 44,835#38
@baoguangba088 · 240,574#39
@Gaosl · 1,095#40
@GTR133 · 8,137#41
@mianbeitongjiling · 30,602#42
@dnyggg · 44,367#43
@a0159 · 128,519#44
@bodu08 · 58,568#45
@oxkkk · 11,441#46
@zhaopinqiuzhi580 · 31,761#47
@qqt13 · 201,549#48
@feixingzhe0 · 58,575#49
@xigang13 · 63,441#50
@ZYWX6 · 101,169#51
@uuuuuf · 244,570#52
@xigang1 · 53,025#53
@SB919 · 139,268#54
@pzbgfabu666 · 354,924#55
@baoguang2022 · 141,409#56
@ChiGua8999 · 11,955#57
@jsj62 · 22,986#58
@DNYXSTJL6668 · 10,193#59
@DNYKX · 60,054#60
@baoguang211 · 24,074#61
@baoguang_g · 53,567#62
@AirdropVerifieSdss · 36,785#63
@dubai0 · 77,364#64
@BGSS8 · 1,040#65
@jianpuzhaidashijian · 44,905#66
@dny88 · 65,507#67
@ZaoTiePH · 3,411#68
@xigangz · 91,884#69
@VP2130123 · 4,028#70
@dubaixinwen2 · 215,460#71
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@baoguangba0 · 157,783
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026
@AQzx_3 · 93,113
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 August 2026
@xigang1 · 53,025
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 24 August 2026
@JPZ990 · 90,168
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 15 August 2026
@TGDSJ110 · 118,464
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 14 August 2026
@dnanyakuaibaobgxs · 55,910
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
@AQzx_2 · 89,932
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 August 2026
@BG576 · 432,047
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 10 August 2026
@AQzx_1 · 180,899
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
@kanxia · 500,222
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 August 2026
@dnyuuu88 · 137,239
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@db2023dbg · 77,246
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
@pianzi1 · 53,258
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@uae918 · 91,667
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 16 August 2026
@dnybgtt · 53,254
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 23 August 2026
@w1666 · 102,034
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
@dnyqqbj · 121,897
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
@dny2023dbg · 78,311
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
@dsj665 · 113,606
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@flwph66 · 148,371
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026
@GGooGG66 · 149,708
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 August 2026
@dny88 · 65,507
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
@dnyxst · 81,683
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 August 2026
@xigang13 · 63,441
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“菲律宾大事件” (@dnydxw), 86,987 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnydxw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.