美国FBI启动“断电行动” 主动打击国际网络诈骗窝点 为严厉打击全球高科技网络诈骗,美国联邦调查局(FBI)于昨天宣布启动“断电行动”(Operation Blackout),改变以往被动应对模式,转向主动出击发起主动打击。 FBI局长表示,该大型行动旨在查明并销毁所有企图诈骗美国公民的跨国犯罪网络。此前,“断电行动”已铲除20多个大型诈骗园区,依法没收相关资产超170亿美元,并成功保护逾1.1万名美国公民免受诈骗,挽回约6.75亿美元的经济损失。此举标志着美方执法部门打击跨国网络犯罪的战略重大转变。 🔔订阅柬埔寨大事件频道 ↓ 🥰订阅频道:@nnccqq ➡️交流总群:@jinrui 🔥投稿爆料:@quanqiu007bot

Channel
全球资讯曝光大事件
@nnccqq
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
37,760subscribers
-2,297 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001852724354 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @nnccqq @qqzxbgdsj |
| Description | 全球资讯曝光大事件 🍀收录每天新鲜事🍀 🌏体育资讯 |吃瓜 |沙雕 |曝光 | 搞笑 | 🌏发布内容不做权威考究,娱乐为主 🌏东南亚博彩之家 @jinrui 🌏海华社区: @HaiHuaSheQu 🌏 曝光发布 @quanqiu007bot 🌏●商务: @AQ_99999 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 94 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nnccqq |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 00:39 | 37,760 | -6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:39 | 37,766 | -9 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:46 | 37,775 | no change |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:06 | 37,775 | -18 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 04:58 | 37,793 | -10 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 10:19 | 37,803 | -10 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 37,813 | -8 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:45 | 37,821 | no change |
| 19 Oct 2026, 21:59 | 37,821 | -8 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:35 | 37,829 | -14 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:58 | 37,843 | -17 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 08:00 | 37,860 | -13 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 16:50 | 37,873 | no change |
| 17 Oct 2026, 10:04 | 37,873 | -19 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 15:57 | 37,892 | no change |
| 16 Oct 2026, 12:15 | 37,892 | -26 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 15:29 | 37,918 | no change |
| 15 Oct 2026, 13:36 | 37,918 | -37 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 18:01 | 37,955 | no change |
| 14 Oct 2026, 15:00 | 37,955 | first reading |
Engagement
1,264 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 146 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.048%
- avg views ÷ 37,760 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 18.3
- 509 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 7.78%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 509
- of 1,264 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 253 of 509 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,264 (7 August 2026 – 24 October 2026) |
| Views total | 9,316 |
| Reactions total | 411 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Oct 2026, 08:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈24,800
- Videos
- ≈5,770
- Links
- ≈9,040
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 55m 51s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 295 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,342 reactions across 554 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎉 | 165 | 12.3% | |
| 🥰 | 161 | 12.0% | |
| ❤ | 154 | 11.5% | |
| 👏 | 148 | 11.0% | |
| 🔥 | 147 | 11.0% | |
| ⚡ | 145 | 10.8% | |
| 🤩 | 145 | 10.8% | |
| 😁 | 139 | 10.4% | |
| 👍 | 138 | 10.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 555 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,342 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 22 August 2026 to 24 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
涉柬埔寨诈骗园区杀猪盘 44岁中国籍嫌犯引渡至美国提审 美国洛杉矶消息:44岁中国籍男子赵峥(Zheng Zhao,音译)因涉嫌参与柬埔寨诈骗园区的跨国加密货币投资诈骗(杀猪盘),自荷兰被引渡至美国,于昨天在洛杉矶首次出庭。 法院文件显示,该网络招揽174名美国受害者,骗取逾3690万美元并转至巴哈马账户,再由赵峥等人兑换为泰达币(USDT)转入柬埔寨园区。赵郑面临最高20年监禁,此前已有何生生、苏景良等8名同谋认罪服刑。美方对荷兰政府的缉捕及引渡协助表示感谢。 🔔订阅柬埔寨大事件频道 ↓ 🥰订阅频道:@nnccqq ➡️交流总群:@jinrui 🔥投稿爆料:@quanqiu007bot
柬埔寨再驱逐36名涉网络诈骗的越南籍人员 昨天,柬埔寨移民总局通过特邦克蒙省特庞普隆国际口岸,将36名(含12名女性)涉嫌非法滞留、非法务工及从事网络诈骗的越南籍人员驱逐出境。 当局强调,绝不允许违法犯罪分子利用柬埔寨领土从事网络诈骗或危害区域与全球安全的犯罪活动,当局将持续清理、打击并无例外地驱逐违法人员,以维护国家声誉与安全。 🔔订阅柬埔寨大事件频道 ↓ 🥰订阅频道:@nnccqq ➡️交流总群:@jinrui 🔥投稿爆料:@quanqiu007bot
#网友反馈:西港双师转盘这里,好友汇超市楼上检查了了 ,目前开始装设备拉人走了。 🔔订阅柬埔寨大事件频道 ↓ 🥰订阅频道:@nnccqq ➡️交流总群:@jinrui 🔥投稿爆料:@quanqiu007bot
#网友投稿:干丹省发现一具漂浮水面的尸体,不知道又是哪位亡命人。 🔔订阅柬埔寨大事件频道 ↓ 🥰订阅频道:@nnccqq ➡️交流总群:@jinrui 🔥投稿爆料:@quanqiu007bot
6名柬埔寨人骗了7万美元! 10月23日,柬埔寨警方在金边棉芷区和万景岗区突查两个网络诈骗窝点,逮捕6名柬埔寨籍嫌疑人,其中4人为女性。 据警方通报,该团伙冒充柬埔寨童军组织,以帮助洪灾灾民为名募捐,同时利用网络赌博平台实施诈骗,涉案金额超过3亿瑞尔(约7.5万美元)。 警方经过数周调查后展开行动,现场查获多台电脑、13部手机、69张SIM卡及其他物品。 🔔订阅柬埔寨大事件频道 ↓ 🥰订阅频道:@nnccqq ➡️交流总群:@jinrui 🔥投稿爆料:@quanqiu007bot
#网友反馈:🇰🇭波贝海发大厦估计是一波印尼人被摁头了,现在大巴车和警车直接拉人出发了。 🔔订阅柬埔寨大事件频道 ↓ 🥰订阅频道:@nnccqq ➡️交流总群:@jinrui 🔥投稿爆料:@quanqiu007bot
#泰国资讯:扣两处涉中国团伙比特币挖矿房产 涉案资产超过1.85亿泰铢 10月22日下午4时,泰国司法部联合特别案件调查厅及反洗钱办公室召开新闻发布会,公布“黑色追踪”专项行动成果,查扣与非法比特币挖矿网络有关的两处房产,价值超过1.85亿泰铢。 其中,春武里府邦拉蒙县一处土地及三层建筑价值超过1.06亿泰铢,由一家泰缅合资公司持有;曼谷辉煌区另有15套公寓,总价值约7900万泰铢,登记在5名缅甸籍人士名下。 调查发现,该挖矿网络与中国灰色资本及跨国诈骗团伙存在关联,资金流转超过50亿泰铢,造成泰国政府收入损失超过30亿泰铢。团伙长期盗用电力,利用大量矿机全天候运行,部分矿场持续经营超过两年。 案件共涉及25名嫌疑对象,包括5名中国籍人士、6名泰国籍人士、13名缅甸籍人士及1家法人实体。目前已有6人被正式指控,另有19人遭通缉,其中7份逮捕令为近期新增。 泰国执法部门正进一步追查相关房产的实际控制人、资金来源及洗钱活动…
#最新消息:波贝市中心正在进行大检查,地点就在海发大厦旁边。附近的兄弟注意 🔔订阅柬埔寨大事件频道 ↓ 🥰订阅频道:@nnccqq ➡️交流总群:@jinrui 🔥投稿爆料:@quanqiu007bot
泰缅边境11名外国人逃离妙瓦底电诈窝点!偷渡湄索后躲进甘蔗地,最终被泰军抓获 10月23日,据缅甸媒体媒体报道,11名来自亚洲及非洲7个国家的外国男子,疑似从缅甸妙瓦底电诈窝点逃出,冒险渡过莫伊河(又称友谊河),进入泰国湄索地区后被安全部队发现并拘捕。 一、11人藏身甘蔗地,遭泰国军警包围 泰国执法部门接获线报,称有一批外国人从缅甸非法越境,随后在达府湄索县Mae Kasa地区第10村附近展开搜索。 执法人员最终在河岸附近一片茂密的甘蔗地内,发现11名躲藏的外国男子。经检查,所有人均未持有有效护照、签证或合法入境文件。 此次行动由泰国移民警察、第五移民调查单位及Ratchamanu特遣部队共同执行。 二、涉及7国人员,其中4人为中国籍 被查获的11人分别来自: 中国:4人,印度:2人,巴基斯坦:1人,越南:1人,尼日利亚:1人,肯尼亚:1人,南非:1人 三、疑从电诈园区逃出,是否遭强迫工作仍待调查 据报道,这批人员声称从…
#网传消息:明天金边领导会下来西港,据了解,明天随领导一起过来的还有多国执法人员,将配合柬方,对西港部分地点开展技术侦查。这几天大家需要更加注意安全🙏 关🔔订阅柬埔寨大事件频道 ↓ 🥰订阅频道:@nnccqq ➡️交流总群:@jinrui 🔥投稿爆料:@quanqiu007bot
#执法视频:10月22日晚,菲律宾国调局(NBI)突袭了苏比克(Subic)的一处诈骗窝点,现场拘留约200名越南籍人员,并查获大量电脑、手机和文件。目前,国调局正在追捕这个窝点的幕后Boss。 此前文章: t.me/jpzdny/64740 10月23日,国调局局长马蒂巴格(Melvin Matibag)接受采访时说,这名在逃的经营者是外国人,同时具有中国和越南背景,用的是菲律宾人的名字。他说,正因如此,国调局已联系移民局协调,追查此人下落。 🔔订阅柬埔寨大事件频道 ↓ 🥰订阅频道:@nnccqq ➡️交流总群:@jinrui 🔥投稿爆料:@quanqiu007bot
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,264 posts we hold for @nnccqq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@cctv_dy · 26,878#1
@iiiik · 42,289#2
@baoheitai · 1,115#3
@baoguangba088 · 239,519#4
@dongnanya108 · 122,097#5
@xinwen118 · 126,649#6
@DNYBG234 · 92,398#7
@xinhuaribao · 913#8
@gouzaibaoliao · 2,067#9
@ZYWX6 · 88,500#10
@HR8877 · 300,828#11
@vipn8888 · 59,158#12
@kk4568 · 112,938#13
@AnWei08 · 49,439#14
@kz692nn · 130,298#15
@AQzx_3 · 87,456#16
@bx666 · 463,311#17
@AQzx_2 · 80,141#18
@gtkx1 · 157,915#19
@AQzx_1 · 175,104#20
@dubaixinwen2 · 216,162#21
@BG2288 · 126,278#22
@feilvbin198 · 97,110#23
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@AQzx_2 · 80,141
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 August 2026
@bocaishen8 · 115,700
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 August 2026
@DNYKX · 54,706
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@dny099 · 141,079
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
@flwph66 · 168,503
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026
@QWHRBGB · 147,114
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 11 August 2026
@xigang1 · 44,688
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 24 August 2026
@gtkx1 · 157,915
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 August 2026
@baoguangba0 · 120,969
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026
@bg99599 · 17
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 August 2026
@bbsooo · 55,468
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 August 2026
@AQzx_3 · 87,456
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 August 2026
@chadnag001 · 34,503
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 1 September 2026
@baoguang_bc · 37,336
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 29 August 2026
@dny2023dbg · 70,744
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
@dubai1w · 164,193
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 12 August 2026
@dnydxw · 57,301
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 16 August 2026
@AQzx_1 · 175,104
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
@baoguang211 · 11,032
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 17 September 2026
@hyxw4 · 77,491
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 19 August 2026
@uae918 · 92,169
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 16 August 2026
@jpzdny · 150,838
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 12 August 2026
@kz692nn · 130,298
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
@w1666 · 74,031
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 88 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“全球资讯曝光大事件” (@nnccqq), 37,760 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nnccqq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.